• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:00
CEST 14:00
KST 21:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week2[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL67
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 655 users

"cheese" and "all in" as hurtful to discussion - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
spearofsolomon
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7 Posts
November 25 2010 18:43 GMT
#21
I would like to point to the variety of definitions listed here for "cheese" as reinforcing my point that people don't really agree on what cheese is. So, even if you don't agree with my definition of what people mean when they say "cheese", you can at least see that you don't agree with each other. Even liquipedia's definition is so broad as to be useless. I was trying to point out that perhaps people should stop using words that have no clear meaning except to be pejorative, and be more clear about what is good or bad about tactics.

As far as "all in" meaning something that has no next step - I still think that those words don't apply to a lot of situations they are used for. For instance, idra calling Tyler's two-base play all-in: if Tyler destroys a lot of Idra's army and prevents him from getting a third but can't break his position, Tyler can resume probe production and get a third at his leisure. I don't know if that was his plan but he didn't have to because he never got put in that position. So, to me, it's a lot more useful to say that he stopped probe production and concentrated on fighting unit production, than to say that he "allin"ed, implying that if he doesn't win immediately then he has no next step, which doesn't even seem true.
HydroXy
Profile Joined May 2010
United States513 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-25 18:56:36
November 25 2010 18:46 GMT
#22
On November 26 2010 02:52 spearofsolomon wrote:
First of all, when you press the "Find Match" button in sc2, you are "all in". You've decided to play a competitive game in which the only possible outcome is to win or lose. From that perspective, it seems redundant to describe any strategy or tactic as "all in" at any point after that, as we have already established that we are "all in". So if there is a specific set of actions which people mean to describe by the words "all in" then I think that they should be more precise with their language and highlight when and why the tactics/timings are good/not good.


How does joining a game mean we are all in? Because we're fully focused on the game--"all" of our focus is "in" the game? I think the misconception here is yours, because when people use the words "all in" they actually are talking about specific tactics/timing (e.g., you cut worker production, mass units, and attack right as the opponent expands).

Further, I would contend that in every game, there are moments where one player (and usually both) make a decision to engage that could potentially win or lose them the game. If what the derogatory "all in" refers to is that decision to put the game on the line with a set of actions, knowing, "there's no way back if this doesn't work," then why is a max army fight more acceptable than a cannon rush?


Now would be a good time to differentiate between "cheese" and "all ins". Cannon rushing is cheese and is all in. There may be situations where an opponent has played so well that your only remaining option to win is to mass up an army and make a last stand. That's not cheese, but you're all in; after having played through the game, your opponent has taken so many advantages that you've been reduced to this last remaining option. It's a rational response to your opponent's better play, and I don't think it should be shunned. Contrast this to a situation where a player is not hopelessly behind, but instead arbitrarily decides to attack all in. This is less rational, since failing will again result almost certainly in a loss. Thus, the variance of your play becomes significantly higher; it starts to look like a gamble, rather than reliance on skill.

Now consider cheese. To use your example to highlight the difference: When you come into the game with the goal of not attacking till your army is maxed, you do so under the belief that your macro and defending will be better than yours opponent's macro and harassment. You're relying on your skill to achieve the goal. In the case of a cannon rush, you play the game hoping to win by surprise and/or by your opponent making mistakes (e.g., not defending it properly). There's very little that a player can do to separate a "skilled" cannon rush from a poor one. You're not relying on your skill set, but on factors outside of your control. At that point, you might as well play roulette instead.

I think the answer is that it feels more like "the way the game is supposed to be played". There's a set of artificial constraints that some of the community embraces that are not actually enforced by the game engine. See Sirlin's "Playing to Win" for a lot more on this concept.


The universe doesn't enforce not killing other humans, but the world generally seems to frown upon it. Is something acceptable just because it's possible?

The reason I started thinking about this was because of Idra's description of Tyler's tactics in their showmatch a couple weeks ago. On the SotG Idra described it as a "two-base all in" and as "abuse" where Tyler made two probes for every patch and then stopped probe production and just made attacking units from there. I think it was 5-gate but I'm not sure. Later he recommended it to incontrol for the gsl qualifier so I guess he either didn't mean those words derogatorily or else he came around in his view of it, but either way I thought that if "all in" can be used to describe two-base play, then it's pretty useless as a term and I wish that people would stop using it and be more precise with their language.


Why? Tyler had no backup plan. His attack either wins or fails. Everything he's got, included his chance of winning, is put into one attack. What's a better description? Again, I think this is your misunderstanding of the term rather than the community's.


....
I don't have any particular opinion on whether cheese is good or bad as a tactic (although along with everyone else I hate losing to it), but I do know that it doesn't have to be "all in" as long as it does damage, and also that scouting it definitely doesn't mean a sure victory for the defender, so I wanted to offer an alternative definition to the discussion and hope I can contribute in a small way to the starcraft zeitgeist.


I'd agree with you on face that cheese isn't necessarily all in, although cheese almost always is accompanied by an all in, simply because cheese puts the player in a position where failure puts the player almost too far behind.
ppshchik
Profile Joined September 2010
United States862 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-25 18:50:47
November 25 2010 18:49 GMT
#23
Agree, cheesing is a part of the strategy in psychological warfare in BO5 / Bo7 matches. I only consider proxiers in ladder "cheesers "

The term "cheesy" is still subjective in Starcraft 2 as the strategies aren't discovered yet.
Legends never die... they end up working in McDonalds.
flodeskum
Profile Joined September 2010
Iceland1267 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-25 18:57:46
November 25 2010 18:57 GMT
#24
On November 26 2010 02:57 YoiChiBow wrote:
I actually totally agree with you on this one.
But I think all-ins and cheeses are good when you play like a bo3 in a tournament or something.
Korean coaches apparently encourage people to throw some all-in buidls into their gameplay according to Jinro.

Ofc, all tournament players should do all-in pushes and cheese on occasion. Just like poker players will mix up their play during sessions just to throw people off. It's all a part of being unpredictable and shouldn't really be frowned upon.
IdrA: " my fans are kinda retarded"
Clamev
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Germany498 Posts
November 25 2010 19:05 GMT
#25
i don´t think you understand what "all-in" means to be honest.
6Pool or die trying
huameng
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States1133 Posts
November 25 2010 19:05 GMT
#26
On November 26 2010 03:43 spearofsolomon wrote:
As far as "all in" meaning something that has no next step - I still think that those words don't apply to a lot of situations they are used for. For instance, idra calling Tyler's two-base play all-in: if Tyler destroys a lot of Idra's army and prevents him from getting a third but can't break his position, Tyler can resume probe production and get a third at his leisure. I don't know if that was his plan but he didn't have to because he never got put in that position. So, to me, it's a lot more useful to say that he stopped probe production and concentrated on fighting unit production, than to say that he "allin"ed, implying that if he doesn't win immediately then he has no next step, which doesn't even seem true.


How often do you think a situation where there is literally no way the game couldn't stabilize into an equal position? Almost always, what is commonly called all-in has some potential to do enough damage to be favorable but not enough damage to win. But if this is very unlikely then we call the strategy all-in. And it's very unlikely in situations where you sacrifice a lot of economy, since you would have to even out the economy by killing a bunch of drones, but not kill most of the drones which seems very difficult to imagine. Certainly it's always possible to construct a situation where something called all-in ends up in an even game until one person isn't mining or something equally drastic, but that doesn't mean we should abandon a term that almost everyone understands.

And calling Tyler's strategy "all-in" is, at least to me, (and most people here I'd assume) getting across that he stopped probe production and concentrated on fighting unit production! I don't see what else it could mean.
skating
awesomoecalypse
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2235 Posts
November 25 2010 19:17 GMT
#27
I dunno if "cheese" is the right term, but I do think its important to distinguish between play that is reliant on tricking your opponent/surprising them/your opponent making a mistake, and play that is equally effective even if your opponent knows its coming.

If I DT rush, I am relying basically on my opponent not doing a good enough job of scouting. If I surprise him with my DTs, chances are good I'll either win outright or do enough damage to take a strong advantage. If he scouts me in time, however, then those DTs will be wildly inefficient for their cost, and I'll have tied up so many resources in getting them that I am at a severe disadvantage. In other words, given that proper scouting is a requirement of mistake-free play, I am essentially banking on my opponent making a mistake.

If I go 3-gate Robo, on the other hand, I am not putting myself in a position to insta-win....but I'm also not relying on my opponent making mistakes. My opponent can scout me, and I can still proceed with my strategy, and if I execute well and make good decisions, I can win even if he knows what I'm doing.

On ladder, there is no particular advantage to either playstyle. People make mistakes a lot, you only play people once, so banking on a fuck-up by your opponent can be a decent bet.

But in a tournament, where the quality of play will likely be higher, where your opponents will likely prepare for what you do, and where you play multiple games, banking on your opponent making a costly mistake is risky. That doesn't mean its never a good idea...but if all you can do is try to trick or surprise your opponent, you probably won't win many matches in a row, which is what it will take to win it all.

Solid play on the other hand, can work much better in a tournament format. You aren't banking on surprising your opponent--in fact you sort of assume they'll figure out what your doing. You're relying on superior execution. If you're good enough, the element of chance is much lower, and you have a much better shot at winning multiple games in a row against opponents who have tried to prepare for you.
He drone drone drone. Me win. - ogsMC
Lobotomist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1541 Posts
November 25 2010 19:45 GMT
#28
I believe the defenitions go like this:

Cheese: a strategy which must go unscouted in order to work. Examples: any offensive proxy, very early pool,

All-in: any strategy, tactic or decision which has no follow-up plan. Examples: 6 pool with all the drones pulled, 200/200 2 base timing pushes, most attacks where the attacker pulls a majority of his workers and uses them to fight.

Most cheeses are all-in, as they don't have very good follow ups, but all-ins do not have to be cheese.
Teching to hive too quickly isn't just a risk: it's an ultrarisk
MaKfejA
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada117 Posts
November 25 2010 19:59 GMT
#29
On November 26 2010 03:03 Enervate wrote:
Umm, let me provide an analogy. In poker, you can bet increments of money over a period of time, or you can go "all-in", and if you lose, you're out. But if you lose hands where you don't go all-in, you can still play. This is like Starcraft. If you pull all of your workers to attack, and you lose the battle, you're out of the game. If you lose one smaller engagement, you still have a chance to come back. That's where the term all-in comes from.

Also, cheese, assuming the game is balanced, should be incredibly easy to stop if scouted. Cheese largely relies on the element of surprise and usually is very aggressive meaning that you cut workers and it is kind of "all-in". However, cheese has also been adapted to the phrase "econ cheese". So basically, cheese is any sort of play designed to catch your opponent off guard and give you an advantage, whether militarily or economically.


This. There are times when you go all-in in poker. You could be doing because you have a certainty of winning the hand, or because you're bluffing. In either case, if you lose that hand, you're out. This is one strategic possibility. In Starcraft, the same strategic possibility exists--and if it succeeds, you have a huge advantage, usually resulting in a win. If it fails, you have zero possibility of winning simply because you have nothing left. When you go into a game, you could consider each attack a hand of poker, and can risk all you have by going "all-in".
Dystisis
Profile Joined May 2010
Norway713 Posts
November 25 2010 20:26 GMT
#30
Definitions do not really matter, what matters is how the word is used.
Aelfric
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Turkey1496 Posts
November 25 2010 20:38 GMT
#31
Actually all-in only means you won't have a proper follow-up for the next of the game after that push/move. It is not "all-in" to start a game with a winning purpose. These are really different things and you, for some reason i dunno why want to mix them up imo.
Tomorrow never comes until its too late...
SichuanPanda
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada1542 Posts
November 25 2010 20:57 GMT
#32
The correct definitions of cheese and all-in are as follows.

Cheese - A strategy which takes place during the opening minutes of a game and that if scouted by ones opponent will result in a near instant defeat for oneself. If the opponent is unable to scout or otherwise have knowledge of the build coming there is very high chances of it either outright ending the game or dealing critical damage.

All-in - Similar to a cheese in that it is an attack which if ineffective will put the attacker at a harsh disadvantage, but different in several areas. Firstly an all-in can occur at any point of the game, and it can also be scouted and still be a viable move (unlike cheeses where if scouted with enough time to spare can easily be thwarted). Secondly an all-in is quite often not actually intended to end the game outright, but to deal equal or more damage to ones opponent than it cost to do the all-in. Which is why the 2 rax marine/scv rush (against Zerg) on the Korean server lately is so effective, sure all those marines and scvs more often than not all get killed. But if you manage to kill one or both queens (assuming there is two), most of the drones, or key tech buildings, both players will be set-back equally, if not putting the Zerg slightly behind. Finally all-ins to actually be classified as such much include all of a players units including workers, because of the nature of the attack. It must do equal damage to what it cost, or it simply will put you at a disadvantage.
i-bonjwa
SmoKim
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark10304 Posts
November 25 2010 21:02 GMT
#33
what would Action Jesus do?
"LOL I have 202 supply right now (3 minutes later)..."LOL NOW I HAVE 220 SUPPLY SUP?!?!?" - Mondragon
Eminent Rising
Profile Joined October 2010
United States174 Posts
November 25 2010 21:08 GMT
#34
who ever doesnt kno wut cheese and all-ins are read this and stop making false claims and pointless threads.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Cheese

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/All-in
Momento Mori
imyzhang
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada809 Posts
November 25 2010 21:13 GMT
#35
another one of these threads again coming from a person with 4 posts? cmon people, havent we exhausted this issue enough?

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Cheese

bleh
n3mo
Profile Joined May 2010
United States298 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-25 21:15:10
November 25 2010 21:14 GMT
#36
is it just me, or has this been discussed to death already? from what i remember (and agree with) from other threads:

all in - no foreseeable secondary option. you either win with this push, or you lose the game in a few minutes.

cheese - generally unorthodox strategy that becomes much more easily defended if scouted.


nothing there implies positive or negative. for example, if you're a zerg and just ravaged my base, i might weigh my options. deciding that you're probably pumping drones, and that i'll never be able to catch up, i bring EVERYTHING and attack you now. its a case of "im behind, so attack before i get even further behind because there's no way for me to catch up". its perfectly legitimate to do when shit hits the fan, and can catch an opponent with their pants down.

cheese is not easy. its not easier to carry out the cheese than to defend the cheese. prime example - if you consider foxer's 2 rax marine stuff cheese (which you arguably could), look at the micro skill involved in pulling it off. stutter step marine micro, using SCVs to intercept melee units, etc. it is by no means 'easy' to pull off.

again, cheese and all-in do not imply positive or negative. certain ones do (cannon rushes are generally considered cheese, all-in, and a noob thing to do), but similar things aren't (forge FE with a cannon blocking zerg expo is...debatable, but not all-in, and not seen as a noob thing).

edit// ah, got ninja'd. whoops.
My hatred for [banelings] is way greater than my compassion
TheAntZ
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Israel6248 Posts
November 25 2010 22:54 GMT
#37
You've decided to play a competitive game in which the only possible outcome is to win or lose. From that perspective, it seems redundant to describe any strategy or tactic as "all in" at any point after that, as we have already established that we are "all in"


Just...what? This makes no sense. Like there is zero logic in there
43084 | Honeybadger: "So july, you're in the GSL finals. How do you feel?!" ~ July: "HUNGRY."
latan
Profile Joined July 2010
740 Posts
November 25 2010 23:11 GMT
#38
your bolded words are a very (very) weak argument. it is very clear what all in means, just like in poker. if it fails, you lose.

but it is true that it is not clear wether some move is all in or not.


cheese only means tactics that will make you extremely pissed off if they work against you.
shabinka
Profile Joined October 2008
United States469 Posts
November 25 2010 23:18 GMT
#39
Please define all-ins correctly. An all in is a stragety with no transition to a mid game. If someone holds off your 6 pool or 4WG you'll be behind economically.
TheAntZ
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Israel6248 Posts
November 25 2010 23:21 GMT
#40
On November 26 2010 08:18 rawk wrote:
Please define all-ins correctly. An all in is a stragety with no transition to a mid game. If someone holds off your 6 pool or 4WG you'll be behind economically.


Thats wrong too, because you can still all-in in the midgame. It is essentially an attack or tactic that has no follow up. Something that you do with the mentality of "If this doesnt win, I have no further plan"
43084 | Honeybadger: "So july, you're in the GSL finals. How do you feel?!" ~ July: "HUNGRY."
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 5
Clem vs ReynorLIVE!
Crank 1389
Tasteless1141
ComeBackTV 1004
IndyStarCraft 161
Rex141
3DClanTV 91
IntoTheiNu 59
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1389
Tasteless 1141
RotterdaM 199
IndyStarCraft 161
Rex 141
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 25504
Sea 22316
Rain 5421
Bisu 2840
Jaedong 1050
Hyuk 779
Pusan 640
Light 583
firebathero 457
Mini 404
[ Show more ]
Zeus 355
actioN 302
Stork 283
EffOrt 226
Backho 172
Soulkey 162
Hyun 153
ToSsGirL 138
hero 83
Mind 62
Snow 56
JYJ38
sSak 33
Shinee 30
Rush 28
Aegong 28
JulyZerg 25
Sacsri 23
sas.Sziky 22
Sharp 21
Icarus 19
Noble 15
yabsab 14
Free 14
sorry 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
Hm[arnc] 10
Movie 8
IntoTheRainbow 7
SilentControl 7
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc7770
XaKoH 591
XcaliburYe416
League of Legends
singsing1813
Counter-Strike
x6flipin544
flusha277
allub274
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor152
Other Games
tarik_tv27030
B2W.Neo1009
shahzam623
crisheroes506
DeMusliM472
Fuzer 269
Liquid`RaSZi171
Pyrionflax145
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick29639
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 314
lovetv 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt493
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h
Replay Cast
12h
RSL Revival
22h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 4h
OSC
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 22h
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.