On November 10 2010 20:41 trancey wrote: I heard about this on SoTG, cool article, didn't know Tyler was treated like a B-Team slave in Korea.
On the contrary, Tyler did very well in Korea. He made the finals in his first courage tournament and eSTRO apparently had a very high opinion of him, especially Sangho:
really cool article! esports has so many good spokespeople that are successful students + athletes which is very good for growing the industry!
also read this again closely :D "He also said some his clients aren’t who you might expect. Some of them are 40-something business guys who just want beat their friends or their kids."
NPR is the last vestige of real reporting. For them to write a serious (and well done) article on SC2 is a great step. Hopefully soon they will interview a player on Fresh Air; that would do a lot for the community I think.
A hundred dollars an hour! WHAT!? No wonder he only plays 3 hours a day haha.
Man i was hoping he was a math major like me because everyone said he was like a machine. I am disappoint. But he does like to chill so i guess Philosophy major will work out well for him. You know im just chillin' and thinking about epistemology.
If i were to pay that much for training though it would definitely be from him. If he can play like 3 hours and be a top of the top level player then it could actually be cost effective if you want to play at an amateur level or something.
Law school is a popular choice, though Tyler's career as a professional gamer is probably a little less stressful.
I dunno about that. Do you know how much pressure pro-gamers must feel to perform well at tournaments and stuff. It can't feel good to spend countless hours preparing and for people to be expecting you to do well and fail (which is a thought I assume most "pro-gamers" must at least consider once in a while.)
Law school is a popular choice, though Tyler's career as a professional gamer is probably a little less stressful.
I dunno about that. Do you know how much pressure pro-gamers must feel to perform well at tournaments and stuff. It can't feel good to spend countless hours preparing and for people to be expecting you to do well and fail (which is a thought I assume most "pro-gamers" must at least consider once in a while.)
Law school is not that bad. Try preparing for trial though. Lots of pressure to do well and generally much more money on the line.
On November 07 2010 19:51 kr_priest wrote: Great article and one commentor on the NPR website made a good point about the future of e-sports. + Show Spoiler +
I think there's a few things that are stacked against gaming in terms of becoming a respected competitive event. First, a significant portion of games are played by an individual, and it's hard to get inside the players head. I think this is why poker never really took off until the "hole card" cameras were used in broadcasts. Until the audience can "play along," gaming won't be huge.
Second, sports do allow people to play along because often they have played the sports before. While it may be true that many gamers can enjoy competitive gaming, the games change so much that even someone like me, who grew up in the 80s-90s and played a lot of games, doesn't have much experience with modern games. Without consistency over time, like in, say, football, it's hard for audiences to be connected to gaming.
Third, the skill in some games is not immediately visible to audiences. Running fast is easily identifiable as a skill. Executing hundreds of actions just looks like clicking a mouse. I'm not saying it's not a skill, just that it's hard to understand for lay observers. Not an insurmountable challenge for gaming, but still, a factor against it.
Although as much as i'd love to see esports grow in the West as well, there are a lot of obstacles that need to be overcome first.
He managed to get what people have been trying to say here for hundreds of pages into one paragraph. Seems pretty spot on. Interesting read nonetheless.
Agreed, definitely an insightful comment.
This was a pretty great article overall. I have to say, I felt the same way about the "cliché" sponsors from the moment I walked into MLG Dallas. The Hot Pockets was what was the most ridiculous to me, but people got to eat there so they could stay around longer, so that was cool. Doritos and Dr. Pepper were handing out free things, too, which was awesome. People wouldn't look twice at Dr. Pepper. Adding Doritos makes them look twice. Hot Pockets solidifies the stereotype.
Note: I'm not criticizing the sponsors at all. I love that they'll all contributing to e-sports! I'm just saying that all you saw was Hot Pockets, Dr. Pepper and Doritos. I mean, you could smell it in the air. And that was hilarious. XD
Also, philosophy majors represent! I'm a triple-major in government, philosophy and rhetoric.