• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:17
CEST 13:17
KST 20:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments1[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes145BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch2Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
Why Storm Should NOT Be Nerfed – A Core Part of Pr StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
Stellar Fest KSL Week 80 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch [ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Too Many LANs? Tournament Ov…
TrAiDoS
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1730 users

Do You Have to be Smart to Play Starcraft? - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Grachuus
Profile Joined August 2010
United States57 Posts
September 21 2010 02:48 GMT
#81
You don't need $1,000,000 but it sure is nice when you have it.
Idiots believe they are infallible. The wise realize they know nothing.
happyness
Profile Joined June 2010
United States2400 Posts
September 21 2010 03:06 GMT
#82
On September 21 2010 11:14 Reason.SC2 wrote:
To be answered we gotta consider the semantic question what does it mean to be smart. To answer that we gotta tackle the metaphysical and epistemic issues surrounding intelligence(smartness) and/or knowledge.

Long story short: the question is too vague to lead to a coherent discussion of possible answers.

This said, my 2 cents is that you don't *have* to be smart but it is certainly a huge asset: something akin smartness is to pro starcraft like tallness is to pro basketball.


This. The OP question is much too vague.

The real question: What is intelligence? Are you talking about intelligence you are born with? Can't intelligence be acquired through a lot of practice? Aren't their different kinds of intelligence?

And further more what does it mean to be "smart"? An I.Q. greater than 100? Greater than 130?

When any one of us started playing starcraft or warcraft or whatever our first RTS was, we were all morons. After a while we learn the concepts and the feel for that game and our RTS knowledge, or intelligence, grows. And once you get to the pro level you know a TON of stuff about the game that your average person just wouldn't see. I'm tired of the BS that "players like Idra who nearly completely rely on mechanics alone" means you don't have to be smart to play sc2. First off, Idra has an incredible game sense and knows how to encounter many strategies and how to react to other "intelligent" players meaning he'd have to be intelligent himself. And second, why is playing a lot of games proof that you don't have to be intelligent? The more games you play, your knowledge of sc2 increases.

How is it that pros practicing 12-14 hours a day proof that you don't have to be smart? Great pianists practice 8+ hours a day, does that not make them smart musically? What about great chess players? They have to practice hours every day.


If the game basically takes mechanics alone, or you just have to be a "machine to play", why hasn't a good AI come out yet? Computers are much faster than us, and if all it takes is quick mechanics to be good, than there should be an impossibly good AI better than any of us slow humans.
iEchoic
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1776 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 03:11:13
September 21 2010 03:08 GMT
#83
On September 21 2010 09:38 Hakker wrote:
Now, that discussion has been done to death, but it did lead us into an interesting debate. He claimed that professional Starcraft doesn't take large amounts of intelligence because deficiencies in a players strategic thinking and tactics can be overcome by spamming games and perfecting mechanics. He pointed to the korean style, practicing for 12-14 hours a day, as proof of that concept as well as players like Idra who nearly completely rely on mechanics alone to bring them to the top.


Your friend is completely right about this part.

Before my school started I played a lot of SC. I played like 6-8 hours a day. I got to the top 100 just because I played a lot. Anybody could have done it. It wasn't Starcraft skill because I didn't play BW and I haven't played a PC rts since AoE. Now that school's started and I can't play that much, I've been dropping down. For me, my skill on this game is pretty much purely a function of how much I play the game.

Before this game, I played a game called Halo Wars, which was a really simple RTS with a low mechanics-ceiling. But while at the time I thought it was a bit lame how 'easy' the game was, it was sort of a blessing in disguise. Because the APM/Mechanics part of the game was basically out of the window, the entire differentiating factor between players became purely strategy and mental processes. As a result, the game did not reward you for playing 12 hours a day because you did not improve your mechanics, and the game was a game entirely of thinking - pure talent/intelligence.

Shooter games like CoD approach that level. Aiming mechanics are not the pinnacle of skill on CoD4 because people die very quickly. Teamwork and game sense are the most important qualities on that game, and as a result, I believe they are much more intelligence/talent based.

Starcraft's mechanics ceiling is too high to ever reach that level, which is why it will always be a time vampire that requires many many thousands of hours to be pro, regardless of your skill level. We see players like WhiteRa who are clearly mentally qualified to be pros being basically forced out by people just because they play more. This isn't good for a competitive game.

Food for thought.
vileEchoic -- clanvile.com
Krafty
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada109 Posts
September 21 2010 03:09 GMT
#84
Yes, unless you play Terran
3clipse
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
Canada2555 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 03:14:56
September 21 2010 03:11 GMT
#85
No, but it really, really helps.

I would say you need either exceptional strategic play or exceptional mechanics to do well in starcraft. Those few that possess both occupy the very highest tier. With the early sc2 scene, I think strategic play is first and foremost in determining how well you do, but this will likely change (ie: boxer no longer able to dominate bw).
xtfftc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom2343 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 03:26:04
September 21 2010 03:12 GMT
#86
I am yet to see a StarCraft 2 game where a player has truly showed strategic awesomeness. Some small decisions - yes, but nothing really cool.

However, SC:BW was a different story. I've had the chance to discuss strategies, including SC2 ones, with SC1 pros and it is obvious that they put a lot of thought into it. Also, the fact that so many SC1 pros became good poker players is also pointing at them being intelligent.

P.S. Being innovative as in finding new purposes of a specific unit does not require as much thinking as utilising the same old unit everyone knows as in positioning and transitions.
Kao
Profile Joined July 2010
24 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 03:16:48
September 21 2010 03:12 GMT
#87
smart for me is when a player is creative, Starcraft is all about experience and mechanics

Analogy:
you can know how to play the song(BO), but maybe you cant execute cuz you dont have a good multi tasking and speed(mechanics)

so i think starcraft u dont need to be more smart than opponent to win, you only need to know BOs and Counters and be able to execute

is like MMA you need to know all martial arts this will help you a lot, but only knowledge and technique is the basics to win a fight
ArvickHero
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
10387 Posts
September 21 2010 03:18 GMT
#88
On September 21 2010 12:08 iEchoic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 09:38 Hakker wrote:
Now, that discussion has been done to death, but it did lead us into an interesting debate. He claimed that professional Starcraft doesn't take large amounts of intelligence because deficiencies in a players strategic thinking and tactics can be overcome by spamming games and perfecting mechanics. He pointed to the korean style, practicing for 12-14 hours a day, as proof of that concept as well as players like Idra who nearly completely rely on mechanics alone to bring them to the top.


Your friend is completely right about this part.

Before my school started I played a lot of SC. I played like 6-8 hours a day. I got to the top 100 just because I played a lot. Anybody could have done it. It wasn't Starcraft skill because I didn't play BW and I haven't played a PC rts since AoE. Now that school's started and I can't play that much, I've been dropping down. For me, my skill on this game is pretty much purely a function of how much I play the game.

Before this game, I played a game called Halo Wars, which was a really simple RTS with a low mechanics-ceiling. But while at the time I thought it was a bit lame how 'easy' the game was, it was sort of a blessing in disguise. Because the APM/Mechanics part of the game was basically out of the window, the entire differentiating factor between players became purely strategy and mental processes. As a result, the game did not reward you for playing 12 hours a day because you did not improve your mechanics, and the game was a game entirely of thinking - pure talent/intelligence.

Shooter games like CoD approach that level. Aiming mechanics are not the pinnacle of skill on CoD4 because people die very quickly. Teamwork and game sense are the most important qualities on that game, and as a result, I believe they are much more intelligence/talent based.

Starcraft's mechanics ceiling is too high to ever reach that level, which is why it will always be a time vampire that requires many many thousands of hours to be pro, regardless of your skill level. We see players like WhiteRa who are clearly mentally qualified to be pros being basically forced out by people just because they play more. This isn't good for a competitive game.

Food for thought.

Broodwar is like Basketball, or any other sport, where you must dedicate and train yourself to become anywhere near decent. Starcraft 2 is more like Risk or a board game (checkers/chess), where it requires much less practicing, but relies more on the mental aspect of things. Personally I think Broodwar is much more fulfilling.
Writerptrk
iEchoic
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1776 Posts
September 21 2010 03:21 GMT
#89
On September 21 2010 12:18 ArvickHero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 12:08 iEchoic wrote:
On September 21 2010 09:38 Hakker wrote:
Now, that discussion has been done to death, but it did lead us into an interesting debate. He claimed that professional Starcraft doesn't take large amounts of intelligence because deficiencies in a players strategic thinking and tactics can be overcome by spamming games and perfecting mechanics. He pointed to the korean style, practicing for 12-14 hours a day, as proof of that concept as well as players like Idra who nearly completely rely on mechanics alone to bring them to the top.


Your friend is completely right about this part.

Before my school started I played a lot of SC. I played like 6-8 hours a day. I got to the top 100 just because I played a lot. Anybody could have done it. It wasn't Starcraft skill because I didn't play BW and I haven't played a PC rts since AoE. Now that school's started and I can't play that much, I've been dropping down. For me, my skill on this game is pretty much purely a function of how much I play the game.

Before this game, I played a game called Halo Wars, which was a really simple RTS with a low mechanics-ceiling. But while at the time I thought it was a bit lame how 'easy' the game was, it was sort of a blessing in disguise. Because the APM/Mechanics part of the game was basically out of the window, the entire differentiating factor between players became purely strategy and mental processes. As a result, the game did not reward you for playing 12 hours a day because you did not improve your mechanics, and the game was a game entirely of thinking - pure talent/intelligence.

Shooter games like CoD approach that level. Aiming mechanics are not the pinnacle of skill on CoD4 because people die very quickly. Teamwork and game sense are the most important qualities on that game, and as a result, I believe they are much more intelligence/talent based.

Starcraft's mechanics ceiling is too high to ever reach that level, which is why it will always be a time vampire that requires many many thousands of hours to be pro, regardless of your skill level. We see players like WhiteRa who are clearly mentally qualified to be pros being basically forced out by people just because they play more. This isn't good for a competitive game.

Food for thought.

Broodwar is like Basketball, or any other sport, where you must dedicate and train yourself to become anywhere near decent. Starcraft 2 is more like Risk or a board game (checkers/chess), where it requires much less practicing, but relies more on the mental aspect of things. Personally I think Broodwar is much more fulfilling.


I guess I'm on the other side of the fence, I think the reliance on mechanics makes a game less about strategy and more about repetitive muscle memory techniques that require nothing but time. To take it to the logical extreme, if BW had literally no AI at all, and a worker would grab minerals, stop, wait for a command, return to the CC, stop, wait for a command, and you had to manually micro all of your workers, the game would reach a point where it eventually becomes literally 100% mechanics and 0% thinking as the importance of mechanics elevates above everything else.

Starcraft 2 takes less mechanics than BW, but it's still at such a level that it prevents it from being a talent-based game. Otherwise WhiteRa would still be one of the best Protoss players.
vileEchoic -- clanvile.com
MegaVolt
Profile Joined September 2010
28 Posts
September 21 2010 03:30 GMT
#90
On the other hand being less mechanical doesn't mean a game becomes more strategic.
There is only a limited set of strategies, if you "out-smart" your opponent most of the time that doesn't mean you were really smart but it just means you experienced the tactic before and you know the counter. Every moron can learn a list of counters.
StarCraft simply is not deep enough to allow for real strategy, that's why it has to emphasize mechanics so much, otherwise there wouldn't be any competition (just randomness).
If you want real strategy then you'd have to turn SC into a turn based game with a very different resource and unit mechanic. Think chess in space.
GenoZStriker
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2914 Posts
September 21 2010 03:34 GMT
#91
Quoting what people have said on TL various time. "You don't have to be smart to play SC2. Just pick Terran" LOL
eSports Prodigy & Illuminati member.
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
September 21 2010 03:38 GMT
#92
you dont really have to be that smart like IQ or anything like that. straight up mechanics could get you disgustingly far in bw so i think you could bring some of that over.
Comeh
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States18919 Posts
September 21 2010 03:38 GMT
#93
In an era where nearly every casual player follows Progamers on their build orders, copys decisions made, and game plans - no.
ヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノDELETE ICEFROGヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(⌐■_■)ノヽ(
Grobyc
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Canada18410 Posts
September 21 2010 03:40 GMT
#94
On September 21 2010 09:43 mOnion wrote:
No. Example?

Gositerran.

This seems like the only exception lol. Other than that, yeah you're generally going to need to be pretty bright to play SC at a high level imo.
If you watch Godzilla backwards it's about a benevolent lizard who helps rebuild a city and then moonwalks into the ocean.
andeh
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States904 Posts
September 21 2010 03:42 GMT
#95
If you watch nal_ra, not really. As he doesn't even know how to turn on a computer or plug in a keyboard.

<3 nalra ducks
Blixy213
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States360 Posts
September 21 2010 03:45 GMT
#96
I agree with your friend with it not being a sport, to an extent.

While there is no real physical aspect of the game, other than fast (And sometimes really fast) Movement of the hands, there is defiantly an entertainment/spectator part of view that can put it somewhere near the definition of the word.

I disagree with no real intelligence, yes, practiced 12-14 hours a day may help, but if you don't know how to analyze a loss, like myself for a good part of the beta, practice goes nowhere. There is also the curve ball that is in some Proleague games, proxies, all-ins, hidden tech are all things that need to be adjusted too on a dime, which can't be done with success from a half-wit.

TL;DR: Practice helps, intelligence is what lets you learn from practice.
#1 sKyHigh and MorroW fan. "Should have stayed in the bush, bush reaper."
forgotten0ne
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States951 Posts
September 21 2010 03:51 GMT
#97
I find it surprising that no one has addressed the core issue here. Intelligence isn't some magical thing that you either have or don't. While genetics do play a big part on your brain's development, your intelligence is merely a compilation of learning experiences through-out life, emphasizing on the development in the earliest stages of life. However, even the dumbest person, when subjected to a subject for long enough, can develop an intelligence for that subject. So, the question isn't so much do you have to be "intelligent" to be good, it should be do you have to be "intelligent" to get good quickly, which is usually confirmed.
"Well it’s obvious that these Terran gamers are just extremely gifted when it comes to RTS games" -Ret, in regards to the first months of SC2
d3_crescentia
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4054 Posts
September 21 2010 03:52 GMT
#98
Wait a goddamn second.

Where is the argument that practicing very good high level mechanics = good game sense? The same can be said of ANYTHING that needs practice to learn. This is about as old as the hard work vs. natural talent debate - if you've got natural talent it only accelerates your pace of learning. Being smart has nothing to do with it (being smart at all is a myth, but that's a different conversation).

Now, does this detract from a game's inherent competitiveness? Does practicing basketball for several hours detract from that game's competitiveness?
once, not long ago, there was a moon here
happyness
Profile Joined June 2010
United States2400 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 03:59:21
September 21 2010 03:56 GMT
#99
On September 21 2010 12:08 iEchoic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 09:38 Hakker wrote:
Now, that discussion has been done to death, but it did lead us into an interesting debate. He claimed that professional Starcraft doesn't take large amounts of intelligence because deficiencies in a players strategic thinking and tactics can be overcome by spamming games and perfecting mechanics. He pointed to the korean style, practicing for 12-14 hours a day, as proof of that concept as well as players like Idra who nearly completely rely on mechanics alone to bring them to the top.


Your friend is completely right about this part.

Before my school started I played a lot of SC. I played like 6-8 hours a day. I got to the top 100 just because I played a lot. Anybody could have done it. It wasn't Starcraft skill because I didn't play BW and I haven't played a PC rts since AoE. Now that school's started and I can't play that much, I've been dropping down. For me, my skill on this game is pretty much purely a function of how much I play the game.

Before this game, I played a game called Halo Wars, which was a really simple RTS with a low mechanics-ceiling. But while at the time I thought it was a bit lame how 'easy' the game was, it was sort of a blessing in disguise. Because the APM/Mechanics part of the game was basically out of the window, the entire differentiating factor between players became purely strategy and mental processes. As a result, the game did not reward you for playing 12 hours a day because you did not improve your mechanics, and the game was a game entirely of thinking - pure talent/intelligence.

Shooter games like CoD approach that level. Aiming mechanics are not the pinnacle of skill on CoD4 because people die very quickly. Teamwork and game sense are the most important qualities on that game, and as a result, I believe they are much more intelligence/talent based.

Starcraft's mechanics ceiling is too high to ever reach that level, which is why it will always be a time vampire that requires many many thousands of hours to be pro, regardless of your skill level. We see players like WhiteRa who are clearly mentally qualified to be pros being basically forced out by people just because they play more. This isn't good for a competitive game.

Food for thought.


Did you play Halo wars 6-8 hours a day? When you spend a lot of time on ANYTHING you are going to get good at it. Granted there are limitations, like you probably won't be great in basketball if you are 5 foot 0, but you could still be good.

I'll refer to my previous point which is if being good at SC or SC2 were purely/mostly mechanics wouldn't their be a super AI that could beat everybody? If speed and multi-tasking are all that are required to be good then a computer would be unbeatable.

It's true that WhiteRa has the intelligence to be mentally qualified and he still does very, very well(last I checked he was in the top 20 in EU). But I also don't think he's necessarily any more mentally qualified than Tester or IdrA, who have the mechanics AND the intelligence to be great at the game.
iEchoic
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1776 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-21 04:03:00
September 21 2010 03:59 GMT
#100
On September 21 2010 12:52 d3_crescentia wrote:
Now, does this detract from a game's inherent competitiveness? Does practicing basketball for several hours detract from that game's competitiveness?


Basketball has built-in limitations on how much you can practice. Usually your body won't let you practice for more than 6-8 hours, and in addition practicing ceases to be effective after so much practice in a day and you need to give time for your muscles to rest. Even practicing large amounts of time takes a lot of willpower. It is hard as hell to do because your body will physically try to stop you.

Starcraft doesn't have those limitations, which is what makes Starcraft a really bad competitive game in my mind. Anybody with no real-life commitments can sit down and play the game 12 hours a day. It takes no willpower, it doesn't physically hurt, and there is no mechanism preventing you from doing so.

On September 21 2010 12:56 happyness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2010 12:08 iEchoic wrote:
On September 21 2010 09:38 Hakker wrote:
Now, that discussion has been done to death, but it did lead us into an interesting debate. He claimed that professional Starcraft doesn't take large amounts of intelligence because deficiencies in a players strategic thinking and tactics can be overcome by spamming games and perfecting mechanics. He pointed to the korean style, practicing for 12-14 hours a day, as proof of that concept as well as players like Idra who nearly completely rely on mechanics alone to bring them to the top.


Food for thought.


Did you play Halo wars 6-8 hours a day? When you spend a lot of time on ANYTHING you are going to get good at it. Granted there are limitations, like you probably won't be great in basketball if you are 5 foot 0, but you could still be good.


See above reply - basketball is much different than starcraft.

And no, I didn't play Halo Wars 6-8 hours a day - and the people who played mass games never really were top players. That's because the game's mechanics ceiling was very low and you couldn't differentiate yourself from others by getting good mechanically (which takes massing games). I disliked it at the time but I'm starting to like the idea of it more and more when I see the way Starcraft players exploit their lack of real-life commitments for an edge.
vileEchoic -- clanvile.com
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 2: Playoffs Day 7
Reynor vs CureLIVE!
TBD vs Zoun
Crank 1061
Tasteless1047
RotterdaM713
IndyStarCraft 211
Rex119
CranKy Ducklings88
3DClanTV 49
IntoTheiNu 27
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1061
Tasteless 1047
RotterdaM 713
IndyStarCraft 211
Rex 119
ProTech66
MindelVK 38
Railgan 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 14777
Calm 6576
Horang2 2565
Rain 2205
Flash 1326
GuemChi 1311
EffOrt 531
Larva 508
actioN 432
Hyuk 352
[ Show more ]
BeSt 340
Zeus 220
Hyun 217
firebathero 185
Last 165
PianO 160
Pusan 151
ZZZero.O 83
Soma 81
Rush 74
Free 62
ajuk12(nOOB) 61
Aegong 57
sSak 56
Sharp 52
Soulkey 43
Nal_rA 43
Mong 42
Sacsri 34
Movie 34
sas.Sziky 29
Sexy 25
soO 21
Bale 20
ivOry 14
Icarus 11
HiyA 9
Hm[arnc] 5
Terrorterran 1
Dota 2
XcaliburYe1271
singsing839
Fuzer 222
Dendi196
Counter-Strike
allub298
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor184
Other Games
B2W.Neo667
crisheroes353
DeMusliM316
NeuroSwarm59
Lowko35
Trikslyr23
OptimusSC210
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick687
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 36
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1232
• Stunt540
Other Games
• WagamamaTV322
Upcoming Events
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3h 43m
OSC
9h 43m
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
20h 43m
RSL Revival
22h 43m
Classic vs TBD
WardiTV Invitational
23h 43m
Online Event
1d 4h
Wardi Open
1d 23h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
LiuLi Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.