|
On September 14 2010 13:00 me_viet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2010 11:23 Gomas wrote: I have to agree with Morrow. Name me some zergs which are on same level as Dimaga or Idra IN ZVZ (!). None? Great.
Now remember all these TvTs u watched in go4scs and ZOTACs? Yeah the ones u all complain about. Tarson winning with Cloud. Morrow losing to Demuslim. Strelok winning with SjoW. I could go on. There is at least 30 names which can easily compete with eachother, when it comes to T.
All that shows, is that there is more good T players atm.
Tbh, i have not yet seen a single zerg apart from Idra (not even dimaga), with macro so perfect like morrows. There is tons of queing going on. Mineral floats etc, all the time. While the Ts (especially morrow) have perfect thought-out builds with 0 quening going on, perfect expansion and depot timings etc.
I have yet to see a zerg buildorder as refined as morrows 5 rax reaper or his TvP 2rax FE. For me, this is the main reason the zerg lose, not imbalance. Your post reeks of Bronze level logic. Your first sentence effectively discredit all notable names such as Sen, Sheth, LaLush, Day9 (not sure if he still plays Z), JooktuJong, all the OgS Zerg players, and a few more I can't remember (oh and MadFrog). Alot of these guys had backgrounds in Sc:BW or were well-regarded in other RTS. Now, let's be honest, who's heard of Silver before he/she caused Idra to rage in the IEM? Looking at the list, there are heaps of T names I don't recognize (who the hell is MuRdeR?) Fits perfectly the point of having Random no-name T players taking down known Z/P players. I am very interested in who these 30 T names that can compete with each other are. The fact you referenced 30 known T names is a problem in itself. Not disrespecting Morrow, but please show me a replay where Morrow makes ZERO macro mistakes. It's not possible. There is also a rumour (I have not seen source) that Morrow was taught the 5rax reapers by Dimaga, a Z player, within 1hr. The fact that Zerg has no build-order 'as refined as morrows" is a source of imbalance itself. The fact is, Zerg CAN"T have a perfectly refined BO past when to get hatch/pool. It is noobie Bronze non-Zerg players like you that gets me on edge, coming in here bashing down on Idra or any Top Zerg player for not having a refined build. What the fuck do you think he does with his time in korea? Play WoW? TLDR: this is a rage post against a bronze noobie who dares say that Zerg players don't try hard enough to 'refine their Build Orders". EDIT: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/291211/Gomas is that you Gomas? My apologies, you're actually silver. not bad. now get to diamond b4 you attempt to bash on Idra and co.
MurDeR is a quite beastly Terran player who used to play War3 iirc. And I'm fairly certain that the story of Dimaga teaching MorroW the 5Rax Reaper build is MorroW himself as I think he mentioned it in an interview a few days after IEM.
|
On September 14 2010 10:22 MorroW wrote: i almost wanna switch to zerg just to show it is possible, its not a coincidence dimaga is by far best zerg atm, he simply has alot more skills than the other zergs. i pity these lower level players that blame their losses on imbalance when dimaga still manages to win. we have 30 terrans who can fight nicely on the top in tvt but who can compete in zvz? the skill gap is huge there and so few players...
DO IT. Make all the zerg tears stop. Or maybe you are too scared to cause you know you wont do as well as zerg....
|
On September 14 2010 13:49 coaL wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2010 13:00 me_viet wrote:On September 14 2010 11:23 Gomas wrote: I have to agree with Morrow. Name me some zergs which are on same level as Dimaga or Idra IN ZVZ (!). None? Great.
Now remember all these TvTs u watched in go4scs and ZOTACs? Yeah the ones u all complain about. Tarson winning with Cloud. Morrow losing to Demuslim. Strelok winning with SjoW. I could go on. There is at least 30 names which can easily compete with eachother, when it comes to T.
All that shows, is that there is more good T players atm.
Tbh, i have not yet seen a single zerg apart from Idra (not even dimaga), with macro so perfect like morrows. There is tons of queing going on. Mineral floats etc, all the time. While the Ts (especially morrow) have perfect thought-out builds with 0 quening going on, perfect expansion and depot timings etc.
I have yet to see a zerg buildorder as refined as morrows 5 rax reaper or his TvP 2rax FE. For me, this is the main reason the zerg lose, not imbalance. Your post reeks of Bronze level logic. Your first sentence effectively discredit all notable names such as Sen, Sheth, LaLush, Day9 (not sure if he still plays Z), JooktuJong, all the OgS Zerg players, and a few more I can't remember (oh and MadFrog). Alot of these guys had backgrounds in Sc:BW or were well-regarded in other RTS. Now, let's be honest, who's heard of Silver before he/she caused Idra to rage in the IEM? Looking at the list, there are heaps of T names I don't recognize (who the hell is MuRdeR?) Fits perfectly the point of having Random no-name T players taking down known Z/P players. I am very interested in who these 30 T names that can compete with each other are. The fact you referenced 30 known T names is a problem in itself. Not disrespecting Morrow, but please show me a replay where Morrow makes ZERO macro mistakes. It's not possible. There is also a rumour (I have not seen source) that Morrow was taught the 5rax reapers by Dimaga, a Z player, within 1hr. The fact that Zerg has no build-order 'as refined as morrows" is a source of imbalance itself. The fact is, Zerg CAN"T have a perfectly refined BO past when to get hatch/pool. It is noobie Bronze non-Zerg players like you that gets me on edge, coming in here bashing down on Idra or any Top Zerg player for not having a refined build. What the fuck do you think he does with his time in korea? Play WoW? TLDR: this is a rage post against a bronze noobie who dares say that Zerg players don't try hard enough to 'refine their Build Orders". EDIT: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/291211/Gomas is that you Gomas? My apologies, you're actually silver. not bad. now get to diamond b4 you attempt to bash on Idra and co. MurDeR is a quite beastly Terran player who used to play War3 iirc. And I'm fairly certain that the story of Dimaga teaching MorroW the 5Rax Reaper build is MorroW himself as I think he mentioned it in an interview a few days after IEM.
Ahh ic, ty, just that I've never seen any VoDs of him on Youtube. I'm not even sure which tournament he won. Only war3 players I know are Grubby, Madfrog, Moon and Sky.
|
On September 14 2010 11:35 LaLuSh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2010 20:20 MorroW wrote: well the sad part is that exactly that @Art_of_Kill forces terran to be the offender against zerg and toss while they always just have to defend. because once u strike 200 psi and both have many expoes, zerg can remkae 50 roaches in 30 seconnds and toss can warpin units in 5 second while terran must build their units
in sc1 terran 200 psi was stronger than toss 200 psi but toss rebuilt faster, so after a battle toss had to rebuild and then wipe out terran
but in sc2 terran 200 psi is weaker and they rebuild alot slower in comparison to production facilities costs
thats why i hope they do something about this because in theory zerg and toss never has to attack the terran because they know they have an easy ride later game. so they can put larva max to half and that wouldnt change alot except for later game where u actually stop make units as z
its very shallow match up if u know lategame terran always lose. maybe u can balance it and say ok terran have to attack and that is balanced, sure but its not so interesting if we always see terran be the attacker. all races should be able to camp, timing attack and be somewhat equal in the late game, but its not like that at all with sc2 Show nested quote +On April 14 2010 23:06 MorroW wrote:i agree with every single thing OP said and sorry i dont have any advise for u, i dont know a safe way to fe anymore. in patch5 and before i could rax fe then 6-7 i could marauder fe and now i cant fe. i cant do anything and ive tried everything just like u its not really just the early game, later game i feel like toss can simply get far better economy because his units r very cost effective and lategame is just ridiculous, if u reach that toss always wins the only way terran has been able to win this entire beta stage is through early game, as we r getting worse bio and stronger mech we are now in a position where we lose against everything rather than everything being viable. demuslim is one of the best terrans in the world and if he comes here and says this, its not just that he has been winning because he been spoiled wins by imba. terran has been worst race and we r getting changes but demuslim were one of few terrans who fought the odds of the mus. if u dont understand the level of play i suggest u to just agree with what he says and if u disagree i suggest u to be silent and accept ur the one whos missing something, not demuslim On April 14 2010 17:19 3D.Strelok wrote: In TvP now it's like that: if you perfectly know what protoss does ( maphack is on) you stay on 50% chances to win. It turns onto who is better. And if you miss what protoss does you have almost no chances to win. I really want to think it's not imbalance but thing that terran didn't find counters yet. u cant really know what toss is doing early game, if u spend 50 on a scan to see what his doing (assuming he built every single tech building near the nexus including with gateways) sure u know what he do, but u cant stop it because u just lost ur mule. if u dont scan u end up in a scenario where either u get a game rolling ur toss rolls over u because he countered ur build and u had no idea whats coming. simply think its ignorant to say its a 50% chance to win in a mu and this is if u know what toss is doing, a good toss wont let u know that and remember toss ALWAYS knows what ur doing. they r the ones with maphack not us so ur scenario is very unrealistic Show nested quote +On April 14 2010 23:21 MorroW wrote:On April 14 2010 23:15 Gretorp wrote: in my experience, tvp has now become very very very boring. you go 4 rax to keep up with the protoss and stay on one base the entire game. tech appropriately such that you don't die to protoss tech since mass immortals and mass collossus are dealt with in 2 different gas/mineral routes(ghost and vikings). don't expand till you're about to run out of minerals, lift CC and expo when minerals start to run out. at end yo uwill still be on either 4 or 5 rax, a factory not producing anything, and a starport, interchanging its add on with the rax. if you go to expo anywhere during this phase, you lose positioning which you desperately need, and you are behind in units.
I've tried going mech pretty aggressively for the past week, and it is very hard to control gas when going mech. then i ran into a warp prism + 2 immortal and lol'ed at my defending tanks. and by lol'ed i mean QQed if u r 1base vs 1base he can make dts and force u to turn back, force u to build turrets and force u to waste at least 1 scan. u cant afford this on 1base and u cant get a raven either, u also cant really contain a toss with a turret and u cant assume hes going dt and get turrets every game. on top of that you also cant scout it. and as ur paying for all this shit just to survive he can expand and hes in a great shape. 1base vs 1base toss is stronger, its the truth Show nested quote +On April 15 2010 02:01 DeMusliM wrote: I can tell we just had a huge influx of protoss players join this thread and fail to see the point.
A terran HAS to make a heavy tier 1-1.5 army just to survive the gateway push - with bunkers the whole lot, pumping every resource he has into this. Meanwhile the protoss can easily expo and out resource the terran - this is the problem - that the terran cannot survive early without getting some kinda force together, while the protoss can can tech even, while pumping out 4 warpgates and immortals while the terrans later tech units make little difference - (Immortals counter all ground terran has, and HT's counter anything that counters the immortal - see the problem late game?).
And i'm not even talking about late game, the problem for terrans right now is surviving the early game without being too far behind mid-late. People who fail to see this are enjoying the easy life of 4 warpgate rushing terrans and winning with relative ease. I spoke with several top protoss players on Europe who all agreed that the MU right now is very heavily favoured towards the protoss - and the only way they lose is if they make a big mistake micro/macro wise or don't scout (pretty hard not to scout with a obs!). Show nested quote +On April 15 2010 02:02 MorroW wrote:On April 15 2010 01:44 deo.deo wrote: haha, cant wait until the koreans really bite into the game. all those little whine threads will be shaken up completely. as it is now im pretty sure sc2 wont last in korea, why? koreans love hard games and sc2 doesnt qualify for that afaik :x On April 15 2010 01:54 Prozen wrote: Have you guys tried going 4 Rax no gas/addons FE? You build only marines and you FE while you build about 3 bunkers to defend your nat. It's been very successful for me lately, haven't lost with it yet. (Top 10 Plat Protosses). The problem with the build though is that you HAVE to make sure the Protoss is going Immortals, otherwise he can just go Collosi and rape your army rofl. It doesn't work too well on maps with two chokepoints sadly, but it worked well fro me on maps like Steppes of War. this is basically how i was playing before patch 6 was out, it even raped colosus then the sad part atm is that it doesnt work now, sentry -2 dmg along with immortal and zea meatshield fucking hard rape this build or they can make fast colosus which also rape it. they can even go mass zea sentry and rape it too :/ Show nested quote +On April 17 2010 09:26 MorroW wrote: the goal is just to create a build that survives and puts up a good fight against anything toss does. just like siege expo in sc1.
if u stop a massgateway u will be ahead and win the game, its a simple thought
the proper way how a rts game should be is that a counter to a safe expo is to expo urself to catch up rather than having a bunch of "C&C db style rock paper scissor" hard counters
im not sure if my build or any tvp build for that matter can defend all cheese yet by "scout and respond rule" but i know its the best so far, since everything else has been failing terribly lately. just watch my reps vs nightend where i desperately tried to play my old 1rax fe xd
so if it now happens to be that u can counter cheese with this build, it doesnt mean pvt is impossible. it just means ur not gonna win easily by going same 1robo3warpgate every game. hopefully this is the first step to counter fe with fe rather than counter fe with rush. if both fe i guess it will turn out to be anyones game. but if terran cant fe then terran cant win because stuff like dts or sentry with force field are just so strong 1base vs 1base that they can let u expand while terran is locked in (5sentry 2immortal and 3 zealot is never ever gonna let u down the ramp). thats why its so important that we need a fe build thats safe against all cheese
im not gonna release any reps and its best if i dont talk about this any more for now because im still not sure how good it is really. but i can imagine it being really strong and ive never lost with it where i executed it correctly yet (im low rating tho). but ill keep u guys posted of my build works or not (as in straight up play, not luck based. not as in win or lose... "without meta game abuse" as nony would say :>) LOL. Only reason I couldn't find more zerg whine is because morrow's post history mysteriously stops in around mid april. All the zerg whining took place in March and early April. Then roach armor and supply got nerfed along with 2x nerf of hydras and a bunch of other things. I only had to check 3 threads to find whine similar to zergs' whine though. I distinctly remember morrow doing lots of crying instead of just "playing the game", as is usually morrow's advice to zerg players nowadays. Protoss 1base vs Terran 1base is imbalanced =) You can't go raven ^^ "Need ways to FE safely". hahaha. Guess what, zerg needs ways to FE safely too!
|
On September 14 2010 10:22 MorroW wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2010 08:15 Raiznhell wrote:this clearly shows that MorroW is OP not terran  ah thank you, im happy i could find at least 1 comment like this on 14 pages  its annoying me so much that everyone talk so much about imbalance we have no zerg players in general. who used to win as zerg when zerg was OP? like dimaga, who else ? haypro and zpux? i cant even name any other zergs that were on top of their game... we simply have few zergs participating in each tour and i think thats a bigger factor than the actual imbalance i almost wanna switch to zerg just to show it is possible, its not a coincidence dimaga is by far best zerg atm, he simply has alot more skills than the other zergs. i pity these lower level players that blame their losses on imbalance when dimaga still manages to win. we have 30 terrans who can fight nicely on the top in tvt but who can compete in zvz? the skill gap is huge there and so few players...
you completely missed the point. no one claimed that those wins are only because of the imbalance, but the fact that one skilled zerg can still lose to a random mid level terran is what makes terran getting so many tourney wins.
you are underestimating all zerg players. lol
do you really think that there are only Terran players playing like 6 hours a day?
|
On September 14 2010 12:11 GGTeMpLaR wrote: passing an elementary statistics class should be a requirement to post on these forums
Funny that you propose that since you've not shown any understanding of elementary statistics as it pertains to the dataset at all.
|
On September 14 2010 11:59 Gomas wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2010 11:56 Subversion wrote:On September 14 2010 11:53 Gomas wrote:On September 14 2010 11:39 Sfydjklm wrote: You must be mentally challenged.
Now that guy tells me to be inventive? No sir, screw you. U should chill  Lalush's whole post revolves around the problem with countering different T strategies. I wanna assure u, that from the terran perspective zerg also has many possible and hard to scout startegies. In 99% percent of the cases, zerglings give u full control of the map, and the Ts scouting is reduced to scans. Scans are easily counterable by spreading buildings. The problem of techswitching (or whatever u wanna call what lalush stated) is there with every race. And even more so with zerg. Because they have one production facility. So, for example, I could scan a baneling nest, roach warren and spire. So you could either produce 100 mutalisks, or 100 banelings.Do i make marines?;d And the tech buildings cost u less then terran production buildings. In addition, u are not constrained by the number of production facilities u have, because u have 1 for all units. Therefore I think lalush is wrong in stating that zerg relies on scouting and luck more than other races. Anyway, this is just theory, and I don't really wanna argue, cause you're taking it too seriously. Morrow is a beast. End of story :D We can only spread buildings at T2 when we get overlord creep. Unless of course you include creep tumours, which you can't. Because using tumors to spread creep to far corners of ur base just to hide tech is retarded, and takes too long anyway. You, on the other hand, can build wherever you like. Like when you build that proxy reaper rax. Or that bunker in our natural. Or you know, how you can wall-off. To everyone saying that T is hard to scout - I completely agree. I'm just saying zerg is equally hard to scout.
Think about what you're posting. Are you a troll or a fool? I can't tell anymore.
|
The Stats are really showing that something is wrong and Blizzard tries to adjust it this month. The Problem (or is it a good thing) is that blizzard really takes his time to release patches and fixes "wierd" stuff and not the obvious things. We will have to see what comes out of this.
Also wow, Lalush killed morrow in this thread :o
|
On September 14 2010 14:04 me_viet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2010 13:49 coaL wrote:On September 14 2010 13:00 me_viet wrote:On September 14 2010 11:23 Gomas wrote: I have to agree with Morrow. Name me some zergs which are on same level as Dimaga or Idra IN ZVZ (!). None? Great.
Now remember all these TvTs u watched in go4scs and ZOTACs? Yeah the ones u all complain about. Tarson winning with Cloud. Morrow losing to Demuslim. Strelok winning with SjoW. I could go on. There is at least 30 names which can easily compete with eachother, when it comes to T.
All that shows, is that there is more good T players atm.
Tbh, i have not yet seen a single zerg apart from Idra (not even dimaga), with macro so perfect like morrows. There is tons of queing going on. Mineral floats etc, all the time. While the Ts (especially morrow) have perfect thought-out builds with 0 quening going on, perfect expansion and depot timings etc.
I have yet to see a zerg buildorder as refined as morrows 5 rax reaper or his TvP 2rax FE. For me, this is the main reason the zerg lose, not imbalance. Your post reeks of Bronze level logic. Your first sentence effectively discredit all notable names such as Sen, Sheth, LaLush, Day9 (not sure if he still plays Z), JooktuJong, all the OgS Zerg players, and a few more I can't remember (oh and MadFrog). Alot of these guys had backgrounds in Sc:BW or were well-regarded in other RTS. Now, let's be honest, who's heard of Silver before he/she caused Idra to rage in the IEM? Looking at the list, there are heaps of T names I don't recognize (who the hell is MuRdeR?) Fits perfectly the point of having Random no-name T players taking down known Z/P players. I am very interested in who these 30 T names that can compete with each other are. The fact you referenced 30 known T names is a problem in itself. Not disrespecting Morrow, but please show me a replay where Morrow makes ZERO macro mistakes. It's not possible. There is also a rumour (I have not seen source) that Morrow was taught the 5rax reapers by Dimaga, a Z player, within 1hr. The fact that Zerg has no build-order 'as refined as morrows" is a source of imbalance itself. The fact is, Zerg CAN"T have a perfectly refined BO past when to get hatch/pool. It is noobie Bronze non-Zerg players like you that gets me on edge, coming in here bashing down on Idra or any Top Zerg player for not having a refined build. What the fuck do you think he does with his time in korea? Play WoW? TLDR: this is a rage post against a bronze noobie who dares say that Zerg players don't try hard enough to 'refine their Build Orders". EDIT: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/291211/Gomas is that you Gomas? My apologies, you're actually silver. not bad. now get to diamond b4 you attempt to bash on Idra and co. MurDeR is a quite beastly Terran player who used to play War3 iirc. And I'm fairly certain that the story of Dimaga teaching MorroW the 5Rax Reaper build is MorroW himself as I think he mentioned it in an interview a few days after IEM. Ahh ic, ty, just that I've never seen any VoDs of him on Youtube. I'm not even sure which tournament he won. Only war3 players I know are Grubby, Madfrog, Moon and Sky.
Tournaments he's won are the first 2 undeniably gamer tournaments (75$ for first place in both I believe). He won a US craftcup, qualified in his group for the IEM. He's won a couple other 50$ tournaments but they were small ones not huge or anything. He won the third (might be 2nd) Fisher tournament. He's actually won quiet a few tournaments just alot of them aren't like huge or anything he never was able to register for the global gamers one for example sadly due to the beta being down for signups and his computer decided to break as I think he would have qualified easy.
But yeah he was a semi pro in wc3 before the game like died from what I know. He has been a solid terran player sense phase 1 of the beta. He streams and used to be pretty popular before he stopped streaming for awhile .
|
|
Wait a minute man. Are there seriously people who still argue that the situation is fine when you have 51 terran tournament wins opposed to 4 zerg tournament wins. No, you cannot possibly convince anyone (and I don't even know how can you convince yourself) that the situation is fine and there are just not many skilled zerg players. Also its funny to see that the only people thinking its fine are terran players.
|
I m not reading this thread's comments as i know it only contains rabid terran jerks's rage about how these stats have no significance and the game is balanced. Good job OP on collecting all this data, i was looking forwrd to sg like this
|
Guys, isnt it obvious that the ratio of skilled Terran players to skilled Zerg players is 51-4? Anyone who took the required elementary statistics class could tell you that.
Fuckign skilless noobies now-a-days....
|
Nice work!
where did you get the tournament list from?
|
On September 14 2010 16:17 Drimacus wrote: Nice work!
where did you get the tournament list from?
read the OPs second sentence.
|
On September 14 2010 05:01 Senx wrote:Community: Can you talk a little bit about the balance of SC2? Blizzard: Sure, so we feel the balance between races is good right now, every race is close to 50% win ratio on the ladders.Community: But don't you see that the imbalance amongst tournaments and top players, isn't that what you should be balancing for anyway? Blizzard: We really like to look at statistics when we balance the game, so according to our metrics, its looking good. Community: Could you answer the question directly instead? Blizzard:+ Show Spoiler +
Do you have a source for this? This didn't really happen did it? Of course every player has 50%... even if all zergs were in bronze league and the other leagues were made of exclusively P and T all players would still have 50%... Match making mandates it... so how is that relevant?
EDIT: I realize now it was a sarcastic fictitious post. Apologies.
|
I'm not sure if anyone's going to read this, but these are the reasons these data may not mean a ton, and why large disparities in racial win rates are probably the rule rather than the exception when looked at over short periods of time:
Only a small number of players have a high probability of winning a tournament (and they have race loyalty) -- what this means is that even if races are evenly distributed among top players (more on that below), they aren't likely to be evenly distributed among winning players. It's statistically much more likely that one race will dominate the top dozen or so players than that the races will be evenly distributed among those players. That means wins will appear race-biased even if everything is balanced.
There is also evidence that players are intentionally steering clear of zerg. I think this is the big problem Blizzard has to face. Of course, the fact that there aren't many zerg players means that there aren't going to be a lot of zerg wins.
My point here is just that there are strong reasons to think that these data aren't very trustworthy, and that maybe people should stop talking about them. I don't think it would be possible to demonstrate mathematically that the distribution of wins is different from what you would expect given the problems I discuss above. Even if the stats were done, interpretation would be difficult.
As far as the underrepresentation of zerg, there are a few non-mutually exclusive possible causes I can think of:
1) Zerg is weak (we already know that if this is a problem, it's only an early-mid game problem. Zerg lategame is very powerful.
2) Zerg play is underdeveloped, making zerg appear weak, when really we just need to learn how to use them and what builds are safe. I have much respect for the current SC2 progamers, but the level of play is NOT the same as the level of play in BW e.g. -- we still have a lot to learn about build orders and there are still underused units
3) People feel like zerg is weak, when it's not
4) The bias is due to factors unrelated to the strength or apparent strength of zerg (i.e. due to random sampling of a small sample size).
Note that 2) and 3) are going to feedback into themselves, increasing the bias. Honestly, I think a little bit of all of this stuff is probably going on, but the real people who know are Blizzard, and they are already doing something about it. Until then my opinion is just that people should play the game and enjoy it, and pros should do whatever it takes to win, including switching races if it comes to it (and some players do seem to feel it's necessary).
|
The problem I see as a diamond lvl player (not very good diamond).
1) If you build wrong (aka dont counter) and don't scout in time, you are usually doomed as Z.
2) There is a very delicate road to go when building drones vs army, since to much of each, big risk you will lose.
|
On September 14 2010 15:54 Jimmy Raynor wrote: Wait a minute man. Are there seriously people who still argue that the situation is fine when you have 51 terran tournament wins opposed to 4 zerg tournament wins. No, you cannot possibly convince anyone (and I don't even know how can you convince yourself) that the situation is fine and there are just not many skilled zerg players. Also its funny to see that the only people thinking its fine are terran players. Yeah man. Like i said only the good players choose terran. And now they have extended their ego into saying 'i should play zerg and win everything, to stop the whining' - Morrow but we know no1 will do that ofcourse lol. I respect IdrA and testers opinions because they have been right. Around patch like 9 tester said terran would be unbeatable. Every weak it seems a zerg or protoss falls through the cracks and an amateur terran takes their spot. I am really not sure what Blizzard has been doing this whole time. They are making like 3 small changes and possibly addign chat channels... How many people do they have working for them. There are some obvious changes that should have been made already but still no action. No1 ever uses carriers for half a year... and STILL no buff or change or anything. I don't see why they cant buff it until it finds a role in the game, then if its imba nerf it.. but atleast people will use it. Anyways i digest Terrans OP
|
On September 14 2010 10:22 MorroW wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2010 08:15 Raiznhell wrote:this clearly shows that MorroW is OP not terran  ah thank you, im happy i could find at least 1 comment like this on 14 pages  its annoying me so much that everyone talk so much about imbalance we have no zerg players in general. who used to win as zerg when zerg was OP? like dimaga, who else ? haypro and zpux? i cant even name any other zergs that were on top of their game... we simply have few zergs participating in each tour and i think thats a bigger factor than the actual imbalance i almost wanna switch to zerg just to show it is possible, its not a coincidence dimaga is by far best zerg atm, he simply has alot more skills than the other zergs. i pity these lower level players that blame their losses on imbalance when dimaga still manages to win. we have 30 terrans who can fight nicely on the top in tvt but who can compete in zvz? the skill gap is huge there and so few players...
what a dumb post, do you even comprehend the state of zvz, how can you compare it to tvt is beyond me. not to mention that im getting really tired of people abusing dimaga's name so much, when he himself considers the matchup broken, he is just not so vocal about it, cause he'd be instantly labeled a whiner by muppets like you. I'd happily see you switch to zerg and get pummeled, just so you understand the problem, before you try to address it. Gogo, amuse me, switch to Z.
|
|
|
|