• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:29
CEST 10:29
KST 17:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202556RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
What tournaments are world championships? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 738 users

Tournament winners since release - Page 19

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 43 Next All
Skullflower
Profile Joined July 2010
United States3779 Posts
September 14 2010 04:49 GMT
#361
On September 14 2010 13:00 me_viet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 11:23 Gomas wrote:
I have to agree with Morrow. Name me some zergs which are on same level as Dimaga or Idra IN ZVZ (!). None? Great.

Now remember all these TvTs u watched in go4scs and ZOTACs? Yeah the ones u all complain about. Tarson winning with Cloud. Morrow losing to Demuslim. Strelok winning with SjoW. I could go on. There is at least 30 names which can easily compete with eachother, when it comes to T.

All that shows, is that there is more good T players atm.

Tbh, i have not yet seen a single zerg apart from Idra (not even dimaga), with macro so perfect like morrows. There is tons of queing going on. Mineral floats etc, all the time. While the Ts (especially morrow) have perfect thought-out builds with 0 quening going on, perfect expansion and depot timings etc.

I have yet to see a zerg buildorder as refined as morrows 5 rax reaper or his TvP 2rax FE. For me, this is the main reason the zerg lose, not imbalance.



Your post reeks of Bronze level logic.

Your first sentence effectively discredit all notable names such as Sen, Sheth, LaLush, Day9 (not sure if he still plays Z), JooktuJong, all the OgS Zerg players, and a few more I can't remember (oh and MadFrog). Alot of these guys had backgrounds in Sc:BW or were well-regarded in other RTS. Now, let's be honest, who's heard of Silver before he/she caused Idra to rage in the IEM? Looking at the list, there are heaps of T names I don't recognize (who the hell is MuRdeR?) Fits perfectly the point of having Random no-name T players taking down known Z/P players.

I am very interested in who these 30 T names that can compete with each other are. The fact you referenced 30 known T names is a problem in itself. Not disrespecting Morrow, but please show me a replay where Morrow makes ZERO macro mistakes. It's not possible.

There is also a rumour (I have not seen source) that Morrow was taught the 5rax reapers by Dimaga, a Z player, within 1hr.

The fact that Zerg has no build-order 'as refined as morrows" is a source of imbalance itself. The fact is, Zerg CAN"T have a perfectly refined BO past when to get hatch/pool. It is noobie Bronze non-Zerg players like you that gets me on edge, coming in here bashing down on Idra or any Top Zerg player for not having a refined build. What the fuck do you think he does with his time in korea? Play WoW?

TLDR: this is a rage post against a bronze noobie who dares say that Zerg players don't try hard enough to 'refine their Build Orders".

EDIT: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/291211/Gomas is that you Gomas? My apologies, you're actually silver. not bad. now get to diamond b4 you attempt to bash on Idra and co.


MurDeR is a quite beastly Terran player who used to play War3 iirc. And I'm fairly certain that the story of Dimaga teaching MorroW the 5Rax Reaper build is MorroW himself as I think he mentioned it in an interview a few days after IEM.
The ruminations are mine, let the world be yours.
dogabutila
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1437 Posts
September 14 2010 04:55 GMT
#362
On September 14 2010 10:22 MorroW wrote:
i almost wanna switch to zerg just to show it is possible, its not a coincidence dimaga is by far best zerg atm, he simply has alot more skills than the other zergs. i pity these lower level players that blame their losses on imbalance when dimaga still manages to win. we have 30 terrans who can fight nicely on the top in tvt but who can compete in zvz? the skill gap is huge there and so few players...



DO IT.
Make all the zerg tears stop. Or maybe you are too scared to cause you know you wont do as well as zerg....
Baller Fanclub || CheAse Fanclub || Scarlett Fanclub || LJD FIGHTING!
me_viet
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Australia1350 Posts
September 14 2010 05:04 GMT
#363
On September 14 2010 13:49 coaL wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 13:00 me_viet wrote:
On September 14 2010 11:23 Gomas wrote:
I have to agree with Morrow. Name me some zergs which are on same level as Dimaga or Idra IN ZVZ (!). None? Great.

Now remember all these TvTs u watched in go4scs and ZOTACs? Yeah the ones u all complain about. Tarson winning with Cloud. Morrow losing to Demuslim. Strelok winning with SjoW. I could go on. There is at least 30 names which can easily compete with eachother, when it comes to T.

All that shows, is that there is more good T players atm.

Tbh, i have not yet seen a single zerg apart from Idra (not even dimaga), with macro so perfect like morrows. There is tons of queing going on. Mineral floats etc, all the time. While the Ts (especially morrow) have perfect thought-out builds with 0 quening going on, perfect expansion and depot timings etc.

I have yet to see a zerg buildorder as refined as morrows 5 rax reaper or his TvP 2rax FE. For me, this is the main reason the zerg lose, not imbalance.



Your post reeks of Bronze level logic.

Your first sentence effectively discredit all notable names such as Sen, Sheth, LaLush, Day9 (not sure if he still plays Z), JooktuJong, all the OgS Zerg players, and a few more I can't remember (oh and MadFrog). Alot of these guys had backgrounds in Sc:BW or were well-regarded in other RTS. Now, let's be honest, who's heard of Silver before he/she caused Idra to rage in the IEM? Looking at the list, there are heaps of T names I don't recognize (who the hell is MuRdeR?) Fits perfectly the point of having Random no-name T players taking down known Z/P players.

I am very interested in who these 30 T names that can compete with each other are. The fact you referenced 30 known T names is a problem in itself. Not disrespecting Morrow, but please show me a replay where Morrow makes ZERO macro mistakes. It's not possible.

There is also a rumour (I have not seen source) that Morrow was taught the 5rax reapers by Dimaga, a Z player, within 1hr.

The fact that Zerg has no build-order 'as refined as morrows" is a source of imbalance itself. The fact is, Zerg CAN"T have a perfectly refined BO past when to get hatch/pool. It is noobie Bronze non-Zerg players like you that gets me on edge, coming in here bashing down on Idra or any Top Zerg player for not having a refined build. What the fuck do you think he does with his time in korea? Play WoW?

TLDR: this is a rage post against a bronze noobie who dares say that Zerg players don't try hard enough to 'refine their Build Orders".

EDIT: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/291211/Gomas is that you Gomas? My apologies, you're actually silver. not bad. now get to diamond b4 you attempt to bash on Idra and co.


MurDeR is a quite beastly Terran player who used to play War3 iirc. And I'm fairly certain that the story of Dimaga teaching MorroW the 5Rax Reaper build is MorroW himself as I think he mentioned it in an interview a few days after IEM.



Ahh ic, ty, just that I've never seen any VoDs of him on Youtube. I'm not even sure which tournament he won. Only war3 players I know are Grubby, Madfrog, Moon and Sky.
Kelethius
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada187 Posts
September 14 2010 05:13 GMT
#364
On September 14 2010 11:35 LaLuSh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2010 20:20 MorroW wrote:
well the sad part is that exactly that @Art_of_Kill forces terran to be the offender against zerg and toss while they always just have to defend.
because once u strike 200 psi and both have many expoes, zerg can remkae 50 roaches in 30 seconnds and toss can warpin units in 5 second while terran must build their units

in sc1 terran 200 psi was stronger than toss 200 psi but toss rebuilt faster, so after a battle toss had to rebuild and then wipe out terran

but in sc2 terran 200 psi is weaker and they rebuild alot slower in comparison to production facilities costs

thats why i hope they do something about this because in theory zerg and toss never has to attack the terran because they know they have an easy ride later game. so they can put larva max to half and that wouldnt change alot except for later game where u actually stop make units as z

its very shallow match up if u know lategame terran always lose. maybe u can balance it and say ok terran have to attack and that is balanced, sure but its not so interesting if we always see terran be the attacker. all races should be able to camp, timing attack and be somewhat equal in the late game, but its not like that at all with sc2


Show nested quote +
On April 14 2010 23:06 MorroW wrote:
i agree with every single thing OP said

and sorry i dont have any advise for u, i dont know a safe way to fe anymore. in patch5 and before i could rax fe then 6-7 i could marauder fe and now i cant fe. i cant do anything and ive tried everything just like u

its not really just the early game, later game i feel like toss can simply get far better economy because his units r very cost effective

and lategame is just ridiculous, if u reach that toss always wins


the only way terran has been able to win this entire beta stage is through early game, as we r getting worse bio and stronger mech we are now in a position where we lose against everything rather than everything being viable.

demuslim is one of the best terrans in the world and if he comes here and says this, its not just that he has been winning because he been spoiled wins by imba. terran has been worst race and we r getting changes but demuslim were one of few terrans who fought the odds of the mus. if u dont understand the level of play i suggest u to just agree with what he says and if u disagree i suggest u to be silent and accept ur the one whos missing something, not demuslim

On April 14 2010 17:19 3D.Strelok wrote:
In TvP now it's like that: if you perfectly know what protoss does ( maphack is on) you stay on 50% chances to win. It turns onto who is better. And if you miss what protoss does you have almost no chances to win. I really want to think it's not imbalance but thing that terran didn't find counters yet.


u cant really know what toss is doing early game, if u spend 50 on a scan to see what his doing (assuming he built every single tech building near the nexus including with gateways) sure u know what he do, but u cant stop it because u just lost ur mule.
if u dont scan u end up in a scenario where either u get a game rolling ur toss rolls over u because he countered ur build and u had no idea whats coming. simply think its ignorant to say its a 50% chance to win in a mu and this is if u know what toss is doing, a good toss wont let u know that and remember toss ALWAYS knows what ur doing. they r the ones with maphack not us so ur scenario is very unrealistic


Show nested quote +
On April 14 2010 23:21 MorroW wrote:
On April 14 2010 23:15 Gretorp wrote:
in my experience, tvp has now become very very very boring. you go 4 rax to keep up with the protoss and stay on one base the entire game. tech appropriately such that you don't die to protoss tech since mass immortals and mass collossus are dealt with in 2 different gas/mineral routes(ghost and vikings). don't expand till you're about to run out of minerals, lift CC and expo when minerals start to run out. at end yo uwill still be on either 4 or 5 rax, a factory not producing anything, and a starport, interchanging its add on with the rax. if you go to expo anywhere during this phase, you lose positioning which you desperately need, and you are behind in units.

I've tried going mech pretty aggressively for the past week, and it is very hard to control gas when going mech. then i ran into a warp prism + 2 immortal and lol'ed at my defending tanks. and by lol'ed i mean QQed

if u r 1base vs 1base he can make dts and force u to turn back, force u to build turrets and force u to waste at least 1 scan. u cant afford this on 1base and u cant get a raven either, u also cant really contain a toss with a turret and u cant assume hes going dt and get turrets every game. on top of that you also cant scout it.
and as ur paying for all this shit just to survive he can expand and hes in a great shape.
1base vs 1base toss is stronger, its the truth


Show nested quote +
On April 15 2010 02:01 DeMusliM wrote:
I can tell we just had a huge influx of protoss players join this thread and fail to see the point.

A terran HAS to make a heavy tier 1-1.5 army just to survive the gateway push - with bunkers the whole lot, pumping every resource he has into this. Meanwhile the protoss can easily expo and out resource the terran - this is the problem - that the terran cannot survive early without getting some kinda force together, while the protoss can can tech even, while pumping out 4 warpgates and immortals while the terrans later tech units make little difference - (Immortals counter all ground terran has, and HT's counter anything that counters the immortal - see the problem late game?).

And i'm not even talking about late game, the problem for terrans right now is surviving the early game without being too far behind mid-late. People who fail to see this are enjoying the easy life of 4 warpgate rushing terrans and winning with relative ease.
I spoke with several top protoss players on Europe who all agreed that the MU right now is very heavily favoured towards the protoss - and the only way they lose is if they make a big mistake micro/macro wise or don't scout (pretty hard not to scout with a obs!).


Show nested quote +
On April 15 2010 02:02 MorroW wrote:
On April 15 2010 01:44 deo.deo wrote:
haha, cant wait until the koreans really bite into the game. all those little whine threads will be shaken up completely.

as it is now im pretty sure sc2 wont last in korea, why? koreans love hard games and sc2 doesnt qualify for that afaik :x

On April 15 2010 01:54 Prozen wrote:
Have you guys tried going 4 Rax no gas/addons FE? You build only marines and you FE while you build about 3 bunkers to defend your nat. It's been very successful for me lately, haven't lost with it yet. (Top 10 Plat Protosses). The problem with the build though is that you HAVE to make sure the Protoss is going Immortals, otherwise he can just go Collosi and rape your army rofl. It doesn't work too well on maps with two chokepoints sadly, but it worked well fro me on maps like Steppes of War.

this is basically how i was playing before patch 6 was out, it even raped colosus then
the sad part atm is that it doesnt work now, sentry -2 dmg along with immortal and zea meatshield fucking hard rape this build or they can make fast colosus which also rape it. they can even go mass zea sentry and rape it too :/


Show nested quote +
On April 17 2010 09:26 MorroW wrote:
the goal is just to create a build that survives and puts up a good fight against anything toss does. just like siege expo in sc1.

if u stop a massgateway u will be ahead and win the game, its a simple thought

the proper way how a rts game should be is that a counter to a safe expo is to expo urself to catch up rather than having a bunch of "C&C db style rock paper scissor" hard counters

im not sure if my build or any tvp build for that matter can defend all cheese yet by "scout and respond rule" but i know its the best so far, since everything else has been failing terribly lately. just watch my reps vs nightend where i desperately tried to play my old 1rax fe xd

so if it now happens to be that u can counter cheese with this build, it doesnt mean pvt is impossible. it just means ur not gonna win easily by going same 1robo3warpgate every game. hopefully this is the first step to counter fe with fe rather than counter fe with rush. if both fe i guess it will turn out to be anyones game. but if terran cant fe then terran cant win because stuff like dts or sentry with force field are just so strong 1base vs 1base that they can let u expand while terran is locked in (5sentry 2immortal and 3 zealot is never ever gonna let u down the ramp). thats why its so important that we need a fe build thats safe against all cheese

im not gonna release any reps and its best if i dont talk about this any more for now because im still not sure how good it is really. but i can imagine it being really strong and ive never lost with it where i executed it correctly yet (im low rating tho). but ill keep u guys posted of my build works or not (as in straight up play, not luck based. not as in win or lose... "without meta game abuse" as nony would say :>)



LOL. Only reason I couldn't find more zerg whine is because morrow's post history mysteriously stops in around mid april. All the zerg whining took place in March and early April. Then roach armor and supply got nerfed along with 2x nerf of hydras and a bunch of other things.

I only had to check 3 threads to find whine similar to zergs' whine though.

I distinctly remember morrow doing lots of crying instead of just "playing the game", as is usually morrow's advice to zerg players nowadays.

Protoss 1base vs Terran 1base is imbalanced =) You can't go raven ^^ "Need ways to FE safely". hahaha. Guess what, zerg needs ways to FE safely too!

ilbh
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Brazil1606 Posts
September 14 2010 05:16 GMT
#365
On September 14 2010 10:22 MorroW wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 08:15 Raiznhell wrote:
this clearly shows that MorroW is OP not terran

ah thank you, im happy i could find at least 1 comment like this on 14 pages its annoying me so much that everyone talk so much about imbalance

we have no zerg players in general. who used to win as zerg when zerg was OP? like dimaga, who else ? haypro and zpux? i cant even name any other zergs that were on top of their game... we simply have few zergs participating in each tour and i think thats a bigger factor than the actual imbalance

i almost wanna switch to zerg just to show it is possible, its not a coincidence dimaga is by far best zerg atm, he simply has alot more skills than the other zergs. i pity these lower level players that blame their losses on imbalance when dimaga still manages to win. we have 30 terrans who can fight nicely on the top in tvt but who can compete in zvz? the skill gap is huge there and so few players...


you completely missed the point. no one claimed that those wins are only because of the imbalance, but the fact that one skilled zerg can still lose to a random mid level terran is what makes terran getting so many tourney wins.

you are underestimating all zerg players. lol

do you really think that there are only Terran players playing like 6 hours a day?
Part of the inhumanity of the computer is that, once it is competently programmed and working smoothly, it is completely honest.
hdkhang
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia183 Posts
September 14 2010 05:26 GMT
#366
On September 14 2010 12:11 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
passing an elementary statistics class should be a requirement to post on these forums


Funny that you propose that since you've not shown any understanding of elementary statistics as it pertains to the dataset at all.
Lennon
Profile Joined February 2010
United Kingdom2275 Posts
September 14 2010 05:31 GMT
#367
On September 14 2010 11:59 Gomas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 11:56 Subversion wrote:
On September 14 2010 11:53 Gomas wrote:
On September 14 2010 11:39 Sfydjklm wrote:
You must be mentally challenged.


Now that guy tells me to be inventive? No sir, screw you.


U should chill

Lalush's whole post revolves around the problem with countering different T strategies.

I wanna assure u, that from the terran perspective zerg also has many possible and hard to scout startegies. In 99% percent of the cases, zerglings give u full control of the map, and the Ts scouting is reduced to scans. Scans are easily counterable by spreading buildings.

The problem of techswitching (or whatever u wanna call what lalush stated) is there with every race. And even more so with zerg. Because they have one production facility. So, for example, I could scan a baneling nest, roach warren and spire. So you could either produce 100 mutalisks, or 100 banelings.Do i make marines?;d And the tech buildings cost u less then terran production buildings. In addition, u are not constrained by the number of production facilities u have, because u have 1 for all units.

Therefore I think lalush is wrong in stating that zerg relies on scouting and luck more than other races.

Anyway, this is just theory, and I don't really wanna argue, cause you're taking it too seriously.

Morrow is a beast. End of story :D


We can only spread buildings at T2 when we get overlord creep. Unless of course you include creep tumours, which you can't.

Because using tumors to spread creep to far corners of ur base just to hide tech is retarded, and takes too long anyway.

You, on the other hand, can build wherever you like. Like when you build that proxy reaper rax. Or that bunker in our natural. Or you know, how you can wall-off.


To everyone saying that T is hard to scout - I completely agree.

I'm just saying zerg is equally hard to scout.


Think about what you're posting. Are you a troll or a fool? I can't tell anymore.
Teeny
Profile Joined March 2010
Austria885 Posts
September 14 2010 06:32 GMT
#368
The Stats are really showing that something is wrong and Blizzard tries to adjust it this month. The Problem (or is it a good thing) is that blizzard really takes his time to release patches and fixes "wierd" stuff and not the obvious things. We will have to see what comes out of this.

Also wow, Lalush killed morrow in this thread :o
blade55555
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States17423 Posts
September 14 2010 06:33 GMT
#369
On September 14 2010 14:04 me_viet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 13:49 coaL wrote:
On September 14 2010 13:00 me_viet wrote:
On September 14 2010 11:23 Gomas wrote:
I have to agree with Morrow. Name me some zergs which are on same level as Dimaga or Idra IN ZVZ (!). None? Great.

Now remember all these TvTs u watched in go4scs and ZOTACs? Yeah the ones u all complain about. Tarson winning with Cloud. Morrow losing to Demuslim. Strelok winning with SjoW. I could go on. There is at least 30 names which can easily compete with eachother, when it comes to T.

All that shows, is that there is more good T players atm.

Tbh, i have not yet seen a single zerg apart from Idra (not even dimaga), with macro so perfect like morrows. There is tons of queing going on. Mineral floats etc, all the time. While the Ts (especially morrow) have perfect thought-out builds with 0 quening going on, perfect expansion and depot timings etc.

I have yet to see a zerg buildorder as refined as morrows 5 rax reaper or his TvP 2rax FE. For me, this is the main reason the zerg lose, not imbalance.



Your post reeks of Bronze level logic.

Your first sentence effectively discredit all notable names such as Sen, Sheth, LaLush, Day9 (not sure if he still plays Z), JooktuJong, all the OgS Zerg players, and a few more I can't remember (oh and MadFrog). Alot of these guys had backgrounds in Sc:BW or were well-regarded in other RTS. Now, let's be honest, who's heard of Silver before he/she caused Idra to rage in the IEM? Looking at the list, there are heaps of T names I don't recognize (who the hell is MuRdeR?) Fits perfectly the point of having Random no-name T players taking down known Z/P players.

I am very interested in who these 30 T names that can compete with each other are. The fact you referenced 30 known T names is a problem in itself. Not disrespecting Morrow, but please show me a replay where Morrow makes ZERO macro mistakes. It's not possible.

There is also a rumour (I have not seen source) that Morrow was taught the 5rax reapers by Dimaga, a Z player, within 1hr.

The fact that Zerg has no build-order 'as refined as morrows" is a source of imbalance itself. The fact is, Zerg CAN"T have a perfectly refined BO past when to get hatch/pool. It is noobie Bronze non-Zerg players like you that gets me on edge, coming in here bashing down on Idra or any Top Zerg player for not having a refined build. What the fuck do you think he does with his time in korea? Play WoW?

TLDR: this is a rage post against a bronze noobie who dares say that Zerg players don't try hard enough to 'refine their Build Orders".

EDIT: http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/291211/Gomas is that you Gomas? My apologies, you're actually silver. not bad. now get to diamond b4 you attempt to bash on Idra and co.


MurDeR is a quite beastly Terran player who used to play War3 iirc. And I'm fairly certain that the story of Dimaga teaching MorroW the 5Rax Reaper build is MorroW himself as I think he mentioned it in an interview a few days after IEM.



Ahh ic, ty, just that I've never seen any VoDs of him on Youtube. I'm not even sure which tournament he won. Only war3 players I know are Grubby, Madfrog, Moon and Sky.


Tournaments he's won are the first 2 undeniably gamer tournaments (75$ for first place in both I believe). He won a US craftcup, qualified in his group for the IEM. He's won a couple other 50$ tournaments but they were small ones not huge or anything. He won the third (might be 2nd) Fisher tournament. He's actually won quiet a few tournaments just alot of them aren't like huge or anything he never was able to register for the global gamers one for example sadly due to the beta being down for signups and his computer decided to break as I think he would have qualified easy.

But yeah he was a semi pro in wc3 before the game like died from what I know. He has been a solid terran player sense phase 1 of the beta. He streams and used to be pretty popular before he stopped streaming for awhile .
When I think of something else, something will go here
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 14 2010 06:49 GMT
#370
--- Nuked ---
Jimmy Raynor
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
902 Posts
September 14 2010 06:54 GMT
#371
Wait a minute man. Are there seriously people who still argue that the situation is fine when you have 51 terran tournament wins opposed to 4 zerg tournament wins. No, you cannot possibly convince anyone (and I don't even know how can you convince yourself) that the situation is fine and there are just not many skilled zerg players. Also its funny to see that the only people thinking its fine are terran players.
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7377 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-14 07:00:20
September 14 2010 06:59 GMT
#372
I m not reading this thread's comments as i know it only contains rabid terran jerks's rage about how these stats have no significance and the game is balanced.
Good job OP on collecting all this data, i was looking forwrd to sg like this
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
Butigroove
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Seychelles2061 Posts
September 14 2010 07:07 GMT
#373
Guys, isnt it obvious that the ratio of skilled Terran players to skilled Zerg players is 51-4? Anyone who took the required elementary statistics class could tell you that.

Fuckign skilless noobies now-a-days....
beach beers buds beezies b-b-b-baaanelings
Drimacus
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany92 Posts
September 14 2010 07:17 GMT
#374
Nice work!

where did you get the tournament list from?
FliedLice
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Germany7494 Posts
September 14 2010 07:21 GMT
#375
On September 14 2010 16:17 Drimacus wrote:
Nice work!

where did you get the tournament list from?


read the OPs second sentence.
Kevmeister @ Dota2
Crushgroove
Profile Joined July 2010
United States793 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-14 07:27:49
September 14 2010 07:26 GMT
#376
On September 14 2010 05:01 Senx wrote:
Community: Can you talk a little bit about the balance of SC2?

Blizzard: Sure, so we feel the balance between races is good right now, every race is close to 50% win ratio on the ladders.

Community: But don't you see that the imbalance amongst tournaments and top players, isn't that what you should be balancing for anyway?

Blizzard
: We really like to look at statistics when we balance the game, so according to our metrics, its looking good.

Community: Could you answer the question directly instead?

Blizzard:

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]



Do you have a source for this? This didn't really happen did it? Of course every player has 50%... even if all zergs were in bronze league and the other leagues were made of exclusively P and T all players would still have 50%... Match making mandates it... so how is that relevant?

EDIT: I realize now it was a sarcastic fictitious post. Apologies.
[In Korea on Vaca] "Why would I go to the park and climb a mountain? There are video games on f*cking TV!" - Kazuke
GagnarTheUnruly
Profile Joined July 2010
United States655 Posts
September 14 2010 07:34 GMT
#377
I'm not sure if anyone's going to read this, but these are the reasons these data may not mean a ton, and why large disparities in racial win rates are probably the rule rather than the exception when looked at over short periods of time:

Only a small number of players have a high probability of winning a tournament (and they have race loyalty) -- what this means is that even if races are evenly distributed among top players (more on that below), they aren't likely to be evenly distributed among winning players. It's statistically much more likely that one race will dominate the top dozen or so players than that the races will be evenly distributed among those players. That means wins will appear race-biased even if everything is balanced.

There is also evidence that players are intentionally steering clear of zerg. I think this is the big problem Blizzard has to face. Of course, the fact that there aren't many zerg players means that there aren't going to be a lot of zerg wins.

My point here is just that there are strong reasons to think that these data aren't very trustworthy, and that maybe people should stop talking about them. I don't think it would be possible to demonstrate mathematically that the distribution of wins is different from what you would expect given the problems I discuss above. Even if the stats were done, interpretation would be difficult.

As far as the underrepresentation of zerg, there are a few non-mutually exclusive possible causes I can think of:

1) Zerg is weak (we already know that if this is a problem, it's only an early-mid game problem. Zerg lategame is very powerful.

2) Zerg play is underdeveloped, making zerg appear weak, when really we just need to learn how to use them and what builds are safe. I have much respect for the current SC2 progamers, but the level of play is NOT the same as the level of play in BW e.g. -- we still have a lot to learn about build orders and there are still underused units

3) People feel like zerg is weak, when it's not

4) The bias is due to factors unrelated to the strength or apparent strength of zerg (i.e. due to random sampling of a small sample size).

Note that 2) and 3) are going to feedback into themselves, increasing the bias. Honestly, I think a little bit of all of this stuff is probably going on, but the real people who know are Blizzard, and they are already doing something about it. Until then my opinion is just that people should play the game and enjoy it, and pros should do whatever it takes to win, including switching races if it comes to it (and some players do seem to feel it's necessary).
fanboii
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden14 Posts
September 14 2010 07:35 GMT
#378
The problem I see as a diamond lvl player (not very good diamond).

1) If you build wrong (aka dont counter) and don't scout in time, you are usually doomed as Z.

2) There is a very delicate road to go when building drones vs army, since to much of each, big risk you will lose.
illumination
Profile Joined August 2010
Korea (South)248 Posts
September 14 2010 07:35 GMT
#379
On September 14 2010 15:54 Jimmy Raynor wrote:
Wait a minute man. Are there seriously people who still argue that the situation is fine when you have 51 terran tournament wins opposed to 4 zerg tournament wins. No, you cannot possibly convince anyone (and I don't even know how can you convince yourself) that the situation is fine and there are just not many skilled zerg players. Also its funny to see that the only people thinking its fine are terran players.

Yeah man. Like i said only the good players choose terran. And now they have extended their ego into saying 'i should play zerg and win everything, to stop the whining' - Morrow but we know no1 will do that ofcourse lol.

I respect IdrA and testers opinions because they have been right. Around patch like 9 tester said terran would be unbeatable. Every weak it seems a zerg or protoss falls through the cracks and an amateur terran takes their spot. I am really not sure what Blizzard has been doing this whole time. They are making like 3 small changes and possibly addign chat channels... How many people do they have working for them. There are some obvious changes that should have been made already but still no action. No1 ever uses carriers for half a year... and STILL no buff or change or anything. I don't see why they cant buff it until it finds a role in the game, then if its imba nerf it.. but atleast people will use it. Anyways i digest Terrans OP
Welcome to TL - Where Terran have been teaching the Zerg / Toss pros how to play since Patch 11
Mentos
Profile Joined August 2003
United Kingdom203 Posts
September 14 2010 07:41 GMT
#380
On September 14 2010 10:22 MorroW wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2010 08:15 Raiznhell wrote:
this clearly shows that MorroW is OP not terran

ah thank you, im happy i could find at least 1 comment like this on 14 pages its annoying me so much that everyone talk so much about imbalance

we have no zerg players in general. who used to win as zerg when zerg was OP? like dimaga, who else ? haypro and zpux? i cant even name any other zergs that were on top of their game... we simply have few zergs participating in each tour and i think thats a bigger factor than the actual imbalance

i almost wanna switch to zerg just to show it is possible, its not a coincidence dimaga is by far best zerg atm, he simply has alot more skills than the other zergs. i pity these lower level players that blame their losses on imbalance when dimaga still manages to win. we have 30 terrans who can fight nicely on the top in tvt but who can compete in zvz? the skill gap is huge there and so few players...


what a dumb post, do you even comprehend the state of zvz, how can you compare it to tvt is beyond me. not to mention that im getting really tired of people abusing dimaga's name so much, when he himself considers the matchup broken, he is just not so vocal about it, cause he'd be instantly labeled a whiner by muppets like you.
I'd happily see you switch to zerg and get pummeled, just so you understand the problem, before you try to address it. Gogo, amuse me, switch to Z.
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 31m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Creator 103
ProTech91
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 6571
ToSsGirL 595
Larva 191
Zeus 188
BeSt 106
Backho 81
JulyZerg 67
NotJumperer 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Britney 0
Dota 2
XaKoH 742
XcaliburYe251
Fuzer 179
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1104
Other Games
summit1g7775
ceh9547
SortOf53
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 43
Other Games
BasetradeTV41
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt1014
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
2h 31m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
5h 31m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 1h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 5h
CSO Cup
1d 7h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.