EPTIts funny b/c he changed to Tues so he could do funday monday, but he didnt do one this week >.>
Official State of the Game Podcast Thread - Page 203
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Chriamon
United States886 Posts
Its funny b/c he changed to Tues so he could do funday monday, but he didnt do one this week >.> | ||
|
lim1017
Canada1278 Posts
| ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:07 Chriamon wrote: Its funny b/c he changed to Tues so he could do funday monday, but he didnt do one this week >.> He changed to tues so when he came home from tournaments that go all weekend he could rest. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:09 Bosu wrote: He changed to tues so when he came home from tournaments that go all weekend he could rest. Which was also the reason there was no funday monday this week. It all makes sense now  | ||
|
ZerOfy
United Kingdom405 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:02 Oslo wrote: tomorrow around 7-8am uk time  Cheers! =) | ||
|
Skuller
United States197 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:08 lim1017 wrote: are we going to need a replacement for incontrol? or will he be waking up in korea? I'm actually hoping to get clarification on this. Will he continue to coach students in the US? If he is, then his schedule will be on US timezone while in Korea. If he focuses on gaming the next couple of weeks, it'd be awesome if he could round up some of the foreigners in Korea on the podcast. | ||
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
On November 10 2010 03:04 frog HERO wrote: lol, that rule is absolutely ridiculous. Isn't it much more reasonable to eliminate the offending player's map choosing privileges? here's what's ridiculous: not actually going to read the rules you complain so vehemently about. Players found breaking Rules #5-9 will be issued a Technical Foul. If an SC2 Player is penalized with a Technical Foul, they will lose their next opportunity to choose the Map for the upcoming Game. Instead, their opponent will choose the Map. SC2 Players who receive three Technical Fouls for one Match will be given a one Game penalty. After three Technical Fouls, each subsequent Technical Foul in the Match will result in another one Game penalty. When an SC2 Player receives a one Game penalty their opponent will be allowed to select one unit, other than Probe, Drone, SCV, Overlord, or Queen, that the Player with the one Game penalty can’t create during the upcoming Game. If the Player with the one Game penalty were to create that unit during the upcoming Game, they would Forfeit the Game. + Show Spoiler [Rules5-9] + # No standing on chairs, tables, or other tournament equipment. # No verbal abuse of Referees and other tournament officials. Verbal abuse of a Referee or other tournament official includes, but is not limited to, the use of vulgar language directed at a Referee or other tournament official, the use of insulting words or gestures directed at a Referee or other tournament official, and excessive argument with a Referee or other tournament official resulting in the delay of a Match. # No use of vulgar language directed at a Player, Coach, or Spectator. # No inciting Spectators into taunting a Player, Coach, or Spectator. # No excessive taunting or celebration by Coaches or Players. Excessive taunting or celebration includes, but is not limited to, post-Match taunting or celebration directed at or referencing an opposing Player(s) and/or Coach. Post-Match interactions between opposing Players and Coaches must be limited to acts of sportsmanship. | ||
|
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:22 Skuller wrote: I'm actually hoping to get clarification on this. Will he continue to coach students in the US? If he is, then his schedule will be on US timezone while in Korea. If he focuses on gaming the next couple of weeks, it'd be awesome if he could round up some of the foreigners in Korea on the podcast. The time the podcast is currently recorded is actually the middle of the day in Korea, so I wouldn't expect there to be too many problems | ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
| ||
|
LGDArm
Canada27 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:29 MrCon wrote: It should be live very soon, no ? Not for another 7 hours or so. | ||
|
-Frog-
United States514 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:25 Antoine wrote: here's what's ridiculous: not actually going to read the rules you complain so vehemently about. + Show Spoiler [Rules5-9] + # No standing on chairs, tables, or other tournament equipment. # No verbal abuse of Referees and other tournament officials. Verbal abuse of a Referee or other tournament official includes, but is not limited to, the use of vulgar language directed at a Referee or other tournament official, the use of insulting words or gestures directed at a Referee or other tournament official, and excessive argument with a Referee or other tournament official resulting in the delay of a Match. # No use of vulgar language directed at a Player, Coach, or Spectator. # No inciting Spectators into taunting a Player, Coach, or Spectator. # No excessive taunting or celebration by Coaches or Players. Excessive taunting or celebration includes, but is not limited to, post-Match taunting or celebration directed at or referencing an opposing Player(s) and/or Coach. Post-Match interactions between opposing Players and Coaches must be limited to acts of sportsmanship. Ok. I still don't believe that giving one player the option to ban the other player from making a unit is anything but ridiculous. What was your point? | ||
|
Erucious
Norway393 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
Thanx a lot | ||
|
PlaGuE_R
France1151 Posts
| ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
|
Madkipz
Norway1643 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:33 frog HERO wrote: Ok. I still don't believe that giving one player the option to ban the other player from making a unit is anything but ridiculous. What was your point? his point is that even if the rules existed and are retarded it wont ever happen. | ||
|
BlueBird.
United States3889 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:33 frog HERO wrote: Ok. I still don't believe that giving one player the option to ban the other player from making a unit is anything but ridiculous. What was your point? his point was that if you plan on going to a tournament, and being a complete dick, you deserve what you get coming to you.. MLG is a professionally run tournament, which means the players in it need to act professional. Personally I don't think the rule is harsh enough. They need to just throw them out of the tournament or give them a game loss if they are going to violate those particular rules. Obviously this hasn't been an issue yet,(at least from what I have heard) in Starcraft 2, but people acting out has been in issue in past games at MLG, there have even been physical confrontations at events. Even my halo 3 team got a technical in an event cause one of my team mates screamed gtfo of my hill... when we took the series by literally one second, so this stuff does happen, again.. I don't see it being a huge problem in SC2 due to the nature of the game, but with new players streaming in, you never know... I don't see how it's ridiculous at all, I think it's ridiculous that there NEEDs to be these kinds of rules cause people don't know how to act in a public setting edit: ok that wasn't his point, but I stand by my statement | ||
|
-Frog-
United States514 Posts
On November 10 2010 05:45 Madkipz wrote: his point is that even if the rules existed and are retarded it wont ever happen. It won't ever happen? I don't see how you could possibly make that claim. It would take a player being more unruly than normal but it is entirely possible. Of course we should expect that our players are respectful of one another but this rule takes it too far. It makes the game a farce and not a competition. | ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
|
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
On November 10 2010 06:03 emc wrote: yea, it would be stupid if players eliminated units, all they would do would be either: marine, mutalisk, stalker and you'd be at a severe disadvantage, that doesn't seem competitive to me at all. The game itself should be fair and balanced, however the penalties should apply outside of game. An example would be that if you have penalties, then your opponent can pick all of the maps for your series. This wouldn't be unbalanced as far as the game itself goes, but would still give a strategical advantage because you would pick maps that favor your race. I think that would be a lot better rather than eliminating units, that is just stupid. seriously? read a few posts up, where i detailed exactly what the rules do. it's not hard. please do this. | ||
| ||
