Cross Realm Conundrum - Page 28

Grettin

42381 Posts

May 29 2010 20:26 GMT

#541

The funny thing is, how Mike Morhaime said that e-sport is going to be popular not only in Korea, but worldwide, 'meaning' that they would be trying to expand the e-sport scene in West.

Yonhap: What's Blizzard's vision for E-sports?
MM: Our understanding of E-sports is as a community project that increases the enjoyment of the game for the players. It's going to be popular not only in Korea, but worldwide.

..But this seriously won't help at all.

MidKnight

Lithuania884 Posts

May 29 2010 20:38 GMT

#542

I just wish they simply got the balls and straight out said "yes, we don't want to allow cross realm play because we want people to buy extra copies of our game" instead of all this pathetic "there's too much lag if you play with people from other continents, so we decided not to even give an option to do it, we know best!" crap..

I bet they don't even get what e-sports means..

Archerofaiur

United States4101 Posts

May 29 2010 20:39 GMT

#543

On May 30 2010 03:33 Oddysay wrote:
just looked in gosugamer website and they know nothing about what happen , same for many other website.

Is anyone here a big player on gosugamer? Send out riders! Rally the Clans!!!

Kashll

United States1117 Posts

May 29 2010 20:55 GMT

#544

/signed

meegrean

Thailand7699 Posts

May 29 2010 21:08 GMT

#545

This is so lame. I would already have expected gamers to be able to play globally as a given right. *sigh*

SoL[9]

Portugal1370 Posts

May 29 2010 21:11 GMT

#546

On May 30 2010 03:33 Kruxt wrote:

Show nested quote +

The stone can have tournaments:
Who can throw me further!

Haha very nice

/signed

spinesheath

Germany8679 Posts

May 29 2010 21:14 GMT

#547

On May 30 2010 01:40 Bill307 wrote:
Honestly, I don't think this is a money grab. I think the problem is:

1. Blizzard wants all SC2 internet traffic routed through its servers, rather than being peer-to-peer. (correct me if I'm wrong about this, but from the outside it seems to be the case)
2. Cross-realm play is infeasible (too laggy) with this setup.
3. Cross-realm play is a lower priority than routing all traffic through their servers.

I am pretty sure that the actual game data is sent peer-to-peer. I didn't confirm that myself but as far as I know even R1CH says so, so I am tempted to believe that. If all the data was sent through their servers, observers should never lag a game (extremely easy to implement), but this is obviously not the case.

SpiritAshura

United States1271 Posts

May 29 2010 21:34 GMT

#548

On May 30 2010 06:08 meegrean wrote:
This is so lame. I would already have expected gamers to be able to play globally as a given right. *sigh*

This.

/signed this thread.

Masq

Canada1792 Posts

May 29 2010 21:57 GMT

#549

signed

oHInsane

France727 Posts

May 29 2010 22:34 GMT

#550

/signed too
Blizzard need to read this.

Sleek

United States60 Posts

May 29 2010 22:40 GMT

#551

I agree with this post. Normally Blizzard is reasonable when fans start to speak out so I can only hope that they listen. I understand they are worried about ping but it should be the players choice imo.

pyr0ma5ta

United States458 Posts

May 29 2010 22:48 GMT

#552

This is important, Blizzard. Listen up.