EPTThe decline of privacy - Would you boycott? - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
MasterFischer
Denmark836 Posts
| ||
|
Kexx
Germany240 Posts
On May 23 2010 20:26 FrozenArbiter wrote: I'd buy it, then I'd go play on a private server. I'd buy it because I respect the work that went into making the actual game. I'd play on private servers because the people who made battle.net 2.0 don't know what the fuck they are doing. Yeah, that would be nice, but it won't happen. It's clear that blizzard wants to reign supreme with bnet 2, that's why there is no Lan mode to prevent things like Garena, and If there will be an actual online private server, blizzard will probably shut it down immediately. It's sad, really. The game has so much potential and it gets ruined because of the infrastructure. Like 60€ a game isn't enough, they feel the need to keep control over what we can do. | ||
|
deadalnix
France120 Posts
On May 23 2010 22:25 XGDragon wrote: And even if you would, who cares? Names can be taken off the street, and in a massive database you shouldn't ever think anyone would care. Your just a number, enjoy the game. You know what french people notice the more when they come to netherland ? (yes ok, legal drugs, but let put this out of this reflexion :D). The fact that you have nothing on your window to hide the inside of houses. If you tell french people to do this, it would be a huge scandal. TV or newspaper will probably make some news about even if it's just an isolated case. And remeber that france is a democratic country (Obviously the problem will become way bigger in contry like tunisia where bloggers sometime disapears). I'm really amazed that people just don't get how the situation can be different and how many reasons you can have to not share your real name on a video game. And very few actually considers that giving a name to play a video game is just useless. So even if it matter for 1 person out of 10 milions, this should logically be avoided. | ||
| ||
