• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:54
CEST 21:54
KST 04:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202544RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 663 users

Oh Micro, Where Art Thou? - Page 9

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 79 Next
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 27 2010 01:11 GMT
#161
On April 27 2010 10:08 StaticKinetics wrote:
I'm probably gonna get flamed for this, but as a new player this whole article read as: "My specific skillset isn't as useful anymore and blizzard needs to change the game to my liking." As much as I appreciate the write up's quality, I can't find anything relevant here. Comparing two different games just doesn't make sense.

I especially don't like your demeaning attitude towards new players. As much as it hurts, new casual players are going to dictate the way the game is developed from Blizzard's perspective. I think you have classic veteran syndrome that most gaming communities suffer from. The scene is changing and you don't like it. There's just no reason to hate on Blizzard for making a game with different mechanics because they don't "feel right".

And I think your definition of skill is extremely narrow. If the game requires better macro strategy, then why not focus on that instead of doing some micro tricks to win the game? Maybe you're really not that good at/don't like the type of game SC2 is?

LaLush is one of the best zergs on europe.....
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
wussleeQ
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States3130 Posts
April 27 2010 01:12 GMT
#162
Dancing units? I thought /dance was already in the game.
Agreed with all your points here. Thanks for taking the time to write this up.
My favorite quote,
Putting someone like Dustin Browder in charge of development for SC2 though, is almost like letting one of the many overly-enthuasiastic-and-overly-optimistic TL forum resident D- noobs have the last say about what is good and bad for a multi million dollar game.
.
BW -> League -> CSGO
Count9
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
China10928 Posts
April 27 2010 01:12 GMT
#163
Totally agree, I loved watching a small force engaging a large one knowing if the player micros it correctly, dancing back and forth, he'll come up on top. It's very exciting watching without knowing who's going to come out ahead based only on skill and control. SC2 just doesn't feel this way, everything looks so clumsy. Even when an inferior zealot+sentry force kills a large roach army I'd be amazed at the force fields, but the roaches look so clumsy and slow rather than the zealot+sentry looking agile and amazing.
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
April 27 2010 01:13 GMT
#164
Great article, read through it twice.
I could be playing Beta on a shared account right now, but last night I wanted to play BW...
And I did.
BW, with all its "flaws" makes for a much better game right now, in my opinion.
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 27 2010 01:13 GMT
#165
On April 27 2010 10:10 Bane_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 09:58 Plexa wrote:
LaLush, moving shot does exist in SC2
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=118641

You CAN dance with Phoenix, it's just way more difficult than it ever was. You CAN do it with vikings and banshees as well. The only unit I had trouble getting the moving shot was, ironically, the mutalisk.


This pretty much crushes the whole premise of the thread no? :o
I like would think so. However, moving shot is so useless in SC2 it isn't worth the extra commands. I suppose you could dance phoenix away from attackers, but really, there's really not that many applications.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
NegativeSC
Profile Joined April 2010
35 Posts
April 27 2010 01:13 GMT
#166
When are people going to stop saying, give it some time, its the beta! and realize that they should have been able to learn what is good and what is bad from SC and apply that to SCII?? I mean srsly moving shot doesnt take a lot of effort to realize it was a good thing in SC
GaMeOfFeAr
Profile Joined March 2010
United States26 Posts
April 27 2010 01:16 GMT
#167
There are two main points regarding the original post which I don't agree with at all.

Your first section essentially boils down to the fact that the Phoenix isn't as good as the Corsair vs Mutalisks, and you attempt to blame the engine, when really it comes down to the fact that Corsairs are just better.

You also briefly touch upon how Zergling's aren't as powerful as they were in Starcraft 1. Two words - Dark Swarm. How powerful would Zerglings be without that in the Starcraft 1 late game?

The point that I agree with you most is how one cannot really engage the larger army with a smaller army and expect to escape, but that has less to do with shot micro, and more with just how the units in Starcraft 2 are different, and tend to do more damage - being able to dance your army around wouldn't stop your retreating units from getting their retreat force fielded, or slowed by Mauraders, or just overrun by a faster Zerg army utilizing the creep speed bonus. So your argument about the game engine doesn't really apply there either.

In short, you are blaming the lack of micro in Starcraft 2 on the engine, when it has more to do with the fact that Starcraft 2 has different units, which work differently, and have better snaring methods than their Starcraft 1 predecessors.

Oh, and you could have shortened your post to at least 3/4th of its original length, especially if you just removed the pointless ranting.
Life is a game based on fear.
StaticKinetics
Profile Joined April 2010
United States23 Posts
April 27 2010 01:16 GMT
#168
On April 27 2010 10:11 Plexa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 10:08 StaticKinetics wrote:
I'm probably gonna get flamed for this, but as a new player this whole article read as: "My specific skillset isn't as useful anymore and blizzard needs to change the game to my liking." As much as I appreciate the write up's quality, I can't find anything relevant here. Comparing two different games just doesn't make sense.

I especially don't like your demeaning attitude towards new players. As much as it hurts, new casual players are going to dictate the way the game is developed from Blizzard's perspective. I think you have classic veteran syndrome that most gaming communities suffer from. The scene is changing and you don't like it. There's just no reason to hate on Blizzard for making a game with different mechanics because they don't "feel right".

And I think your definition of skill is extremely narrow. If the game requires better macro strategy, then why not focus on that instead of doing some micro tricks to win the game? Maybe you're really not that good at/don't like the type of game SC2 is?

LaLush is one of the best zergs on europe.....



And? He's whining about how HIS skills aren't as effective in this game. I don't see any good reasoning why Blizzard should change the game. If macro is more important than micro in SC2 then so be it.

Why is micro skill > macro skill?
GHOST RUSH
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 01:22:02
April 27 2010 01:16 GMT
#169
On April 27 2010 10:10 Bane_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 09:58 Plexa wrote:
LaLush, moving shot does exist in SC2
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=118641

You CAN dance with Phoenix, it's just way more difficult than it ever was. You CAN do it with vikings and banshees as well. The only unit I had trouble getting the moving shot was, ironically, the mutalisk.


This pretty much crushes the whole premise of the thread no? :o

Not really. It doesn't sound like it works to any relevant extent.

On April 27 2010 10:16 StaticKinetics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 10:11 Plexa wrote:
On April 27 2010 10:08 StaticKinetics wrote:
I'm probably gonna get flamed for this, but as a new player this whole article read as: "My specific skillset isn't as useful anymore and blizzard needs to change the game to my liking." As much as I appreciate the write up's quality, I can't find anything relevant here. Comparing two different games just doesn't make sense.

I especially don't like your demeaning attitude towards new players. As much as it hurts, new casual players are going to dictate the way the game is developed from Blizzard's perspective. I think you have classic veteran syndrome that most gaming communities suffer from. The scene is changing and you don't like it. There's just no reason to hate on Blizzard for making a game with different mechanics because they don't "feel right".

And I think your definition of skill is extremely narrow. If the game requires better macro strategy, then why not focus on that instead of doing some micro tricks to win the game? Maybe you're really not that good at/don't like the type of game SC2 is?

LaLush is one of the best zergs on europe.....



And? He's whining about how HIS skills aren't as effective in this game. I don't see any good reasoning why Blizzard should change the game. If macro is more important than micro in SC2 then so be it.

Why is micro skill > macro skill?


It isn't. We need both, because having both provides a fun and exciting game. Are you seriously asking why a game where you only execute build orders and then click the attack button is boring? I don't think you are, and that displays that you need elements of both for a good game, which the OP is arguing is lacking on the micro side.
Too Busy to Troll!
LaLuSh
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden2358 Posts
April 27 2010 01:18 GMT
#170
Dudes. Yes. I exaggerated greatly trying to get some points across. Don't take every word I wrote literally.

By no means did I mean that SC2 has no micro or no macro. And I even point out that Blizzard's designers were probably really lucky with Starcraft and Brood War.

If I were Blizzard though, I would try to recreate and emulate some of the mistakes and bugs that made Starcraft so good. There is no reason why they shouldn't try to implement moving shot. Would it do any harm?

On April 27 2010 09:58 Plexa wrote:
LaLush, moving shot does exist in SC2
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=118641

You CAN dance with Phoenix, it's just way more difficult than it ever was. You CAN do it with vikings and banshees as well. The only unit I had trouble getting the moving shot was, ironically, the mutalisk.


I have tried plexa. Can you please show this off in a VOD? From what I gather it only looks like it has a moving shot because it's gliding. You can even glide backwards. While it is possible to fire without coming to a stop or decelerating (although it's very difficult and often requires you to be moving in a straight line), it is not possible to change your direction or issue any move command while the aircraft is gliding.

It pretty much means you have to anticipate the optimal gliding pattern before engaging, and there's no chance to change your mind.

I have tried it based on your description, but I can't get it to work in a "non defective" manner (meaning it contained all of the flaws in the paragraphs above). I think you'll have to show us how you do it.
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 01:19:59
April 27 2010 01:18 GMT
#171
On April 27 2010 10:16 StaticKinetics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 10:11 Plexa wrote:
On April 27 2010 10:08 StaticKinetics wrote:
I'm probably gonna get flamed for this, but as a new player this whole article read as: "My specific skillset isn't as useful anymore and blizzard needs to change the game to my liking." As much as I appreciate the write up's quality, I can't find anything relevant here. Comparing two different games just doesn't make sense.

I especially don't like your demeaning attitude towards new players. As much as it hurts, new casual players are going to dictate the way the game is developed from Blizzard's perspective. I think you have classic veteran syndrome that most gaming communities suffer from. The scene is changing and you don't like it. There's just no reason to hate on Blizzard for making a game with different mechanics because they don't "feel right".

And I think your definition of skill is extremely narrow. If the game requires better macro strategy, then why not focus on that instead of doing some micro tricks to win the game? Maybe you're really not that good at/don't like the type of game SC2 is?

LaLush is one of the best zergs on europe.....



And? He's whining about how HIS skills aren't as effective in this game. I don't see any good reasoning why Blizzard should change the game. If macro is more important than micro in SC2 then so be it.

Why is micro skill > macro skill?

He is not whining about his skill... it is about the feeling ( and also the balance ) when you play the game. It is like a Quake game without circle jumps.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
April 27 2010 01:19 GMT
#172
Haven't there already been multiple games completely disproving the "no micro"

Reaper games, Nony's amazing Phoenix usage, Thor drop and pops, Hellion harass and flanks, etc?

You spent a whole lot of words to basically say SC2 and BW have different movement mechanics. I don't think you proved anything about how it "killed micro" just because you can't micro Mutas the same way anymore.
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
April 27 2010 01:20 GMT
#173
On April 27 2010 10:19 PanzerDragoon wrote:
Haven't there already been multiple games completely disproving the "no micro"

Reaper games, Nony's amazing Phoenix usage, Thor drop and pops, Hellion harass and flanks, etc?

You spent a whole lot of words to basically say SC2 and BW have different movement mechanics. I don't think you proved anything about how it "killed micro" just because you can't micro Mutas the same way anymore.


Compare the amount of micro needed to thor drop with the amount of micro needed to reaver drop.
Too Busy to Troll!
diehilde
Profile Joined September 2008
Germany1596 Posts
April 27 2010 01:21 GMT
#174
I am not really sure if its all about the moving shot, but i sure know what you mean by saying micro doesnt "feel" right. The general unit movement ai doesnt give me nearly as much control as I would like. I think latency and things like autosurround have something to do with it as well.
Savior: "I will cheat everyone again in SC2!" - SCII Beta Tester
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
April 27 2010 01:21 GMT
#175
Good Article. Looking forward to seeing your one on macro.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
April 27 2010 01:21 GMT
#176
On April 27 2010 10:16 Half wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 10:10 Bane_ wrote:
On April 27 2010 09:58 Plexa wrote:
LaLush, moving shot does exist in SC2
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=118641

You CAN dance with Phoenix, it's just way more difficult than it ever was. You CAN do it with vikings and banshees as well. The only unit I had trouble getting the moving shot was, ironically, the mutalisk.


This pretty much crushes the whole premise of the thread no? :o

Not really. It doesn't sound like it works to any relevant extent.

Oh no it works, it just isn't practical. Without scourges in the game there is zero reason for wanting to moving shot. I mean you could get the odd shot off against Mutalisks if they are attacking you and you are hiding behind cannons - but chances are you've already lost by then. The game, by design, has made moving shot not useful in any way. Who has the bigger army, or more specifically, who has the best army composition is far more important than any little micro tricks at the moment. I say at the moment since once we reach an equilibrium and we can standardize the builds and find useful micro tricks there.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
KameZerg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Sweden1762 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 01:24:08
April 27 2010 01:22 GMT
#177
This feeling caused by the lack of micro in the game your describing is no stranger to me either.
I find myself playing 1 game of sc2 each day and thats it, theres no wanting more, no wanting to get better.
asdasdasdasdasd123123123
Tajja
Profile Joined March 2010
United States33 Posts
April 27 2010 01:22 GMT
#178
I completely agree with everything on this article. I think you should hold some back some of the rage you feel for Browder though, because he is the one creating the game and he might not fix anything because of spite. But this was the best article I have read about SC2 yet. Everytime I play SC2, I always feel drawn back to BW and start playing BW because of the way it FEELS. In SC2, it just feels like the two players get big armies, the one that wins the battle, wins the game. In SC1 terran could have a large amount of mnm and the zerg could just defend his third with lurker eggs or lurkers at the ridge. I miss being able to mutalisk control. I miss hydralisk control. I miss dragoon control. I miss vulture control. I really agree with what you said about the pre-Browder era and the post-Browder era. I feel that SC1 tried to go for a game in which regular people could play, but couldn't master unless they practiced very hard and had natural skill at it. SC2 went for casual players that could learn the game and be good at it easily. Unless Blizzard incorporates a new engine system, SC2 will never become the e-sport that its predecessor was. I could play SC1 for hours and hours and watch VODs for hours and not be bored. After 2 games in SC2, I get bored. You or someone should definitely put a poll about this. (My assumptions on SC2 might not completely be correct as I have only been playing different levels of AI on SC2 as I don't have a beta key yet.) Maybe my feelings will change if I play a person not a computer, but I seriously doubt it.
gg
ComradeDover
Profile Joined November 2009
Bulgaria758 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 01:27:33
April 27 2010 01:23 GMT
#179
On April 27 2010 10:00 Kironide wrote:
Instead of presenting any semblance of reasonable, logical criticism to the points presented in the article, you merely focused on the emotion-filled conclusion, claiming that the negativity towards Blizzard was the crux of the argument. Many agree that the emotion presented was excessive, but by no means was it the core point and the presence of emotion does not invalidate the points presented.


It's the basis for it. This article isn't so different from the dozens of others that have been written about the supposed lack of micro, or the supposed lack of macro because of MBS, or whatever the flavor of whine is that particular week.

The thought process behind these articles is obvious. It isn't
Find a flaw -> make a logical argument -> Blame Blizzard
It's
Blame Blizzard -> Look for flaws -> Make a logical argument so your article isn't just a hate post

It's the same thing over and over and over and over again. Whether it's MBS or micro or maps or replays or chat channels or any one of the thousand other innane things, people are just looking for excuses to shit on Blizzard, which is really disapointing considering this is the website dedicated to one of Blizzard's creations. I'm surprised I'm the only one who's sick of this shit at this point.

On April 27 2010 10:00 Kironide wrote:
In fact, your own posts are no less full of ad hominem attacks and emotionally laden phrases with little content; if you do not intend to contribute to the thread in a meaningful manner, I would respectfully ask that you simply do not participate.


I respectfully disagree with your observation. Pointing out ad hominem and emotionally laden phrases is not in itself ad hominem nor nessessarily emotional laden.

On April 27 2010 10:00 Kironide wrote:
If you do indeed feel that the OP was in any way flawed, I, along with many others, invite you to present your counter-points and in doing so spark a meaningful discussion instead of ignoring the well thought-out ideas presented herein.


Doing so.

On April 27 2010 10:00 Kironide wrote:
Although I am a new poster, I feel that it's simply disrespectful to make far-fetched claims about the OP with no relation to the content of the argument ("the emotion is at the core of the argument") and ignore the work that the thread creator undoubtedly put into his write-up.


Since you're a new poster, I'll forgive you for not recognizing this style of article, then. If you had been reading this forum more closely and for a longer period of time, you would understand where I'm coming from.

On April 27 2010 10:00 Kironide wrote:
I don't mean to chastise you--I just don't feel that your contributions in this thread as well as other threads offering reasonable criticism of Starcraft II have at all actually contributed to the ongoing discussion and I simply wanted to point out that you could participate in and enrich the conversation or debate if you do feel so strongly about the issue.


And you're welcome to feel any way you wish to feel, in the same way the OP is free to feel that Blizzard is ruining his life because vultures don't dance anymore. But if you can boil down the entirity of my posts in this thread into a one-sentence statement, it would be that Feelings don't equate truth. If you need a hard evidence example, just take a look at this thread. The OP feels something is wrong because he doesn't feel that there is a moving shot mechanic in the game. Plexa shows us that there is, in fact, moving shot in the game. Regardless of how strongly the OP feels his beliefs to be true, feelings don't equate truth. To make an article to heavily laden with feelings is to write an article that risks being bereft of truth.

On April 27 2010 10:00 Kironide wrote:
I would also like to apologize for my poor English. Being very fatigued and not a native English speaker, I am certain I made many errors in my writing.


Your English is fine, I could understand you perfectly.
Bring back 2v2s!
RodrigoX
Profile Joined November 2009
United States645 Posts
April 27 2010 01:24 GMT
#180
This is probably the most insightful article iv read about Sc2. He hits exactly what what meant to be hit. He found the needle in the haystack and hes wagging it in front of the guy who bet 10 bucks that he wouldnt find it.

Blizzard, please look at this.
We were all raised on televion that made us believe we'd all be Millionairs, Movie gods, and Rockstars..... But we won't.... We are slowly learning that fact. And we are very, very pissed off.
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 79 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .344
Nathanias 97
BRAT_OK 61
MindelVK 31
ForJumy 17
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 877
TT1 12
Bale 7
JulyZerg 4
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 837
Stewie2K397
flusha230
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu393
Khaldor294
Other Games
Grubby3332
FrodaN2008
tarik_tv427
ToD222
C9.Mang0116
Sick36
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta177
• StrangeGG 34
• HeavenSC 19
• poizon28 10
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 21
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22498
League of Legends
• Nemesis2418
• TFBlade928
Other Games
• imaqtpie1216
• Shiphtur365
• WagamamaTV357
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
14h 6m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 15h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.