• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:05
CEST 20:05
KST 03:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent8Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues7LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris69
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Production Quality - Maestros of the Game Vs RSL 2 Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
FlaSh on ACS Winners being in ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group A [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Is there English video for group selection for ASL
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1325 users

Oh Micro, Where Art Thou? - Page 69

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 79 Next
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-05 19:06:05
May 05 2010 19:05 GMT
#1361
On May 06 2010 04:00 BigDates wrote:
I do miss moving shot, however i think that the game is becomming alot easier to play, which is actually very good, as it can boost the popularity of the community.


I don't think that this assumption is in any way true...

Think of yourself as someone new to RTS-games, will you really think about something like "moving-shot" when deciding whether to buy the game or not?

Also, ppl that actually want to play competetively and aren't total morrons, will soon see that stuff like that is what will make SC2 interesting to play and watch in the long run.

I myself can't watch SC2 VoD's or Replays anymore - it's just too boring. I also don't play SC2 anymore really, after a few weeks of beta and maybe 800 games. Though I'm still watching almost every single proleague, osl and msl VoD and happil playing SC:BW... ^^'
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
May 05 2010 19:11 GMT
#1362
On May 05 2010 04:44 Gont wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 05 2010 04:31 PanzerDragoon wrote:
On May 05 2010 03:20 Perfect Balance wrote:
Well, first off, the tone of the article is just plain hostile. Even if the points he makes are correct...


This says more about your loyalty towards a video game company than anything else. Also your centrist attitude on this topic won't lead to anything. Look at countries run by centrist politics, nothing gets done one way or another.

There's a REAL problem with Blizzard lying aboud their reason for not including LAN play. It's a REAL issue that Blizzard decided to sell a game in three parts, costing as much as a gaming console. Sure, they have the right to remove features from their products, but deceiving the consumers about the reasons for these cuts raises some moral questions. Companies do have moral obligations to their customers, honesty is very important there. Blizzard are deliberately lying to and deceiving their customers, many of whom pre-ordered the game based on previous products.

So by your logic it was wrong for Blizzard to sell Starcraft 1 in two parts then?

u cant compare 1998 with 2010 simply because the comunity is much bigger and people actually know whats possible and if there is something we had in the year 1998 why isnt it possible in 2010?...if releasing the game in 3 parts means for blizzard not to have chat channels,lan mode,switching between realms and so on... then yes it is wrong to sell a game in 3 parts

Releasing the game with 2 expansion packs means Starcraft 2 gets to come out in 2010 instead of 2012.


Weren't you all bitching about how long you had to wait for SC2 since it had been announced in 07?

Again, did you cry when Brood War was announced, and you had to buy the game in "2 parts"? No, right? Everyone loved the extra content!

Its unreasonable bitching being used to paint Blizzard as some sort of supervillian organization
Lemure
Profile Joined March 2010
189 Posts
May 05 2010 19:20 GMT
#1363
On May 06 2010 04:11 PanzerDragoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 05 2010 04:44 Gont wrote:
On May 05 2010 04:31 PanzerDragoon wrote:
On May 05 2010 03:20 Perfect Balance wrote:
Well, first off, the tone of the article is just plain hostile. Even if the points he makes are correct...


This says more about your loyalty towards a video game company than anything else. Also your centrist attitude on this topic won't lead to anything. Look at countries run by centrist politics, nothing gets done one way or another.

There's a REAL problem with Blizzard lying aboud their reason for not including LAN play. It's a REAL issue that Blizzard decided to sell a game in three parts, costing as much as a gaming console. Sure, they have the right to remove features from their products, but deceiving the consumers about the reasons for these cuts raises some moral questions. Companies do have moral obligations to their customers, honesty is very important there. Blizzard are deliberately lying to and deceiving their customers, many of whom pre-ordered the game based on previous products.

So by your logic it was wrong for Blizzard to sell Starcraft 1 in two parts then?

u cant compare 1998 with 2010 simply because the comunity is much bigger and people actually know whats possible and if there is something we had in the year 1998 why isnt it possible in 2010?...if releasing the game in 3 parts means for blizzard not to have chat channels,lan mode,switching between realms and so on... then yes it is wrong to sell a game in 3 parts

Again, did you cry when Brood War was announced, and you had to buy the game in "2 parts"? No, right? Everyone loved the extra content!

I sure would have! but I got Starcraft in 1999 so both were already out.
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
May 05 2010 19:28 GMT
#1364
On May 06 2010 04:20 Lemure wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2010 04:11 PanzerDragoon wrote:
On May 05 2010 04:44 Gont wrote:
On May 05 2010 04:31 PanzerDragoon wrote:
On May 05 2010 03:20 Perfect Balance wrote:
Well, first off, the tone of the article is just plain hostile. Even if the points he makes are correct...


This says more about your loyalty towards a video game company than anything else. Also your centrist attitude on this topic won't lead to anything. Look at countries run by centrist politics, nothing gets done one way or another.

There's a REAL problem with Blizzard lying aboud their reason for not including LAN play. It's a REAL issue that Blizzard decided to sell a game in three parts, costing as much as a gaming console. Sure, they have the right to remove features from their products, but deceiving the consumers about the reasons for these cuts raises some moral questions. Companies do have moral obligations to their customers, honesty is very important there. Blizzard are deliberately lying to and deceiving their customers, many of whom pre-ordered the game based on previous products.

So by your logic it was wrong for Blizzard to sell Starcraft 1 in two parts then?

u cant compare 1998 with 2010 simply because the comunity is much bigger and people actually know whats possible and if there is something we had in the year 1998 why isnt it possible in 2010?...if releasing the game in 3 parts means for blizzard not to have chat channels,lan mode,switching between realms and so on... then yes it is wrong to sell a game in 3 parts

Again, did you cry when Brood War was announced, and you had to buy the game in "2 parts"? No, right? Everyone loved the extra content!

I sure would have! but I got Starcraft in 1999 so both were already out.

Then it would make you a whiny, entitled idiot.
sCuMBaG
Profile Joined August 2006
United Kingdom1144 Posts
May 05 2010 19:36 GMT
#1365
this thread actually makes me really really mad and agressive.
so unlogic and dumb answers by almost everyone. especially those newb registered "February 2010", who played whatever games and have no clue what the name "starcraft" was and should be about.

goddammit, can't we just ban all of them and be the community pre-sc2-beta. i never posted much bu i really enjoiyed it here. but lately it just pisses me off.
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-05 19:55:51
May 05 2010 19:53 GMT
#1366
On May 06 2010 04:36 sCuMBaG wrote:
this thread actually makes me really really mad and agressive.
so unlogic and dumb answers by almost everyone. especially those newb registered "February 2010", who played whatever games and have no clue what the name "starcraft" was and should be about.

goddammit, can't we just ban all of them and be the community pre-sc2-beta. i never posted much bu i really enjoiyed it here. but lately it just pisses me off.


I actually have to agree here: People that don't know anything about what made SC:BW such a great game and do just not see SC2's problems post like they have it all figured out.

Basically, anyone that speaks out against changes with engine considering moving shot, changes in the current highground-mechanic, changes in the current hard-counter-system etc. just don't get it. Anyone that knows SC and gives a crap about how SC2 will turn out just knows that these things matter, especially in a as highly evolved, big and extremely competetive Scene as SC2 will surely have.
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 05 2010 20:28 GMT
#1367
Because everybody who registered before 2010 is a fricken genius, and everybody who registered during 2010 is retarded and can't figure things out, right?

Anyone who speaks out against changes in the engine to become more SC-like is because they don't WANT the engine to change, not because they're ignorant idiots (which, by the way, isn't defined by whether or not you worship SC).

I hate when people confuse "Will not have a competitive scene" with "Will not have a competitive scene that is exactly the same as SC"

Oh, and I'm calling it: somebody will say "I hate when people think SC2 will have a competitive scene the way it is." Too bad that is mainly derived from the second statement from the line above.
bubusls
Profile Joined March 2010
Romania61 Posts
May 05 2010 20:48 GMT
#1368
It's funny when fans claim they deserve a game, or some aspect of a game and ask for it. These people don't care about us, we're just wallets to them, all they really care about is how much they can rip off before the game is declared trash by word of mouth. They don't share our passion for the game or care about it's legacy. I know this because they do a good job at distracting my 100 apm noob attention with pretty graphics and gadgets, so this means that not only will us fans buy it, but every other rts noob, so the blizzard team are actually doing a good job, at achieving their objective taht is, which is selling tons of copies and making ridiculous amounts of money by turning us into slaves like the wow players. I personally have no faith in the blizzard team, but I really appreciate the efforts made by the high level members of the starcraft community to turn this game into a goog sequel.
Could I use the term " lings " to refer to ducklings ?
Zombee
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany69 Posts
May 05 2010 21:08 GMT
#1369
Hm, I agree with your points in that article.

I am rather new to RTS games and started playing in bronze. After figuring out the very basics I moved upwards in my division until place 1. Than I had to play against really good players. In my 8th game with Protoss I (Bronze rank 1), actually beat another Protoss (Plat rank1)..even though my hotkeys are broken and I mostly played mice only...ending up 41 apm (myself) vs 143 apm (enemy), when all I did was basicly a-move...which makes me wonder if sc2 will ever be suitable as a "real" e-sport.
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 05 2010 21:10 GMT
#1370
On May 06 2010 06:08 Zombee wrote:
Hm, I agree with your points in that article.

I am rather new to RTS games and started playing in bronze. After figuring out the very basics I moved upwards in my division until place 1. Than I had to play against really good players. In my 8th game with Protoss I (Bronze rank 1), actually beat another Protoss (Plat rank1)..even though my hotkeys are broken and I mostly played mice only...ending up 41 apm (myself) vs 143 apm (enemy), when all I did was basicly a-move...which makes me wonder if sc2 will ever be suitable as a "real" e-sport.


If you posted the replay, we could tell. You'll lose a game if you have an inferior strategy, no matter how ridiculously fast you can click (which, to me, is fair. It's not Real Time APM, after all)
Zombee
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany69 Posts
May 05 2010 21:21 GMT
#1371
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?eigqztnjil5

Oh yeah, the replay...I mean we both play badly in my opinion, but how come my enemy is ranked platinum 1?
Mentos
Profile Joined August 2003
United Kingdom203 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-05 21:26:42
May 05 2010 21:25 GMT
#1372
On May 06 2010 05:48 bubusls wrote:
It's funny when fans claim they deserve a game, or some aspect of a game and ask for it. These people don't care about us, we're just wallets to them, all they really care about is how much they can rip off before the game is declared trash by word of mouth. They don't share our passion for the game or care about it's legacy. I know this because they do a good job at distracting my 100 apm noob attention with pretty graphics and gadgets, so this means that not only will us fans buy it, but every other rts noob, so the blizzard team are actually doing a good job, at achieving their objective taht is, which is selling tons of copies and making ridiculous amounts of money by turning us into slaves like the wow players. I personally have no faith in the blizzard team, but I really appreciate the efforts made by the high level members of the starcraft community to turn this game into a goog sequel.


The only glitch in your logic is that sc2 is by no means graphically stunning, just average. And I doubt that an rts fan gives a damn about graphics, it's the last thing on his mind, he wants a balanced, demanding game which he enjoys in every aspect, right now SC2 doesn't meet these requirements, and it's in blizzard's best interest to remedy that, and they DO know it, they just have a slight moron making executive decisions and they should change that asap, cause I guarantee that nobody is going to buy SC2 for graphics (big lol).
matthewfoulkes
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United Kingdom246 Posts
May 05 2010 21:26 GMT
#1373
i think the issue of wether blizzard is a company for profit does not mean that there should be an inherently lower skill cap does paint blizz as evil.

E.G. there is no LAN support, why? they have not announced there solution to the problem? why?
not looking to work with the community they love so much as they always say.
Lies? I Dont Tell lies! Thats no lie!
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 05 2010 21:29 GMT
#1374
On May 06 2010 06:21 Zombee wrote:
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?eigqztnjil5

Oh yeah, the replay...I mean we both play badly in my opinion, but how come my enemy is ranked platinum 1?


Because that's how broken the ladder system is, as of now.
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
May 05 2010 21:30 GMT
#1375
On May 06 2010 06:26 matthewfoulkes wrote:
i think the issue of wether blizzard is a company for profit does not mean that there should be an inherently lower skill cap does paint blizz as evil.

E.G. there is no LAN support, why? they have not announced there solution to the problem? why?
not looking to work with the community they love so much as they always say.

There's no LAN support because LAN support is an easy vulnerability to justify piracy. If you can't play multiplayer in any way without a legit key, it removes a hell of a lot of incentive to pirate the game over buying it.


I wonder just how many illegal copies of BW there were in China being used for LAN cafes and such.
KungKras
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden484 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-05 21:36:39
May 05 2010 21:36 GMT
#1376
On May 06 2010 05:48 bubusls wrote:
It's funny when fans claim they deserve a game, or some aspect of a game and ask for it. These people don't care about us, we're just wallets to them, all they really care about is how much they can rip off before the game is declared trash by word of mouth. They don't share our passion for the game or care about it's legacy. I know this because they do a good job at distracting my 100 apm noob attention with pretty graphics and gadgets, so this means that not only will us fans buy it, but every other rts noob, so the blizzard team are actually doing a good job, at achieving their objective taht is, which is selling tons of copies and making ridiculous amounts of money by turning us into slaves like the wow players. I personally have no faith in the blizzard team, but I really appreciate the efforts made by the high level members of the starcraft community to turn this game into a goog sequel.


The company that we are talking about is Blizzard.

They will live and die by how well thier games pleases their fans, that's how they do business, make a game that is so good that people will want to play it for years and tell other people about how fun it is. At least that WAS how they do business. If they start to displease their fans, I suspect there will eventually be a huge backlash. Blizzard should know better than to turn into a normal game company. They weren't like the other game makers, and that's why they got so many fans. They better not forget that.
"When life gives me lemons, I go look for oranges"
bubusls
Profile Joined March 2010
Romania61 Posts
May 05 2010 21:36 GMT
#1377
Plus, when I hear or read that SC2 is not dynamic, and no micro is present, I feel like I've been watching and playing a different game. Sure it's slow and boring; if I'm the one who's playing, but if you get 2 top tear players, there is a recipe for a spectacle of a match. I've watched tons of great and fast games. The first one I can think of is the one with TLO vs. LiquidNazgul, very fast, back and forward, plus, the one where Artosis lost to some great sentry micro and cool use of hallucination by a protoss player who's name I can't quite remember, Voidwards if I'm not mistaking. I can tell where you're knocking with the no micro problem, but once again, I can't forget all the good matches I saw, like this one, posted by HD Sc , just count how many times you hear the word "micro" in it:
Could I use the term " lings " to refer to ducklings ?
KungKras
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden484 Posts
May 05 2010 21:41 GMT
#1378
On May 05 2010 04:47 Rabiator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2010 09:38 buhhy wrote:
On May 03 2010 09:27 Zeke50100 wrote:
Why don't you guys make a mod to make every unit have a moving shot and see how it goes? It sounds perfectly reasonable to me, especially since you can actually just replace your cache/assets to play with other people during custom matches.

Although, to be honest, you guys can have fun with your 1 Phoenix v 10 Muta Toss wins battles, because I don't exactly agree with adding something in just to give a superior player a good chance to win with an unreasonably inferior army.


Why shouldn't a superior player utterly crush a worse player?

How do you define "superior player"? Just by a higher APM? Maybe Blizzard wants those with the better decisions to win in Starcraft 2 instead of those who click faster? Also:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2010 03:42 Cheebah wrote:
4- And finally, and more importantly, you actually complain over the fact that an RTS (fyi, the S stands for Strategy) game requires more strategic skills than micro? o_0 You remind me of those people who preferred DotA over War3... the ones who judge a player's skill only on his APM -.-

If we get moving shot back into the game why not get the BW unit movement AI as well? But nobody is complaining about that, because the improved AI in SC2 allows for those powerful balls of infantry which demolish everything in seconds.


How do you define "superior strategy"?

Eventually all the strategies of the game will be discovered (and since they are less dependant on execution, there will be fewer strategies)

What do you think will happen when all the strategies are discovered and all the outcomes of different actions are known by the community?

Then strategy skill will mean jack shit and it will all come down to exection.
I could try and do flash build against Jaedong, but would I succeed? No, I'd get steamrolled becasue despite my strategy being good, Jaedong's execution would be in a different league.

In a game where all strategies are known, execution will be what sets players apart. Give the game a low skill cap, and who wins will be decided by randomess since players will just chose a strategy and hope it counters what the oponent chose. Boring!
"When life gives me lemons, I go look for oranges"
bubusls
Profile Joined March 2010
Romania61 Posts
May 05 2010 21:49 GMT
#1379
On May 06 2010 06:25 Mentos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2010 05:48 bubusls wrote:
It's funny when fans claim they deserve a game, or some aspect of a game and ask for it. These people don't care about us, we're just wallets to them, all they really care about is how much they can rip off before the game is declared trash by word of mouth. They don't share our passion for the game or care about it's legacy. I know this because they do a good job at distracting my 100 apm noob attention with pretty graphics and gadgets, so this means that not only will us fans buy it, but every other rts noob, so the blizzard team are actually doing a good job, at achieving their objective taht is, which is selling tons of copies and making ridiculous amounts of money by turning us into slaves like the wow players. I personally have no faith in the blizzard team, but I really appreciate the efforts made by the high level members of the starcraft community to turn this game into a goog sequel.


The only glitch in your logic is that sc2 is by no means graphically stunning, just average. And I doubt that an rts fan gives a damn about graphics, it's the last thing on his mind, he wants a balanced, demanding game which he enjoys in every aspect, right now SC2 doesn't meet these requirements, and it's in blizzard's best interest to remedy that, and they DO know it, they just have a slight moron making executive decisions and they should change that asap, cause I guarantee that nobody is going to buy SC2 for graphics (big lol).


Yeah, you're right , but it's the best looking rts I've ever seen. lol, course graphics don't matter in an rts, it's not gonna' beat Mass Effect 2 at that or anything. It's just that, I really like playing it, the abilities and gimmicks are cool to watch, like blink and warping in units, I love that stuff, and I feel like I'm being distracted from the things I don't like, like accidentally loosing to a 15 apm player, and LaLush is pulling me back to reality. So that is why I think the game is tricking me into buying it. Your argument is very valid if we're to give blizzard credit, but they seem to be pretty sure about the final game considering they announced a fairly early release date.
Could I use the term " lings " to refer to ducklings ?
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
May 05 2010 21:53 GMT
#1380
On May 06 2010 06:41 KungKras wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 05 2010 04:47 Rabiator wrote:
On May 03 2010 09:38 buhhy wrote:
On May 03 2010 09:27 Zeke50100 wrote:
Why don't you guys make a mod to make every unit have a moving shot and see how it goes? It sounds perfectly reasonable to me, especially since you can actually just replace your cache/assets to play with other people during custom matches.

Although, to be honest, you guys can have fun with your 1 Phoenix v 10 Muta Toss wins battles, because I don't exactly agree with adding something in just to give a superior player a good chance to win with an unreasonably inferior army.


Why shouldn't a superior player utterly crush a worse player?

How do you define "superior player"? Just by a higher APM? Maybe Blizzard wants those with the better decisions to win in Starcraft 2 instead of those who click faster? Also:
On May 01 2010 03:42 Cheebah wrote:
4- And finally, and more importantly, you actually complain over the fact that an RTS (fyi, the S stands for Strategy) game requires more strategic skills than micro? o_0 You remind me of those people who preferred DotA over War3... the ones who judge a player's skill only on his APM -.-

If we get moving shot back into the game why not get the BW unit movement AI as well? But nobody is complaining about that, because the improved AI in SC2 allows for those powerful balls of infantry which demolish everything in seconds.


How do you define "superior strategy"?

Eventually all the strategies of the game will be discovered (and since they are less dependant on execution, there will be fewer strategies)

What do you think will happen when all the strategies are discovered and all the outcomes of different actions are known by the community?

Then strategy skill will mean jack shit and it will all come down to exection.
I could try and do flash build against Jaedong, but would I succeed? No, I'd get steamrolled becasue despite my strategy being good, Jaedong's execution would be in a different league.

In a game where all strategies are known, execution will be what sets players apart. Give the game a low skill cap, and who wins will be decided by randomess since players will just chose a strategy and hope it counters what the oponent chose. Boring!

Ideally, it becomes a game like football, where strategy is always changing and never is completely discovered.

BW is mostly figured out nowadays but every so often we get a new strategy or so.
Prev 1 67 68 69 70 71 79 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
MNW 22
SteadfastSC566
TKL 424
IndyStarCraft 271
BRAT_OK 161
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 531
mouzHeroMarine 526
TKL 424
IndyStarCraft 271
BRAT_OK 161
mcanning 101
UpATreeSC 77
MindelVK 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4776
Flash 1088
Mini 296
sSak 227
Dewaltoss 147
Zeus 80
Hyun 40
Rock 30
Free 22
scan(afreeca) 20
[ Show more ]
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Noble 5
Britney 0
Dota 2
Gorgc9885
qojqva3552
XcaliburYe176
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K261
Foxcn220
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu8
Other Games
Grubby2016
FrodaN1754
Beastyqt672
B2W.Neo595
ceh9458
KnowMe232
Hui .214
SortOf126
QueenE125
ArmadaUGS117
OptimusSC26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2033
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 3
• kabyraGe 1
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix10
• Pr0nogo 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2585
• Noizen65
League of Legends
• Jankos1559
• TFBlade723
Other Games
• imaqtpie901
• WagamamaTV486
• Shiphtur341
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
15h 55m
BeSt vs Alone
Queen vs Bisu
PiGosaur Monday
1d 5h
OSC
1d 21h
OSC
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Cure vs SHIN
Reynor vs Zoun
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
3 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21: BSL Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.