EPTOn April 17 2010 17:22 FragKrag wrote:
different situation
there are a limited amount of keys here!
different situation
there are a limited amount of keys here!
There are a limited amount of keys everywhere.
Beta Key Self-Nominators - Page 12
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
There are a limited amount of keys everywhere. | ||
Kau
Canada3502 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:19 ComradeDover wrote: If people thought they weren't deserving, they wouldn't nominate themselves or opt in or break their F5 keys on Facebook or jump through hoops just for the slim hope of being one of those lucky nerds. Seriously, who thinks they are entirely undeserving and still want a key? Ken doesn't say that only the most deserving need apply. Merely "deserving" is good enough And I believe you think you are deserving because you talk about sc2 a lot and have great discussions like this? ComradeDover was just temp banned for 2 weeks by Plexa. That account was created on 2009-11-07 06:08:24 and had 132 posts. Reason: You've been pinged as an obnoxious and arrogant douche! Congratulations! | ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:23 Kau wrote: And I believe you think you are deserving because you talk about sc2 a lot and have great discussions like this? For the record, that ban was for keeping a level head and seeing the big picture when everyone else was losing it and going into "WAHHH NERF ROACHES!!1!" mode. Yes. That makes me deserving. I don't bitch and complain about the balance of the game and don't look upon those that do with any pity. But, if you had been quite as observant in this thread as you have been into my posting history (lol), you would have noticed I already withdrew my nomination. | ||
|
DragonDefonce
United States790 Posts
| ||
|
Cheree
Canada123 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:22 FragKrag wrote: different situation there are a limited amount of keys here! If Blizzard didn't have a limited amount of keys to give out, then what would be all the fuss over beta keys? Like ComradeDover said, there's a limited amount of keys being given out and I bet very few of them had to pass through the 'deserving' filter. | ||
|
Perguvious
United States1783 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32281 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:27 Cheree wrote: If Blizzard didn't have a limited amount of keys to give out, then what would be all the fuss over beta keys? Like ComradeDover said, there's a limited amount of keys and I bet very few of them had to pass through the 'deserving' filter. uh, Blizzard can generate any amount of keys they want, but TL only has these to give out. | ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:29 FragKrag wrote: uh, Blizzard can generate any amount of keys they want, but TL only has these to give out. They CAN generate any amount they want. They could produce enough keys for every member of the world population. But they won't, and thus the total keys remain limited. | ||
|
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
 | ||
|
Cheree
Canada123 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:29 FragKrag wrote: uh, Blizzard can generate any amount of keys they want, but TL only has these to give out. true, but what's the difference on this end? only a limited amount are being given out. the ressource is scarce, no matter what source it's coming from. | ||
|
Trezeguet
United States2656 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
b. Teamliquid cannot generate any amount of keys they want therefore TL must differentiate between those are 'deserving' and those who are not do you see something | ||
|
starfries
Canada3508 Posts
and how many is a "certain" number of users? | ||
|
Late
Latvia418 Posts
| ||
|
endGame
United States394 Posts
 | ||
|
Weedman
United States65 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:31 Trezeguet23 wrote: So only the most selfish win? Well if we are all to selfish noone wins. | ||
|
Cheree
Canada123 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:33 FragKrag wrote: a. Blizzard can generate any amount of keys they want therefore they do not worry about those who are 'deserving' that will play the game extensively b. Teamliquid cannot generate any amount of keys they want therefore TL must differentiate between those are 'deserving' and those who are not do you see something a. TL gets a limited number of keys and are trying to find those who are most deserving. Props to them. b. A random person gets a limited number of keys, typically one, and doesn't try to find someone more deserving than themselves. | ||
|
ComradeDover
Bulgaria758 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:33 FragKrag wrote: a. Blizzard can generate any amount of keys they want therefore they do not worry about those who are 'deserving' that will play the game extensively b. Teamliquid cannot generate any amount of keys they want therefore TL must differentiate between those are 'deserving' and those who are not do you see something Blizzard's ability to generate an infinite amount of keys is irrelevant if they don't use those powers. So long as there's someone out there who doesn't get a key, the number of keys are limited. Furthermore, if Teamliquid was truly interested in giving keys only to the deserving, these 50 or so keys in question would be handed out on a case-by-case basis to whomever the powers that be decide is deserving, or through more of those contests that have people jump through hoops to prove their worth. | ||
|
Kau
Canada3502 Posts
On April 17 2010 17:25 ComradeDover wrote: For the record, that self-nomination was for keeping a level head and seeing the big picture when everyone else was losing it and going into "WAHHH GIMME KEY!!1!" mode. Yes. That makes me deserving. I don't bitch and complain about the balance of the game and don't look upon those that do with any pity. Fixed. Oh wait, that fix is a contradiction. That ban was for keeping a level head? I think your self-evaluation is about on par with your self-nomination. Now if only you could withdraw your evaluation the same way you withdrew your nomination. Somehow it doesn't seem to make a difference. | ||
| ||
