EPTOn March 14 2010 05:55 s.a.y wrote:
ggs.
Ret won 4:2
ggs.
Ret won 4:2
You can't put the score in a spoiler things, that's bad for ppl who don't see the game yet
[SC2B] SC2 Liquibition #1 - iNfeRnaL vs ret - LR - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Toads
Canada1795 Posts
You can't put the score in a spoiler things, that's bad for ppl who don't see the game yet | ||
|
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:02 MidKnight wrote: Yep, that's sad.. In BW there were times when you actually wanted to make archons instantly to make some sort of timing attack, for example. Now they are just..There.. Hate that sort of view from Blizzard Agreed. They can at least give them some sort of specialized role, maybe as dark archons with limited and specialized spell casting abilities. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
|
3nickma
Denmark1510 Posts
 Maybe he was too busy talking and observing but otherwise a little more use of the obs tools would be super too. Like what's in production can give a very quick glance of the situation. Dunno why there's only 6 pages when SC2 is still so fresh I'd expect a lot more people to tune in the give theirs thoughts about it. But otherwise a super 1st SC2 Liquibition!  | ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
Thanks for the stream, it was worth the time | ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:03 StoLiVe wrote: You can't put the score in a spoiler things, that's bad for ppl who don't see the game yet This is a Live Report thread. That implies there will be spoilers of the games played. In the future dont read LR threads if you dont want to be spoiled. | ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
| ||
|
deL
Australia5540 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:03 StoLiVe wrote: You can't put the score in a spoiler things, that's bad for ppl who don't see the game yet LR thread dude. | ||
|
Nilaus
Denmark159 Posts
| ||
|
Icx
Belgium853 Posts
| ||
|
3nickma
Denmark1510 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:27 Nilaus wrote: I tuned in just as the 'gg' was said in the last fight, so is there any way to see the VODs of the fights includings Sean's commentary? Det kommer helt sikkert nok om et par dage  Will be there in a couple of days I'm sure | ||
|
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:03 StoLiVe wrote: You can't put the score in a spoiler things, that's bad for ppl who don't see the game yet sorry, but this is a game report topic, you have to expect results. | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France8150 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:05 Kaniol wrote: Yeah, it is just as if Blizz commented on SC1's queen that her role is to humiliate opponent and they don't want to make her viable because of that. Thanks for the stream, it was worth the time Queens are awesome in ZvT, it's just that nobody bother because the matchup is already so demanding in term of mechanics. Plus infested cc makes life easier to take down expos. The only almost completely and non worthy unit in BW is the scout. Scouts suck, they always sucked and they will always suck, even if we kept playinf the game another 10 years. I can definitly see queens becoming standart one day. I think they will fix archons in SC2. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:31 Biff The Understudy wrote: Queens are awesome in ZvT, it's just that nobody bother because the matchup is already so demanding in term of mechanics. Plus infested cc makes life easier to take down expos. The only almost completely and non worthy unit in BW is the scout. Scouts suck, they always sucked and they will always suck, even if we kept playinf the game another 10 years. I can definitly see queens becoming standart one day. I think they will fix archons in SC2. They are good vs carriers actually | ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
On March 14 2010 06:31 Biff The Understudy wrote: Queens are awesome in ZvT, it's just that nobody bother because the matchup is already so demanding in term of mechanics. Plus infested cc makes life easier to take down expos. The only almost completely and non worthy unit in BW is the scout. Scouts suck, they always sucked and they will always suck, even if we kept playinf the game another 10 years. I can definitly see queens becoming standart one day. I think they will fix archons in SC2. Scout has a place, counter vs carrier in PvP | ||
|
wintergt
Belgium1335 Posts
| ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
| ||
|
Tdelamay
Canada548 Posts
If you decrease the amount of larva spawned by the queen, then you solve the roach and muta issue. I watched the Liquibet match today between Ret and Infernal; Infernal was getting stomped unless ret into a predictable roach build. Thing was, it's so easy for zergs to suddenly change unit composition, that when ret frightened Infernal with a few roaches and Infernal produced many immortals, then Ret was able to produce a Spire and produce a massive amount of mutalisks in just a few minutes. Now, Infernal could have built sentries to counter mutalisk, but mutalisk are far more agile than sentries and could simply avoid encountering them while harrassing the workers here and there. I think building Pheonixes would be a great answer. I'm not sure if they build fast enough. Pheonixes are an underestimated unit that most players never seem to remember. Pheonixes can be powerful and are far superior to mutalisk 1 on 1, however, mutalisk can produce faster due to the zerg's large amount of larva. However, protoss do have chrono boost; they could make better use of it. Over-all, I think the number of larva spawned could be toned down, and that would make all the difference. IT would put more pressure on the zerg economy and army. | ||
|
StreetWise
United States594 Posts
| ||
| ||
