On March 04 2010 23:32 Tamerlane wrote: Fresh update from the US ladder, for those interested:
Nice first post Tamerlane!
-Mani
==========
Quick update to those who care. Unfortunately the Only way to check this is if you have a friend online Where you can check his profile to see Where he stands in the rankings. (blizzard Really needs to fix this).
On March 03 2010 14:48 DrivE wrote: OMG DAVID KIM IN THIRD PLACE??? btw is that the real oversky? he is playing a lot of games O_O david kim hwaiting!!
I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
On March 03 2010 14:51 Motiva wrote: I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
what are you waiting for post a screenshot on tinypic
As a trick to finding the divisions: look for people in your own division or friends divisions, check their 2v2 ladders, check people on the 2v2 ladders and find their 1v1 division - with enough patience you can probably find any division. Easiest to find platinum 1v1s when looking at platinum 2v2 ladders of course.
Anyways, found division 11 this way, leader is ZPr.theamazing if anyone wants easy access to it.
On March 03 2010 14:51 Motiva wrote: I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
What's your id?
Okay so it looks like we're only missing division 13 now.
On March 03 2010 14:56 geno wrote: As a trick to finding the divisions: look for people in your own division or friends divisions, check their 2v2 ladders, check people on the 2v2 ladders and find their 1v1 division - with enough patience you can probably find any division. Easiest to find platinum 1v1s when looking at platinum 2v2 ladders of course.
Anyways, found division 11 this way, leader is ZPr.theamazing if anyone wants easy access to it.
On March 03 2010 14:51 Motiva wrote: I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
what are you waiting for post a screenshot on tinypic
Also, when i got promoted, I went from ~1430 ELO to 988 ELO.. This didn't make any sense to me, especially after looking at some of the other people that got moved out of Gold and into Plat. today and got to keep their points.....
On March 03 2010 14:51 Motiva wrote: I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
what are you waiting for post a screenshot on tinypic
Also, when i got promoted, I went from ~1430 ELO to 988 ELO.. This didn't make any sense to me, especially after looking at some of the other people that got moved out of Gold and into Plat. today and got to keep their points.....
What's your id so that i can add your division to my list?
On March 03 2010 14:51 Motiva wrote: I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
what are you waiting for post a screenshot on tinypic
Also, when i got promoted, I went from ~1430 ELO to 988 ELO.. This didn't make any sense to me, especially after looking at some of the other people that got moved out of Gold and into Plat. today and got to keep their points.....
No one really knows how the points work. It is obvious that the points are related to metal ranks individually, and adjusted according to the rest in your division.
On March 03 2010 15:01 CharlieMurphy wrote: Smuft and kiwikaka are the only people with over 2k points, and there isn't even anyone with 1900. Smuft almost has 22k.
division 2 has been one of the largest from the start so their points are among the most inflated. i think if point ranking was done properly across the board smuft would still be first but not by nearly that much.
On March 03 2010 14:51 Motiva wrote: I think there are 14 Platinum Division, I got moved up from Gold Div 1 Rank 4 to Platinum Division 14 Rank 4 out of 6. Since theres only 6, i assume it's the last, and everyone in it looks to have joined it today.
what are you waiting for post a screenshot on tinypic
Also, when i got promoted, I went from ~1430 ELO to 988 ELO.. This didn't make any sense to me, especially after looking at some of the other people that got moved out of Gold and into Plat. today and got to keep their points.....
What's your id so that i can add your division to my list?
yeahhhh rocking #6 in div2 represent writing staff
are there any replay packs of some of these #1 ranked zergs? I'm seriously wondering how they deal with smart, aggressive protoss players at this level
On March 03 2010 15:47 Atrioc wrote: yeahhhh rocking #6 in div2 represent writing staff
are there any replay packs of some of these #1 ranked zergs? I'm seriously wondering how they deal with smart, aggressive protoss players at this level
mutas? what do you mean by smart aggressive protoss play
On March 03 2010 15:47 Atrioc wrote: yeahhhh rocking #6 in div2 represent writing staff
are there any replay packs of some of these #1 ranked zergs? I'm seriously wondering how they deal with smart, aggressive protoss players at this level
mutas? what do you mean by smart aggressive protoss play
haha obviously im making mutas basically every game against Protoss i didnt get this far without knowing that
but when they 2 gate or agressive 1 gate with constant pressure into proxy pylon and warp gate its very hard to match their output while keeping your economy and tech going to the point where you can get a decent # of mutas.
i've also lost to idra when he takes an early expansion (kulas ravine) and masses sentry + 2 colossus + a few assorted zel/stalker. My usual unit combo of ling/baneling/muta is completely useless against that because he can - with good micro - block all the banelings with the mass sentry force field, defeat the mutas with guardian shield, and obviously clean up the lings with the rest.
obviously the answer in both cases is simply to micro and play better but i'm just wondering if better zergs are finding stronger builds than what i've come up with that pressure or scare the protoss into not doing exactly what they want
also, charlie if you'd like to see other ladders, just have someone (ANYONE) from a division on your friends list, and you can look at your friends ladders whenever you want. (if you want div 11 I'm disarray.disarray
On March 03 2010 15:47 Atrioc wrote: yeahhhh rocking #6 in div2 represent writing staff
are there any replay packs of some of these #1 ranked zergs? I'm seriously wondering how they deal with smart, aggressive protoss players at this level
mutas? what do you mean by smart aggressive protoss play
haha obviously im making mutas basically every game against Protoss i didnt get this far without knowing that
but when they 2 gate or agressive 1 gate with constant pressure into proxy pylon and warp gate its very hard to match their output while keeping your economy and tech going to the point where you can get a decent # of mutas.
i've also lost to idra when he takes an early expansion (kulas ravine) and masses sentry + 2 colossus + a few assorted zel/stalker. My usual unit combo of ling/baneling/muta is completely useless against that because he can - with good micro - block all the banelings with the mass sentry force field, defeat the mutas with guardian shield, and obviously clean up the lings with the rest.
obviously the answer in both cases is simply to micro and play better but i'm just wondering if better zergs are finding stronger builds than what i've come up with that pressure or scare the protoss into not doing exactly what they want
bling vs toss? Sounds like a bad idea. I mean they are really only good versus probes and sentries right? (maybe HT).
What I've been using against standard aggressive protoss is basically a little bit of everything. It is very challenging to say the least.
Open with roaches to defend any zealot openings, then get speedlings in anticipation of the toss's next move, which is stalker/sentry/immortal. Use the lings to scout as much as possible. If you see his unit/gate numbers low, get a lair, evo chamber, and hydra den. He's most likely going pheonix, voidray, or DT. Don't forget to upgrade lord speed and get some overseers too. You need recon ASAP in this matchup, and it's very difficult to get some early on. Try to secure enough gas and econ while doing this so you can switch to mutas.
Ling/Roach with good micro does pretty damn well vs zeal stalker armies. Basically what you wanna do is hit and run with the roaches on all his zeals (unless he has charge, then you need to pull front to back over and over), until they are really weakened or the numbers have diminished a little. Then send the lings in to wrap them or the stalkers. Roaches aren't that bad versus stalkers in a straight up fight either.
lol that frose guy disced on me when I wtfpwned his expo on metalopolis
pretty safe to assume this has already been asked, but what happens if a person DCs in a match? they get a loss?
Yep... SC2 said "You have been dropped from the game." about 10 seconds into a game vs Idra and then the program crashed when I clicked OK I got a loss off it. My internet did not die or anything during this, it was just some weird issue (I've only had it happen once)
On March 03 2010 14:17 Crunchums wrote: Terran at 1, 2 in div 10, 3 in div9, and then nobody else is higher than 5.
If it's not the worst race it's certainly the hardest.
This does not follow from the numbers. Compared to Terrans, there are about twice as many zergs and protosses in platinum divisions, and there also about twice as many of them in the top 1 position. So the ratio at the #1 spot seems to be the same as the ratio overall - there does not seem to be much evidence for a correlation between race and success.
Maybe I'll do a proper hypothesis test later, I'm a nerd like that.
I like how the top zergs have shitty win % compired to the protoss and terran lol well only 2 terran isn't much of a median and cows go moo with his cheater 90% win rate lol
Here is division 12 mr murphy
I can't compete with the people playing 200 300 games when i'm barely at 120 games... t-t
On March 03 2010 18:43 Virtue wrote: I like how the top zergs have shitty win % compired to the protoss and terran lol well only 2 terran isn't much of a median and cows go moo with his cheater 90% win rate lol
Here is division 12 mr murphy
I can't compete with the people playing 200 300 games when i'm barely at 120 games... t-t
Are you joking or are you saying that Cowgomoo cheats?
On March 03 2010 18:43 Virtue wrote: I like how the top zergs have shitty win % compired to the protoss and terran lol well only 2 terran isn't much of a median and cows go moo with his cheater 90% win rate lol
Here is division 12 mr murphy
I can't compete with the people playing 200 300 games when i'm barely at 120 games... t-t
Are you joking or are you saying that Cowgomoo cheats?
On March 03 2010 18:43 Virtue wrote: I like how the top zergs have shitty win % compired to the protoss and terran lol well only 2 terran isn't much of a median and cows go moo with his cheater 90% win rate lol
Here is division 12 mr murphy
I can't compete with the people playing 200 300 games when i'm barely at 120 games... t-t
Are you joking or are you saying that Cowgomoo cheats?
CowGoMoo posted a replay pack here, from TL's replay thread. Some are pre-patch, but all his games are vs. top players. He plays very safely and has some nice timings, etc. He works in the QA dept. at Blizzard,
On March 03 2010 18:43 Virtue wrote: I like how the top zergs have shitty win % compired to the protoss and terran lol well only 2 terran isn't much of a median and cows go moo with his cheater 90% win rate lol
Here is division 12 mr murphy
I can't compete with the people playing 200 300 games when i'm barely at 120 games... t-t
i bet that percentage is directly effected by the ZvZ matchup!
On March 03 2010 18:47 Odds wrote: CowGoMoo 112-10 92%
Bonjwa.
And yet I watch his replays and notice so many little things that he could have done better. Why, oh why does my macro suck so bad? =(
I have a laundry list of things I should do better. I am not playing anywhere near as good as players will be playing in a couple weeks from now. I should use better hotkeys for units and buildings, stop getting supply blocked, stop setting rally points to my opponents base when I think im ahead, look at minimap more, macro better etc...
On March 03 2010 14:48 DrivE wrote: OMG DAVID KIM IN THIRD PLACE??? btw is that the real oversky? he is playing a lot of games O_O david kim hwaiting!!
And IdrA is above him!
Also, Artosis and Tasteless and David Kim are all the highest ranked randoms each at 3rd.
On March 03 2010 23:27 Senx wrote: Smuft 238-55 2184
How did he got so much higher points than everyone else?
There's this ridiculous system where if your division has more people in it, then you get more points. His division is way larger than most, so he gets way more points :/
On March 04 2010 23:32 Tamerlane wrote: Fresh update from the US ladder, for those interested:
There are so many cross division games that would be fun to watch. I'm starting to dislike this whole "we make lots of divisions". Just give one huge plat ladder, huge gold ladder etc.
There are gonna be sooo many discussions on "which division is the best" and ppl are gonna argue senseless over that without anyone coming to any conclusion.
On March 04 2010 23:32 Tamerlane wrote: Fresh update from the US ladder, for those interested:
There are so many cross division games that would be fun to watch. I'm starting to dislike this whole "we make lots of divisions". Just give one huge plat ladder, huge gold ladder etc.
There are gonna be sooo many discussions on "which division is the best" and ppl are gonna argue senseless over that without anyone coming to any conclusion.
I think that's the point :p Then the questions will be resolved by the end of season tournaments. I like it and can't wait to be put in a Division.
It's actually not a bad system. They just need to put in an easy way to view all divisions (i.e. not through friends list) and a way to view the top players in each league regardless of their division (like Top 100 Platinum Players).
On March 05 2010 00:45 Tomed wrote: It's actually not a bad system. They just need to put in an easy way to view all divisions (i.e. not through friends list) and a way to view the top players in each league regardless of their division (like Top 100 Platinum Players).
Big word on this, I really like the division system, I just want to be able to press a single button and be shown any given division and the total rankings for an entire league (platinum, gold etc)
that hotsauce guy isn't that great. I played him in a ZvZ and would have owned him with normal play, but I was trying out something new on scrapyard and got rolled stupidly.
On March 05 2010 08:28 QuitoTheOne wrote: how you guys already played 300 games?
i cant afford to play like 20 games a week :I cant keep up ;O
I know ... it's sad. I only wish I had that kind of time to devote to gaming. At first you feel inferior because you can't perform on the level of these guys and you think they are some kind of masterminds ... but it is really that they just play the heck out of the game and learn as they go. It isn't like they sit down and figure things out all that quickly.
Still, you can't keep up with people who play 150 games a week, can you? Kind of depressing.
On March 05 2010 08:28 QuitoTheOne wrote: how you guys already played 300 games?
i cant afford to play like 20 games a week :I cant keep up ;O
I know ... it's sad. I only wish I had that kind of time to devote to gaming. At first you feel inferior because you can't perform on the level of these guys and you think they are some kind of masterminds ... but it is really that they just play the heck out of the game and learn as they go. It isn't like they sit down and figure things out all that quickly.
Still, you can't keep up with people who play 150 games a week, can you? Kind of depressing.
On March 05 2010 09:14 QuitoTheOne wrote: i prefer making 60k a year. Gaming is fun but hardcore gaming is useless IMO I will do ladder this week-end gf is gone for the week-end i will see if i suck
On March 05 2010 09:14 QuitoTheOne wrote: i prefer making 60k a year. Gaming is fun but hardcore gaming is useless IMO I will do ladder this week-end gf is gone for the week-end i will see if i suck
I personnally know some of the players with 300-400 games played on this ladder and they all earn much more than 60k a year by playing poker...
On March 05 2010 09:14 QuitoTheOne wrote: i prefer making 60k a year. Gaming is fun but hardcore gaming is useless IMO I will do ladder this week-end gf is gone for the week-end i will see if i suck
I personnally know some of the players with 300-400 games played on this ladder and they all earn much more than 60k a year by playing poker...
Dkim is randoming and cow is playing 1 race. And tbh with the way dkim is playing.. it looks like hes giving 70% effort.. not even kidding. Ofc cow is prob better then anyone right now.
On March 05 2010 09:14 QuitoTheOne wrote: i prefer making 60k a year. Gaming is fun but hardcore gaming is useless IMO I will do ladder this week-end gf is gone for the week-end i will see if i suck
Wow you are so awesome...
Oh how I hate people who make these pathetic excuses because they cannot compete at the levels they secretly wish they could. If you can't devote the time to gaming then don't make excuses about your poor skill level with ifs or buts.
It's especially irritating to see "i prefer making 60k a year" with the condescending tone associated to it. I make more than that in a year, and so do a lot of the players playing a whole lot at the moment. We can afford to put a lot of time into gaming because we have financial freedom because we were clever and dedicated to gaming in the first place. Your whole logic is flawed and that post made you sound like a pretentious generalizationist. If you want to try and use the condescending trick on us to cover up your own shortcomings in gaming then at least talk about your (unprovable) social skills instead of the money you make because I doubt you can compete in that area.
Also here's a hint: Nobody is interested in your schedule and your relationship status.
This might be a completely noob question, but how exactly do they determine who is in what divisions? like if you're "platinum" caliber, from your testing games, do they just randomly throw you into one of the 12 platinum divisions, or is there a method. What if you go from gold to platinum?
On March 05 2010 11:47 KiLL_ORdeR wrote: This might be a completely noob question, but how exactly do they determine who is in what divisions? like if you're "platinum" caliber, from your testing games, do they just randomly throw you into one of the 12 platinum divisions, or is there a method. What if you go from gold to platinum?
nobody has any clue. As far as the placement goes it doesn't really make sense either. I think I went like 7-3 in placement and landed near top gold position. Played 2 more games and instantly boosted up to 60th on platinum. Then slowly climbing from there, at about 25 now ^_^
On March 05 2010 21:30 vradovic wrote: anyone know where is "MONK" in platinum? I can't find him on this list?
there are two "monk"'s in platinum which I know of... or there was as of yesterday, I didn't check rankings to see if there was a reshuffle this morning before work ^^
There is/was one in Division 12 Platinum and I forgot where the other one was.
if the rating system works like WoW, your placement matches will work sorta like this
Game 1: I have no idea how good this guy is, let's have him fight someone with 1000 rating to see how it goes Game 2: So he's better then that, let's try 1200 Game 3: Maybe 1400? Game 4: How about 1600? Game 5: He lost, maybe he's 1500 Game 6: He won, let's try 1550
etc etc. So someone that gets 7 wins in a row followed by 3 losses will most likely get a better placement then someone that first loses 3 games and then wins 7 in a row because the ranking is more sensitive in the earlier games.
On March 05 2010 08:28 QuitoTheOne wrote: how you guys already played 300 games?
i cant afford to play like 20 games a week :I cant keep up ;O
I know ... it's sad. I only wish I had that kind of time to devote to gaming. At first you feel inferior because you can't perform on the level of these guys and you think they are some kind of masterminds ... but it is really that they just play the heck out of the game and learn as they go. It isn't like they sit down and figure things out all that quickly.
Still, you can't keep up with people who play 150 games a week, can you? Kind of depressing.
It's not that hard... I think I'm 29-19 right now, and I'm trying to get about 2 hours in a day - it's hard when I work full time, but if you think things out and play strategically, you can improve really quickly. But then again, that's probably my sc instincts kicking in. I'm platinum rank ~25-35 and I'm pretty satisfied, considering everyone around my rank has 100-300 more games played than me.
Now 26 people in division 16. add tabako.tabako to friend list if you want to see that ladder. Wouldn't be surprised if there's already a division 17, with all the new invites that came in yesterday.
Anyone looking for a complete update?? Divisions 1 through 16?
I will do it today if I see some interest.
Might even do a 2v2 update (of its 20+ divisions...) sometimes this week as well.
So, if you're interested just type in "+1 1v1" and/or "+1 2v2" !!
On March 06 2010 04:34 jimbobdwayne wrote: Why do division 3 and 4 have no people compared to the other ones?
my little theory on the subject is that new divisions get created when the previous division reaches its maximum number of players (which is probably less than 200), the problem is : for a while (I think it's semi-fixed now) the divisions that were getting depleted because players were demoted to gold or lower divisions did not refill with new/promoted players or anything of the like
this is probably caused by the fact that players that get promoted retain the number of points they get, so they can not reach a division with few people in it and get top 3 instantly - at least, that would not make sense
On March 06 2010 04:34 jimbobdwayne wrote: Why do division 3 and 4 have no people compared to the other ones?
my little theory on the subject is that new divisions get created when the previous division reaches its maximum number of players (which is probably less than 200), the problem is : for a while (I think it's semi-fixed now) the divisions that were getting depleted because players were demoted to gold or lower divisions did not refill with new/promoted players or anything of the like
this is probably caused by the fact that players that get promoted retain the number of points they get, so they can not reach a division with few people in it and get top 3 instantly - at least, that would not make sense[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure this is right or if i'm understanding you correctly, when i got promoted out of silver i had around 1500 points and it put me in a somewhat fresh gold division where i started with around 700
On March 06 2010 04:34 jimbobdwayne wrote: Why do division 3 and 4 have no people compared to the other ones?
my little theory on the subject is that new divisions get created when the previous division reaches its maximum number of players (which is probably less than 200), the problem is : for a while (I think it's semi-fixed now) the divisions that were getting depleted because players were demoted to gold or lower divisions did not refill with new/promoted players or anything of the like
this is probably caused by the fact that players that get promoted retain the number of points they get, so they can not reach a division with few people in it and get top 3 instantly - at least, that would not make sense[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure this is right or if i'm understanding you correctly, when i got promoted out of silver i had around 1500 points and it put me in a somewhat fresh gold division where i started with around 700
On March 10 2010 01:11 Rothbardian wrote: I'm interested Tamerlane, for 1v1. Could you please list the top 200 US ELO also? Sort of like what the French E-Sports site did?
With their points and division as well please =)
I have a feeling my division is inflated in rank because all the good players are in other divisions.
On March 10 2010 05:18 heyoka wrote: Charlie I have screenshots in the last ~12 hours for all the divisions except 11 and 13 do you want me to just ship them to you?
naw, I'll just do it tomorrow to be consistent and i'll make a new thread.
On March 10 2010 05:18 heyoka wrote: Charlie I have screenshots in the last ~12 hours for all the divisions except 11 and 13 do you want me to just ship them to you?
naw, I'll just do it tomorrow to be consistent and i'll make a new thread.
Awesome. Will it be like the French site, but with W-L? :p