Bnet 2.0 and chat - Page 3
Forum Index > SC2 General |
ShaperofDreams
Canada2492 Posts
| ||
PluS
United States80 Posts
| ||
XIII
483 Posts
On February 24 2010 11:10 PluS wrote: 8 losers voting no huh i would like to know why u would not want a chat channel from them | ||
omninmo
2349 Posts
On February 18 2010 22:17 RaGe wrote: Chat rooms need to be added 100%. The Battle.net chatrooms are one of the reasons the SC community is as tightly nit as it is now, imo. | ||
ShadowDrgn
United States2497 Posts
On February 18 2010 22:37 opiuman wrote: On the topic of this, how are we supposed to add people when we can usually only see the first part of their name? I wanted to add someone after a game but the only thing is left is the main part of his name and I can't find the second part anywhere... From most interface screens you can right-click someone's name and add him to friends. It works on the victory screen and the ladder pages. Bnet2 definitely needs private chatrooms though. | ||
synapse
China13814 Posts
On February 18 2010 22:54 FrozenArbiter wrote: Another reason to add chat: Yeah, so far I'm liking Starcraft 2 the GAME. Not so hot on Battle.net 2.0. I agree. From what I've seen, BNET2.0 looks cute but doesn't do much... | ||
Trumpet
United States1935 Posts
There's no way they'd let b.net2 be such a downgrade, perhaps the chat functionality was something holding back the beta so they moved on without it to keep the game development rolling? Can't possibly see the game launching without channels | ||
Nightmarjoo
United States3360 Posts
Sometimes I'll be talking to someone while in a game or replay with /r, and /r will just stop working, and it'll say "To []" instead of to my friend, it's really annoying. To f add someone, right after a game right click their id in the scoreboard and hit friend add. You can look at the scoreboard for a game in your recent game list (like 5 games I think) under your own profile if you decide to add someone after closing the initial scoreboard. | ||
CowGoMoo
United States428 Posts
| ||
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
On February 24 2010 12:14 Nightmarjoo wrote: Yeah I don't get why beta took so long to come out if it was for "refining bnet2" when we get maybe 1/5th of what "bnet2" actually is. Because I doubt they give you 100% Bnet 2.0 functionality just for the sake of beta. It will most definitely have more features and functions than what is present right now. Everyone should just calm down and stop expecting every single thing given to them on a silver platter from the very start and have some patience. | ||
Tdelamay
Canada548 Posts
I hope these will make a re-appearance. | ||
Nightmarjoo
United States3360 Posts
On February 24 2010 12:18 beefhamburger wrote: Because I doubt they give you 100% Bnet 2.0 functionality just for the sake of beta. It will most definitely have more features and functions than what is present right now. Everyone should just calm down and stop expecting every single thing given to them on a silver platter from the very start and have some patience. My complaint isn't necessarily in what we don't have accessible in bnet2, but in how long it took to give us such an incomplete interface. When I heard beta was being delayed because of work needed to be done on bnet2 I was anticipating a more complete and less buggy interface. The current bnet2 and the ranked-matching system is just very disapointing, it's lacking and buggy. | ||
NrG.NeverExpo
Canada2114 Posts
I'm going to be ridiculously upset if there isn't a way for us to do this, and i know iwont be the only one.. | ||
pat965
Canada274 Posts
On February 24 2010 12:18 beefhamburger wrote: Because I doubt they give you 100% Bnet 2.0 functionality just for the sake of beta. It will most definitely have more features and functions than what is present right now. Everyone should just calm down and stop expecting every single thing given to them on a silver platter from the very start and have some patience. The point of a beta is not to be quiet and assume things will change. Whether or not refinements to Bnet2.0 are in the works (and they likely are) the more people talk about something (i.e. complain) the more likely it is to receive some attention. | ||
Disarray
United States1164 Posts
Also, if you look there is a whole "Social" button on the top left that is grayed out. Be patient, we'll get chat. | ||
ErOs_HalO
United States167 Posts
| ||
leomon
![]()
Canada169 Posts
There were times when I just didn't feel like playing a game of SC and just chat with my friends on Bnet. Once you're in game, you'll rather concentrate on your game. Oh sure there's the usual chit-chat, but when half your attention is in the game, the conversations usually become dull, or the game quality is less than perfect. | ||
StarsPride
United States364 Posts
| ||
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
On February 18 2010 22:29 CharlieMurphy wrote: Poll: CHATROOMS! (Vote): YES (Vote): NO (Vote): OTHER BRING CHATROOMS BACK PETITION /signed CharlieMurphy Who the fuck said No and what would be the other lol? | ||
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
| ||
| ||