• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:40
CET 19:40
KST 03:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1276 users

Nexus has time warp ability, Obelisk out of game - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 10 Next All
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
February 12 2010 22:14 GMT
#101



1. The mechanic affects ALL aspects of macromanagement and not just one specific area like Proton Charge did. This in itself causes it to have a lot of targetting tension, since the player must decide and balance between increased economic growth, increased unit production and accelerated tech.


PC (via increased minerals) increased economic growth, unit production, supply, etc...






http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 02:13:41
February 13 2010 02:13 GMT
#102
Archer, I haven't read the entire thread but are you seriously saying you liked the old mechanic better? Yes, better economy has an effect on your entire game, but it was the most mindless mechanic ever.

It was "Click here to get more money!!!!", like a damn pop-up ad.

I mean, with this mechanic you have to decide what you are going to boost, that opens up WAAAAAY more options.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
nodule
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada931 Posts
February 13 2010 02:34 GMT
#103
huge improvement. might have to make it a nexus upgrade to balance it, but that's fine.

the psychout potential of this is amazing
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 02:38:00
February 13 2010 02:37 GMT
#104
On February 12 2010 17:06 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2009 03:04 Fontong wrote:
Pig wang, this mechanic is pretty strange because of the range limitation. It is a sign that is already a very forced an unnatural mechanic for protoss. The strategic effects are far reaching and range from annulling the usefulness of proxies to making a build similar to the forge first FE in SC1 much weaker because you cannot speed buildings more than 14 range away.

luckily it wont be in the game. thank god


LoL


I would have thought it would make FE easier. You can now 12 Nex much easier against zerg because your forge and cannons will build much quicker. Not only that, it becomes a much more powerful build because you now have 2 time warps at your disposal.

(assuming that there is no research required)
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 04:06:29
February 13 2010 04:04 GMT
#105
On February 13 2010 11:13 FrozenArbiter wrote:
Archer, I haven't read the entire thread but are you seriously saying you liked the old mechanic better?



FA please I have enough people missinterpreting me.

I dont just blanket statement mechanics. I look at what makes them what they are. I dissect what works and what doesnt. Their were good and bad parts about Proton Charge. There are good and bad parts about TW. I analyze mechanics. The things that people like about Time Warp (targeting decision making, pacing manipulation) I have been talking about for a looong time.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
love1another
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1844 Posts
February 13 2010 06:07 GMT
#106
This sounds really cool. It increases apm while actually having meaningful utility. You have to choose what to accelerate wisely!
"I'm learning more and more that TL isn't the place to go for advice outside of anything you need in college. It's like you guys just make up your own fantasy world shit and post it as if you've done it." - Chill
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 09:25:27
February 13 2010 08:20 GMT
#107
edit: nvm you guys are totally right
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
February 13 2010 08:26 GMT
#108
On February 13 2010 17:20 Zelniq wrote:
wait, lemme get this straight.

Protoss gets Time Warp and Warp Gates
Terran gets Reactor (double unit production) and M.U.L.E.
Zerg just gets Inject Larvae?
Yeah that's correct.
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
CauthonLuck
Profile Joined July 2009
United States93 Posts
February 13 2010 08:30 GMT
#109
Just?

Inject Larvae is incredible, the strength it gives to either early game aggression or economic growth far surpasses the other race's mechanics. It's strength dwindles in comparison only because of the relative weakness of Zerg tier 2, and even then you have to recognize it's potential for surprise tech switches in terms of the sheer number of units that you aren't prepared for.
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
February 13 2010 08:31 GMT
#110
what you mean JUST inject larvae. that shit's imba son =D
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 08:42:20
February 13 2010 08:41 GMT
#111

On February 13 2010 17:20 Zelniq wrote:
wait, lemme get this straight.

Protoss gets Time Warp and Warp Gates
Terran gets Reactor (double unit production) and M.U.L.E.
Zerg just gets Inject Larvae?
I saw your post on SC2GDF and think you might be overreacting. If the Blizzcon article about inject larvae is correct about 1 hatch + queen = 2.5 hatch then spawn larvae sounds like the best mechanic (we have no idea how strong time warp is yet).
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
meeple
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada10211 Posts
February 13 2010 09:03 GMT
#112
It seems funny to me that when Blizzard comes out with this, there are like 20 people standing by saying "They took my idea... I said this from the beginning!!" instead of just appreciating the change...
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
February 13 2010 09:24 GMT
#113
damn I'm not thinking clearly, you guys are totally right.
tried to delete that thread but failed, gg.

i think i used it as an excuse to post my suggestions/criticisms of the shallowness of their macro mechanics, when it could be oh so much more! but i'll wait for beta to be out before I really lay it on em
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
February 13 2010 11:07 GMT
#114
On February 13 2010 07:14 Archerofaiur wrote:


Show nested quote +

1. The mechanic affects ALL aspects of macromanagement and not just one specific area like Proton Charge did. This in itself causes it to have a lot of targetting tension, since the player must decide and balance between increased economic growth, increased unit production and accelerated tech.


PC (via increased minerals) increased economic growth, unit production, supply, etc...



Extra minerals do not give you any more choice than you already had without it, except when you should build it in your BO.

For example compare PC with mule, pc gives extra minerals without choice, mule gives extra minerals but you can chose to scan or get extra supplies instead. Which one have the most choice?

With this speed thing you can also chose to get extra minerals (Building workers faster, duh), but you can also chose to upgrade faster or speed up production for a critical unit in emergencies. Which one got more choice, just extra minerals like the old or the choice between extra minerals, faster upgrading or faster unit production?

With your logic Blizzard could add this new revolutionary macro mechanic:
"All players now gain double the minerals and gas", zomg it would double your decisions!!!!!!!!! Then we would get awesome macro games!!!!!!!
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 15:36:43
February 13 2010 15:30 GMT
#115
On February 13 2010 20:07 Klockan3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2010 07:14 Archerofaiur wrote:



1. The mechanic affects ALL aspects of macromanagement and not just one specific area like Proton Charge did. This in itself causes it to have a lot of targetting tension, since the player must decide and balance between increased economic growth, increased unit production and accelerated tech.


PC (via increased minerals) increased economic growth, unit production, supply, etc...



Extra minerals do not give you any more choice than you already had without it, except when you should build it in your BO.


I think your missing that minerals like research times and unit production are pacing elements. Choosing where to focus these pacing element enhancers is what you would call decision making. This is true for both PC and TW with the exception that PC does not affect research pacing and TW does not effect supply pacing. Quick before everyone starts writing telling me all the differences between TW and PC make sure you go back and read those sentences and understand what im saying (hint im not just saying they are the same).


So ultimatly your arguement is that extra minerals isnt choice because it can just be part of your BO. By that same logic Time Warp "lists" could be built into BOs. Also your statement ignores that game circumstances and progression can cause players to diverge off the BO beaten path.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
DarkShadowz
Profile Joined December 2008
Sweden321 Posts
February 13 2010 15:37 GMT
#116
I tihnk this is amazing.
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 17:13:26
February 13 2010 17:10 GMT
#117
On February 14 2010 00:30 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2010 20:07 Klockan3 wrote:
On February 13 2010 07:14 Archerofaiur wrote:



1. The mechanic affects ALL aspects of macromanagement and not just one specific area like Proton Charge did. This in itself causes it to have a lot of targetting tension, since the player must decide and balance between increased economic growth, increased unit production and accelerated tech.


PC (via increased minerals) increased economic growth, unit production, supply, etc...



Extra minerals do not give you any more choice than you already had without it, except when you should build it in your BO.


I think your missing that minerals like research times and unit production are pacing elements. Choosing where to focus these pacing element enhancers is what you would call decision making. This is true for both PC and TW with the exception that PC does not affect research pacing and TW does not effect supply pacing. Quick before everyone starts writing telling me all the differences between TW and PC make sure you go back and read those sentences and understand what im saying (hint im not just saying they are the same)

So ultimatly your arguement is that extra minerals isnt choice because it can just be part of your BO. By that same logic Time Warp "lists" could be built into BOs. Also your statement ignores that game circumstances and progression can cause players to diverge off the BO beaten path.
There's no choice at all with PC; this is silly. Mining 6 minerals instead of 5 just speeds you up. You have to make the same decisions regardless. If SC:BW was patched so that worked mined 10 minerals instead of 8, would that add more choice to the game? It would change how the game is played, but it would not add any new choices or skill to the game.

We don't know much about time warp, but if it targets a single building then it has a ton more choice in every build order.

"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
heroyi
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1064 Posts
February 13 2010 18:22 GMT
#118
i may have to switch back from terran to protoss just because of this mechanic lol (oh and love the warp in).
i dont know if blizzard did it because of this knowledge or not BUT it seems a great way to balance pvz espacially. zerg has the ability to switch its tech or between army aggression and economy. All doing so with a high chance of preventing scouting....and in pvz you always wanna scout zerg. Now with the time warp protoss can immediately produce more zealots or templars or w.e is necessary to combat the tech switch and even to maybe match the zerg unit number (not food).
At the same time i cant help but feel that they are making protoss more of a "newb" class and make it even more forgiving. you lost your main army full of the most powerful race, dont worry just build it up quickly.
if we look at pvt how will it change? toss had to be extremely careful against terrans (mines and siege tanks). now fly a pylon over one rran expo, warp 5 lots and take it out, suicide your main army into another expo and quickly regen the army with warp gates (10sec faster units) and time warp (w.e the stats will be). All this new mechanics ACTUALLY COMPLIMENTS the gameplay of pvt in sense of toss has to grab many expo as possible at same time shutting terrans out. those hordes of minerals will be used really fast in pvt for protoss now. i dont think flash can just turtle in his games anymore in sc2.

of course this is all theorycrafting...but the human mind is imaginative. BETA BETA BETA BETA
wat wat in my pants
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 18:42:26
February 13 2010 18:33 GMT
#119
On February 14 2010 02:10 Tsagacity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2010 00:30 Archerofaiur wrote:
On February 13 2010 20:07 Klockan3 wrote:
On February 13 2010 07:14 Archerofaiur wrote:



1. The mechanic affects ALL aspects of macromanagement and not just one specific area like Proton Charge did. This in itself causes it to have a lot of targetting tension, since the player must decide and balance between increased economic growth, increased unit production and accelerated tech.


PC (via increased minerals) increased economic growth, unit production, supply, etc...



Extra minerals do not give you any more choice than you already had without it, except when you should build it in your BO.


I think your missing that minerals like research times and unit production are pacing elements. Choosing where to focus these pacing element enhancers is what you would call decision making. This is true for both PC and TW with the exception that PC does not affect research pacing and TW does not effect supply pacing. Quick before everyone starts writing telling me all the differences between TW and PC make sure you go back and read those sentences and understand what im saying (hint im not just saying they are the same)

So ultimatly your arguement is that extra minerals isnt choice because it can just be part of your BO. By that same logic Time Warp "lists" could be built into BOs. Also your statement ignores that game circumstances and progression can cause players to diverge off the BO beaten path.
There's no choice at all with PC; this is silly. Mining 6 minerals instead of 5 just speeds you up. You have to make the same decisions regardless. If SC:BW was patched so that worked mined 10 minerals instead of 8, would that add more choice to the game? It would change how the game is played, but it would not add any new choices or skill to the game.

We don't know much about time warp, but if it targets a single building then it has a ton more choice in every build order.




The big thing your missing is causation. You think the decision making just stops once the ability is casted. You have to look at what it does for the gameplay expierence as a whole. Its like looking at Spawn Larva and realizing that more larva mean more decisions about what those larva become. Ok so ive just given you 200 extra minerals. What are all the possible choices you can make with it?

Zealots, probes, pylons, gateways, cannons, forge, core, assimilator, expanding ...and thats not even counting what you can do with some more gas.


One of the bigger macro mechanics in SC1 was building lots of gateways. PC encourages that. TW much less so (only through pumping probes). If your using it for faster unit production than the pressure to build additional gateways is reduced. In essence your decreasing one macro action to increase another. Borrowing from Peter to pay Paul. Although we need the actual numbers to actually see the degree of impact here.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Tsagacity
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States2124 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-13 18:43:55
February 13 2010 18:40 GMT
#120
On February 14 2010 03:33 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2010 02:10 Tsagacity wrote:
On February 14 2010 00:30 Archerofaiur wrote:
On February 13 2010 20:07 Klockan3 wrote:
On February 13 2010 07:14 Archerofaiur wrote:



1. The mechanic affects ALL aspects of macromanagement and not just one specific area like Proton Charge did. This in itself causes it to have a lot of targetting tension, since the player must decide and balance between increased economic growth, increased unit production and accelerated tech.


PC (via increased minerals) increased economic growth, unit production, supply, etc...



Extra minerals do not give you any more choice than you already had without it, except when you should build it in your BO.


I think your missing that minerals like research times and unit production are pacing elements. Choosing where to focus these pacing element enhancers is what you would call decision making. This is true for both PC and TW with the exception that PC does not affect research pacing and TW does not effect supply pacing. Quick before everyone starts writing telling me all the differences between TW and PC make sure you go back and read those sentences and understand what im saying (hint im not just saying they are the same)

So ultimatly your arguement is that extra minerals isnt choice because it can just be part of your BO. By that same logic Time Warp "lists" could be built into BOs. Also your statement ignores that game circumstances and progression can cause players to diverge off the BO beaten path.
There's no choice at all with PC; this is silly. Mining 6 minerals instead of 5 just speeds you up. You have to make the same decisions regardless. If SC:BW was patched so that worked mined 10 minerals instead of 8, would that add more choice to the game? It would change how the game is played, but it would not add any new choices or skill to the game.

We don't know much about time warp, but if it targets a single building then it has a ton more choice in every build order.




The big thing your missing is causation. You think the decision making just stops once the ability is casted. You have to look at what it does for the gameplay expierence as a whole. Ok so ive just given you 200 extra minerals. What are all the possible choices you can make with it?

Zealots, probes, pylons, gateways, cannons, forge, core...and thats not even counting what you can do with some more gas..
These are the same choices any player makes with their minerals in SC:BW regardless of race. Increasing someone's income does not add choice; it just makes them go through their choices faster. Whether or not I want to make a zealot, a probe, a gateway, or a cannon is not a special decision added thanks to PC.
"Everyone worse than me at video games is a noob. Everyone better than me doesn't have a life."
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 10 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 21m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 202
UpATreeSC 134
BRAT_OK 117
ROOTCatZ 65
MindelVK 50
ProTech47
SpeCial 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 22637
Bisu 843
Horang2 838
Larva 395
Shuttle 357
firebathero 161
Hyun 154
Mini 145
actioN 104
ggaemo 26
[ Show more ]
HiyA 21
soO 14
SilentControl 8
Dota 2
420jenkins815
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King136
Other Games
FrodaN1474
Beastyqt550
ceh9450
XaKoH 100
Chillindude59
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 26
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• XenOsky 6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV1754
• lizZardDota275
League of Legends
• Nemesis5048
Other Games
• Shiphtur279
• imaqtpie192
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
14h 21m
WardiTV Invitational
17h 21m
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Big Brain Bouts
1d 22h
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-22
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.