EPT2019 - 2020 Football Thread - Page 57
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
| ||
|
sharkie
Austria18637 Posts
On September 23 2019 22:48 Greg_J wrote: I'm sure I'm a bit behind here but that Chelsea VAR call was harsh. Celebrating an equaliser then moments later 0:2 down. I read somewhere that this was not the first time it happened (VAR disallowing a goal and then the team conceding). VAR disallowances seem to create the same phenomenon that missing 100% chances does to a team | ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4156 Posts
On September 23 2019 22:48 Greg_J wrote: I'm sure I'm a bit behind here but that Chelsea VAR call was harsh. Celebrating an equaliser then moments later 0:2 down. If you think that was harsh go watch the Spurs one. | ||
|
DucK-
Singapore11447 Posts
On September 23 2019 22:48 Greg_J wrote: I'm sure I'm a bit behind here but that Chelsea VAR call was harsh. Celebrating an equaliser then moments later 0:2 down. Chelsea fan here. I thought the offside was obvious from the replay. I want var to remove such 'wrong calls', so I'm supportive of the decision. Spurs var call though, I do not accept. I do not think it was clear in any way that it was offside. This is not goal line tech where its clear of the ball crossed the line or not. There's margins of error when you have to fine the right frame when the ball is kicked, draw the right line etc. The spurs call isn't conclusive and hence should not be called. What we want to eliminate are calls that are blatantly wrong. If var is inconclusive, it means the attacker is fairly close and the 'adcantage' is minute. I think its fine to favour the attacker in such cases. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18637 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On September 24 2019 01:13 Rebs wrote: I agree aswell, if there is doubt despite technology (which can totally happen) then the best thing to do is to not over rule the call on the field. This is basic common sense shit that other sports already implement so its kind of baffling that the people in charge cant seem to grasp the concept or havent even researched the issue enough to see what sort of precedence there is for doubtful cases. They couldnt possibly have been naive enough to think that the video review would eliminate it 100%. (evidently they are) Small point, sticking with the call on the field with some calls is actually quite hard because referees/linesman are told not to make a call and wait what VAR says. However they should adhere to the traditional standard of offside, in doubt side with the attacking player. It is just a question of how close is too close to call. | ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On September 24 2019 02:10 sneirac wrote: Small point, sticking with the call on the field with some calls is actually quite hard because referees/linesman are told not to make a call and wait what VAR says. However they should adhere to the traditional standard of offside, in doubt side with the attacking player. It is just a question of how close is too close to call. Which is fine, that still just makes it a call on the field. I.e the decision to not call offside. Potato Potaaato. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18637 Posts
what is that stupid 11? Modric, Marcelo, Ramos?! | ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
| ||
|
DucK-
Singapore11447 Posts
On September 24 2019 02:10 sneirac wrote: Small point, sticking with the call on the field with some calls is actually quite hard because referees/linesman are told not to make a call and wait what VAR says. However they should adhere to the traditional standard of offside, in doubt side with the attacking player. It is just a question of how close is too close to call. That's why I'd say overall it would favour attackers. Refs now don't make calls until VAR, and it being inconclusive means the attacker will not be called offside. Refs waiting for VAR is a good thing because wrong calls can be easily reversed. But if they whistle happy, you see incidents like RLC's pass to Hazard in Carabao final that gets arguably wrongfully called. Could have been the winner. | ||
|
Dante08
Singapore4156 Posts
On September 24 2019 01:13 Rebs wrote: I agree aswell, if there is doubt despite technology (which can totally happen) then the best thing to do is to not over rule the call on the field. This is basic common sense shit that other sports already implement so its kind of baffling that the people in charge cant seem to grasp the concept or havent even researched the issue enough to see what sort of precedence there is for doubtful cases. They couldnt possibly have been naive enough to think that the video review would eliminate it 100%. (evidently they are) Yeah that call was extremely absurd. If you have a draw lines to make out a millimeter of difference in a frame by frame video review then it would be better to just stick with initial call and favour the attacking side. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
| ||
|
Greg_J
China4409 Posts
| ||
|
Harris1st
Germany7207 Posts
On September 24 2019 05:50 sharkie wrote: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cps/624/cpsprodpb/4EF4/production/_108921202_mens_xi.jpg what is that stupid 11? Modric, Marcelo, Ramos?! lololol 3 from Real and not one from ManCity?? I mean they just won PL with an astounding record and lost in CL really unfortunately. And what did Real do? Absolutely fucking nothing. wtf | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28798 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Also isn't one of these sponsors a major contributor to UEFA? | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18637 Posts
Imagine fifa or uefa criticising their refs... | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On September 24 2019 18:45 Harris1st wrote: lololol 3 from Real and not one from ManCity?? I mean they just won PL with an astounding record and lost in CL really unfortunately. And what did Real do? Absolutely fucking nothing. wtf Not only won the premier league but they won every domestic competition lol all 3 cups and yeah Real Madrid had one of worst seasons ever xD | ||
| ||
