Don't expect much from this one though... apparently he used a "switch" on his child for punishment. I thought Texas would love that sort of thing. We know it doesn't take much to get an indictment BUT if he scarred the kid...
It depends on the severity. Looks like a spanking gone wrong. I thought the rule in general was you could spank but you can't leave a mark. Or something like that.
Live in MN, was listening to local sports radio about it. There apparently is a report that he caught the kid in the scrotum with the switch. Any way you cut that I don't think it ends all peachy if the kid's nuts were involved. Pretty sure a line is crossed there if nothing else but we shall see.
On September 13 2014 08:52 Sermokala wrote: Here in Minnesota really disappointed. I doubt he will play a down again and I wouldn't want him to in Minnesota again.
Whatever you've heard it's worse he has no excuse expecially after he lost a son last year the same way.
I'm not making excuses but that's a pretty common punishment to have grown up with, especially if you had southern parents.
Of course most parents aren't NFL running backs. So they tend not to do so much damage on accident.
I bet I could ask any of my younger cousins and they have all been whooped with a 'branch'. I don't think it's an effective punishment most of the time (I only think corporal punishment is appropriate to reinforce discussion based punishment about things like darting out in traffic [so like swatting a kid on the behind when they dart away from the car in a busy parking lot.)
People assume with money comes some sense but that isn't always the case. Millions of people are going to hit their kids with a switch this year but because they don't have millions and can't make careers by bringing it up (or just flat out see nothing wrong with it) it wont make any headlines and most people wont see any charges.
The NFL should offer anger management, parenting, and marriage counseling classes, and if I was a team owner I would require them (when appropriate) if a player was going to join my team. It's a shame this may ruin his career and with the child support payments he has to make (potentially without an NFL career) will break him in no time. All in all the kids life will probably get worse.
The CFL or some indoor team may be celebrating the shit out of this though.
I don't personally agree that beating a child is a good thing under pretty much any circumstance, but my main issue is that people need to realize when they are potentially going to do permanent damage to a kid.
Here's a pro tip: if your mom used to hit you with a belt every now and then on the ass it's probably not gonna do anything serious. If you're a fucking professional athlete built for power hitting a kid apparently on the arms/legs/scrotum with a tree branch than yeah you're gonna mess the kid up. There's a line and I think he crossed it. (note I haven't actually seen the pictures I just gave one article a quick glance)
The main problem with physical punishment is the delay between punishable action and punishment makes it an ineffective tool to punish children. In other words it's ineffective at teaching do and do not, really effective in teaching fear me. Punishment based learning has to be near instantaneous and consistent in occurrence else the message isn't clear to the punished.
On September 13 2014 08:52 Sermokala wrote: Here in Minnesota really disappointed. I doubt he will play a down again and I wouldn't want him to in Minnesota again.
Whatever you've heard it's worse he has no excuse expecially after he lost a son last year the same way.
I'm not making excuses but that's a pretty common punishment to have grown up with, especially if you had southern parents.
Of course most parents aren't NFL running backs. So they tend not to do so much damage on accident.
I bet I could ask any of my younger cousins and they have all been whooped with a 'branch'. I don't think it's an effective punishment most of the time (I only think corporal punishment is appropriate to reinforce discussion based punishment about things like darting out in traffic [so like swatting a kid on the behind when they dart away from the car in a busy parking lot.)
People assume with money comes some sense but that isn't always the case. Millions of people are going to hit their kids with a switch this year but because they don't have millions and can't make careers by bringing it up (or just flat out see nothing wrong with it) it wont make any headlines and most people wont see any charges.
The NFL should offer anger management, parenting, and marriage counseling classes, and if I was a team owner I would require them (when appropriate) if a player was going to join my team. It's a shame this may ruin his career and with the child support payments he has to make (potentially without an NFL career) will break him in no time. All in all the kids life will probably get worse.
The CFL or some indoor team may be celebrating the shit out of this though.
I don't care how 'normal' it is in Texas to hit your kids with a 'switch,' if you're leaving cuts and bruises that last a week+ then you seriously, seriously fucked up. The only way a kid should have scrapes and cuts on them like that is because they ran through some bushes they didn't know were thorny or something, not because another person inflicted them.