EPTbecause if u piss him off you won't get into the hall of fame no matter how many clutch goals u score.
2014 Olympic Ice Hockey Tournament of Manly Men - Page 12
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
lamprey1
Canada919 Posts
because if u piss him off you won't get into the hall of fame no matter how many clutch goals u score. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
|
Flaccid
8923 Posts
On February 13 2014 06:34 QuanticHawk wrote: but if all five skaters are avatars of a clutch postin corner muckin 'forums user' do the goals cease to be 'clutch?' may 'be'... | ||
|
lamprey1
Canada919 Posts
Burke is the biggest mouth in favour of larger ice.. but guys like guys like Ray Shero, and Garth Snow also favour this idea. Burke has worked in some of the NHL's most senior management ranks during his career... so when he speaks up on a substantial rule change it means something. You can keep pounding away on this topic.. but with each passing year the players get bigger and bigger making an ice dimension set in 1895 more and more obsolete. if the average player were 5'10" and 160 lbs the current NHL dimensions would be fine. but that is not the case. the NCAA has the right idea. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32159 Posts
| ||
|
Flaccid
8923 Posts
ballot hall o f famer Darcy 'the brother mucker corn-shucker trucker fucker' tucker though about it... thought 'so'... theres a 'reason' they say big 'ice' "is" 'nice'... vincent 'damphousse' | ||
|
Orcasgt24
Canada3238 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:00 QuanticHawk wrote: yes, it will change in a fantasty world, where the owners happily lose 4-6 rows of the most expensive seats in the house, and the leafs win the cup Every team is gonna have to spend 480 million bucks on a new rink with 30k seats obviously. Only viable way. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32159 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:02 Flaccid wrote: ask wat first ballot hall o f famer Darcy 'the brother mucker corn-shucker trucker fucker' tucker though about it... thought 'so'... theres a 'reason' they say big 'ice' "is" 'nice'... vincent 'damphousse' this guy 'flaccid' posts the right 'way' one might say he'd make mr hockey 'proud' | ||
|
lamprey1
Canada919 Posts
| ||
|
lamprey1
Canada919 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:00 QuanticHawk wrote: yes, it will change in a fantasty world, where the owners happily lose 4-6 rows of the most expensive seats in the house, and the leafs win the cup actually the way Burke proposes it.. it'll be 2 rows. also, that is not how the leafs work what the leafs will do is replace 2 rows of platinums where the first 2 rows of the golds are.... then replace 2 rows of gold where the first 2 rows of red are.. and so on .. and so forth. and so .. what will happen is the ACC will lose 2 rows of its least expensive seats. even if its 4 rows. it still the least expensive seats in the arena and the luxury boxes remain untouched. ![[image loading]](http://www.theaircanadacentre.com/uploads/maps/F598DF3F24CE4A66A2667BE2AA8D35AC.jpg) if they can do all these outdoor games... they can manage to renovate arenas. as players continue to grow in size this change becomes the only reasonable solution. | ||
|
L1ghtning
Sweden353 Posts
On February 13 2014 04:27 QuanticHawk wrote: salak playing all game probably would have been different story too. oduya being there over hedman is still pretty funny Our coach is in love with Chicago and Detroit, so I get why Oduya is there. Oduya and Hjalmarsson is a two-player deal. Hedman is a better player than both, but Oduya and Hjalmarsson are used to playing with eachother, so it would be unwise to split them up. What I will never understand is why they picked Edler and Tallinder over Hedman. Edler have been pathetic this season, and is a danger defensively, and Tallinder is not a elite defenseman. Hedman on the other hand has been carrying Tampa's defense, and has been productive offensively as well. Speaking of Tampa, why didn't the Czech play Radko Gudas? | ||
|
castleeMg
Canada791 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32159 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:46 lamprey1 wrote: actually the way Burke proposes it.. it'll be 2 rows. also, that is not how the leafs work what the leafs will do is replace 2 rows of platinums where the first 2 rows of the golds are.... then replace 2 rows of gold where the first 2 rows of red are.. and so on .. and so forth. and so .. what will happen is the ACC will lose 2 rows of its least expensive seats. even if its 4 rows. it still the least expensive seats in the arena and the luxury boxes remain untouched. if they can do all these outdoor games... they can manage to renovate arenas. as players continue to grow in size this change becomes the only reasonable solution. the bottom bowl is not 'cheap' and losing 2-4 rows from anywhere in is a lot of money lost over the course of a season but keep 'entertaining' the idea that owners will throw away money On February 13 2014 07:50 L1ghtning wrote: Our coach is in love with Chicago and Detroit, so I get why Oduya is there. Oduya and Hjalmarsson is a two-player deal. Hedman is a better player than both, but Oduya and Hjalmarsson are used to playing with eachother, so it would be unwise to split them up. What I will never understand is why they picked Edler and Tallinder over Hedman. Edler have been pathetic this season, and is a danger defensively, and Tallinder is not a elite defenseman. Hedman on the other hand has been carrying Tampa's defense, and has been productive offensively as well. Speaking of Tampa, why didn't the Czech play Radko Gudas? That's definitely true about Edler. He's been flaming dogshit this season. Tallinder has been ok, but he's nothing special. Just do not get no Hedman | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On February 13 2014 07:00 QuanticHawk wrote: yes, it will change in a fantasty world, where the owners happily lose 4-6 rows of the most expensive seats in the house, and the leafs win the cup to be fair, the most valuable seats in the house are the luxury boxes, not the 4 front rows. I am honestly surprised that more teams dont eliminate mid-bowl seats for box space. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32159 Posts
getting up early for the us tomorrow unzunzunz | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
lamprey1
Canada919 Posts
On February 13 2014 10:08 QuanticHawk wrote: the bottom bowl is not 'cheap' and losing 2-4 rows from anywhere in is a lot of money lost over the course of a season but keep 'entertaining' the idea that owners will throw away money That's definitely true about Edler. He's been flaming dogshit this season. Tallinder has been ok, but he's nothing special. Just do not get no Hedman Burke has stated a larger ice surface will lower injuries. if he sells the top NHL minds on that then that justifies the cost. every injury costs money. furthermore, in the ultra long term a larger playing surface will lead to larger arena capacities for any new arena. only slightly larger but still larger. the larger the playing surface of the sport the greater the capacity of the stadium boxing/mma < basketball < hockey < baseball < american football < european football < auto racing oval yes, you can theoretically stick an MMA event in a giant domed stadium, but for serious viewing a small intimate venue is what satisfies a serious MMA/boxing fan. Hence, the MGM Grand is your standard size of venue for a combat sport. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32159 Posts
On February 13 2014 13:07 xDaunt wrote: Ugh, why the balls are the US games at 730 ET? shit sucks gold game is the same time too ugh. no idea why youd do that when you have other game times available | ||
|
VaultD
Finland85 Posts
| ||
| ||
