|
On July 25 2016 01:59 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2016 01:59 nojok wrote:On July 25 2016 01:55 Alchemik wrote:On July 25 2016 01:54 nojok wrote:On July 25 2016 01:52 Alchemik wrote:On July 25 2016 01:51 nojok wrote:On July 25 2016 01:50 Alchemik wrote:On July 25 2016 01:49 Noocta wrote: Yeeeeah, I doubt that APM metric is close to accurate at all lol what, why? They said he had 450 APM on the French stream xD Maybe he produced that many lings :p he often has more than 500 APM, his style is very multitask-intensive, it makes sense They changed how they measuered it or what? WoL and HotS APM was wrong, now it's right But broodwar's one was right and they never reached those numbers outside of peaks during fights and they surely were a bunch of guys macroing really well, even with the crappy hotkeys. You get MUCH more apm in SC2 just macroing. in any case by.hero still sits around 500 in his games Yeah, I can see how having to manually move you mouse to every damn buildings slows down the apm compared to SC2 where you just check your prod every few seconds because you don't have to mouse your move or your left either. TY for the info
|
|
On July 25 2016 02:02 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2016 02:01 Charoisaur wrote:On July 25 2016 02:00 The_Red_Viper wrote:On July 25 2016 01:53 Charoisaur wrote:On July 25 2016 01:52 The_Red_Viper wrote:On July 25 2016 01:49 Ej_ wrote:On July 25 2016 01:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: I mean it was fun, no doubt about that but still this mass liberator thing is still annoying holy shit. you just make corruptors Sure if you have the economic lead you can build enough of them. But that's not always the case if terran can build liberators you should be able to make corruptors too. You guys make this into zerg vs terran whine. This isn't meant as zerg whine. This is meant as "Liberators lead to bad gameplay interactions". Anytime zerg has to mass corruptors to deal with something you can kinda tell that the unit interactions are horrible. terran having to mass liberators to deal with ultras isn't ideal either. I think the matchup is ok as long as it doesn't come to the idiotic split map BL vs ghosts scenario
Match up would be great if Tanks would actually be viable again... Yet you have a quadrillion counters at your disposal when playing Zerg, it's ridiculous.
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
|
On July 25 2016 02:05 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ugh so many dead lings
Worth, it keeps him in the game. If that gold goes up with his lack of tech, he straight up dies
|
On July 25 2016 02:04 Creager wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2016 02:02 Ej_ wrote:On July 25 2016 02:01 Charoisaur wrote:On July 25 2016 02:00 The_Red_Viper wrote:On July 25 2016 01:53 Charoisaur wrote:On July 25 2016 01:52 The_Red_Viper wrote:On July 25 2016 01:49 Ej_ wrote:On July 25 2016 01:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: I mean it was fun, no doubt about that but still this mass liberator thing is still annoying holy shit. you just make corruptors Sure if you have the economic lead you can build enough of them. But that's not always the case if terran can build liberators you should be able to make corruptors too. You guys make this into zerg vs terran whine. This isn't meant as zerg whine. This is meant as "Liberators lead to bad gameplay interactions". Anytime zerg has to mass corruptors to deal with something you can kinda tell that the unit interactions are horrible. terran having to mass liberators to deal with ultras isn't ideal either. I think the matchup is ok as long as it doesn't come to the idiotic split map BL vs ghosts scenario Match up would be great if Tanks would actually be viable again... Yet you have a quadrillion counters at your disposal when playing Zerg, it's ridiculous. you do realize tankivacs are viable though, right?
|
Australia18228 Posts
Whys Stephano banking so much
|
On July 25 2016 02:06 Inflicted wrote: Whys Stephano banking so much 2 hatcheries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, all he had to do was use the wraith form thingy teleport on one adept, so sad
|
|
|
|
|