|
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/EEcOqCm.png) Banner by SneiracThursday, Jul 14 9:00am GMT (GMT+00:00)http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2016_StarCraft_II_StarLeague_Season_2/Main_Event
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/08h88.png)  Twitch | Youtube |  YoutubeCasters:![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/CMU99oi.png) GTR | Valdes
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/QY06u.png) ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/4729.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/4761.jpg)  Dark vs  Trust
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1988.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/977.jpg)
 aLive vs Zest
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/L6Pww.png) + Show Spoiler [Results] +
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/0PxXd.png) + Show Spoiler ++ Show Spoiler [Dark vs Trust] +Poll: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 29% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4) 57% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 14% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 29% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4) 57% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 14% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 50% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (1) 25% ★★★ - Good game (1) 25% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 4 total votes Your vote: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (1) 17% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2) 33% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (3) 50% 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (2) 29% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (5) 71% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 50% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3) 50% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 43% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4) 57% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (8) 80% ★★★ - Good game (1) 10% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 10% 10 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (7) 58% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (2) 17% ★★★ - Good game (3) 25% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 12 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (5) 71% ★★★ - Good game (2) 29% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (8) 57% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (4) 29% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2) 14% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 14 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (1) 17% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (5) 83% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3) 75% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 25% 4 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 100% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 3 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (2) 67% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1) 33% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 3 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/QARj1.png) Click Me
|
Poll: Heart?Dark & aLive (8) 33% Dark & Zest (7) 29% Trust & Zest (4) 17% Dark & Trust (3) 13% Trust & aLive (2) 8% aLive & Zest (0) 0% 24 total votes Your vote: Heart? (Vote): Dark & Trust
(Vote): Dark & aLive
(Vote): Dark & Zest
(Vote): Trust & aLive
(Vote): Trust & Zest
(Vote): aLive & Zest
Poll: Head?Dark & Zest (15) 83% aLive & Zest (2) 11% Trust & aLive (1) 6% Dark & Trust (0) 0% Dark & aLive (0) 0% Trust & Zest (0) 0% 18 total votes Your vote: Head? (Vote): Dark & Trust
(Vote): Dark & aLive
(Vote): Dark & Zest
(Vote): Trust & aLive
(Vote): Trust & Zest
(Vote): aLive & Zest
|
|
|
Hypuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Zest Hwaiting!
|
On July 14 2016 17:32 Pandemona wrote:Oh nice Yello thanks for doing this  i have a work experience guy i have to show some things to do today and well i can't do this at the same time xD
also you forgot the recommended games section in the template. Dude, you are slacking 
btw no more spoiler-free results section in recent LR ops? I never cared for it anyway but we did that so long that it feels kinda weird not doing it
|
Poll: Best KT?Your vote: Best KT? (Vote): KT
|
More GTR and Valdes today. GTR's last week in Korea is coming to a close.
|
|
|
That sounded like she was singing "Surrender the pron"
|
I hope this group goes well, I have an exam today and have to leave in a bit over 2 hours.
Still don't care enough to do English subtitles I see.
|
Come on Dark save the swarm
|
Was that Rain in the commentator panel ?
|
On July 14 2016 18:06 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Was that Rain in the commentator panel ?
Yeah Rain casts SSL.
|
On July 14 2016 18:07 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:06 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Was that Rain in the commentator panel ? Yeah Rain casts SSL.
awesome
I miss him so much he'd have been so great in LotV
|
I want both KT players to win but if Dark loses this, zerg representation will be halved for rest of the tournament
|
On July 14 2016 18:09 Isualin wrote:
I want both KT players to win but if Dark loses this, zerg representation will be halved for rest of the tournament
And then in group C it'll die.
|
What is Trust's badge? <.<
|
Does this count as away cheese?
|
now that's some quick robo
|
lol and the lings see it, Trust already in an awful lot of trouble
|
Quickly, switch to colossus drops!
|
On July 14 2016 18:16 Elentos wrote:
Quickly, switch to colossus drops!
would actually be good vs the lings Dark is getting
|
looks like this will be a quick game
|
|
|
|
|
HAHHAHAHA!!! This was Life vs Lilbow level of REKT!
|
Poll: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 29% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4) 57% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 14% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
Trust didn't look too good in that one
|
That one disruptor could have killed every unit on the ramp if he left it at home.
|
winning on Dusk Towers basically gives the series to Dark I think
|
So was this home or away cheese? I can't decide.
|
On July 14 2016 18:18 Elentos wrote:
That one disruptor could have killed every unit on the ramp if he left it at home.
There were overlord drops as well, i doubt it would work that well
|
On July 14 2016 18:19 Elentos wrote:
So was this home or away cheese? I can't decide.
every map feels like home when you cheese
|
On July 14 2016 18:19 Isualin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:18 Elentos wrote:
That one disruptor could have killed every unit on the ramp if he left it at home. There were overlord drops as well, i doubt it would work that well
and even then I doubt Dark would have let every unit on the ramp get blown up without reacting
|
On July 14 2016 18:19 Isualin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:18 Elentos wrote:
That one disruptor could have killed every unit on the ramp if he left it at home. There were overlord drops as well, i doubt it would work that well
Killing all the banes before they blow up your Artosis pylon could have helped though.
But yeah he should have totally switched to a colossus drop when he got scouted. Dark would never see that coming.
|
Dark's turn to create chaos
|
haha how did this happen?
|
|
|
Trust with the total play time of 8 minutes against Dark
|
|
|
Poll: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 29% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4) 57% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 14% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 50% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (1) 25% ★★★ - Good game (1) 25% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 4 total votes Your vote: Recommend Dark vs Trust Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
That was BRUTAL! Dark looks on point.
|
lol my stream died so I couldn't see how Trust lost
what happened ?
|
This game tried to break shortest BO3 ever recorded
|
On July 14 2016 18:25 RaFox17 wrote:
That was BRUTAL! Dark looks on point.
hard to say if Dark looks on point or if Trust looks ridiculous based on this series
|
On July 14 2016 18:25 RaFox17 wrote:
That was BRUTAL! Dark looks on point.
Well, he didn't show anything.
|
On July 14 2016 18:25 [PkF] Wire wrote:
lol my stream died so I couldn't see how Trust lost
what happened ?
Dark dropped some lings and walked in with roaches/lings and killed an Artois pylon.
|
On July 14 2016 18:25 [PkF] Wire wrote:
lol my stream died so I couldn't see how Trust lost
what happened ?
Ling drop distracted him until the roach all-in arrived, then Dark busted the Artosis pylon powering every single warpgate.
|
|
|
You idiots Zest didn't lose to GuMiho.
|
Austria24422 Posts
Zest's PvT hasn't dropped, not sure what they're on about
|
On July 14 2016 18:26 [PkF] Wire wrote:hard to say if Dark looks on point or if Trust looks ridiculous based on this series
Two well executed attacks from Dark. Dark will take this group.
|
On July 14 2016 18:27 RaFox17 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:26 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:25 RaFox17 wrote:
That was BRUTAL! Dark looks on point. hard to say if Dark looks on point or if Trust looks ridiculous based on this series Two well executed attacks from Dark. Dark will take this group.
doubt such a basic approach will work vs Zest
|
On July 14 2016 18:27 RaFox17 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:26 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:25 RaFox17 wrote:
That was BRUTAL! Dark looks on point. hard to say if Dark looks on point or if Trust looks ridiculous based on this series Two well executed attacks from Dark. Dark will take this group.
Dark will be stomped by Zest.
Zest is best Zest is best.
|
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
|
On July 14 2016 18:27 RaFox17 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:26 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:25 RaFox17 wrote:
That was BRUTAL! Dark looks on point. hard to say if Dark looks on point or if Trust looks ridiculous based on this series Two well executed attacks from Dark. Dark will take this group.
well executed by Dark but Trust didn't look good at all. How the hell did he have only one pylon for all his production in game 2? And that opening in game 1 was really risky.
I don't think Zest will go down as easy as that
|
On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL.
|
On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
1/ different games so the fact he's Blizzcon champion is not relevant
2/ round robin group of 6 qualifiers is like as not volatile as you can get in sc2. Blame sOs for underperforming that day and losing to Trust in the decider.
|
|
|
hmmmm
when did Zest lose to Gumiho ?
|
Someone go tweet at Valdes that Zest and GuMiho didn't play each other in GSL, ffs.
|
On July 14 2016 18:33 [PkF] Wire wrote:
hmmmm
when did Zest lose to Gumiho ?
2014.
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
On July 14 2016 18:33 Elentos wrote:
Someone go tweet at Valdes that Zest and GuMiho didn't play each other in GSL, ffs.
ah yeah now I get why they're confused.
|
Frozen Temple? Time for the build?
|
Austria24422 Posts
I just tweeted at him, hope he sees it
|
On July 14 2016 18:35 Elentos wrote:
Frozen Temple? Time for the build?
cyclones and tanks ftw
|
Austria24422 Posts
Looks like the build Byun did vs Seed on KSS yesterday
Oh Cyclone, nvm
|
I am getting " this video is private on YouTube English link " .
Can someone fix it. Thanks.
|
On July 14 2016 18:36 [PkF] Wire wrote:cyclones and tanks ftw
Wait is this a real thing? Early cyclone before any other unit?
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
On July 14 2016 18:37 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:36 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:35 Elentos wrote:
Frozen Temple? Time for the build? cyclones and tanks ftw Wait is this a real thing? Early cyclone before any other unit?
cyclone tank + bunker contain with liberators and mines in the end is really strong on the short rush distances map
don't know if that's what aLive has in mind, you can check Gumiho's Proleague TvPs to see what I'm talking about
|
That adept micro vs the lock-on
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
On July 14 2016 18:38 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:37 Yello wrote:On July 14 2016 18:36 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:35 Elentos wrote:
Frozen Temple? Time for the build? cyclones and tanks ftw Wait is this a real thing? Early cyclone before any other unit? cyclone tank + bunker contain with liberators and mines in the end is really strong on the short rush distances map don't know if that's what aLive has in mind, you can check Gumiho's Proleague TvPs to see what I'm talking about
okay, I'll watch some vods then.
aLive was way too aggressive with his cyclone here though
|
zest so scared of hidden mines
|
Zest is literally the only Protoss who gets cannons that fast.
|
Austria24422 Posts
Well that's one way to die
|
Poll: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (1) 17% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2) 33% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (3) 50% 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
On July 14 2016 18:42 Olli wrote:
Well that's one way to die
One of many.
|
why was alive out on the map?
you can't do damage to toss while he's on 3 bases
|
Jesus my internet died again
what happened ?
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
On July 14 2016 18:43 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Jesus my internet died again
what happened ?
aLive was out on the map, Zest brought his entire army into aLive's main and force fielded the ramp.
|
On July 14 2016 18:43 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:43 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Jesus my internet died again
what happened ? aLive was out on the map, Zest brought his entire army into aLive's main and force fielded the ramp.
ha ha he loves to do that
thx
|
Can someone link me up to the English American? YT stream please? Thanks
Edit: nvm ty Inficted
|
On July 14 2016 18:43 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:43 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Jesus my internet died again
what happened ? aLive was out on the map, Zest brought his entire army into aLive's main and force fielded the ramp.
Zest always knew where alives army was and alive didn't know anything about Zests positioning. I don't know why alive didn't send a single marine down the middle lane if he planned to be aggressive via the top lane
|
|
|
Zest actually believes they're cross
|
Australia18228 Posts
7 probes for cyclone, is this Beta?
|
It's DT-Blink? By Zest?! Say it ain't so
|
I don't understand what Zest was thinking with no units and no pylon
still a prayer to Inca can always salvage a bad game
|
This game is not going too well for Zest.
|
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game
|
Okay that free medivac helps.
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game
He's going to, but it's Zest so it's fine
|
why would you bother dropping toss when he's only on 3 base? they can't take damage with photon overcharge
|
On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game
RIP aLive :/
|
On July 14 2016 18:50 IMPrime wrote:
why would you bother dropping toss when he's only on 3 base? they can't take damage with photon overcharge
or at least don't drop the most obvious most easily defendable spot
|
On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/
he's terrible
|
On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible
I wish I was as terrible as aLive
|
Poll: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (2) 29% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (5) 71% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 50% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3) 50% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend aLive vs Zest Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
And now is about the time aLive regrets picking Zest during the group selection.
|
On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive
ofc me too
but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly
|
Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out?
On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly
he did..
|
On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did..
Zest and Trust for me..
|
On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me..
still feel confident after the first series Trust played ?
|
On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ?
Dark was just too scared to face Trust in a real game so he played all-ins!
I think that's how this goes on ladder, right?
|
On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ?
I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled?
|
those ads are... hypnotizing
|
On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled?
well the series didn't last 8 minutes
|
On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled?
He got Artosis pylowned™
|
On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me..
Taking risks or faith in the power of Protoss?
|
On July 14 2016 18:58 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. Taking risks or faith in the power of Protoss?
Not voting Dark actually kinda made sense given his current bad form
but he seems to be on point enough to get out with Zest today
|
On July 14 2016 18:57 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled? well the series didn't last 8 minutes
On July 14 2016 18:57 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled? He got Artosis pylowned™
Just getting himself set up for the real games in the rematch.
On July 14 2016 18:58 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. Taking risks or faith in the power of Protoss?
I just don't have it in me to vote against my team. It's why I always bomb out in tipping competitions. 
|
On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled?
Are you physically at the venue?
|
51560 Posts
Guys, I can cook better carbonara than him. Why am I not invited on this show?!?!
|
Australia18228 Posts
Is this that virtual dating show ByuN will appear in?
|
On July 14 2016 19:00 Alur wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:49 [PkF] Wire wrote:
If Zest wins this aLive should just give up on the game RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled? Are you physically at the venue?
I most certainly am not. I fell asleep on my couch and just woke up and turned on the stream
|
On July 14 2016 19:00 GTR wrote:
Guys, I can cook better carbonara than him. Why am I not invited on this show?!?!
Either because you're not a pro (discrimination, sue them) or because your Korean isn't good enough (discrimination, sue them).
|
On July 14 2016 19:01 Inflicted wrote:
Is this that virtual dating show ByuN will appear in?
Yeah
:D
|
Australia18228 Posts
Seed retired to become a full time virtual dating "streamer"
|
On July 14 2016 19:01 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:00 Alur wrote:On July 14 2016 18:57 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:55 Phredxor wrote:On July 14 2016 18:54 Penev wrote:Anyone who voted differently than Dark & Zest getting out? On July 14 2016 18:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:52 Penev wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 18:51 Penev wrote:
[quote]
RIP aLive :/ he's terrible I wish I was as terrible as aLive ofc me too but he really handled a very advantageous situation extremely poorly he did.. Zest and Trust for me.. still feel confident after the first series Trust played ? I actually just got here, missed all the games so far. I assume he got rolled? Are you physically at the venue? I most certainly am not. I fell asleep on my couch and just woke up and turned on the stream
ㅋㅋㅋ Fair enough
|
|
|
I think she says Surrender the Throne, but all I hear is Surrender the Pron. I guess Dark reinvested his SSL winnings into a sizable collection.
|
On July 14 2016 19:07 Elentos wrote:
I think she says Surrender the Throne, but all I hear is Surrender the Pron. I guess Dark reinvested his SSL winnings into a sizable collection.
Pron the for the pron throne
|
|
|
the new block meta is interesting
|
Now I hope Zest prepares for the inevitable all-in.
|
Few in numbers, GTR. Few.
|
yeah probably roach ravager
|
|
|
did Zest pylon block a base? Because when that happens to me I expand to 3rd, make a roach warren and roach rush for the Protoss tears.
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
On July 14 2016 19:13 Ej_ wrote:
did Zest pylon block a base? Because when that happens to me I expand to 3rd, make a roach warren and roach rush for the Protoss tears.
Pylon + cyber
|
Austria24422 Posts
That's as good as it gets for holding this
|
Austria24422 Posts
And now Dark is really sad
|
Ok Dark lost, shouldn't have taken a 3rd base if he was planning to all-in in the first place.
|
Well now that he already has 2 cyber cores he might as well go mass air.
|
Dark seems to have a lot of faith in his macro ZvP
|
Australia18228 Posts
On July 14 2016 19:15 Ej_ wrote:
Ok Dark lost, shouldn't have taken a 3rd base if he was planning to all-in in the first place.
Transitional third
|
Ok Zest. I know your PvZ isn't great but you can't lose this from here surely.
|
|
|
Dark should just leave already
|
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 43% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4) 57% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
|
|
Zested him like a boss :D
|
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly
I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything"
|
Dark, basically, is only capable of cheese.
|
|
|
On July 14 2016 19:19 Olli wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything"
I mean nothing wrong with that but he prolonged Dark's death animation by a good 10 minutes
|
On July 14 2016 19:20 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:19 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything" I mean nothing wrong with that but he prolonged Dark's death animation by a good 10 minutes
Was the game even 10 minutes long?
|
On July 14 2016 19:20 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:19 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything" I mean nothing wrong with that but he prolonged Dark's death animation by a good 10 minutes
he wanted to enjoy his only win this series
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 19:20 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:19 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything" I mean nothing wrong with that but he prolonged Dark's death animation by a good 10 minutes
He did, but I like that vs zerg. It's easy to fuck up against ravager/ling sometimes, but no real way to screw up with mass blink/sentry and a 4th base for safety
|
On July 14 2016 19:21 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:20 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything" I mean nothing wrong with that but he prolonged Dark's death animation by a good 10 minutes Was the game even 10 minutes long?
yeah I was a little hyperbolic here
|
On July 14 2016 19:21 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:20 [PkF] Wire wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 19:19 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest just slightly too cautious
very very slightly I think the thought process there was "he can't do anything so I can do everything" I mean nothing wrong with that but he prolonged Dark's death animation by a good 10 minutes he wanted to enjoy his only win this series
ha ha ha
|
Zest does this 2 oracles thing every freaking game vZ I wonder why they're surprised
|
On July 14 2016 19:25 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest does this 2 oracles thing every freaking game vZ I wonder why they're surprised
Take a guess.
|
On July 14 2016 19:25 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest does this 2 oracles thing every freaking game vZ I wonder why they're surprised
Do you really think that any caster who isn't named Artosis watches Starcraft games?
|
On July 14 2016 19:26 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:25 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Zest does this 2 oracles thing every freaking game vZ I wonder why they're surprised Do you really think that any caster who isn't named Artosis watches Starcraft games?
they at least watched the ones they casted
early Alzheimer ?
|
so Dark just amoves now and wins, right?
|
Haven't seen this in a little while.
|
wow that was the best possible defense by Dark.
I though he would lose way more
|
Should bring a Defiler for Dark Swarm too
|
|
|
is this.. a 1-1 score? :o
|
Zest's multitasking is shite
|
This looks more like the Zest PvZ that I know.
|
I love when Zest gets rekt by a bit of multitasking.
|
Australia18228 Posts
Dark learning from European Zergs
|
|
|
|
|
On July 14 2016 19:29 Heartland wrote:
Should bring a Defiler for Dark Swarm too
I remember you used to bring vipers with muta clouds vs mech in HotS to blind the turrets, that was cool. If only blinded cannons lost detection...
|
On July 14 2016 19:29 Yello wrote:
wow that was the best possible defense by Dark.
I though he would lose way more
Yeah, literally. That was beautifully played out, I thought that he would lose to this kind of pressure and harassment just like majority of Zergs when they are not in their comfort zone.
|
I think if Zest had waited with the sentry drop until charge was done Dark's main base would have been rekt.
|
This is like watching BW ZvP where Protoss slowly loses their mind.
|
Dark let this get awkwardly close.
|
|
|
On July 14 2016 19:37 Elentos wrote:
Dark let this get awkwardly close.
hydra/lurker is really awful at attacking IAC, he has to choke Zest slowly
|
Zest is just going to get mined out it seems
|
Well Zest is dead to Broods now. But Dark pretty slack not winning earlier.
|
Barrier pretty good there
|
|
|
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (8) 80% ★★★ - Good game (1) 10% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 10% 10 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
Australia18228 Posts
Zest is so poor, only producing 2 obs lol
|
pretty impressive by Zest to have been able to stall the game for so long. I wonder if Dark wasn't too slow on the blords transition though.
|
Atleast throw away your army for the spectators zzz
|
A pleasure to watch this series!
|
On July 14 2016 19:40 [PkF] Wire wrote:
pretty impressive by Zest to have been able to stall the game for so long. I wonder if Dark wasn't too slow on the blords transition though.
Dark really did not have a chance to kill Zest before broods without taking a huge risk. Dark played it pretty safely and did not rush to broods.
|
On July 14 2016 19:41 -KG- wrote:
A pleasure to watch this series!
it's pretty high level yeah
|
On July 14 2016 19:41 RaFox17 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:40 [PkF] Wire wrote:
pretty impressive by Zest to have been able to stall the game for so long. I wonder if Dark wasn't too slow on the blords transition though. Dark really did not have a chance to kill Zest before broods without taking a huge risk. Dark played it pretty safely and did not rush to broods.
I guess so yeah. His macro ZvP actually doesn't look too bad.
|
A series, I forgot they existed
|
gtr is not going to cast more at all?
|
This is supposed to be a pretty good Zerg map, let's go Dark!
|
Italy3609 Posts
...gtr leaving? 
|
Australia18228 Posts
He announced it awhile ago
|
first time I see someone playing on this map. Is this like Ulrena but good? xD
|
I will miss gtr. He should cast more.
|
On July 14 2016 19:44 Yello wrote:
first time I see someone playing on this map. Is this like Ulrena but good? xD
I like it. I liked the games I saw on it and I enjoyed the ones I played yesterday.
|
On July 14 2016 19:45 [PkF] Wire wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:44 Yello wrote:
first time I see someone playing on this map. Is this like Ulrena but good? xD I like it. I liked the games I saw on it and I enjoyed the ones I played yesterday.
I like to think of it as Newkirk Precinct that doesn't make you regret playing Starcraft
|
|
|
|
|
holy crap my stream just died. Banelings?
okay back online. This looks like Zest is doing well
|
Australia18228 Posts
RIP Dark, this aint gonna work
|
sick timing 10 seconds before his +1
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
"I guess if he does not micro then i win"
That's what Darks attack looked like
|
Australia18228 Posts
Adept upgrade done, Dark is donezo
|
pretty interesting strat by Dark
|
|
|
|
|
Lol wtf he shaded onto banes and lost everything?
|
|
|
|
|
that was awesome. Just hearing the baneling sound and suddenly there's no more adepts
|
On July 14 2016 19:52 Phredxor wrote:
Lol wtf he shaded onto banes and lost everything?
"Who cares" - Observer.
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
Would have liked to see what happened.....
|
|
|
did Zest just shade on banelings ???
|
On July 14 2016 19:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:
did Zest just shade on banelings ???
he did but it was off camera
|
well gg Ej you had foreseen it
|
Australia18228 Posts
On July 14 2016 19:53 [PkF] Wire wrote:
did Zest just shade on banelings ???
Looked like it, he was morphing a lot of banes near the third beforehand
|
Way to throw Zest.
|
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (7) 58% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (2) 17% ★★★ - Good game (3) 25% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 12 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
DAAAAAARKKKKK!!!! WHO IS BEST NOW?!?!?!?!?!
|
Dark the king defend his throne!
|
Fugly game. That shade onto the banes was so stupid.
|
|
|
Welcome to the Darkest timeline.
|
Austria24422 Posts
I like zerg, you can never know whether they're making more units to keep all inning you or if they're making 20 drones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From "game almost won" to "pretty much dead" in one shade
|
|
|
Oh well. Zest got closer than I expected to beating him tbh.
|
shitty shades from Zest
also get out NASL sound guy
|
On July 14 2016 19:57 Alchemik wrote:
how did Dark play
well
a lot of agression and multitasking (lurker drops in game 2 on KSS after a succesful blink sentry defense ; ling bane in game 3 on New Gettysburg, a pretty messy one)
|
On July 14 2016 19:57 Alchemik wrote:
how did Dark play
failed roach allin on Frozen
lurker/hydra turtle with drops into broods >>> blink opening on KSS
ling/bane queen semi all-in with bane drops on Gettysburg, Zest defends and almost kills him with adept counter attack, but then shades entire army on banelings
|
Australia18228 Posts
Dark plays against Group D not Group B? unless they changed it...
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 19:59 Ej_ wrote:failed roach allin on Frozen lurker/hydra turtle with drops into broods >>> blink opening on KSS ling/bane queen semi all-in with bane drops on Gettysburg, Zest defends and almost kills him with adept counter attack, but then shaded entire army on banelings
Was already over at that point though
|
Italy12246 Posts
On July 14 2016 19:55 Olli wrote:
I like zerg, you can never know whether they're making more units to keep all inning you or if they're making 20 drones
As much as i despise zerg, that was actually just a good adjustment by Dark. When Protoss opens stargate and then gets glaives that timing is the only thing he could be doing, Dark just reacted well.
|
LP says 1st place A vs 2nd place D though
Damnit Zest I wanted you to advance before I have to leave for my exam.
|
I heard ling/bane and was like, "there really are people who still die to it?" but the circumstances make sense
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
|
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:01 Teoita wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 19:55 Olli wrote:
I like zerg, you can never know whether they're making more units to keep all inning you or if they're making 20 drones As much as i despise zerg, that was actually just a good adjustment by Dark. When Protoss opens stargate and then gets glaives that timing is the only thing he could be doing, Dark just reacted well.
He could just macro out of it though after holding that.
|
On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL.
the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year.
personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun)
If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else.
It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players.
So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl.
i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic".
i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example)
Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes.
|
On July 14 2016 20:09 berndniph wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL. the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year. personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun) If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else. It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players. So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic". i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example) Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes.
watch out as Trust beats aLive and then upsets Zest
name is not everything and this game is no exception ^^
|
On July 14 2016 20:09 berndniph wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL. the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year. personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun) If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else. It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players. So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic". i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example) Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes.
Different game.
|
On July 14 2016 20:09 berndniph wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL. the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year. personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun) If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else. It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players. So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic". i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example) Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes.
if sOs was any better than "mediocre", he would qualify, simple as that
|
|
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
This gonna be a good game.
|
|
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
this game just went full bonkers within the first 2 minutes
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:13 Inflicted wrote:
Wow sick turret mindgame
It's gonna block his SCVs when they're trying to run from the disruptor
|
Australia18228 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:13 Olli wrote:It's gonna block his SCVs when they're trying to run from the disruptor
He can cancel when he sees the disruptor though
|
Italy3609 Posts
colossus + disruptor drop hype
|
Proxy colossus? We just have to Trust that his opponent won't be aLive after this.
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
|
|
that was so awful by aLive
|
So much damage but he has barely any army to defend with.
|
this would look way weaker if alive just went factory-starport at home and got a quick viking or liberator out to push the prism away
|
Wonder if it would be better to just do nothing with your scvs
|
Australia18228 Posts
aLive would take less damage if he didn't split
|
Italy3609 Posts
...aLive not on top today...
|
On July 14 2016 20:15 Yello wrote:
this would look way weaker if alive just went factory-starport at home and got a quick viking or liberator out to push the prism away
there's a reason you proxy this
|
|
|
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (5) 71% ★★★ - Good game (2) 29% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 7 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
That was some curbstomping from Trust
|
Australia18228 Posts
KT fans will feel so confused if Trust advances over Zest
|
If Trust also eliminates aLive and Zest after sOs xD
|
So what are the odds on Trust advacing over Zest then getting kicked out of KT?
|
On July 14 2016 20:11 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:09 berndniph wrote:On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL. the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year. personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun) If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else. It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players. So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic". i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example) Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes. if sOs was any better than "mediocre", he would qualify, simple as that
So I guess maru is also a mediocre player huh
|
On July 14 2016 20:18 Phredxor wrote:
So what are the odds on Trust advacing over Zest then getting kicked out of KT?
He won't get kicked but we'll never see him again.
|
On July 14 2016 20:19 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:18 Phredxor wrote:
So what are the odds on Trust advacing over Zest then getting kicked out of KT? He won't get kicked but we'll never see him again.
They'd bring out the gimp
|
On July 14 2016 20:19 swissman777 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:11 Ej_ wrote:On July 14 2016 20:09 berndniph wrote:On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL. the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year. personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun) If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else. It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players. So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic". i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example) Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes. if sOs was any better than "mediocre", he would qualify, simple as that So I guess maru is also a mediocre player huh
do you really want me to answer this question :< ?
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:19 swissman777 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:11 Ej_ wrote:On July 14 2016 20:09 berndniph wrote:On July 14 2016 18:30 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 18:29 berndniph wrote:
can't believe het got out of his group and sOs didn't.
this is why sc2 needs more seeded players.
no one cares about trust or aLive if there is a possibility to watch sOs or Maru.
Qualifiers are still too volatile.
How can the Blizzcon champion not play in the ssl ?
He won Blizzcon 8 months ago in a different game. There was no basis to seed sOs into SSL. the world champion should always be allowed to play, since he is the champion for ONE year. personally i'm only watching games with players i follow (Maru, sOs, Dark, Byun) If my favorite Players isn't playing, i just do something else. It's the same in every other sport, i just watch my favorites teams or players. So because of this shitty qualifiers i have no interest in watching ssl. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one prefering a group with "Maru, Dark, Zest and Classic". i just don't care about a lot of players. (the whole foreigner scene for example) Even if the big guys underperform, the games are much more exiting than watching trust getting stomped by dark in 5 minutes. if sOs was any better than "mediocre", he would qualify, simple as that So I guess maru is also a mediocre player huh
Yeah
|
that build by aLive is so oldschool, I like it
|
Austria24422 Posts
Pretty sure that wasn't meant to snipe a prism, it was to force an overcharge to then attack with concussive shell. It's a HotS build
|
He lost a prism and a stalker, come on, it's not like he has to all-in because of that.
|
On July 14 2016 20:23 Olli wrote:
Pretty sure that wasn't meant to snipe a prism, it was to force an overcharge to then attack with concussive shell. It's a HotS build
yeah, aLive got lucky with his movement and the prism movement
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:24 Elentos wrote:
He lost a prism and a stalker, come on, it's not like he has to all-in because of that.
He was doing a 3gate adept attack, so it does suck that it got interrupted. It does help that aLive himself was planning an aggressive moveout that he had to back out of, so they're somewhat even
|
aLive has to attack now or he's losing his timing
edit: yeah, I think he missed it
|
On July 14 2016 20:25 Olli wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:24 Elentos wrote:
He lost a prism and a stalker, come on, it's not like he has to all-in because of that. He was doing a 3gate adept attack, so it does suck that it got interrupted. It does help that aLive himself was planning an aggressive moveout that he had to back out of, so they're somewhat even
I think that was supposed to be 3-gate stalker like Zest did vs Maru in Challenge.
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:27 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:25 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:24 Elentos wrote:
He lost a prism and a stalker, come on, it's not like he has to all-in because of that. He was doing a 3gate adept attack, so it does suck that it got interrupted. It does help that aLive himself was planning an aggressive moveout that he had to back out of, so they're somewhat even I think that was supposed to be 3-gate stalker like Zest did vs Maru in Challenge.
Doesn't Zest do that with blink?
|
On July 14 2016 20:28 Olli wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:27 Elentos wrote:On July 14 2016 20:25 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:24 Elentos wrote:
He lost a prism and a stalker, come on, it's not like he has to all-in because of that. He was doing a 3gate adept attack, so it does suck that it got interrupted. It does help that aLive himself was planning an aggressive moveout that he had to back out of, so they're somewhat even I think that was supposed to be 3-gate stalker like Zest did vs Maru in Challenge. Doesn't Zest do that with blink?
He did it without blink on King Sejong because Maru's opening had basically no units on the defense.
|
Trust adepted his gameplan
|
Australia18228 Posts
aLive getting outplayed so hard
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37064 Posts
So happy to see Dark made it out. I'm even happier to see that he made it out first. But the thing that makes me the most happy? Is that he beat Zest while doing it.
WAY TO GO DARK! MAH BOY!!!
|
aLive doesn't target fire the immortal :x
He's dEad
|
So many Artosis pylons today
|
On July 14 2016 20:31 Penev wrote:
So many Artosis pylons today
all of them on KT. Coincidence?
|
I love scrappy games! So entertaining to watch
|
On July 14 2016 20:32 Ej_ wrote:all of them on KT. Coincidence?
KT Artosis confirmed?
|
On July 14 2016 20:32 Ej_ wrote:all of them on KT. Coincidence?
KT.Tosis blizzcon 2017 winner
|
You Trust in your one single pylon too much.
|
Terrible defense by Trust, hope he loses now.
|
|
|
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (8) 57% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (4) 29% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2) 14% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 14 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
Another series! I feel like a spoiled brat
|
who else absolutely loved that game ?
|
And then when they think they're done they realize they still have to beat Zest to advance
|
On July 14 2016 20:37 Elentos wrote:
And then when they think they're done they realize they still have to beat Zest to advance
I'm afraid for Zest if Trust goes through, after all it's a teamkill and Trust may know things other Protosses don't to abuse his PvP.
|
Alive had 3 scv s at the end of that fight.!!
|
On July 14 2016 20:36 [PkF] Wire wrote:
who else absolutely loved that game ?
according to the poll only one person didn't :D
I'm kinda sad that the series will be decided on the most boring map in the pool
|
On July 14 2016 20:38 Gawd wrote:
Alive had 3 scv s at the end of that fight.!!
but he had bases and Trust was never going to get another base with the army supply aLive could throw at him
|
Trust always getting such late mscs
|
aLive seems in a very good position to get the third place
|
aaah that broken spot
oh nvm stalkers got the lib
|
|
|
On July 14 2016 20:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
aLive seems in a very good position to get the third place
well not anymore xD
|
yeah and like this Zest gets a dangerous PvP teamkill instead of a peaceful PvT
|
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (1) 17% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (5) 83% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
|
|
On July 14 2016 20:44 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
aLive seems in a very good position to get the third place well not anymore xD
yeah he got really murdered by the drop
|
On July 14 2016 20:45 Phredxor wrote:
Lol aLive you scrub.
at least he won the game of the day
|
On July 14 2016 20:44 [PkF] Wire wrote:
yeah and like this Zest gets a dangerous PvP teamkill instead of a peaceful PvT
Nice to have something at stake
|
shit I have to miss that last series. I hope it's good. Have fun guys ^^
|
I really really really do hate PO ... not because aLive lost (not a fan of him) but this game reminds me of my laddergames against Protoss.
Oh you're trying to harass? PO! Oh you're going in a second time? PO again!... and a third time... and a fourth time.
Edit: And while we're at it , have another PO at the front. >_>
|
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work.
|
My concern for Zest is rising.
|
<3 lalalalalalalaaaaaaaaaaaaaa <3
|
On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work.
dont kow what happend in g1 sry but
g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords
g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings
|
On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. but he shades all his adepts into banelings
i /facepalm at that...
|
On July 14 2016 20:52 Kaizor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. but he shades all his adepts into banelings i /facepalm at that...
They were decent games though
|
|
|
On July 14 2016 20:54 OsaX Nymloth wrote:
What am I even watching.
true love
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings
G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him
G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition.
G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done.
|
On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done.
I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map.
The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well
|
|
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well
I loved the first stage of the all in. Ling/bane/transfuse vs adept, msc and oracle micro, baneling drops into the main vs really fast probe splits and warpins
|
On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well
"Lurker turtle into gglords" may be the words of a biased individual by my expert assessment, unless we watched two different games.
|
On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done.
Thanks for the recap.
Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts.
|
Austria24422 Posts
Trust is essentially dead here
|
On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well
Well at least the games were good, will catch the vods later and not cringe in agony.
|
On July 14 2016 21:02 sparklyresidue wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well "Lurker turtle into gglords" may be the words of a biased individual by my expert assessment, unless we watched two different games.
Dont be so rude man ;D , i didnt catch the whole series cause i am at work
|
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 1?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3) 75% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (1) 25% 4 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 21:04 RKC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. Thanks for the recap. Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts.
An all in to me is a strategy that, if it doesn't do the damage it's designed to, will have no chance to win the game.
|
On July 14 2016 21:05 Kaizor wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well Well at least the games were good, will catch the vods later and not cringe in agony.
a warning: only watch Dark vs Trust if you are a Zerg and like to watch some well-executed all-ins totally destroying a player who looked quite lost
|
Italy12246 Posts
On July 14 2016 21:04 RKC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. Thanks for the recap. Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts.
In poker an allin isn't necessarily a flip (in terms of chance to win), it's just when someone bets all his chips (ie, either i win this pot or i'm out of the game). That's also basically what starcraft allins are; you either deal game-ending damage or you're out of the game.
Of course in poker it's easy to tell if someone gets busted or not, in starcraft defining game ending damage can be trickier.
|
On July 14 2016 21:07 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:05 Kaizor wrote:On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well Well at least the games were good, will catch the vods later and not cringe in agony. a warning: only watch Dark vs Trust if you are a Zerg and like to watch some well-executed all-ins totally destroying a player who looked quite lost
Luckily i am a lowly gold zerg who would definitely relish watching some protoss get demolished after getting demolished myself countless times by the big book of protoss bs.
|
On July 14 2016 21:06 fealx wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:02 sparklyresidue wrote:On July 14 2016 20:59 Yello wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. I prefer the way Olli describes it, those games were entertaining and stuff was happening. Especially the 2nd game, lots of good army movement by Zest, never overcommitting but always being active on the map. The 3rd game was really scrappy and fun to watch as well "Lurker turtle into gglords" may be the words of a biased individual by my expert assessment, unless we watched two different games. Dont be so rude man ;D , i didnt catch the whole series cause i am at work
Sorry, it's my nature! I thought the lurker drops were cool.
|
Austria24422 Posts
On July 14 2016 21:08 Teoita wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:04 RKC wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. Thanks for the recap. Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts. In poker an allin isn't necessarily a flip (in terms of chance to win), it's just when someone bets all his chips (ie, either i win this pot or i'm out of the game). That's also basically what starcraft allins are; you either deal game-ending damage or you're out of the game. Of course in poker it's easy to tell if someone gets busted or not, in starcraft defining game ending damage can be trickier.
It doesn't have to be game-ending damage in my book. Say you're on two bases and committing to killing a third base and if you succeed, you stay alive. That's not necessarily game-ending, but you get to continue the game. If you fail, you're dead. That's also an all in imo.
That's just my definition though. Maybe my interpretation is a bit liberal.
|
Austria24422 Posts
Ah geez, wrong buttons and stuff
|
Nice scout Zest. Why would you try to scout tech buildings anyway?
|
On July 14 2016 21:12 Olli wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:08 Teoita wrote:On July 14 2016 21:04 RKC wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. Thanks for the recap. Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts. In poker an allin isn't necessarily a flip (in terms of chance to win), it's just when someone bets all his chips (ie, either i win this pot or i'm out of the game). That's also basically what starcraft allins are; you either deal game-ending damage or you're out of the game. Of course in poker it's easy to tell if someone gets busted or not, in starcraft defining game ending damage can be trickier. It doesn't have to be game-ending damage in my book. Say you're on two bases and committing to killing a third base and if you succeed, you stay alive. That's not necessarily game-ending, but you get to continue the game. If you fail, you're dead. That's just my definition though. Maybe my interpretation is a bit liberal.
Yea if the game continues on somewhat even foots you could compare it to a split pot in poker, i guess.
|
On July 14 2016 21:08 Teoita wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:04 RKC wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. Thanks for the recap. Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts. In poker an allin isn't necessarily a flip (in terms of chance to win), it's just when someone bets all his chips (ie, either i win this pot or i'm out of the game). That's also basically what starcraft allins are; you either deal game-ending damage or you're out of the game. Of course in poker it's easy to tell if someone gets busted or not, in starcraft defining game ending damage can be trickier.
Sure, 'flip' isn't the best word to use, my mistake. You could have the nuts and allin and be 100% of winning.
Probably 'bust' is a better word. The attack either kills the enemy or you go bust and lose. So a heavy committed attack that fails and leave you far behind isn't necessarily an allin (in poker it would be like putting in 80% of your chips in the pot and losing - you're way far behind but still have a slim chance of coming back). I know we may be pulling hairs here.
|
Italy12246 Posts
On July 14 2016 21:15 RKC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:08 Teoita wrote:On July 14 2016 21:04 RKC wrote:On July 14 2016 20:56 Olli wrote:On July 14 2016 20:50 fealx wrote:On July 14 2016 20:47 Kaizor wrote:
Any kind soul to summarize Dark vs Zest series. Just got back from work. dont kow what happend in g1 sry but g2: Lurker turtle + drops into gglords g3: Failed Semi allin by dark into counterattack by Zest but he shades all his adepts into banelings G1: Dark tried a roach/ling all in but it did essentially nothing, Zest macro'd up and killed him G2: Dark defended a pre-lurker attack without really taking any damage, did tons of damage with lurker drops but then Zest did really well with superior army movement. Just didn't have the economy back at home to deal with the BL transition. G3: Dark did a ling/bane/queen all in, but then decided to all in again behind it, while Zest counterattacked. Dark killed the third, held the attack, won the game. By the time his adepts shaded into banelings, it was essentially already done. Thanks for the recap. Just a curious note: I notice that the term "allin" gets thrown about to describe heavily invested attack. But isn't an allin by definition a 'flip' which decides the match there and then (at least in poker)? If the allin failed but merely puts the player far behind and capable to mount another allin or macro up, can it really be considered an allin? Shouldn't an allin be limited to really extreme plays like 4pool in BW or one base vs two base plays? Just curious on your thoughts. In poker an allin isn't necessarily a flip (in terms of chance to win), it's just when someone bets all his chips (ie, either i win this pot or i'm out of the game). That's also basically what starcraft allins are; you either deal game-ending damage or you're out of the game. Of course in poker it's easy to tell if someone gets busted or not, in starcraft defining game ending damage can be trickier. Sure, 'flip' isn't the best word to use, my mistake. You could have the nuts and allin and be 100% of winning. Probably 'bust' is a better word. The attack either kills the enemy or you go bust and lose. So a heavy committed attack that fails and leave you far behind isn't necessarily an allin (in poker it would be like putting in 80% of your chips in the pot and losing - you're way far behind but still have a slim chance of coming back). I know we may be pulling hairs here.
Yeah that's how i think about it as well.
|
why would you ever fight dts with workers? He could have pulled and not taken any damage if he micros his stalkers
I'd consider that attack by Zest an all-in as well. Trust went for all the tech units while Zest went mass adept-stalker. If Zest doesn't kill him there Trust will have the way better army so he had to commit and subsequently lost the game
|
|
|
Zest, stop fucking throw away your mass adepts.
|
|
|
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 2?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 100% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 3 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
I can't believe Zest lost this. But I would have expected him to be able to scout decently, so I guess not all too surprising.
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
Italy3609 Posts
|
|
|
Austria24422 Posts
Was a really committed attack, Trust was so ahead in tech.
Somewhat all in :D
|
"The army of trust" seems like a good name for a sect
|
Damn, going to miss the last game
|
|
|
|
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
Italy12246 Posts
|
Australia18228 Posts
Well adept
Not well enough
|
Austria24422 Posts
If Trust hadn't lost the prism, I think this might have actually worked lol
|
On July 14 2016 21:26 Olli wrote:
I can't see this working
I think that could have worked if he didn't fight in 3 overcharges and if he didn't lose the prism. So with better execution that opening might actually be something to throw into a bo3 or bo5
|
Austria24422 Posts
Trust is about to die. Really interesting build though.
|
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 3?★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (2) 67% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1) 33% ★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 3 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
On July 14 2016 21:28 Olli wrote:
If Trust hadn't lost the prism, I think this might have actually worked lol
Yeah looked far closer to breaking Zest than I expected.
|
That last attack was brutally well executed :D Zestuuuu
|
Zest is Best! Trust is Bust! 
|
Australia18228 Posts
TY vs Zest if TY wins the group lol
|
On July 14 2016 21:40 Inflicted wrote:
TY vs Zest if TY wins the group lol
I don't see TY advancing past the Ro8 tbh. Beating Zest or Dark is no easy task.
|
On July 14 2016 21:43 spir00 wrote:I don't see TY advancing past the Ro8 tbh. Beating Zest or Dark is no easy task.
I could see TY maybe beating Zest in a close series since it is a teamkill and he has historically struggled in them. Then again Zest hasn't lost a bo3+ PvT this year so I wouldn't give TY a great chance. TY probably has a better chance against Dark.
|
jeah it is better for TY not to finish first in his group with zest pvt and the teamkill and vs dark he has great tvz and dark struggles in zvt
|
On July 14 2016 21:49 Lil_nooblet wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 21:43 spir00 wrote:On July 14 2016 21:40 Inflicted wrote:
TY vs Zest if TY wins the group lol I don't see TY advancing past the Ro8 tbh. Beating Zest or Dark is no easy task. I could see TY maybe beating Zest in a close series since it is a teamkill and he has historically struggled in them. Then again Zest hasn't lost a bo3+ PvT this year so I wouldn't give TY a great chance. TY probably has a better chance against Dark.
TY doesn't have the best TvZ and Dark has been so far schooling him in LotV.
|
Yeah but I'd still agree he has a better chance vs Dark. Zests PvT is still just stupid good.
Also thats another RO8 for his streak.
|
anywhere to find vods for this group?
|
Dark & Zest advancing - who would have thought
Valdes has grown on me - enjoying his casting a lot these days
|
On July 14 2016 22:35 Phredxor wrote:
Yeah but I'd still agree he has a better chance vs Dark. Zests PvT is still just stupid good.
Also thats another RO8 for his streak.
Yeah, kinda insane how Zest crushed + Show Spoiler +aLive in the game where a quick Cyclone sniped his probes and his DTs got scouted, and yet he still managed to macro up and take a supply lead mid-game.
|
On July 14 2016 22:55 warok wrote:
anywhere to find vods for this group?
+ Show Spoiler +https://www.youtube.com/user/ESportsTV/videos
Should be up the next day most of the time. Sometimes it takes a few days.
|
Wooooo Dark :D Unfortunately I missed the group, but I'm happy he advanced :D
|
|
|
All according to plan. Funkukuku
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
