EPT[GSL Pre-Season] Quarter Finals - Page 7
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
PinoKotsBeer
Netherlands1385 Posts
| ||
|
heishe
Germany2284 Posts
On December 17 2015 20:53 stevorino wrote: what happened, that studio looks really cheap, especially the background with the all bubbles in the plastic film O_o they're above the main studio for pre season because other stuff is going on there. | ||
|
Damnitmynameistaken
United States187 Posts
On December 17 2015 20:59 Undead1993 wrote: ?? terran was doing so well until the raoches attacked dafuq Wasn't he down a lot by army supply? I remember about 70+ vs 30~40 | ||
|
heishe
Germany2284 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:01 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: You pretty much need balanced patch against roach/ravager. Yes, the Terran did nothing wrong in this game at all, it's all roach/ravager imbalance. Sigh... Pro tip: If it's 7 minutes into the game and your first tank just arrives you either better have a shit ton of marines or you're gonna lose. The Terran basically had unupgraded marines (no shield and upgrades were 1/0 vs zerg 0/1), some marauders, and half the army supply vs Zerg because he had so much invested in reapers and lost them all (people shouldn't underestimate them - they can do some serious damage in a fight and also split up the slow roaches), and lost some units in his failed attempt to attack the third hatch. | ||
|
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:02 Damnitmynameistaken wrote: Wasn't he down a lot by army supply? I remember about 70+ vs 30~40 ye he was overconfident for sure moving out without medivacs getting caught, artosis explained it quite well, was kinda a throw | ||
|
Vedeynevin
United States431 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:01 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: You pretty much need balanced patch against roach/ravager. Lol, please tell me how nerfing the ravager would have changed the outcome of that game. | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51485 Posts
| ||
|
KtJ
United States3514 Posts
| ||
|
pure.Wasted
Canada4701 Posts
too much SC2 for one day t.t will have to catch the rest tomorrow | ||
|
PepperMintTea
187 Posts
| ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:03 Vedeynevin wrote: Lol, please tell me how nerfing the ravager would have changed the outcome of that game. I'm almost sure if it could be only a simple roach attack without Ravager the outcome would be different, imagine u need some kind of ravager den, than those attack comes later. Ravager is a good solution in busting terran walls/bunkers as well as a pretty simple tool to deal with tanks/liberators. | ||
|
rauk
United States2228 Posts
you need banshees | ||
|
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
| ||
|
10bulgares
352 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:02 heishe wrote: Yes, the Terran did nothing wrong in this game at all, it's all roach/ravager imbalance. Sigh... Pro tip: If it's 7 minutes into the game and your first tank just arrives you either better have a shit ton of marines or you're gonna lose. The Terran basically had unupgraded marines (no shield and upgrades were 1/0 vs zerg 0/1), some marauders, and half the army supply vs Zerg because he had so much invested in reapers and lost them all (people shouldn't underestimate them - they can do some serious damage in a fight and also split up the slow roaches), and lost some units in his failed attempt to attack the third hatch. Agreed. Terran was greedy, up 20 workers or something and his early game investment in reapers didn't pay off thanks to ByuL's good defense with good scouting of the position of the reapers. | ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51485 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:07 PepperMintTea wrote: alright quick bite before I get back to work, have the games been good so far? I'm happy Byul got through herO beat down!! | ||
|
Vedeynevin
United States431 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:09 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: I'm almost sure if it could be only a simple roach attack without Ravager the outcome would be different, imagine u need some kind of ravager den, than those attack comes later. Ravager is a good solution in busting terran walls/bunkers as well as a pretty simple tool to deal with tanks/liberators. He didn't even need the ravager in that attack is what I'm saying. Just roaches would have won. | ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
 | ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:13 cSc.Dav1oN wrote: And only zerg players don't see the issue in ravager, interesting I don't see any pros complaining about ravagers, it's always the other things - Lurkers, Ultras, Nydus, Vipers | ||
|
Vedeynevin
United States431 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:12 10bulgares wrote: Agreed. Terran was greedy, up 20 workers or something and his early game investment in reapers didn't pay off thanks to ByuL's good defense with good scouting of the position of the reapers. No it was clearly the OP ravager that prevented the superior terran player from winning. /s | ||
|
Elentos
55550 Posts
On December 17 2015 21:12 mCon.Hephaistas wrote: Oh no a no name Terran loses, better start to whine about some unit again.. Funny you say that as most big name Terrans spent all day failing in the SSL qualifiers. | ||
| ||
