EPTGEM looks like a team, works like a team and plays like a team. I call it a team.
Acer TeamStory Cup Season 3 Qualifier - Page 50
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
GEM looks like a team, works like a team and plays like a team. I call it a team. | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
 Mekar <Polar Night> Patience MorroW <Frost> PatienceStarNaN <Yeonsu> PatienceRunA <Habitation Station> PatienceRunA <Heavy Rain> StrelokRunA <Daedalus Point>  GoldenMorroW <Alterzim Stronghold> GoldenMorroW <Polar Night> Revenge(not sure this one, at least terran) | ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
It's the +Roccat bit I have a problem with there. Bunch of teamless players form a clan? Alright I can get behind that. Bunch of teamless players form a clan then partner with an actual team? Ermm no, that's not a thing and the whole management agency thing is nonsense as well. Same with XMG. You can't partner with a team that doesn't exist. The way this should have been done imho is to specify that a partnership must include a team consisting of X minimum players of which Y minimum players must participate. Don't get me started on Empire partnering with Fnatic and bringing Fnatic into the league without Fnatic actually having to qualify. That's not the same team that played last season, not even close, they should have had to requalify at that point. GEM looks like a team, works like a team and plays like a team. I call it a team. A management group is not a team. Bounty Hunters you can argue are a team, GEM is not. Bounty Hunters + HyuN = Bounty Hunters + Joker imho. Partnering with teams for just one player is not ok and definitely fits the Joker rule from last year. | ||
|
ssxsilver
United States4409 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:10 NovaMB wrote: The Joker ruler (mercenary from a different team) was revoked this season, but teams found a loophole and "partnered" with player agencies. I guess nobody at TaKeTV took player agencies into account when doing the rulebook What's the difference between the Joker and Cooperation rule in the rulebook? I agree that the Bounty Hunter team is silly, but Vega-RoX and XMG-CSA (Violet being a mercenary so I can see that as a violation) is just two groups no? Sorry for asking so many questions, I'm just curious. Edit: Thanks guys. That makes sense now. | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:17 ssxsilver wrote: What's the difference between the Joker and Cooperation rule in the rulebook? I agree that the Bounty Hunter team is silly, but Vega-RoX and XMG-CSA (Violet being a mercenary so I can see that as a violation) is just two groups no? Sorry for asking so many questions, I'm just curious. CSA is a player agency, not a team, Vega-RoX is a partnership between teams, XMG-CSA not so much. Basically why everyone was upset is the player agency nonsense | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
 | ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:17 ssxsilver wrote: What's the difference between the Joker and Cooperation rule in the rulebook? I agree that the Bounty Hunter team is silly, but Vega-RoX and XMG-CSA (Violet being a mercenary so I can see that as a violation) is just two groups no? Sorry for asking so many questions, I'm just curious. The difference is taking two rosters and merging them vs cherry-picking from a roster. Jokers are effectively ringers at that point, plus it causes a bunch of problems when those players can't play in the finals (see Western Wolves getting slaughtered because their Joker San couldn't participate). I really think there should either be a minimum quota of players from the other team you have to field or some other requirement that ensures relatively even participation. If I suddenly announced Axiom-KT and all I did was pay Zest to come and stomp on people, would people be ok with that? They shouldn't be, that's not a partnership, that's hiring a mercenary to do your heavy lifting. | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:19 NovaMB wrote: I wish my liquipedia edits wouldnt need to be approved every time did you enter the results for AI vs prop? Because I just wanted to do that and they are in the edit but not approved yet :p | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:20 Yello wrote: did you enter the results for AI vs prop? Because I just wanted to do that and they are in the edit but not approved yet :p Yep. Fucked up twice though and fixed it. Guess thats why I need approval | ||
|
Dingodile
4131 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:14 TotalBiscuit wrote: A management group is not a team. Bounty Hunters you can argue are a team, GEM is not. Bounty Hunters + HyuN = Bounty Hunters + Joker imho. Partnering with teams for just one player is not ok and definitely fits the Joker rule from last year. What about Roccat.Dimaga? | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
ssxsilver
United States4409 Posts
| ||
|
Niko_Thien
Germany2671 Posts
Well in theory he is allowed to play. | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10301 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:21 NovaMB wrote: Yep. Fucked up twice though and fixed it. Guess thats why I need approval I think it's for everyone who is still new to doing LP stuff. All my changes have to be approved as well. Keep editing till you get those bronze coins I guess ^.^ | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23570 Posts
| ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
| ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:24 Yello wrote: I think it's for everyone who is still new to doing LP stuff. All my changes have to be approved as well. Keep editing till you get those bronze coins I guess ^.^ But I have a bronze coin already Also gogogo Welmu! | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On March 25 2014 06:20 TotalBiscuit wrote: The difference is taking two rosters and merging them vs cherry-picking from a roster. Jokers are effectively ringers at that point, plus it causes a bunch of problems when those players can't play in the finals (see Western Wolves getting slaughtered because their Joker San couldn't participate). I really think there should either be a minimum quota of players from the other team you have to field or some other requirement that ensures relatively even participation. If I suddenly announced Axiom-KT and all I did was pay Zest to come and stomp on people, would people be ok with that? They shouldn't be, that's not a partnership, that's hiring a mercenary to do your heavy lifting. 100% agree with what you've been saying the whole time. If you're going to be getting a single player to all-kill for your team do it like Liquid and actually pay the guy. | ||
|
GreenMash
Norway1746 Posts
| ||
| ||
