|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 1?★ - Do not see this game no matter what (4) 44% ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (3) 33% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2) 22% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (0) 0% 9 total votes Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★ - Good game (Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
|
On January 22 2014 16:24 Daogin wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:24 NovemberstOrm wrote:On January 22 2014 16:23 Daogin wrote:On January 22 2014 16:23 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On January 22 2014 16:22 hansonslee wrote:On January 22 2014 16:18 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Somewhere in California, the Steppes of War mapmaker has just started a petition to put his map back in the WCS pool. Hey, give the man who made Incineration Zone some love too! And if those two mapmakers had a baby... it would be named Daedalus. Sounds like a movie michael bay could make it interesting 2 hours of shit exploding But only the protoss, never the zergs
|
On January 22 2014 16:24 xuanzue wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:22 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Everyone bitches that the maps are all the same and it's no good for the viewers.
Then everyone bitches when a map isn't the same as all the others.
not all people, khaldor seems to love every map with free 3rd where you can see a death ball vs a free ball.
This map is fine on the ladder, completely OK with that, but in a WCS system where players careers and lives depend on the success of this tournament, it has no fucking business being in the map pool. Especially in a bo3 format with no vetoes. At least put the map out on ladder for a season at least to test results. But this map is different in the shittiest way possible. There is absolutely nothing special about this map that allows people to look passed the shortcomings, it's just a wide open map with no personality, it's just different for the sake of being different without any redeeming qualities. The theme of the map is even boring as hell.
|
On January 22 2014 16:24 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:22 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Everyone bitches that the maps are all the same and it's no good for the viewers.
Then everyone bitches when a map isn't the same as all the others.
There is a difference between being different and just being plain bad... They can at least try to tweak it. Or do you want to see 1 base maps as well because that would be different too...
Im down for experimentation, it's more interesting even if you do get a couple of maps that are terrible. A veto system would probably fix everything though.
|
On January 22 2014 16:25 imrusty269 wrote: Nobody feels sorry for terran playes. L2p noobs. Well... + Show Spoiler +I didn't really have any occasion to do so from the beginning of SC2 until now, so just for this time, I won't feel sorry at all.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
why take a greedy third with phoenixes and not voidrays like sOs
|
Canada16217 Posts
|
United States11390 Posts
Life going SH on Yeonsu, surprise.
|
On January 22 2014 16:28 samurai80 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:25 imrusty269 wrote: Nobody feels sorry for terran playes. L2p noobs. Well... + Show Spoiler +I didn't really have any occasion to do so from the beginning of SC2 until now, so just for this time, I won't feel sorry at all.
Well, aren't your expectations a bit too SkyHigh?
|
On January 22 2014 16:28 lichter wrote: why take a greedy third with phoenixes and not voidrays like sOs
Yeah, I was like where are the Voidrays, Paralyze?
No respect.
|
Im in school and my teacher is dealyed. Seems like im the only one enjoying myself, watching those games meanwhile everyone else is kind of sleeping on the tables O.o
|
|
On January 22 2014 16:27 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:24 vthree wrote:On January 22 2014 16:22 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Everyone bitches that the maps are all the same and it's no good for the viewers.
Then everyone bitches when a map isn't the same as all the others.
There is a difference between being different and just being plain bad... They can at least try to tweak it. Or do you want to see 1 base maps as well because that would be different too... Im down for experimentation, it's more interesting even if you do get a couple of maps that are terrible. A veto system would probably fix everything though.
If I am not mistaken WCS NA and EU have 1 veto per player, but GSL is an exception... So the problem comes from different rules for regions.
|
REDDITS WITH YOU HERR WOLF
|
Posting on Tl on my phone while watching, yes On January 22 2014 16:27 Glorfindel! wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:25 SoleSteeler wrote: Watching this with my students in class ㅠㅠ
And then you wrote this... O.o
|
On January 22 2014 16:26 bo1b wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:22 pure.Wasted wrote:On January 22 2014 16:19 bo1b wrote: While I agree with you Khaldor I don't think it's the place to say it. If people stay quiet, nothing will change. I salute the casters for speaking their minds when the truth is so self-evident. I'm not advocating not saying anything, I just think saying it in what is meant to be the most prestigious event in korea seems a little unprofessional. I guess it's a just shitty situation.
Ya well you would think the most prestigious event in Korea would be able to get a map pool that isn't completely retarded and imbalanced. There is completely no testing that goes on beforehand to see how the results turn out. Putting a map like this on ladder is completely fine, test it out first though before putting it into competition play where players careers and lives are at stake, especially in the WCS system where the cumulative points system counts from the very beginning. Same goes for Heavy Rain and the TvP matchup, it's extremely favored for Blink and shouldn't be in the WCS map pool.
|
I asked a kid,
what do you like zerg or protoss?
Answer: terran
|
Canada16217 Posts
sloppy letting the voidrays kill that base
|
On January 22 2014 16:30 SoleSteeler wrote:Posting on Tl on my phone while watching, yes Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:27 Glorfindel! wrote:On January 22 2014 16:25 SoleSteeler wrote: Watching this with my students in class ㅠㅠ
And then you wrote this... O.o Ohh, sorry. Its just that I said in a post over that "while you are in class you cant pay attention to the teacher because you got to watch Starcraft - therefore the random dude in the thread didnt get the Berlin Wall joke cause he did not pay attention on the history class".
And then you wrote that you watch with your students ^^
However, TLLR must be a good place to study english in a fun way for students? ^^
|
On January 22 2014 16:30 ArTiFaKs wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 16:26 bo1b wrote:On January 22 2014 16:22 pure.Wasted wrote:On January 22 2014 16:19 bo1b wrote: While I agree with you Khaldor I don't think it's the place to say it. If people stay quiet, nothing will change. I salute the casters for speaking their minds when the truth is so self-evident. I'm not advocating not saying anything, I just think saying it in what is meant to be the most prestigious event in korea seems a little unprofessional. I guess it's a just shitty situation. Ya well you would think the most prestigious event in Korea would be able to get a map pool that isn't completely retarded and imbalanced. There is completely no testing that goes on beforehand to see how the results turn out. Putting a map like this on ladder is completely fine, test it out first though before putting it into competition play where players careers and lives are at stake, especially in the WCS system where the cumulative points system counts from the very beginning. Same goes for Heavy Rain and the TvP matchup, it's extremely favored for Blink and shouldn't be in the WCS map pool. I agree, I just don't think it's the time to comment on it.
|
|
|
|