(Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★ - Do not watch unless you got nothing better to do
(Vote): ★ - Don't watch, seriously don't

goody153

44020 Posts

October 06 2013 10:32 GMT

#104

On October 06 2013 19:29 lolfail9001 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Splitting chargelots is WAY harder than splitting marines though, because marines do not run towards banelings if they attack.
StarDust better return to his old 2-1 timing with immortal-sentry-chargelot IMO.

yeah i know .. also if zealot has charge it is way more harder .. i think against that kind of composition you should never make zealots and just mass stalkers and sentries

SneX

Sweden377 Posts

October 06 2013 10:33 GMT

#105

GOGO StarDustOh

lolfail9001

Russian Federation40186 Posts

October 06 2013 10:33 GMT

#106

On October 06 2013 19:32 goody153 wrote:

Show nested quote +

yeah i know .. also if zealot has charge it is way more harder .. i think against that kind of composition you should never make zealots and just mass stalkers and sentries

And then you have to deal with hydra ling without collosi and storm. Zerg morphs banes as a reaction, not as plan.

Fjodorov

5007 Posts

October 06 2013 10:33 GMT

#107

On October 06 2013 19:30 Musicus wrote:
Splitting chargelots is pretty much impossible, they just run in their death, no baneling speed needed, really smart from Nerchio

. I was wondering how he was going to win without roaches to tank the chargelots.

Yeah you can never split zealots like stimmed marines but just a little bit of splitting of the zealots makes such a huge difference to the effectiveness of the banelings.

Weavel

Finland9221 Posts

October 06 2013 10:33 GMT

#108

On October 06 2013 19:30 Shellshock wrote:

Show nested quote +

The zealot splitting level on starcraft master was just so annoying for me.

Oh don't remind me. I ragequited like 3 times playing that level.

goody153

44020 Posts

October 06 2013 10:34 GMT

#109

On October 06 2013 19:31 lolfail9001 wrote:

Show nested quote +

Probably, but it will happen if SD fails to all-in :D

meh .. i doubt it .. stardust is pretty nice so probably nerchio not gonna do that

Salteador Neo

Andorra5591 Posts

October 06 2013 10:34 GMT

#110

Not like SD had any spare gas after all those phoenixes and a few Archons.

Hell he had a bazilion zealots and still floating minerals.

lolfail9001

Russian Federation40186 Posts

October 06 2013 10:34 GMT

#111

On October 06 2013 19:34 goody153 wrote:

Show nested quote +

meh .. i doubt it .. stardust is pretty nice so probably nerchio not gonna do that

I remember the first time the shit talk between 'em happened was when StarDust failed 7 gate.

goody153

44020 Posts

October 06 2013 10:35 GMT

#112

stardust loves zealot/phoenix aggression

lolfail9001

Russian Federation40186 Posts

October 06 2013 10:38 GMT

#113

Man, that small micro war was really cute. Who cares about defender's advantage, if lack of it gives such a beauty of a battle.

Salteador Neo

Andorra5591 Posts

October 06 2013 10:41 GMT

#114

With standard pro micro, Nerchio had this game from the start IMO

First the roaches countered easily the zealot+stalker attack, even if his army cost was a bit lower.

Then he could force a cancel on the third whenever he wanted.

lolfail9001

Russian Federation40186 Posts

October 06 2013 10:42 GMT

#115

On October 06 2013 19:41 Salteador Neo wrote:
With standard pro micro, Nerchio had this game from the start IMO

First the roaches countered easily the zealot+stalker attack, even if his army cost was a bit lower.

Then he could force a cancel on the third whenever he wanted.

ZvP confirmed imba for Z /sarcasm