On June 17 2013 01:06 WigglingSquid wrote:
The plural of nexus is not nexi. Stop it.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
The plural of nexus is not nexi. Stop it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
Nexus and Colossus, apparently the two hardest words to pluralize in the English language.
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
June 16 2013 16:10 GMT
#1441
On June 17 2013 01:06 WigglingSquid wrote: The plural of nexus is not nexi. Stop it. ![]() Nexus and Colossus, apparently the two hardest words to pluralize in the English language. | ||
Wintex
Norway16835 Posts
June 16 2013 16:10 GMT
#1442
On June 17 2013 01:07 Bagi wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 01:05 Wintex wrote: On June 17 2013 01:04 Bagi wrote: On June 17 2013 00:59 Scarecrow wrote: On June 17 2013 00:54 Bagi wrote: On June 17 2013 00:47 Wintex wrote: I sense favoritism for the swede. This isnt making sense. 5>4 and that's maps WON. Lucky should advance. "My Koreans should advance despite having equal map score and losing the head-to-head match, else its favoritism!" Seriously, I'm getting real tired of your shtick. No, Thorzain won less maps and shouldn't advance. H2H is only okay when there's nothing else differentiating the players. Since when do we only consider maps won and not maps lost? They both end up with +1 map wins, but please do explain why maps won is the only reasonable metric. I'd love to hear it. Because you handled the other players in the group better. A 2-0 can be close, but most of the time, it is more onesided than even. I guess. Oh fuck, I bet you would be arguing this if a foreigner dropped out? Seriously the only reason for this argument is because of KR fanboys who can't accept that their guy lost fair and square. I'll argue if the player that doesn't advance has been told that he advances and then gets shut down by a ruleset that is left to an admin's interpretation. | ||
Sated
England4983 Posts
June 16 2013 16:10 GMT
#1443
| ||
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
June 16 2013 16:10 GMT
#1444
| ||
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
June 16 2013 16:10 GMT
#1445
On June 17 2013 01:09 _SpiRaL_ wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 01:08 ghosthunter wrote: Why someone with, let's say, 4 wins and 0 losses should be behind someone with 5 wins and 4 losses? This is probably the best example that makes it apparent why raw game wins shouldn't be used instead of differential. It creates perverse incentives. Exactly. What is a better score 2/1 or 101/100. It's obvious right? in percentages it's 2:1 ![]() always a matter of perspective | ||
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
June 16 2013 16:10 GMT
#1446
On June 17 2013 01:07 SebaZ wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 00:59 sc2superfan101 wrote: In my book: more wins should equal advancement regardless of losses. I think the one that won the head to head should win regardless of map scores. So glad that thorzain was able to pull it off ![]() I think head to head would have meant Thorzain would be out of the group because of the 3-way tie. Obviously irrelevant, but I'm glad Thorzain made it thru. | ||
Sated
England4983 Posts
June 16 2013 16:11 GMT
#1447
| ||
blobrus
4297 Posts
June 16 2013 16:11 GMT
#1448
I don't know why Elfi isn't building a warp prism though. | ||
Jampackedeon
United States2053 Posts
June 16 2013 16:11 GMT
#1449
On June 17 2013 01:08 Musicus wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 01:06 Sated wrote: On June 17 2013 01:02 Musicus wrote: On June 17 2013 00:56 greenelve wrote: On June 17 2013 00:54 Musicus wrote: On June 17 2013 00:53 greenelve wrote: Is it known at which stream Jaedong games will be casted? On the mainstream right now. Also: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AklGLUOqCLs1dGNTSTdrUVRQTGl4MndXSEVwSWNwLWc&f=true&noheader=true&gid=1 thank you very much, exactly what i was hoping for. :D Np, it's really your life line while watching this DH, you can find the link in the OP btw if you lose it. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=417317 Just use this. R1CH is a wizard. Yep that's just sick, he is a wizard indeed, but if you want to plan ahead the google doc is your friend. Wow, this is awesome. Thanks R 1 C H! | ||
Wintex
Norway16835 Posts
June 16 2013 16:11 GMT
#1450
| ||
Xoronius
Germany6362 Posts
June 16 2013 16:11 GMT
#1451
On June 17 2013 01:10 Undead1993 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 01:09 _SpiRaL_ wrote: On June 17 2013 01:08 ghosthunter wrote: Why someone with, let's say, 4 wins and 0 losses should be behind someone with 5 wins and 4 losses? This is probably the best example that makes it apparent why raw game wins shouldn't be used instead of differential. It creates perverse incentives. Exactly. What is a better score 2/1 or 101/100. It's obvious right? in percentages it's 2:1 ![]() always a matter of perspective That´s what he was saying, I think. | ||
BakedButters
United States748 Posts
June 16 2013 16:12 GMT
#1452
| ||
Noonius
Estonia17413 Posts
June 16 2013 16:12 GMT
#1453
On June 17 2013 01:06 WigglingSquid wrote: The plural of nexus is not nexi. Stop it. ![]() Plural is nexus. Because the word nexus is an irregular plural. | ||
_SpiRaL_
Afghanistan1636 Posts
June 16 2013 16:12 GMT
#1454
The reason goals scored is the next tie breaker after goal difference is simply to encourage attacking footballl. 4-3 is better than 1-0 to encourage exciting games. Do you see why this makes NO sense in SC2 as a comparison? | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
June 16 2013 16:12 GMT
#1455
On June 17 2013 01:12 Noonius wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 01:06 WigglingSquid wrote: The plural of nexus is not nexi. Stop it. ![]() Plural is nexus. Because the word nexus is an irregular plural. nexus or nexuses are both accepted plural forms | ||
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
June 16 2013 16:13 GMT
#1456
On June 17 2013 01:12 BakedButters wrote: Why doesn't Elfi use warp prism? no apm left | ||
_SpiRaL_
Afghanistan1636 Posts
June 16 2013 16:13 GMT
#1457
On June 17 2013 01:10 Undead1993 wrote: Show nested quote + On June 17 2013 01:09 _SpiRaL_ wrote: On June 17 2013 01:08 ghosthunter wrote: Why someone with, let's say, 4 wins and 0 losses should be behind someone with 5 wins and 4 losses? This is probably the best example that makes it apparent why raw game wins shouldn't be used instead of differential. It creates perverse incentives. Exactly. What is a better score 2/1 or 101/100. It's obvious right? in percentages it's 2:1 ![]() always a matter of perspective Of course its 2-1! Who could possibly argue 101-100 is a better score??? | ||
artrea
Latvia3560 Posts
June 16 2013 16:14 GMT
#1458
| ||
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
June 16 2013 16:14 GMT
#1459
| ||
NHY
1013 Posts
June 16 2013 16:14 GMT
#1460
This also happened at 2012 DreamHack Open: Summer, Group Stage #2, Group G. 3 way tie between Seiplo (5-3), Mini (4-3), ToD (5-4). Seiplo and Mini advanced. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby10408 summit1g7669 Dendi1415 Beastyqt918 Pyrionflax200 Trikslyr97 Skadoodle29 JuggernautJason21 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • davetesta23 StarCraft: Brood War• musti20045 ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Laughngamez YouTube • intothetv ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
OSC
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
BSL Nation Wars 2
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] SOOP Global
ByuN vs Zoun
Rogue vs Bunny
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL Nation Wars 2
The PondCast
|
|