EPTOn June 17 2013 00:57 Steins;Gate wrote:
Why don't they just do tiebreakers?
Sting>Thorzain>Lucky>Sting
Why don't they just do tiebreakers?
Sting>Thorzain>Lucky>Sting
This. It seems unfair to say any of those guys is out.
[DreamHack] Summer Day 2 2013 - Page 70
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
This. It seems unfair to say any of those guys is out. | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
|
Oddball28
Denmark2121 Posts
| ||
|
sOda~
United Kingdom441 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:58 MrMotionPicture wrote: This. It seems unfair to say any of those guys is out. Because the tournament had to be over in 3 days. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:54 Bagi wrote: "My Koreans should advance despite having equal map score and losing the head-to-head match, else its favoritism!" Seriously, I'm getting real tired of your shtick. No, Thorzain won less maps and shouldn't advance. H2H is only okay when there's nothing else differentiating the players. | ||
|
CCa1ss1e
Canada3231 Posts
| ||
|
Undead1993
Germany17651 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:59 StarVe wrote: Harpner beating GoOdy with skytoss. harpner make it happen harpner vs life | ||
|
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:58 Ropid wrote: Dude... 5/4 is a smaller number than 4/3. Type it into a calculator if you don't believe it. *Facepalm... DID I SAY I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT????? In my book: more wins should equal advancement regardless of losses. Is that too hard for you to understand or should I break it down even more barney-style for you? | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:59 sOda~ wrote: Because the tournament had to be over in 3 days. That is why they have a rule that gives us coinflips after 3 tiebreakers. | ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:59 Scarecrow wrote: No, Thorzain won less maps and shouldn't advance. H2H is only okay when there's nothing else differentiating the players. And ThorZaIN lost less maps. | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:59 sc2superfan101 wrote: *Facepalm... DID I SAY I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT????? In my book: more wins should equal advancement regardless of losses. Is that too hard for you to understand or should I break it down even more barney-style for you? Well, there's not much point arguing right? Isn't the decision finalized? | ||
|
Luolis
Finland7111 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:59 sc2superfan101 wrote: *Facepalm... DID I SAY I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT????? In my book: more wins should equal advancement regardless of losses. Is that too hard for you to understand or should I break it down even more barney-style for you? Why should they? That doesnt make sense. | ||
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
 | ||
|
cravin74
Malaysia1088 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:57 Steins;Gate wrote: Why don't they just do tiebreakers? Sting>Thorzain>Lucky>Sting They could be separated on map score/head-to-head, if all that was equal, then they would have a tiebreaker like Lucifron's group at the last Dreamhack. | ||
|
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:59 sc2superfan101 wrote: *Facepalm... DID I SAY I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND IT????? In my book: more wins should equal advancement regardless of losses. Is that too hard for you to understand or should I break it down even more barney-style for you? But more losses is completely fine? | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
LimitSEA
Australia9580 Posts
| ||
| ||
