[DreamHack] Summer Day 2 2013 - Page 69
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
DoubleB
Germany870 Posts
| ||
![]()
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
artrea
Latvia3560 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:53 greenelve wrote: Is it known at which stream Jaedong games will be casted? OP has Google Doc, there is main stream in English, also Dimaga's stream in Russian and some other streams | ||
Musicus
Germany23570 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:53 greenelve wrote: Is it known at which stream Jaedong games will be casted? On the mainstream right now. Also: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AklGLUOqCLs1dGNTSTdrUVRQTGl4MndXSEVwSWNwLWc&f=true&noheader=true&gid=1 | ||
Wintex
Norway16835 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:50 stuchiu wrote: motbob wrote this entire thing: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=399543 http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=404503 Also, this is Dreamhack. They should have used a coin. What motbob wrote is just genius. Ah well, round robin is a shitty format when you have 4 player groups and i don't see why they do the exact same mistake every time. | ||
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
| ||
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:47 Wintex wrote: I sense favoritism for the swede. This isnt making sense. 5>4 and that's maps WON. Lucky should advance. "My Koreans should advance despite having equal map score and losing the head-to-head match, else its favoritism!" Seriously, I'm getting real tired of your shtick. | ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
Lucky, your luck has run out ![]() | ||
Facultyadjutant
Sweden1876 Posts
| ||
sc2superfan101
3583 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:50 4ZakeN87 wrote: Man people are stupid.. but okay lets not give up on mankind yet. I will try to explain it, maybe someone will get smarter. So the score is based wins and lose, or rather the difference between them. Lose are negative, wins are positive. That means Thorzain and lucky have the same score, positive 1. Thus they are T-I-E-D in score. As they are T-I-E-D the rules progresses to the next deciding factor, in this case head-head performance. Than Thorzain beat Lucky, that is the same as he wins in the next deciding category. See? Hey... did I say I didn't understand it? No... I said it was a retarded system. I'm not surprised that it's the way it is with this tournament though (and no other), because DH has the most retarded rules of any tournament I've ever seen. So... instead of being a dick and making yourself look even dumber... try actually working on your reading comp. eh? | ||
grapedog
United States151 Posts
| ||
greenelve
Germany1392 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:54 Musicus wrote: On the mainstream right now. Also: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AklGLUOqCLs1dGNTSTdrUVRQTGl4MndXSEVwSWNwLWc&f=true&noheader=true&gid=1 thank you very much, exactly what i was hoping for. :D | ||
CCa1ss1e
Canada3231 Posts
| ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:56 grapedog wrote: clearly zerg need more units that create free units. 3 is not enough... A long long time ago, back in the beta, Overseers could spawn infested Terrans. Unlimited Supply! | ||
Wintex
Norway16835 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:54 Bagi wrote: "My Koreans should advance despite having equal map score and losing the head-to-head match, else its favoritism!" Seriously, I'm getting real tired of your shtick. I'll stop. The ruleset is bad and written in a way that it can be read differently. The fault lies on that and I get just as pissed every time people get fucked by the rules (coin flips are painful, for example). | ||
Steins;Gate
1422 Posts
Sting>Thorzain>Lucky>Sting | ||
Ropid
Germany3557 Posts
On June 17 2013 00:55 sc2superfan101 wrote: Hey... did I say I didn't understand it? No... I said it was a retarded system. I'm not surprised that it's the way it is with this tournament though (and no other), because DH has the most retarded rules of any tournament I've ever seen. So... instead of being a dick and making yourself look even dumber... try actually working on your reading comp. eh? Dude... 5/4 is a smaller number than 4/3. Type it into a calculator if you don't believe it. | ||
BakedButters
United States748 Posts
| ||
NguN
Australia1322 Posts
| ||
| ||