EPT[Code S] RO32 Group B 2013 GSL Season 1 - Page 73
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
rj rl
648 Posts
| ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12042 Posts
| ||
|
Scarlett`
Korea (South)2399 Posts
| ||
|
Sumahi
Guam5609 Posts
| ||
|
WhX
Germany778 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On January 23 2013 21:52 Glubschauge wrote: nydus roach aggression and creep spread, yeah Ah. So the one nestea and leenock have been doing although i think they like to do it with a hatch cancel | ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
| ||
|
Vesky
United States857 Posts
| ||
|
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
| ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
|
liberate71
Australia10252 Posts
| ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
| ||
Inflicted
Australia18228 Posts
On January 23 2013 21:53 Vesky wrote: Supply drops don't eat up minerals, so they save you 100 minerals that you'd mine, while mules don't 'save' you any minerals, they just mine them faster. Everyone's fond of saying that it's real smart in certain situations, but it's usually used for supply blocks, and is almost never practical, despite what a lot of people seem to think. Ryung used it vs MarineKing when he was contained on 2-bases (while dropping MKP's bases) | ||
|
Thinasy
2856 Posts
| ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On January 23 2013 21:54 Goibon wrote: Dammit, didn't want to see a ZvZ. Oh boy, this season won't be your favorite then I hope Leenock makes it through. We need Curious to protect the borders. | ||
|
Miragee
8677 Posts
| ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On January 23 2013 21:53 Vesky wrote: Supply drops don't eat up minerals, so they save you 100 minerals that you'd mine, while mules don't 'save' you any minerals, they just mine them faster. Everyone's fond of saying that it's real smart in certain situations, but it's usually used for supply blocks, and is almost never practical, despite what a lot of people seem to think. Happy actually used it as a strategy while he was meching on Entombed Valley in one of his GSL matches but it's one of those decisions a player makes that may be worth it but may not. Given the entirety of baby's matches in SC2 thus far, it's not a stretch to say it's probably sloppy macro. Although in both games he did end up losing a fair amount of supply to roaches. | ||
|
Confuse
2238 Posts
| ||
|
Herect
Brazil216 Posts
On January 23 2013 21:51 Eufouria wrote: No they're not. Artosis knows a lot about starcraft but this isn't the first time he's said that supply drops can be better than building depots in a timely manner and he's still not right. BaBy just uses them so much because its better to supply drop than be supply blocked for too long. It's not bad macro. TY is consciously doing this. It's just too much Supply Depots Calldowns to be Macro mistakes. And it makes since he was going mech and staying too much on 2/3 bases. | ||
| ||
