EPT[SPL] CJ Entus vs. EG-TL R1 - Page 110
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Bonejaw
Canada5 Posts
| ||
|
Khaldor
Germany861 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:57 JJH777 wrote: Winners league lets a team with 1 good player win though. Proleague is actually based on which is the better TEAM. That's not true. That's what snipers are for etc. Both systems actually produce very similar results. We had this discussion going on for years in WC3. A lot in this system depends on luck (map + matchup you get). While in the elemination format good team-strategies can win you the day. | ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
| ||
|
Exarl25
1887 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:56 monkybone wrote: Playing the metagame is nothing like doing the exact same old cookie cutter build... You have no idea what you're talking about. These days it is. Sure it's important to have some degree of consistency to allow a metagame to develop. But what we see in SC2 now is not a developing metagame, it's stagnation. Every game plays out the same, every map plays out the same. It's boring as shit. You need to keep things fresh and reward innovation. Some crazy new maps to shake things up a bit are a very welcome addition and long overdue. The overwhelmingly favorable response should be proof enough of that. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:56 Khaldor wrote: We had the same two systems in WC3 and I would prefer the winners league system over this format any day. I think it's much more interesting and dynamic This format favours more preparation and less generic games. I like Winner's League for one round but any more and it gets a bit dull (they had it for two rounds of a season a few years ago) | ||
|
Resentable
Canada132 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:58 nomyx wrote: 2 base muta hydralisks what is this, brood war? I wish Then we could break out the shuttles and reavers ;____; | ||
|
iamho
United States3347 Posts
edit: nevermind he sucks | ||
|
Havik_
United States5585 Posts
| ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
| ||
|
IndyO
392 Posts
| ||
|
GunPaladin
United States1205 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
| ||
|
Moka
Canada942 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland26224 Posts
On December 16 2012 17:59 Exarl25 wrote: These days it is. Sure it's important to have some degree of consistency to allow a metagame to develop. But what we see in SC2 now is not a developing metagame, it's stagnation. Every game plays out the same, every map plays out the same. It's boring as shit. You need to keep things fresh and reward innovation. Some crazy new maps to shake things up a bit are a very welcome addition and long overdue. The overwhelmingly favorable response should be proof enough of that. Exactly, and bring that to ladder too. Hell, I used to love the old map-pool with XNC and Metalopolis. Yeah they weren't great maps, but as a Protoss I had to play out games using different openers to other maps, and different openers if I spawned close air on Meta. Players, especially Zergs (no offence folks  ) complained so much that they wanted macro maps that we have incredibly stagnant map pool and styles employed | ||
|
ref4
2933 Posts
| ||
|
GreyKnight
United States4720 Posts
| ||
|
Dubzex
United States6994 Posts
| ||
|
Arceus
Vietnam8333 Posts
 | ||
|
casualman
United States1198 Posts
And he still crushed it. | ||
| ||
