EPTDreamhack Summer [Day 2] - Page 99
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
arQ
1033 Posts
| ||
|
SnowK
United States245 Posts
| ||
|
flakmonkey
Australia254 Posts
| ||
|
silent_owl
Philippines3098 Posts
| ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On June 17 2012 23:53 ohampatu wrote: I think he started out in cs possibly? I can't remember. To speak about this though. Yes, 120 is completely overkill. The human eye can barely recognize pas 75+. Also, most Starcraft and Starcraft 2 Programers seem to be complete noobs when it comes to technology. False. The human eye does not work in FPS. What you can say is that the human vision can recognize up to 10-12 individual images per second, but refresh rates can affect vision and perception of motion differently. | ||
|
Lasbike
France2888 Posts
| ||
|
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
| ||
|
DOUDOU
Wales2940 Posts
On June 17 2012 23:53 ohampatu wrote: I think he started out in cs possibly? I can't remember. To speak about this though. Yes, 120 is completely overkill. The human eye can barely recognize pas 75+. Also, most Starcraft and Starcraft 2 Programers seem to be complete noobs when it comes to technology. My friend and I are IT people, and we actually recently had a discussion how each pro seems to be 'bad' at using a computer. Apart from playing the game of course. 1-the human eye doesn't work in frame per second, saying the eye can't see the difference over x fps is completely dumb read this http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm 2-the reason cs player praise the 100fps mark is because of tickrate, basicly, in counter strike, the computer sends 100 packets of information per second, if you are below 100fps, then less than 100 packets have been processed, giving you a disadvantage in the game | ||
|
Serinox
Germany5224 Posts
xDDDD | ||
|
Fueled
United States1610 Posts
On June 17 2012 23:58 Lasbike wrote: "Monster is paying us almost enough for the guy behind you [stephano]" ©SirScoot omg did he really say that?!?! I turned it off when they said they were leaving. | ||
|
ohampatu
United States1448 Posts
On June 17 2012 23:55 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Where's your scientific evidence for that? Read this: http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm And one of the conclusion from that article: scientific evidence isn't always needed, especially for that type of question that can be answered for any person who has played games for 10+ years. you will not tell the difference in SC2 if your playing at 100 FPS or 150 FPS. If you have no pc issue, they will look almost completely the same. Im not saying you can't scrutinize it and tell the difference, but i was simply answering the question above. Which is yes, its overkill. EDIT: lol, people being dumb i know the eye doesn't see in fps. I was answering a general basic questions. | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
bokchoi
Korea (South)9498 Posts
| ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
thats how u beat dem koreans!^^ | ||
|
Slakkoo
Sweden1119 Posts
| ||
|
kju
6143 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
|
Aeroplaneoverthesea
United Kingdom1977 Posts
| ||
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
WHAT HAPPENED TO APOLLO'S BEAUTIFUL HAIR. No homo. | ||
|
arQ
1033 Posts
| ||
| ||
