EPTdespite nani saying pvz is his worst, it should be okay. especially considering his closest teammate (SaSe) just killed stephano's "unbeatable zvp"
[Code S] RO32 Group B GSL 2012 Season 3 - Page 152
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
-TesteR-
Canada1165 Posts
despite nani saying pvz is his worst, it should be okay. especially considering his closest teammate (SaSe) just killed stephano's "unbeatable zvp" | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
I love anyone who works hard basically. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24604 Posts
(Also, first time post, long time lurker. Wee.) | ||
|
Darthsanta13
United States564 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:11 [17]Purple wrote: Would people consider NaNiwa a "StarTale" Protoss? He would be wouldn't he since he has lived and trained there for such a long time and would SaSe count as well? I think I would. Startale has a reputation for having an amazing Protoss lineup and Naniwa and Sase live and train with those people. So it's not too much of a stretch to lump them into the same category with the success they've both been having. | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:10 Otolia wrote: People don't know this but ESL is actually known for banning hackers even for minor offenses. Online qualifiers is a viable solution. It is not only about viability; it is exclusivity that makes a GSL spot so prized. Also, having only live qualifiers ensures that no-shows will rarely happen. I don't like Naniwa, but I'm happy for him that he performed so well today. I don't know why people need to talk shit about him when he is obviously good. Whether or not he is a nice person is irrelevant today. | ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
Cheers | ||
|
revel8
United Kingdom3022 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:26 -TesteR- wrote: despite nani saying pvz is his worst, it should be okay. especially considering his closest teammate (SaSe) just killed stephano's "unbeatable zvp" Sase's results are not transferable to Naniwa. Stephano beating MC, Squirtle, Parting, Alicia, JYP, Socke (3 times!), Mana, Bling, HwangSin just in the last month or so shows how strong Stephano's ZvP is currently. This also highlights why Sase deserves credit for taking that series over Stephano. Naniwa does not get the props for that win, similarly Sase does not get the props for Naniwa's wins today. I accept they may have helped each other prepare builds but even so. | ||
|
Heouf
Netherlands787 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:26 DamageControL wrote: God I love naniwa. I love anyone who works hard basically. Then you must like all the koreans!!! | ||
|
Sc2Null
United States3754 Posts
hey i work hard | ||
|
daxile
Canada829 Posts
| ||
|
nath
United States1788 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:47 revel8 wrote: Sase's results are not transferable to Naniwa. Stephano beating MC, Squirtle, Parting, Alicia, JYP, Socke (3 times!), Mana, Bling, HwangSin just in the last month or so shows how strong Stephano's ZvP is currently. This also highlights why Sase deserves credit for taking that series over Stephano. Naniwa does not get the props for that win, similarly Sase does not get the props for Naniwa's wins today. I accept they may have helped each other prepare builds but even so. the players themselves disagree with you | ||
|
revel8
United Kingdom3022 Posts
Which players? My post mentioned 12. | ||
|
-TesteR-
Canada1165 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:47 revel8 wrote: Sase's results are not transferable to Naniwa. Stephano beating MC, Squirtle, Parting, Alicia, JYP, Socke (3 times!), Mana, Bling, HwangSin just in the last month or so shows how strong Stephano's ZvP is currently. This also highlights why Sase deserves credit for taking that series over Stephano. Naniwa does not get the props for that win, similarly Sase does not get the props for Naniwa's wins today. I accept they may have helped each other prepare builds but even so. I said SaSe beating stephano should just be taken into consideration when looking at nani's pvz, not as a transferable achievement. (Also stephano did not beat MC recently, he got stomped in their last engagement which was 2012 redbull Lan I believe :D) | ||
|
Harbinger631
United States376 Posts
On June 13 2012 01:11 -TesteR- wrote: I said SaSe beating stephano should just be taken into consideration when looking at nani's pvz, not as a transferable achievement. (Also stephano did not beat MC recently, he got stomped in their last engagement which was 2012 redbull Lan I believe :D) Since when is losing 3-2 getting "stomped"? | ||
|
revel8
United Kingdom3022 Posts
On June 13 2012 01:11 -TesteR- wrote: I said SaSe beating stephano should just be taken into consideration when looking at nani's pvz, not as a transferable achievement. (Also stephano did not beat MC recently, he got stomped in their last engagement which was 2012 redbull Lan I believe :D) Stephano certainly did beat MC recently. Stephano narrowly lost to MC 3-2 at Red Bull. However a week before he beat MC 2-0 at MLG Spring Arena 2. I was referring to that as that occured about a month ago and is valid to use to highlight Stephano's current ZvP strength, and thus add credit to Sase's achievement. | ||
|
GreyKnight
United States4720 Posts
On June 13 2012 00:26 -TesteR- wrote: despite nani saying pvz is his worst, it should be okay. especially considering his closest teammate (SaSe) just killed stephano's "unbeatable zvp" Stephano looked the better player in that series honestly. I think if they meet again stephano will crush him. He got overconfident | ||
|
redc
Australia81 Posts
On June 12 2012 22:23 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: But GSL is different, GSL is the premier tournament for the best of the best where winning Code S means far more than winning any other tournament. I don't know why such a fuss is made of the 2 GSL seeds. To pick some sports at random, all 4 Tennis majors have wildcard entries at the discretion of the organisers, professional cycling has team wildcard entries, golf has invites, on and on it goes. What is the big deal? | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
| ||
|
Fighter
Korea (South)1531 Posts
| ||
|
revel8
United Kingdom3022 Posts
On June 13 2012 01:19 redc wrote: I don't know why such a fuss is made of the 2 GSL seeds. To pick some sports at random, all 4 Tennis majors have wildcard entries at the discretion of the organisers, professional cycling has team wildcard entries, golf has invites, on and on it goes. What is the big deal? People like to complain! Some people seem to think road to Code S is via Code A. The reality is that GOM run GSL and they decide how the qualifiers work. They make the rules and can change them as they see fit. GOM determine who is in Code S and no-one else. Of course some folks like to pretend they are the sole arbiters of deciding who is 'worthy' but in reality it is GOM's call. GOM are running a business and so commercial forces will always influence their decisions. The new KESPA transition to SC2 will change the situation. There will be competing Korean tournaments to GSL and maybe seeds/invites will be used to allow 'transfer' of players between Korean competitions. Not exactly sure how things will work out, but the current situation may very well be shaken up. | ||
| ||
