| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:38 Ruscour wrote: I don't think there's a single thing foreigners are better at than Koreans now. The only foreigners I consider to be at the highest level of PvP all train in Korea. I disagree. Naniwa and HuK have a higher win rate vs. TOP Koreans in PvP than TOP Koreans have vs. them. | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
| ||
|
haegN
Norway547 Posts
Edit: no homo | ||
|
ShAdZ_ZX
Australia635 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17737 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
| ||
|
Talionis
Scotland4085 Posts
Game 2, Heart won the first game. | ||
|
Doomwish
438 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:39 ShAdZ_ZX wrote: Fuck everything about Tal'Darim you sound mad. | ||
|
Chunhyang
Bangladesh1389 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:38 Azarkon wrote: I disagree. Naniwa and HuK have a higher win rate vs. TOP Koreans in PvP than TOP Koreans have vs. them. Stephano has better hair than all. | ||
|
Seohce
United Kingdom394 Posts
| ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:35 Thinasy wrote: "No?" 73.33% in Korea, yeah he's way better then HuK @ PvP, you can't use the argument "he won once". Huk wins all the PvP's he has played for quite some time now. Its funny how many Swedish people seem to troll Huk. Why can't people like both Huk and Naniwa -_- | ||
|
Havik_
United States5585 Posts
| ||
|
Bear4188
United States1797 Posts
Game 2 regame, after a disconnect already during game 2. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:38 Azarkon wrote: I disagree. Naniwa and HuK have a higher win rate vs. TOP Koreans in PvP than TOP Koreans have vs. them. HuK and Naniwa are the product of Korean training though, I don't think they are a good argument for " foreign pvp is better " | ||
|
CrAzEdBaDgEr
Canada166 Posts
| ||
|
flowSthead
1065 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:36 Ventor wrote: He is sub-par. Just because he does well for 2 weeks doesnt mean he's amazing. In the recent mlgs, hes done worse than huk. lol... So many bias people in this LR. MC is a god and that's the bottom line. Whether or not Naniwa has had a good two weeks, I don't think you understand the meaning of the words sub-par. Par implies average. Sub-par implies below average. What exactly is average if Naniwa is below average? Even if I take the premise that MC is a god, which I don't since there have been Protoss players doing better than him recently and fairly often, that still doesn't mean that Naniwa is sub-par. MC could be a god and Naniwa could still be very good, because you have yet to define an average. As for whether or not I am biased, at least I think logically, which is more than I can say for you. | ||
|
Zealot Orgy
United Kingdom537 Posts
| ||
|
ShAdZ_ZX
Australia635 Posts
I am, its a terrible map for Zerg with the current FFA v 3 hatch metagame -.- I don't care that DRG lost a game, good on HuK and his 2 base play, but as a Zerg players its frustrating how bad the map is. | ||
|
jianming
149 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:36 Ventor wrote: He is sub-par. Just because he does well for 2 weeks doesnt mean he's amazing. In the recent mlgs, hes done worse than huk. lol... So many bias people in this LR. MC is a god and that's the bottom line. I wouldn't say he's sub-par, but I don't understand why people are saying his GSL run suddenly makes him better than Huk. Naniwa won 2 PvPs, beat Ryung and beat Virus. PvP's don't count, right? Because when Huk had his MLG runs they didn't count. And Huk beat both Ryung and Virus at IPL4. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
OSC
Douyu Cup 2020
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
OSC
Douyu Cup 2020
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
Maestros of the Game
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
Douyu Cup 2020
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
