|
On March 15 2012 22:45 BoxingKangaroo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2012 22:40 Maghetti wrote:On March 15 2012 22:36 BoxingKangaroo wrote:On March 15 2012 22:34 Sajaki wrote:On March 15 2012 22:33 BoxingKangaroo wrote: Why they keep calling him ForGG? That's his BW name right? That's going to stick with him forever? well actually forgg renamed his sc2 account and stream accounts "forgg" so kinda think he likes it better then "fin" So why play under Fin for GSL? Genuinely curious. I can't believe no one has figured this out yet. The GSL names you after your account name as a default. ForGG entered with his smurf account Fin and that is the ONLY reason he has that name. He calls himself ForGG on his stream and has said he wants to be called that in chat. Well then maybe he shouldn't have entered with his smurf account...  This isn't his first season either right? Surely he could change inbetween?
Fin should use his free name change to switch to fOrGG.
|
go fin go!!!
looks like he is ahead, 1 banshee to kill tanks! :D
|
On March 15 2012 22:45 BoxingKangaroo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2012 22:40 Maghetti wrote:On March 15 2012 22:36 BoxingKangaroo wrote:On March 15 2012 22:34 Sajaki wrote:On March 15 2012 22:33 BoxingKangaroo wrote: Why they keep calling him ForGG? That's his BW name right? That's going to stick with him forever? well actually forgg renamed his sc2 account and stream accounts "forgg" so kinda think he likes it better then "fin" So why play under Fin for GSL? Genuinely curious. I can't believe no one has figured this out yet. The GSL names you after your account name as a default. ForGG entered with his smurf account Fin and that is the ONLY reason he has that name. He calls himself ForGG on his stream and has said he wants to be called that in chat. Well then maybe he shouldn't have entered with his smurf account...  This isn't his first season either right? Surely he could change inbetween?
I doubt he really cares. Koreans use their actual names most of the time anyways, the only people that care about their account name are foreigners.
|
On March 15 2012 22:45 Giriath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2012 22:40 TheBB wrote:On March 15 2012 22:40 Giriath wrote: Fin is already through for certain? And he's playing a game that's deciding for HuK and Virus? Yes. I don't like that. I won't say that ForGG won't play his best, but he or any player in his position could play without effort with no repercussions for themselves. That's just a property of the system, hard to avoid.
Looking at the game, I'd say Fin is playing just fine.
|
You guys are killing me with ambiguous comments, can't figure out who is losing CCs  no broodwar style live report t.t
|
On March 15 2012 22:45 Giriath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2012 22:40 TheBB wrote:On March 15 2012 22:40 Giriath wrote: Fin is already through for certain? And he's playing a game that's deciding for HuK and Virus? Yes. I don't like that. I won't say that ForGG won't play his best, but he or any player in his position could play without effort with no repercussions for themselves.
What else would you do? It's a round robin, it's how things work, it's one of the weaknesses of the system. The best way to guarantee that you don't have your fate rest in someone else's hands is to just win the damn games so that it doesn't come down to a tiebreaker like that.
|
Oh my god, I love that Fin actually lifted his vikings up instead of going for the cost effective trade vs Hellions. Its painful when players see "oh free Hellions" and then they lose the air battle.
|
Please live report! Need to know what's happening!
|
On March 15 2012 22:40 TheBB wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2012 22:36 ichnaschekot wrote:On March 15 2012 22:35 Quintum_ wrote: Gom messed up, they should of made fin play first cause he would not of known if he would of advanced. Can someone explain me that writing of "of" instead of "have"? It's becoming quite popular, but I don't get it. It's evil. Shun it. It's probably meant for literately challenged people.
|
Hahahaha! What a bad game!
|
On March 15 2012 22:43 Ketch wrote: Hey, I was away for a bit. I thought we theorized yesterday that a 4-way tie was not possible.
Khaldor thought otherwise today: Thomas Kilian @Khaldor 32m LOL, this is getting INSANE!!!! WTF is going on with this group? Oo? We could have a four-way-tie in todays #GSL group....
Is Khaldor confused or can a 4-way tie, resulting in a 4 person tiebreaker happen?
No. Every player would have played 3 games against players with the same standing, so the possible standings for each person would be 3:0 2:1 1:2 0:3 (impossible) Then the score would have 2 guys 2:1 vs 2 guys 1:2; so thes 2 2:1player advance or 1 guy 3:0 3 1:2 so the 3:0 would go through.
|
|
This game is retarded lol
|
ouch, that seems byebye huk
|
|
Australia18228 Posts
|
|
Anyone have shots of HuK facepalming backstage? lol
|
On March 15 2012 22:44 Fragile51 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 15 2012 22:43 Ketch wrote: Hey, I was away for a bit. I thought we theorized yesterday that a 4-way tie was not possible.
Khaldor thought otherwise today: Thomas Kilian @Khaldor 32m LOL, this is getting INSANE!!!! WTF is going on with this group? Oo? We could have a four-way-tie in todays #GSL group....
Is Khaldor confused or can a 4-way tie, resulting in a 4 person tiebreaker happen? You could also look at the age of that tweet and realise that two games have been played in that time z_z
Yeah yeah, I know that. It was a question if it was theoretically possible. Anyways, I read back and I still have to conclude it is not really possible.
|
omg! i was really scared with that counteratack good to see fin take him out.
|
|
|
|