On March 11 2012 06:22 VX14 wrote: so... absolutely no benefit in being in the winners bracket...
Can people stop saying things like these, it's not true. EG had to win fewer games to get to the final, they played two up until the final and liquid had to play three.
uh... not true at all... EG had to win 2 sets to get to the final, Liquid also had to win 2 sets to get to the final.
It seemed like sometimes you could see what people had before they re-rolled, and other times you couldn't.
I think that's one of the more interesting parts of the game, where you see what you opponent has and the team has to decide who to risk to pick up an anti-air. Or just when a player is really greedy and throws away a decent unit only to get something even sillier.
On March 11 2012 06:22 VX14 wrote: so... absolutely no benefit in being in the winners bracket...
Can people stop saying things like these, it's not true. EG had to win fewer games to get to the final, they played two up until the final and liquid had to play three.
EG had to win 2 games to get to final and TL also had to win 2.
[QUOTE]On March 11 2012 06:26 VX14 wrote: [QUOTE]On March 11 2012 06:25 ovnell wrote: [QUOTE]On March 11 2012 06:22 VX14 wrote: so... absolutely no benefit in being in the winners bracket...[/QUOTE] Can people stop saying things like these, it's not true. EG had to win fewer games to get to the final, they played two up until the final and liquid had to play three.[/QUOTE]
On March 11 2012 06:21 Roxor9999 wrote: Wow this format sucks so unfair for EG.
It's a fucking random monobattles tournament.
That's not a very convincing argument.
Don't ruin a fun event by being whiny...He said off the bat it wasn't double elim.
OP says other wise
How is this even a tournament? - Because I will it. Each team will enter a BO3 double elimination bracket to ensure maximum unfairness. They will battle through to the BO5 finals in an effort to grab a $1000 prize.