| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
eloist
United States1017 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:27 sleepingdog wrote: Are you "really" counting Terrans losing in a MIRROR match? Ok, that's it for now, I can only handle so much stupidity on one day... What? All non TvT results add up to 50% as there were no mirror matches besides TvT. And you call me stupid for that? | ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:28 Asha` wrote: Jup, MVP skipped it to concentrate on GSL. MLG invites = Nada, Coca, Tester, Bomber. Oh snap. This might be DRG's chance to take it down. | ||
|
paradox_
Canada270 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:27 rpgalon wrote: what are you talking about, MVP just abused the shit out of MC with a marine tank banshee raven scv bunker contain. If MVP underestimate HuK, and don't use abusive strats like that, I can easly see him losing. I'm not impressed by his PvT I really wanted MC to win but MVP went for a greedy build teching like that off a 1 rax expo with only 1 bunker so far away from scvs. MC didn't punish him and basically got contained after he missed the window of opportunity. MC also made a larger mistake of not picking an easy opponent for group stages to make sure he stayed in Code S. He took a gamble and a lot of us wanted it to pay off but it didn't. Its how gambles go. What MVP did wasn't 111, it was just smart. He was ahead, so he contained so he could get further ahead because the map is retarded. | ||
|
r0x0r
Germany293 Posts
Amirite? | ||
|
realstarcrafter
92 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:20 sleepingdog wrote: 100% wrong. Protoss greed is needed on certain maps where you can't punish economic zerg play. 3 gate expo is crap on large maps. zergs have the ability to ridiculously outmacro protoss and you speak of the necessity of "punishing" protoss when they dare to build an early expansion....TL as it's best today Would you say the same thing about greedy being necessary in the case where zerg takes a early 3rd expo when protoss goes nexus first? | ||
|
Benga
Korea (South)471 Posts
i wished puzzle to win so bad | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
kuroshiro
United Kingdom378 Posts
kthxbai. | ||
|
GreatestThreat
United States631 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:20 Phayt wrote: Huk's chances aside, looking at the remaining players JULY actually has a decent title shot here. There's no ZvZs for him to shoot himself in the foot, and mostly just terrans, which has been a good match up for him before. He still has great player's he'd have to beat, but I think he'd much rather take on MVP and Polt than Nestea and MC, right? Oh my god, you're right. i just realized July cannot get a ZvZ for the rest of the season. This may be his GSL. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:24 alan25 wrote: summary for mvp vs nestea? huk vs nada games? Fist game "longish" game. Marine+tank+thor vs baneling+ling+infestor and in the end broodlords. Great drops by MVP and excellent macro. Nothing really special. MVP just played really well and in the end made a huge drop and destroyed all the tech buildings from Nestea, while neastea was in MVP's base with his last units. 2nd game, excellent bunker rush blocking the way from main to natural. HuK vs Nada: 1st game normal macro game. In the end Nada lost because of poor micro on big engagements. 2nd game: HuK 4 gates, nada defends. Nada pushes with stim, HuK hold's with great forcefields and has a significant lead. Nada goes another push with most of his scv:s and Huk holds barely. Then Huk got his 2nd or 3rd colossus, he pushed out with really small army while Nada had his army out and destroyed that, attacked and finished the game. Stupid aggression mistake by HuK there. 3rd game counter bo win pretty much. Going blind DT's against 4 rax. Check the games if you want a closer insight. I'm pretty bad at summarizing stuff and i'm sure that i'm missing something here anyway. | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:30 eloist wrote: What? All non TvT results add up to 50% as there were no mirror matches besides TvT. And you call me stupid for that? yes I do - because a huge portion of NON-terrans never even reached Ro16. Let's supposed for one moment that Ro16 would've consisted of 15 terrans and one protoss. Then the one protoss wins his match. Cool, in 8 out of 8 matches a terran player loses and all non TvT results add up to 100% wins for the non terran player - not so bad apparently. Anyways, still have to get some work done... | ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:28 Looms wrote: hehe but what would the EG organization think if he didn't show up to the next major event after joining the team Haha true I guess XD | ||
|
ilisan
Germany78 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:23 eloist wrote: 8 out of 16 players advance. 2 out of 4 Protosses advanced (2 out of 3 against Terran). 1 out of 2 Zergs advanced (0 out of 1 against Terran). 5 out of 10 Terran players advanced. Point out the 'continued' domination please. i dont want to say anything about dominance, but you shouldnt bend stats in this forum like that! for example imagine 16toss in the ro16: 8 out of 16 advance  also, there are 3 zergs and only 9 terrans what means: 5 out of possible 7 terran advance with 2 mirrors | ||
|
Heimatloser
Germany1494 Posts
GENIUS FOR GSL CHAMPION! wheres the fanclub? xD | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:33 Grettin wrote: Fist game "longish" game. Marine+tank+thor vs baneling+ling+infestor and in the end broodlords. Great drops by MVP and excellent macro. Nothing really special. MVP just played really well and in the end made a huge drop and destroyed all the tech buildings from Nestea, while neastea was in MVP's base with his last units. 2nd game, excellent bunker rush blocking the way from main to natural. HuK vs Nada: 1st game normal macro game. In the end Nada lost because of poor micro on big engagements. 2nd game: HuK 4 gates, nada defends. Nada pushes with stim, HuK hold's with great forcefields and has a significant lead. Nada goes another push with most of his scv:s and Huk holds barely. Then Huk got his 2nd or 3rd colossus, he pushed out with really small army while Nada had his army out and destroyed that, attacked and finished the game. Stupid aggression mistake by HuK there. 3rd game counter bo win pretty much. Going blind DT's against 1-1-1. Check the games if you want a closer insight. I'm pretty bad at summarizing stuff and i'm sure that i'm missing something here anyway. it wasn't 1-1-1, it was 4 rax | ||
|
King.Crimson
Romania478 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:33 Grettin wrote: Fist game "longish" game. Marine+tank+thor vs baneling+ling+infestor and in the end broodlords. Great drops by MVP and excellent macro. Nothing really special. MVP just played really well and in the end made a huge drop and destroyed all the tech buildings from Nestea, while neastea was in MVP's base with his last units. 2nd game, excellent bunker rush blocking the way from main to natural. HuK vs Nada: 1st game normal macro game. In the end Nada lost because of poor micro on big engagements. 2nd game: HuK 4 gates, nada defends. Nada pushes with stim, HuK hold's with great forcefields and has a significant lead. Nada goes another push with most of his scv:s and Huk holds barely. Then Huk got his 2nd or 3rd colossus, he pushed out with really small army while Nada had his army out and destroyed that, attacked and finished the game. Stupid aggression mistake by HuK there. 3rd game counter bo win pretty much. Going DT's against 1-1-1. Check the games if you want a closer insight. I'm pretty bad at summarizing stuff and i'm sure that i'm missing something here anyway. 3rd game Nada vs Huk he definitely did not go 1-1-1. In fact, 1-1-1 counters DT's, so that could not be a BO loss. He went 4 rax all-in. | ||
|
eloist
United States1017 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:33 Grettin wrote: 3rd game counter bo win pretty much. Going DT's against 1-1-1. Now even 4 Rax qualifies as 1-1-1? | ||
|
kuroshiro
United Kingdom378 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:33 Grettin wrote: .. 3rd game counter bo win pretty much. Going blind DT's against 1-1-1. ... It was 4rax, not 1-1-1... | ||
|
Micket
United Kingdom2163 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:30 eloist wrote: What? All non TvT results add up to 50% as there were no mirror matches besides TvT. And you call me stupid for that? You are right. The ro8 issue is because there are so many Terrans in code S, including mediocre ones such as Ensnare, clide, noblesse who managed to 1/1/1 or bunker rush there way to a single victory in the group stages. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
I'm pretty bad at summarizing stuff and i'm sure that i'm missing something here anyway. Well there you go. I missed something and i'm sorry. | ||
| ||
|
|
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
Cure vs Reynor
Classic vs herO
IPSL
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
OSC
BSL 21
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
RSL Revival
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
