EPTCheering for July. No ZvZ = July might win. Also no MC
.[GSL] Aug Code S RO16 Day 2 - Page 300
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Cheering for July. No ZvZ = July might win. Also no MC . | ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
| ||
|
paradox_
Canada270 Posts
When is a 4rax considered 111. I wonder if the majority of the other toss have a clue about what 111 is when I read these posts. I want 111 "fixed" in some way either thru metagame or balance change but wtf 4rax = 111? REALLY? | ||
|
realstarcrafter
92 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:30 eloist wrote: What? All non TvT results add up to 50% as there were no mirror matches besides TvT. And you call me stupid for that? Count carefully...T won 3 games out of 5 in TvZ/P | ||
|
eloist
United States1017 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:33 sleepingdog wrote: yes I do - because a huge portion of NON-terrans never even reached Ro16. Let's supposed for one moment that Ro16 would've consisted of 15 terrans and one protoss. Then the one protoss wins his match. Cool, in 8 out of 8 matches a terran player loses and all non TvT results add up to 100% wins for the non terran player - not so bad apparently. Anyways, still have to get some work done... That is not what you said. And yes, if there were only 1 Terran in the Ro16 then 1 advancing would be a great result for Terran in the Ro16. What would have been an indication of balance in the Ro16 in your mind? All non Terrans winning their games so it would even out the higher number of Terrans at the start of the competition? That's absurd. In the Ro16, each race won 50% of their matches. Period. Over the last two days of competition no race has dominated in results. | ||
|
Shuray
Brazil642 Posts
At first I thought I wouldn't cheer for HuK 'cause his move to EG, but I just couldn't help to cheer for him and I'm glad he advanced. And July! Yeeees, I'm so happy he make it to Ro8! Keep Fighting! | ||
|
Nastiness
Sweden275 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:28 Seditary wrote: The reason people love July (at least for me) is because he makes the game do what he wants, either he destroys you, or he destroys himself. He plays the opponent, making you do what he wants and daring you to defy him. He lives on the edge more than almost any other sc2 progamer which is incredibly exciting to watch and through sheer skill manages to not fall over it more often than not. There is almost noone out there who can come close to playing like he does. plays alot like fruitdealer before his demise | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:36 paradox_ wrote: Wow are these people trolling or what. When is a 4rax considered 111. I wonder if the majority of the other toss have a clue about what 111 is when I read these posts. I want 111 "fixed" in some way either thru metagame or balance change but wtf 4rax = 111? REALLY? Way to overreact, especially if you are referring to my post. It was a mistake, told you that i might miss something and honestly i didn't remember how the 3rd game went. Calm the fuck down. | ||
eggs
1011 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:33 ilisan wrote: i dont want to say anything about dominance, but you shouldnt bend stats in this forum like that! for example imagine 16toss in the ro16: 8 out of 16 advance  also, there are 3 zergs and only 9 terrans what means: 5 out of possible 7 terran advance with 2 mirrors i actually don't understand your middle part after reading it 3 times. | ||
|
frucisky
Singapore2170 Posts
| ||
|
HowardRoark
1146 Posts
| ||
|
Taryssa
United States1628 Posts
I was worried with your recent team transition but you smashed those tonight. Keep beasting, make it to the ro4! | ||
|
eloist
United States1017 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:36 realstarcrafter wrote: Count carefully...T won 3 games out of 5 in TvZ/P Hm.. yes, however the race losing that extra against T then won against the other race to even out the number that advanced. Hard to achieve an even split with 5 matches. | ||
|
kuroshiro
United Kingdom378 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:36 realstarcrafter wrote: Count carefully...T won 3 games out of 5 in TvZ/P 3 out of 5? It's almost like their chances of winning are 50% and the discrete nature of win/loss numbers in a match of starcraft forced the eventual number in a very small sample set to land on the higher side! Call David Kim -- NERF STATISTICS T.T | ||
|
ilisan
Germany78 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:38 eggs wrote: i actually don't understand your middle part after reading it 3 times. it just shows that the raw numbers dont explain anything. in mirrors its always 50% and looking at the brackets, it shows 3zergs and 9terrans in ro16 | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:40 eloist wrote: Hm.. yes, however the race losing that extra against T then won against the other race to even out the number that advanced. Hard to achieve an even split with 5 matches. your last 2 comments i swear I can't decipher the meaning of them. the race losing the extra won against the other race? can you please clarify? | ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:40 kuroshiro wrote: 3 out of 5? It's almost like their chances of winning are 50% and the discrete nature of win/loss numbers in a match of starcraft forced the eventual number in a very small sample set to land on the higher side! Call David Kim -- NERF STATISTICS T.T It's amazing how Terran win ratios in the GSL always tend to land on the "higher side". And that's with reasonably large samples from a whole month of Code A/S and GSTL. | ||
|
King.Crimson
Romania478 Posts
| ||
|
realstarcrafter
92 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:40 kuroshiro wrote: 3 out of 5? It's almost like their chances of winning are 50% and the discrete nature of win/loss numbers in a match of starcraft forced the eventual number in a very small sample set to land on the higher side! Call David Kim -- NERF STATISTICS T.T I wasn't saying anything about balance at all. Just purely pointing out the logic flaws in the little math game ppl are playing here. | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On August 24 2011 21:41 ilisan wrote: it just shows that the raw numbers dont explain anything. in mirrors its always 50% OH i see it was a spacing issue. i thought the middle 2 sentences were related. so i thought he was saying: "imagine there are 16 toss in the ro16, obviously 8 advance. but now imagine there are 3 zergs and 9 terrans and not 16 toss" and it made no sense at all to me. -_- | ||
| ||
