EPTYeah lol WTF xD
NASL Grand Finals Day 1 - Page 308
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Please refrain from posting and quoting image macros and memes. | ||
|
NeWeNiyaLord
Norway2474 Posts
Yeah lol WTF xD | ||
|
flanksteak
Canada246 Posts
（╯°□°）╯︵ ןsɐu | ||
|
godemperor
Belgium2043 Posts
On July 09 2011 05:29 Ultimate Weapon wrote: SC2 LR threads are amazing. 200 before game 1, and 300 after 15 minutes and 2 games. Shit. Not even a JD vs Flash Bo5 can top that 285 pages of complaining, that's not something to be proud of. | ||
|
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
lmfao....LOSS....LOSS...LOSS...... AND NOW SQUIRTLE STANDS HERE TODAY!! CAN HE WIN?? | ||
|
Lylat
France8575 Posts
| ||
|
Arceus
Vietnam8333 Posts
On July 09 2011 05:30 Bucht wrote: However: what I do not understand is how the organizers could pick these three maps, Xel'Naga Caverns, Crossfire SE and The Shattered Temple. Why on earth would they choose 1v1 player maps for the first two games? Just look at the first match - Ret had been dominating the group play and once he gets to the finals he has to play two maps which does not at all favor his style of play. He is out of the tournament in less than 15minutes of play... How about Tal'Darim Altar and Crevasse? Generally bigger maps favor the better player (oh yes they do). Does anyone know if these are only for RO16 or if they will there for the rest of the tournament? - If those two are bad maps for Ret, he can only blame himself. Puma could argue the same - Puma is the better player. Fact - Welcome to LAN (sorta) tbh I would prefer map-veto but whiners gonna whine | ||
|
Shirolol
England504 Posts
Why are they doing this? It has to be on purpose. | ||
|
MassIncestor
743 Posts
it shows the struggles, only wins is boring | ||
|
BlindDruid
Germany653 Posts
That's how you do it when you are showing "the way to the Finals". | ||
|
seansye
United States1722 Posts
On July 09 2011 05:34 Yggydraseal wrote: I hope they can improve this. They have a great player pool! Pick it up NASL! I really wish they were just showing the games already. No interview, no more intros, etc. ~_~ | ||
|
Abductedonut
United States324 Posts
| ||
|
Cirn9
1117 Posts
| ||
|
provrorsbarn
Sweden766 Posts
| ||
|
Shirolol
England504 Posts
On July 09 2011 05:34 Lylat wrote: Man, this is sooo long... WAY too long! | ||
|
MaxField
United States2386 Posts
I think it would be nicer if they showed the winning battles only. Kinda mean to show how they lose every game, haha | ||
|
RageBot
Israel1530 Posts
| ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
What did I miss?! | ||
|
nams
53 Posts
| ||
|
dsll
United Kingdom143 Posts
| ||
|
Evangelist
1246 Posts
1. If you're doing a big wrestling style promo for each match, make it relevant and no more than thirty seconds for each player. Personalise. SHETH VS SQUIRTLE at the end, etc. 2. If you're going to do this style of commentary/analysis, do analysis. You've got loads of casters. Have a second casting team -discuss- the upcoming game. Even if its not intellectually honest, just do it. That's how real world sports fill time. Get a couch, put a few players on it, and channel HSC3. Seriously, it works. Watch how Sky Sports cover the Premiership. 3. Kill dead space. Use the time of the promo to sort technical issues out. | ||
| ||
