EPT[GSL May] Code S Semifinals - Page 58
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Magnus Strongchest
Australia89 Posts
| ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
I would argue bio-mech with emphasis on ghosts and tanks, especially since Nada was going to be on 4base. | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 cheesemaster wrote: it really just wasnt an entertaining series at all, 2 all ins first game with pretty terrible control on inca's part but he still managed to come out on top. second game was decent still an all in though, and the little douchebag tried to all in again on the third game. Pretty disrespectful to try and all in your team mate three times, douchebag move inca. Disrespectful? I'd show my teammate respect by pulling out all stops and playing to win no matter what. | ||
|
Wedberg
Sweden169 Posts
I'll be rooting for him in the finals. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 DooMDash wrote: Game 3 : Proof if archons get a buff the match up will be broken. Nada played way better that game. I already thought Zealot Templar Archon was really powerful since the Zealot buff. Inca is good though no doubt. By the time the archons came into play, Nada already lost the game. | ||
|
meep
United States1699 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 openbox1 wrote: Okay, who wants Nestea to win so we have an epic final? Shout AYE! It'd be Nestea vs Inca. How will that be epic at all? | ||
|
openbox1
1393 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 Zooper31 wrote: Proxy stargate fail, is still a proxy stargate in my books. Doesn't matter if he succeeded with it or not. I don't deny Nada killed himself after he failed to kill that 2nd nex and losing so many units. And are you forgetting the 20min after the failed cheese? To come back after being behind like that is spectacular in my opinion. | ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
The patch hasn't hit yet, and it's not going to kill the thor even if they're at full energy. | ||
|
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
He did really well microing for the most part, and was ahead of Inca the entire game in supply as well as economy, but he really needed proper counters. If not Ghosts, at least some sort of mech combination =/. | ||
|
Parcelleus
Australia1662 Posts
Your basically saying " dont try and kill me when Im not ready !!! " Do you see how illogical that is ? There are strategies that are designed to take out an opponent early (with associated higher risk) , and those that are designed for mid and late game. It is as simple as that. There is no such thing as 'cheese'. If NaDa had focused more on early scouting he would have had a better chance in the first 2 games, just like when he did it in game 3. | ||
|
Funkatron
United States725 Posts
how about a ghost or 2... hellions? Banchees? you guys are just hilarious. keep crying and don't think... | ||
|
cheesemaster
Canada1975 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 Raambo11 wrote: At all the people saying Inca outplayed nada, how? Not trying to troll but his all in got scouted, he dropped 4 gates, and then expoed so he was way behind in econ. Got his nexus sniped, but all he needed to do that get enough chargelot + HT. Then he ran into two sets of bunkers, not sure how that shows how he outplayed nada? If anything nada should not have gotten that nexus, that was EXTREMELY sloppy by Inca. All the protoss can keep saying Inca is good but I need evidence, his FF on the ramp vs a DT was very flashy but I have yet to see some really solid drawn out play from him. Just my opinion. Meh im a protoss and im not really impressed by Inca at all, the only reason hes so good at pvp's is because pvp is 1 base play and thats the only thing he actually decent at. He didnt win game 3 nada lost it. | ||
|
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 cheesemaster wrote: it really just wasnt an entertaining series at all, 2 all ins first game with pretty terrible control on inca's part but he still managed to come out on top. second game was decent still an all in though, and the little douchebag tried to all in again on the third game. Pretty disrespectful to try and all in your team mate three times, douchebag move inca. I agree. I can't believe Inca had the nerve to want to win. | ||
|
Ban1189
11 Posts
| ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 cheesemaster wrote: it really just wasnt an entertaining series at all, 2 all ins first game with pretty terrible control on inca's part but he still managed to come out on top. second game was decent still an all in though, and the little douchebag tried to all in again on the third game. Pretty disrespectful to try and all in your team mate three times, douchebag move inca. The ignorance is reaching embarassing levels... They are teammates; using that kind of non-standard builds was the right move, especially in a bo5. | ||
|
Jacob666
United States285 Posts
| ||
|
bbQ4Aiur
Hong Kong2752 Posts
Thor have energy again? | ||
|
akalarry
United States1978 Posts
| ||
|
Resilient
United Kingdom1431 Posts
On May 07 2011 15:05 DooMDash wrote: Game 3 : Proof if archons get a buff the match up will be broken. Nada played way better that game. I already thought Zealot Templar Archon was really powerful since the Zealot buff. Inca is good though no doubt. Please explain to me how Nada played better than Inca. All I saw was his Marauders running into 3 storms in a row, killing at least 10 of them @ the Nexus snipe attempt. Other than that Nada was barely ahead all game due to a failed Stargate attempt. | ||
| ||
