|
Arguing and whining in this thread will be met with the hammer. Please enjoy the games and keep this thread on track! |
On April 25 2011 04:03 Yaotzin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 04:01 AlBundy wrote:On April 25 2011 04:00 hugman wrote:On April 25 2011 03:58 Fyzar wrote: Hahaha that immortal shot chasing the stalker that blinked away looked fucking aesome. Yeah it looks cool, happened in MC vs White_Ra too That's why I love blink stalkers  Vs. Collossus is totally awesome too. You can't dodge colossi either. You can do funny stuff to their animations, but the damage is instant.
Thanks for clarifying, that animation is all I need to be happy though
|
On April 25 2011 04:03 ToInfinity wrote:both are from wc3
Neither accomplished anything in wc3 though
|
this game clearly shows how nani is superior to cruncher in almost every way...his micro that game (blink and delaying the 4gate) was godly thats why he won.
also on shakuras cruncher got the lucky build as in PvP (generally speaking)
Stargate > robo > templars > stargate > robo > .......
|
In a match up as micro intensive as PvP, it's no mystery that Naniwa is coming out on top. But for me that just begs the question, why didn't Moon choose Protoss?
|
On April 25 2011 04:04 3 Lions wrote: Cruncher is definitely the Backho of Sc2 lol Nah, he is a crossbreed between Shine and Canata
|
"They're gonna be like there's nothing Cruncher can do they're gonna be like it's Masters versus Bronzeeeeee!" Haha DJWheat is the man, all the casters are.
|
Guys, don't hate on Cruncher. He's in the TSL, you arn't. He just showed us in game 2 what a good player he is. So what if he cheeses every now and then. So does MC. And you defended MC, so no more of that please.
He outplayed NaNi is game 2, and NaNi has out micro'd him in both game 1 and 3.
|
On April 25 2011 04:03 DoubleReed wrote: I really don't understand why people go stargate and robo in PvP. Doesn't Blink Stalkers just beat everything?
I'm a zerg player so maybe I don't understand the matchup, but it looks to me like Blink Stalkers own all. Blink stalkers have to kill a robo user fast or the immortal count climbs and immortals demolish stalkers.
|
On April 25 2011 04:03 DoubleReed wrote: I really don't understand why people go stargate and robo in PvP. Doesn't Blink Stalkers just beat everything?
I'm a zerg player so maybe I don't understand the matchup, but it looks to me like Blink Stalkers own all. Colossus > all if you have more than a couple. Unless your opponent has like mass phoenix/vr but that never happens. e; oh yeah, immortals in a big number also chew blink stalkers.
|
On April 25 2011 04:03 ToInfinity wrote:both are from wc3 Yes but Naniwa can stay.
|
United Kingdom38256 Posts
On April 25 2011 04:02 Truefire wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 04:01 sickoota wrote: Lol people talking about BO luck and risk taking of cruncher but whenNaniwa goes 1gate citdael on tal'darim its "outplaying". People are so fucking biased and dumb here its painful. If cruncher had attacked with a 4 gate on normal time, he would've easily won. He decided to sit back for some reason after even winning the middle battle.
Nani pushed out to make it look like an aggressive 4gate and to get Cruncher thinking defensively while he got his extra gates up too. As soon as he killed Cruncher's probe the rush was massively slowed, if you can't warp in you can't rush (same with Nani getting his killed).
|
On April 25 2011 04:04 AlBundy wrote:Show nested quote +On April 25 2011 04:03 Yaotzin wrote:On April 25 2011 04:01 AlBundy wrote:On April 25 2011 04:00 hugman wrote:On April 25 2011 03:58 Fyzar wrote: Hahaha that immortal shot chasing the stalker that blinked away looked fucking aesome. Yeah it looks cool, happened in MC vs White_Ra too That's why I love blink stalkers  Vs. Collossus is totally awesome too. You can't dodge colossi either. You can do funny stuff to their animations, but the damage is instant. Thanks for clarifying, that animation is all I need to be happy though  I think the damage is only instant to the colossus's target, and it's possible to dodge the splash. Don't quote me on that, though.
|
cruncher a wc3 player? must be human or orc. two cheesiest races of that game lo...
User was warned for this post
|
I don't mind adds in the bottom of the screen but damn, there is no fighting them. Click, return, click, return, click return. First time i encounter them in such amounts..
|
On April 25 2011 04:04 rblstr wrote: Guys, don't hate on Cruncher. He's in the TSL, you arn't. He just showed us in game 2 what a good player he is. So what if he cheeses every now and then. So does MC. And you defended MC, so no more of that please.
He outplayed NaNi is game 2, and NaNi has out micro'd him in both game 1 and 3.
lol.. english
|
Can anyone explain to me why the fuck some players have 200 APMs in the first 2 minutes of the game? What the hell are they doing?
|
Guys, don't hate on Cruncher. He's in the TSL, you arn't.
That's not an argument and we're allowed to hate whoever we want to <3
|
CrunCher is player really well. Didn't think hed stand a chance in this MU but damn. Game 2 with perfectly executed Phoenix harassment and good 'panic management' in game 3. Did think it would be more one sided. Still hoping NaNiwa brings it home now in game 4.
|
Nice spawn locations for Cruncher if he goes phoenix play again. Naniwa's choke and mineral line on the opposite sides of his base.
|
On April 25 2011 04:04 rblstr wrote: Guys, don't hate on Cruncher. He's in the TSL, you arn't. He just showed us in game 2 what a good player he is. So what if he cheeses every now and then. So does MC. And you defended MC, so no more of that please.
He outplayed NaNi is game 2, and NaNi has out micro'd him in both game 1 and 3.
True, chill people, chill!
|
|
|
|
|
|