Team-kills ahoy!
[GSL] Code S Ro32 Day 2 - Page 131
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
CjrNinja
Australia223 Posts
Team-kills ahoy! | ||
ForTheDr3am
842 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:27 Kommander wrote: Alicia's like a more stable version of MC. ![]() He is worse at PvP though. By a huge margin. | ||
DisaFear
Australia4074 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:29 Blasterion wrote: Colossus isn't even needed anymore lol Gateway units all the way Ssh. That's top secret | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
Anyway guys, go watch the MSL Group of Death now. | ||
fant0m
964 Posts
Chargelots are so absurd with guardian shield + 3 armor upgrades against bio. Nada did everything right micro wise, took out the storms AND the force fields and still didn't stand a chance. | ||
namedplayer
844 Posts
| ||
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
At the rate GSL is going it's not gonna be much a secret any longer lol | ||
Juanald
United States354 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:27 Kommander wrote: Alicia's like a more stable version of MC. ![]() this.. tasteless needs 2 realice alicia is putting zealots behind his army on purpose. we see squirtle n ace do this in teamleague. do u really think these guys would micro that bad with all practice they have? cmon... | ||
Cryhavoc
372 Posts
4 base vs 2 base dont tell any1 | ||
Vei
United States2845 Posts
god damn day9 talks over ppl even when hes laughing that was annoying hilarious clip tho | ||
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:31 fant0m wrote: And we saw that same story against MKP.... So much for Bio being viable against P. Chargelots are so absurd with guardian shield + 3 armor upgrades against bio. Nada did everything right micro wise, took out the storms AND the force fields and still didn't stand a chance. And people complain about colossus =P | ||
AimForTheBushes
United States1760 Posts
| ||
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:32 Vei wrote: god damn day9 talks over ppl even when hes laughing that was annoying hilarious clip tho It only makes it funnier. Did you know you are more likely to laugh when you see/hear other people laugh? | ||
Apolo
Portugal1259 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:29 eviltomahawk wrote: On one hand, I would suggest that you use the TL search function. On the other hand, I just did a search. Unfortunately, all the threads are useless with posts in them suggesting links to other useless threads. No one knows. Apparently, it has something to do with Liquid'Nazgul and stuff. Oooo no one knows how a website in the internet got its name... ooooo! Actually, there's no mystery at all, and nothing special about it. The Nazgûl were stopped by Arwen when she was carrying sick Frodo on her horse's back, by summoning the power of the water in a small river (don't remember the name) that took the form of trotting horses. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKUyZ3_wUsQ&t=1m35s] [/url] | ||
befek
Poland413 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:31 Blasterion wrote: At the rate GSL is going it's not gonna be much a secret any longer lol You still need HT's or colo agianst stim + medivacs. At least for the feedback, if u want to be more fancy. | ||
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:32 Juanald wrote: this.. tasteless needs 2 realice alicia is putting zealots behind his army on purpose. we see squirtle n ace do this in teamleague. do u really think these guys would micro that bad with all practice they have? cmon... Because pros never missmicro?... common. | ||
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:26 zocktol wrote: I now need a bigger O to express how good feedback and armour upgrades is. I played exactly this in August 2010, then gave up on it because I sucked and nobody else was using it anyways. Classic FML, dammit I've always known that gateway-units with upgrades are awsome as long as you can take the third M out of the MMM with feedback....meh | ||
Rodiel3
France1158 Posts
| ||
OnlyChobo
Canada126 Posts
| ||
Kavas
Australia3421 Posts
On April 21 2011 21:30 ForTheDr3am wrote: He is worse at PvP though. By a huge margin. Not really. He only lost versus IMYonghwa who is the IM's PvP sniper. | ||
| ||