|
On April 17 2011 06:27 Dawski wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2011 06:26 rapture wrote:
i think hasu wins now. zerg was way too passiv the last 10 minutes wtf are you talking about, zerg was as aggressive as anyone could POSSIBLY get. im sick of comments like this, same comments as idra vs MC game. he did 3 pushes in a row in the same FF choke just for the sake of pushing on aggression. That just pisses me off
Lol are you serious? Hardly any useful aggression at all by zerg. Pushing up to the Protoss deathball is not agression. As zerg you have to take advantage of protoss immobility which MorroW did exactly zero. Really terrible play by MorroW.
If you aren't going to harass you need to have Hive WAY earlier.
|
Poll: Recommend HasuObs vs MorroW (Game 1)?No (75) 78% Yes (13) 14% If you have time (8) 8% 96 total votes Your vote: Recommend HasuObs vs MorroW (Game 1)? (Vote): Yes
(Vote): No
(Vote): If you have time
|
On April 17 2011 06:25 Roggay wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2011 06:24 vrok wrote:This game is pretty painful to watch as a zerg player.  Yep, but I have to say that Morrow did not managed his 60 supply lead well at all.
Yea that first battle he engaged really badly and lost a lot.
|
Great game by Hasu, he played so smart the whole way through.
|
On April 17 2011 06:26 Azuroz wrote:
i just love hasuobs, hes constantly active with his units, doing everything he can with what he has.
actively walking colossi into armies and actively placing 3 forcefields on top of each other...
|
zerg (once again) fought at the worst possible position, however i can feel it in the air well have balance whines again.
|
Morrow threw that game away when he was 80 supply ahead, attacking into the ffs multiple times...
|
I thought MorroW was more of an innovator than this -_-
Roach Hydra vs P isn't that great anymore in the late game.
|
On April 17 2011 06:26 Headshot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2011 06:25 HuHEN wrote:On April 17 2011 06:21 ZeromuS wrote:On April 17 2011 06:20 Designakrobat wrote:On April 17 2011 06:19 cyclone25 wrote:
This just shows that zergs can't be aggressive vs Protoss. 200/200 vs 130 supply and he can't engage ... this.... Have you not seen the super aggressive ling/bling based plays that have become a bit more popular lately? It can engage pretty well. Not to mention drops.. imagine those same armies but forcing the protoss to split his army up. Drops also force the Zerg army to split up. -.- But I agree that Roach/Hydra is not the ideal comp at this point in the game.
The point is which army does better in smaller numbers. Collosi have to have meat with them... stalker balls are effective in... well balls.
|
why is he stacking the broodlords on top of his roaches when hasuobs has storms ready...
|
On April 17 2011 06:27 Elefanto wrote:
zerg still doing roach hydra corrupter, even though it doesn't work.
this is pathetic play by morrow.
sorry zergs will perfect something in a month after playing a staple for 8 months.
try playing pvz without stalker/collosus. it takes time.
|
On April 17 2011 06:27 .Enigma. wrote:
ZvP is just not fun to watch at all, not arguing balance AT ALL. It's just boring to watch.
IdrA and Sen and anyone else who can be constantly aggressive and use multi-pronged attacks can make ZvP enjoyable, in my opinion 
go HasuObs!
|
On April 17 2011 06:26 Moonwrath wrote:
Attacking head on against Protoss deathball just doesn't work, like ever. Why do these zergs keep trying to slam their roach/hydra army against it? You have to abuse the fact that Toss needs to keep their army in a clump. Throw some nydus worms up, drop the main, SOMETHING.
He had 60 freaking extra supply. That's close to 33% more. Or if you consider about 70 drones - 50 probes, it's 130 army to 90 army. That's 44% more army. And you still massively lose. Everyone says - oh just don't let the P get to 200. Um, that shows that doesn't work. So now we go to - oh he teched to slowly.
|
Wow, Morrow played sooo bad that game. His macro was good but Hasu had undefended bases and Morrow never poked anywhere but at the main army.
|
Morrow has been obliterated exactly in the same way that Idra the other day against MC....
And no, Day9, no, having the broodlords earlier wouldn't make much of a difference.
|
On April 17 2011 06:27 Dawski wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2011 06:26 rapture wrote:
i think hasu wins now. zerg was way too passiv the last 10 minutes wtf are you talking about, zerg was as aggressive as anyone could POSSIBLY get. im sick of comments like this, same comments as idra vs MC game. he did 3 pushes in a row in the same FF choke just for the sake of pushing on aggression. That just pisses me off
I am sick of zergs thinking that was aggressive play. Where were the drops and Nydus Worms? Protoss was spread out, you can harass somewhere in that situation
|
On April 17 2011 06:28 Beyonder wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2011 06:27 Dawski wrote:On April 17 2011 06:26 rapture wrote:
i think hasu wins now. zerg was way too passiv the last 10 minutes wtf are you talking about, zerg was as aggressive as anyone could POSSIBLY get. im sick of comments like this, same comments as idra vs MC game. he did 3 pushes in a row in the same FF choke just for the sake of pushing on aggression. That just pisses me off Oh come on, as agressive as anyone can get? Watch the Mondragon vs. tod games.
lol fail, beyonder is absolutely right
|
Well, that's what happens when you let a Toss 200/200 and try to take them on head on.
|
Kind of an underwhelming game :/ Especially after the Sen vs Boxer match :/
|
On April 17 2011 06:27 .Enigma. wrote:
ZvP is just not fun to watch at all, not arguing balance AT ALL. It's just boring to watch.
I think ZvP can be great to watch if there's no 4-gate or death ball. Shame most ZvP go down one of those two roads. Can't blame P though, if it works it works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
