|
On April 14 2011 12:54 Belegurth wrote:
I am not asking this in an offensive way, but is it always the same for cruncher to sit in base and defend until deathball is completed and roll over? (excluding 4 gate-cannon rush etc), whenever I see his casted games it kinda always the same. may be one of his fans elaborate this.
pretty much just does abusive play and hopes people play like darkforce did.
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 Sky Net wrote:
"the vortex was such a KEY... role... unit... in that entire battle"
What makes it even better is that the vortex caught like 3 units lol
|
The Vortex took out 6 Infestors, don't know how you see a problem in that being a key thing when they were moving towards the right and could've neural parasited the mothership
|
So...that was like 10 infestors sacrificed to the deathball, without casting a single spell? Come on Darkforce, if you're going to use infestors you need to control your units better.
|
On April 14 2011 12:52 cursor wrote:
Show me 1 game where a 200/200 Zerg army wins against a 200/200 Protoss army. Just 1 game. Doesn't matter the composition. And no, I don't give a fuck.
http://day9tv.blip.tv/file/4737515/
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 GP wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 12:53 AssuredVacancy wrote:On April 14 2011 12:52 Sandro wrote:
Sooo why was this darkforce guy invited again? he's top 3 zerg in europe? Really? Over Morrow, Ret, and Dimaga? You've got to be joking. Darkforce's play here was awful.
But please don't judge him on 2 games. Give him a bit more opportunities.
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 Heavenly wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 12:52 cursor wrote:
Show me 1 game where a 200/200 Zerg army wins against a 200/200 Protoss army. Just 1 game. Doesn't matter the composition. And no, I don't give a fuck. Why wouldn't a 200/200 army from the protoss win? It's at least 3 times the cost of the zerg army. An army of 300/200, 250/150, and 125/50 units beats an army of mostly 75/25, 100/50, and 150/100 units? Imagine that.
No. It does not cost more.
|
I don't understand how DarkForcE expected to win that game. What was his plan?
|
"Unbelievable play..... he was... able to...... build a lot of units and sit in his base while zerg did nothing"
I have to say, I think I can wait a bit for the next Cruncher series.... -.-
To be clear i'm not saying imba anything. Just saying all that game consisted of was Cruncher working towards an Invincible death ball while zerg just sort of stood there. Very uninteresting styles out of both players.
|
|
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 Belegurth wrote:
I am not asking this in an offensive way, but is it always the same for cruncher to sit in base and defend until deathball is completed and roll over? (excluding 4 gate-cannon rush etc), whenever I see his casted games it kinda always the same. may be one of his fans elaborate this.
In most of the games i see him play he does this. TBH his early game is kind of gimp imo... you could see it in game 2 loosing a stalker for no reason. But I didn't think darkforce would take advantage of this, hence I win my liquibet ^^
|
On April 14 2011 12:55 ct2299 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 12:53 vrok wrote:On April 14 2011 12:52 Sandro wrote:
Sooo why was this darkforce guy invited again? Because he's still better than the alternative NA players? Take a guess.  Haha, if people are shocked that DarkForce was invited, why is no one surprised at CatZ being in NASL?
CatZ had an awesome video, is from NA and is a baller.
|
LMAO wtf that was hilarious
|
|
|
wtf was with the 2 incontrols?
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 Heavenly wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 12:52 cursor wrote:
Show me 1 game where a 200/200 Zerg army wins against a 200/200 Protoss army. Just 1 game. Doesn't matter the composition. And no, I don't give a fuck. Why wouldn't a 200/200 army from the protoss win? It's at least 3 times the cost of the zerg army. An army of 300/200, 250/150, and 125/50 units beats an army of mostly 75/25, 100/50, and 150/100 units? Imagine that.
If that were even true... Zerg should get to 200/200 3x faster than protoss, yet protoss are only ever behind by ~20/30 supply? What?
|
On April 14 2011 12:55 heaven- wrote:
Why did the Zerg army look so tiny. he was 200 pop right??? that was the smallest 200 pop army i ever seen.
Zerg maxed armies always look smaller in comparison in Sc2. They really don't look the way they do in brood war.
Though im not sure how many drones Darkforce had. That could have played a role.
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 koolaid1990 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 12:53 SMD wrote:On April 14 2011 12:52 cursor wrote:
Show me 1 game where a 200/200 Zerg army wins against a 200/200 Protoss army. Just 1 game. Doesn't matter the composition. And no, I don't give a fuck. Thats the point. DONT LET THE PROTOSS GET 200/200. Thats the point. Its impossible to attack into a protoss with forcefields and cannons.
Oh shut up, it's completely possible, Cruncher had like 2 sentries for most of the early game, Darkforce had a massive timing in which he could have mauled Cruncher, but he's like almost every other boring macro Zerg--too passive and wimpy.
|
On April 14 2011 12:54 RedDragon571 wrote:
Lol, I'm a masters zerg, and I suck, and I know not to do half the stuff DarkForce did. I'm willing to say my Z v P, is better than Darkforce's.
The only thing darkforce did right is his creep spread.
|
On April 14 2011 12:55 acker wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2011 12:53 vrok wrote:On April 14 2011 12:52 Sandro wrote:
Sooo why was this darkforce guy invited again? Because he's still better than the alternative NA players? Take a guess. Even with the lag issues, a KR player might have been a better choice.
Then you need to replace Artosis, Vibe and some others too 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
