On April 13 2011 05:09 Spicy Pepper wrote: Some of the people bashing MC on Shakuras also cheered Dimaga against Nestea on Xelnaga. Both were calculated gambles by smart players, exploiting a weakness in their opponent.
White-Ra played really well. Shame about that cheesy build that MC made... MC is really the best protoss/player in the world at the moment. The interviews proved that White-Ra is the most awesome guy in the universe. He cares about us Props to Sweden and Dreamhack! I had great fun!I think I'm not sleeping toniight because of NASL.
On April 13 2011 05:06 enemy2010 wrote: Wow, i am just imagining MC looking through his match history in battlenet and clicking this one special match thinking "Wow, this match brought me 15.000 dollars."
And White-Ra clicking the same match in his match history thinking "Wow, i almost won 15.000 dollar right there."
Must be a beastly feeling
Yeah but he didn't care about winning, he just wanted the eSports scene to grow. But I understand what you mean, narrow victory. I will look forward to them in NASL and future Dreamhacks.
No no, what i mean is, that just this one game (ok, after playing many others, but in fact this one game), this one piece of data, digits of ones an zeros, brought you so much money
re: Uruguay, Suarez commited a foul, he did not cheat. They are very different things. Cheating is stuff like doping and calciopoli. Fouling OTOH is within the rules of the game (at a price, of course).
On April 13 2011 04:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get it.. have you all forgotten this is a strategy game?
Yep, and thats why MC avoids the strategic part of the game and just cheeses his way to the win. Srsly, I just couldnt respect MC before and I disrespect him even more now. He didnt deserve this win today.
On April 13 2011 04:40 Graham wrote: wow MC what a shitty way to play lost a fan indeed
This... he calls himself (and is called) the best Protoss in the world and feels the necessity to proxy gate the last match? Lame.
if it's the best way to play, and if it's the most powerful, then i suppose he doesnt consider that playing a different build would and winning at the same time would prove he's better
On April 13 2011 04:41 hugman wrote: We need an MC anti-fanclub
qft
door's that way -->
if white ra had proxy gate'd you'd be spamming speshul taktiks / calling Ra a genius
Due to the persona MC has created for himself any game he wins make him have anti-fans, hes a B team MBC scrub somehow making it big in SC2 and people fall all over him. Its rage worthy.
On April 13 2011 04:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get it.. have you all forgotten this is a strategy game?
I didn't forget this. But I also listen when players like MC promise entertaining games. There is pride involved in the way you win as much as the win itself. My frustration comes from the lack of showmanship. I want to see their mid and late game PvP (does that even exist?!) and MC knows that while he won, he did not win how a God would win. He won like a mere mortal, reverting to cheesy 'strategic' play.
He gets the check, get gets the W. WhiteRa gets my respect though.
On April 13 2011 04:47 ReacH. wrote: How can people say that it was good strategy for MC to cheese? It was a coin flip, and it proves nothing about his skill.
On April 13 2011 04:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get it.. have you all forgotten this is a strategy game?
Nope white-ra is a foreigner therefore MC was supposed to just throw the games, thats how it works around here right?
Being a foreigner might play a part, but I am just really disappointed that a person who says he is "god protoss" or whatnot needs to cheese to win his games.
Doesn't even matter that WhiteRa 4gated too, if you act like you're the best player ever, I would like to see some standards. Like winning solid games or something.
On April 13 2011 04:43 Fawkes wrote: @posts about MC losing a fan.
Don't think anybody cares.
"Whitera is so nice, how could you do this to him MC?!" "omg no gl at beginning of game, so bm!" "omg cheese, i hate you"
Whitera 4 gates are pure genius. MC 4 gates are pure cheese.
so much truth!
Whitera opens with a defensive 4gate to hold offensive 4gates Whitera prefers not to go 4gate because he believes it requires absolutely no skill to execute Whitera lost only because he didn't scout -because of that type of cheese i scout at 8 and i always scout my base and around it in pvp. He lost purely due to his lack of scouting -MC wasn't confident to win a real game so he cheesed his way through -made the series completely anticlimactic = doesnt care about the observers and making a good show. That is my 2 cents.
On April 13 2011 04:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get it.. have you all forgotten this is a strategy game?
Have you forgotten that microing 3 units has absolutely nothing to do with strategy ?
Micro in general has nothing to do with strategy. Strategy is about economy management and global army management aka positionning. Microing individual units has nothing to do with strategy.
User was temp banned for this post.
10ish slightly related posts many pages back, warrent this whole imaginary shitstorm? nah. Like I said before, People were disappointed their favourite didn't win. Thats it. They were invested in the game, guess what? SC2 is awesome, it's only natural.
We should all be a lot more worried if you didn't get some negative responses.
On April 13 2011 04:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I don't get it.. have you all forgotten this is a strategy game?
Did you enjoy it when this happened?
Really, people have a right to be upset if we are robbed of a great finish yeah? But MC won grats to him.
Well said Halvorg. No offence Naz, I just think that both sides of this argument are represented well by this. MC did what he chose to to win and it worked and thats great, but I understand how one could be disappointed by that
The video show something that is illegal tactics. What did mc do that was illegal against the rule of the game?
Holy fuck did you just show me an example of cheating to compare the situations?
My IQ just dropped to 50 trying to understand your point. These situations are NOTHING alike. Trying to win and trying to win by cheating are two different worlds buddy.
Actually, it's not illegal. You get a red card and a penalty and that's it. In football if there is an attacker running alone and the last defender can't catch up, it's usually advisable to foul him. You get a red card, but they will just get a penalty kick. What he meant is that it's anti-climax I think, it would be "cheating" only if the ref hadn't seen it and even that would have been considered something you just have to use (as it can go both ways).
If it's not illegal then there would be no punishment for doing such acts. You basically proved that it was illegal. Just because the scope is limited to within the game and not always outside of the game(Red cards can affect participation in other games) you cannot say it's legal.
Just no. It's part of the game, if a player can prevent his team from getting eliminated from the world cup do you think he'd care about getting a red card? Also, partecipation for other games is only for bad behaviour (punching, spitting, hurting someone). That was just a technical "illegal" move which is completely contemplated in the game, it does not differ from cheese in any way. If your cheese gets spotted, you lose the game. If their penalty kick scores, you are in the same situation as before but with a player less. The example is more than valid in my opinion.
I'm sorry but I am battling to understand what you are trying to say. You say it's not illegal because it's "part of the game". Yet there is punishment for it and a player cannot do it without receiving this punishment(Unless ref/outside ref doesn't see). Nothing else matters. You stated that it wasn't illegal because it could be done but that isn't a valid line of reasoning. It is illegal. I never said your point of it being like cheese didn't stand, merely you were wrong about it being legal.
That being said it differs completely from being cheese. You cannot take such an arbitrary comparison and then state you have solved the mystery. That is just complete nonsense. Cheese is a concept within a strategy game. Hand balling and other illegal activities are confined within football. A direct comparison is impossible, you can make some kind of philosophical comparison but I find those rather pointless.
I'm not supporting the example, I was cheering for both. It's just that the way you think of "illegal action" is wrong, as I wrote
Again, they don't ban you from soccer for doing that. Every trainer would tell you that fouling the last man to prevent a goal is the best thing to do and they would fire you if you don't do that because it's against the rules. You get a red card but you prevent a goal, you cheese but if you fail you lose the game. The example works in my opinion.
Now you are merely talking about semantics here. Just because the punishment doesn't extend past the confines of the game doesn't mean it is legal. Let me give you a ludicrous analogy:
Cheating in junior school is legal because they just give you some form of one time punishment and remove your mark. You aren't banned from education forever.
You see how ridiculous it sounds?
On April 13 2011 05:14 Yaotzin wrote: re: Uruguay, Suarez commited a foul, he did not cheat. They are very different things. Cheating is stuff like doping and calciopoli. Fouling OTOH is within the rules of the game (at a price, of course).
I think I should give up. Seems people have limited understanding of what rules are and what they are not. If there is punishment for an action it is against the rules of the game. There is no rule that states "you my hand ball as much as you like but there will be punishment!". The rule is "you may not hand ball. Different situations require different punishment"(Paraphrasing). I don't understand how people can say otherwise.
Anyway this point is going beyond Starcraft2 and the lovely dreamhack. Enough of this on my part
Really Big Props to Dreamhack for bringing in such a high production-value tournament! One thing though, (at least from the players' perspective) pooling all the prize money to only the winner kinda sucks, just my two-cents.
Also, congratulations to MC and all the other players!
On April 13 2011 05:00 Hot_Bid wrote: The only reason epic long macro games are epic is because we know players are trying to win 100%. If we're ever at a point where players are just playing to entertain fans and not to win, then SC2 as an ESPORT will definitely fail. Everyone needs to stop killing MC and recognize that he did something that was very smart given the way the map was and how he saw WR play in the earlier games. Not to mention this is something that is definitely not a sure win.
Who's denying it was smart? Do you think it's strange to get upset when the well mannered guy who wouldn't think of all-inning, is up 2-0 against a player with an aura of invincibility and then loses to 3 all-ins in a row?
this guy
I agree. It's funny how people keep talking about White-Ra being the well-mannered guy when he's been whining about 4-gates for a long time. Only reason he was up 2-0 was MC giving in to the whining at first and trying not to 4-gate the first two games. In fact, MC was the one who got 4-gated the first game.
My IQ just dropped to 50 trying to understand your point. These situations are NOTHING alike. Trying to win and trying to win by cheating are two different worlds buddy.
That wasn't cheating. The rule set for soccer says that a player who deliberately bats the ball down with his hands is ejected from the game and the opposing team gets a penalty kick. The player on Uruguay used that to his advantage. If people have a problem with the rule, change it. You can't bely human nature when someone takes advantage of the rule set. It was a smart play.
"The rule set for soccer says that a player who deliberately bats the ball down with his hands is ejected from the game and the opposing team gets a penalty kick."
Do you know why there's such a penalty? It's because the action is considered cheating.
If you break a rule in a sport, it's cheating, just because the cheating worked out well for them doesn't mean it wasn't cheating.
On April 13 2011 05:11 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: After such an amazing tournament, I really can't believe how much whining we're getting about MC winning, especially since he was the huge favorite anyway. I love White-Ra, and he played incredibly well overall, but the fact that he was unable to scout his own base made him lose the game, and MC was just plain ballsy with that last move.
Cheesing isn't cheating, and you play to win. Period. If you don't like the fact that a player's top priority is to win instead of entertain you, then you probably shouldn't be watching any tournament with a prize pool. When money is on the line, players use strategies that they're comfortable with. You're not always going to see amazing games or crazy builds.
If you don't like the fact that MC tricked White-Ra in the last game, then just talk about something not related to MC. Or don't post at all. The QQ regarding MC's strategy doesn't need to be included. Post about how awesome White-Ra played overall, or how Dreamhack was an amazing tournament.
Don't post bullshit about how MC needs to cheese to win, or how he doesn't have real skill, because his achievements have already proven that he's one of the best SC2 players in the world.
so so true
Doesnt change the fact that White-Ra is the better player overall in my eyes and that MC didn't deserve the win imo.
On April 13 2011 05:02 pompey606 wrote: In my opinion this was the best run event to date. Great production values, great casting, great, exciting and genuinly funny announcer. A*
+1
+2
And u know what?
Even +3
I agree with this as well. I watched from aftonbladet though, because they had some interviews with the Swedish players etc between the games, but the normal stream seemed to keep a very high quality as well. Jinro seemed so disappointed tho..
Wasn't perfect in terms of a regame and a sound issue, but overall it was a pleasure to watch I think. Dreamhack boss didn't want to promise anything but with it being sold out I'm guessing that there will be an even bigger venue for the upcoming events. The cheers and stuff really helps the feel of it all I think.
I have to ask though.. why were the two Swedish hosts there? They had no clue whatsoever, and basically every "fact" they had up their sleeve was wrong. Also they were about two months behind the newsfeed of sc2. It truly saddened my heart. TT
Really, people have a right to be upset if we are robbed of a great finish yeah? But MC won grats to him.
Well said Halvorg. No offence Naz, I just think that both sides of this argument are represented well by this. MC did what he chose to to win and it worked and thats great, but I understand how one could be disappointed by that
The video show something that is illegal tactics. What did mc do that was illegal against the rule of the game?
It's not illegal, per se. Or, to be more precise, the advantages outweighed the penalty.
wat? the penalty was losing out on 15k... so how do the advantages outweigh that?
TL's mentality: every game must be a 5-base, 40:00 macro game. /facepalm
Err... he was talking about the football match. The point he was making is countering the previous quote: it's not ILLEGAL to make a handsball on the goal line. However, the punishment is a red card and a penalty shot against your team. At that point, Suàrez realized that with seconds left on the chance, a 100% goal was worse than a penalty shot (which Ghana could - and did- miss) and being expelled. It was tactics. Just as MC played tactically against White-Ra that last match. However, it was also "being a spoil sport". In both situations. That is why it is such a good analogy. I don't blame MC, or Suàrez, for doing what it takes to win. However, the reverse is also not true: I most definitely don't admire them for it.
In MC's case especially: he is the GOD Protoss. Yet, so mortally afraid of White-Ra that he resorts to a "cheap" tactics to win. I don't blame him for 4-gating, blink stalkers or anything: that is and has been the name of the game wrt PvP for months now. The people saying that White-Ra was being greedy and could've stopped the proxy gate if he had scouted, chrono boosted out a zealot, etc. are obviously correct: with 20-20 hindsight anybody can stop a proxy. However, the fact of the matter is that if you take all the precautions all the time you will lose in a straight up 4gate battle. Therefore, White-RA didn't check and lost to the proxy. It is a cheap tactic. Players of top quality should have confidence enough to duke out the final match "like men". It's not a Nash equilibrium, but it is the gentlemanly thing to do. Neither Suàrez, nor MC are gentlemen.
God help Esports the day TL is not filled with anger, whining about balance and cheesing, because without those present, it would have meant that TL was dead.
Really, people have a right to be upset if we are robbed of a great finish yeah? But MC won grats to him.
Well said Halvorg. No offence Naz, I just think that both sides of this argument are represented well by this. MC did what he chose to to win and it worked and thats great, but I understand how one could be disappointed by that
The video show something that is illegal tactics. What did mc do that was illegal against the rule of the game?
Holy fuck did you just show me an example of cheating to compare the situations?
My IQ just dropped to 50 trying to understand your point. These situations are NOTHING alike. Trying to win and trying to win by cheating are two different worlds buddy.
Actually, it's not illegal. You get a red card and a penalty and that's it. In football if there is an attacker running alone and the last defender can't catch up, it's usually advisable to foul him. You get a red card, but they will just get a penalty kick. What he meant is that it's anti-climax I think, it would be "cheating" only if the ref hadn't seen it and even that would have been considered something you just have to use (as it can go both ways).
If it's not illegal then there would be no punishment for doing such acts. You basically proved that it was illegal. Just because the scope is limited to within the game and not always outside of the game(Red cards can affect participation in other games) you cannot say it's legal.
Just no. It's part of the game, if a player can prevent his team from getting eliminated from the world cup do you think he'd care about getting a red card? Also, partecipation for other games is only for bad behaviour (punching, spitting, hurting someone). That was just a technical "illegal" move which is completely contemplated in the game, it does not differ from cheese in any way. If your cheese gets spotted, you lose the game. If their penalty kick scores, you are in the same situation as before but with a player less. The example is more than valid in my opinion.
I'm sorry but I am battling to understand what you are trying to say. You say it's not illegal because it's "part of the game". Yet there is punishment for it and a player cannot do it without receiving this punishment(Unless ref/outside ref doesn't see). Nothing else matters. You stated that it wasn't illegal because it could be done but that isn't a valid line of reasoning. It is illegal. I never said your point of it being like cheese didn't stand, merely you were wrong about it being legal.
That being said it differs completely from being cheese. You cannot take such an arbitrary comparison and then state you have solved the mystery. That is just complete nonsense. Cheese is a concept within a strategy game. Hand balling and other illegal activities are confined within football. A direct comparison is impossible, you can make some kind of philosophical comparison but I find those rather pointless.
I'm not supporting the example, I was cheering for both. It's just that the way you think of "illegal action" is wrong, as I wrote
Again, they don't ban you from soccer for doing that. Every trainer would tell you that fouling the last man to prevent a goal is the best thing to do and they would fire you if you don't do that because it's against the rules. You get a red card but you prevent a goal, you cheese but if you fail you lose the game. The example works in my opinion.
The fact that people like you think it's OK that football players are encouraged to break the rules to win, and actually do so as well, is the reason football is turning to shit.
On April 13 2011 04:58 Teacher74 wrote: How did MC know that whitera was in that position without scouting the bottom position?
Seems kinda strange to me as well. Guess it was cross positions only, yet white-ra scouted the top left first. I feel so bad for him. Coming so close to 15000$, and losing like that. He def. got his community support though
you know....it could actually be that mc decided to scout cross positions first and then the other but wound up finding white-ra straight away, and that's allt here is to it. Try not to get paranoid over nothing.