|
On March 27 2011 06:41 Eeevil wrote: That 1 zealot won the game. Naniwa saw every drop comming.
Someone promote that Zeal to a DT. Zeals on Taldarim altar have superpowers in TSL. First Tyler's zealot had killed like 26 workers against Strelok, today Naniwa's spotted drops and army movements for 10mins
|
I really want to like Ret but i cant really get behind his play. To much droning and not reacting the what he is seeing.
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 Toshihito_TL wrote: Is it just me or does today's game seem more disappointing that last week's? =(
Such a stacked lineup this week too...
are u kidding?
|
BUT Ret can do it still, no worries at all.
|
I Ret lost thanks to that zealot placed at xtower.
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 fueNN wrote: ret obviously had lag
User was warned for this post
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 teamsolid wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:41 Jakalo wrote:On March 27 2011 06:40 Bellygareth wrote: If all zergs get knocked out first round I'll kill a probe. Morrow made it through It was 2x baneling busts though. Doesn't really count. Sen played like a beast though, glad he made it.
Why does that not count? Hard counters to greedy play suddenly became bad?
|
Let me guess, Ret lost cause of lag? Yeah right.
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 teamsolid wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:41 Jakalo wrote:On March 27 2011 06:40 Bellygareth wrote: If all zergs get knocked out first round I'll kill a probe. Morrow made it through It was 2x baneling busts though. Doesn't really count. Sen played like a beast though, glad he made it.
Wtf have how he made it through got to do with anything? Do you just jump at an opportunity to bash players when you see it? Grow up...
|
Imagine if those OV drops had been filled with banelings instead. I feel as if it would have been a very different game.
|
On March 27 2011 06:43 Beef Noodles wrote: lol at all the ret haters. He didn't play poorly. He played amazingly. Its hard to drop harass with map hack xel naga zealot seeing everything
Yeah, it is pretty tough to kill a zealot. Nani should apologize for hacking.
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 DeltruS wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:41 jdseemoreglass wrote: Max supply:
Protoss: 190 Terran: 200 Zerg: 210 they can do the same thing by changing unit supply costs. that's way more rigid
|
On March 27 2011 06:40 VarpuliS wrote: noooooo ret. i'm 0/3 on liquibets today, don't let me go to 0/4
yeah would suck for me as well^^ really hope ret stops this shinanigans and starts playing^^
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 Toshihito_TL wrote: Is it just me or does today's game seem more disappointing that last week's? =(
Such a stacked lineup this week too...
Its just you. Adel vs MVP was awesome.
qxc vs Genius was absolutely an epic series
GoOdy vs Nestea was nice too (tho I was more pumped as I am german )
|
On March 27 2011 06:37 abominable wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:26 m4dm4n wrote: Goody hotkey setup:
1. main army and harrass units, all on 1 key 2-3 orbitals 4 factory
and thats it rofl, i never played RTS before SC2 and im using 1-6 (3keys for army and 3 for production)....
2 bad Nestea lost against such a bad player. why is that 'bad' play? laughable that you're suggesting mech is low-micro. watch the vod and then review your post. there's too much to micro to use hotkeys on mech army - you dont just move them around like lings/roach... you have to manually siege and kite with hellions and move thor to protect... therefore with mech army it's best to ctrl click, shift click etc for unit selection. nestea was outplayed, obviously didn't study goody's style at all and thus lost the metagame and although looking very good he did not know how to handle mech play.
I agree mech army u have much more point click micro commands then with bio but seriously using 1 hotkey for EVERYTHING? At least use 2 for main army and 2nd for hellions, u cant say its easier to have everything on one lol.
|
On March 27 2011 06:41 jdseemoreglass wrote: Max supply:
Protoss: 190 Terran: 200 Zerg: 210 Nah, just adjust the supplies units cost Roaches should be 1.5 supply, they're too cheap for being a 2 supply unit
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 teamsolid wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:41 Jakalo wrote:On March 27 2011 06:40 Bellygareth wrote: If all zergs get knocked out first round I'll kill a probe. Morrow made it through It was 2x baneling busts though. Doesn't really count. Sen played like a beast though, glad he made it. Lol of course it counts, he countered the CC first.
|
On March 27 2011 06:42 teamsolid wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2011 06:41 Jakalo wrote:On March 27 2011 06:40 Bellygareth wrote: If all zergs get knocked out first round I'll kill a probe. Morrow made it through It was 2x baneling busts though. Doesn't really count. Sen played like a beast though, glad he made it. Jinro played in a way which Morrow exploited, that's what good players do. Morrow isn't known for his baneling busting. Reacting to an opponents strategy and crushing it is just good starcraft. Can't begrudge Morrow for doing it.
|
@Toshihito: You can't be serious. IMMVP getting taken down by AdelScott's all-gateway-unit style, QXC's game 2 with lategame reapers + Nukes, all 3 Koreans going down... you think last week's games were BETTER?!
|
I have Naniwa winning the tournament (in the Bracket contest), gogo Nani!
|
|
|
|