EPTGSL Code A Round of 8 Day 1 - Page 92
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
It's alright to debate over the game, that's completely fine. It's alright to criticize casters/players/etc. It is not fine, however, to be an idiot and unnecessarily flame other users of this site, players, casters, etc etc etc for no reason. Any absurd and unnecessary flaming of anything/talking an absurd amount of shit/talking out of your ass/etc will be met with a 2day temp ban or longer. Please keep it civil. | ||
Wunder
United Kingdom2950 Posts
| ||
|
iRRelevance
Romania725 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:58 Moonwrath wrote: Siege tanks don't get used enough in TvP. It's such a good unit. As long as no immortals are on the field, its a really good unit yea and if you can abuse the map like this. | ||
|
NguN
Australia1322 Posts
| ||
|
kirbynator
Canada503 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:58 Moonwrath wrote: Siege tanks don't get used enough in TvP. It's such a good unit. theyre very very very situational if you dont have over like 6-7 of them theyre close to useless vs zealots with immortla or colossi. a small choke helps a ton too obviously | ||
|
Kyhol
Canada2574 Posts
| ||
|
bbQ4Aiur
Hong Kong2752 Posts
| ||
|
Ezekyle
Australia607 Posts
| ||
|
GDbushido
United States926 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:58 Moonwrath wrote: my phoenix laugh at silly human crawler-guns.Siege tanks don't get used enough in TvP. It's such a good unit. | ||
|
FXOpen
Australia1844 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:58 iRRelevance wrote: wtf was killer doing? You cannot attack a sieged terran in that position. You either expand somewhere else or counter-attack. And lose his entire base with all his tech? It was over already the moment the Terran sieged up there. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
Counter-attacking was the correct move, though base trading with a Terran is rarely a good idea. Generally speaking, against this composition you can't do much without mass phoenixes or immortals. | ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:59 Kyhol wrote: Yeah, it's a big problem.Do you think that blizzard removed shakuras because of pushes like that? | ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
|
vrok
Sweden2541 Posts
| ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:45 dani` wrote: Exactly, which is why it will not become a standard PvT opening. Sorry jalstar, but you could have figured that one out  Basically anything that has multiple hard counters will never become the standard opening.This is why the Thor rush died out in TvP - It auto-lost to DTs. If DTs fall out of favor as an opening, the Thor Rush could come back (but never be standard). Such is the shifting state of the Meta-game. | ||
|
NExt
Australia1651 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:59 Kyhol wrote: Do you think that blizzard removed shakuras because of pushes like that? Official Blizzard Quote about 1.3 Patch changes (4) Shakuras Plateau This map we decided to remove for a different reason. There isn't a huge problem with this map, but we feel there aren't enough interesting features. The natural expansion is easy to take and defend; there are only two possible attack paths, only one of which is generally used, and main bases aren’t easy to harass. For a change, we wanted to replace this relatively plain map with something new. --full map changes blog link http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/2356440#blog | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
According to them, it's balanced but "boring", so idk. | ||
|
Deleted User 109835
629 Posts
| ||
|
sqrt
1210 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:59 Kyhol wrote: Do you think that blizzard removed shakuras because of pushes like that? No, the reason was...different. But let's not turn this into a flame thread, more than it is at least. | ||
| ||
