[GSL] Code S Semi-finals - Page 80
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
No balance whining. 2-day temp bans will be handed out like candy. | ||
Thetan
240 Posts
| ||
k20
United States342 Posts
On January 23 2011 15:36 Ezekyle wrote: Anyone else notice the interesting parallels to IdrA vs Jinro? Game 1 is a crushing victory for the Zerg on XNC, then loses due to a bunker rush and close position Shakuras backdoor push, then ends up losing 1-3 because of Jungle Basin. Haha wow I didn't even notice. That is a good observation | ||
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
| ||
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On January 23 2011 15:36 LoLAdriankat wrote: I didn't say "He shouldn't make mutas." I said he should invest some of the money he spends on mutas on infestors instead. You don't need 20 infestors. If Nestea made a few to FG he would've been able delay pushes, dwindle marine counts, build up baneling counts, and drain medivac energy. I think one of the worst things that Korean zergs do is make lings and send them into marine balls. That's essentially throwing away minerals. This is just wrong. If you noticed, MVP consistently sent out little groups of 4-5 marines specifically to ward off infestors and comb the area. Vs a high-level korean terran, infestor play just doesn't work a lot of the time. Too many tanks. Too good spreading. And costs way too much gas. Also the research time for energy + building the infestors just adds up to guaranteeing the zerg will never get their 4th. | ||
kellymilkies
Singapore1393 Posts
| ||
LoLAdriankat
United States4307 Posts
On January 23 2011 15:30 Cyanocyst wrote: FG range 6, Siege tanks range 13. Its just really hard to use Fg effectively vs tanks. Also, even if you get a good FG, you still might loose an infestor, given their cost its quite detrimental. FG range is 9. Also, infestors aren't for killing siege tanks. Siege tanks set up a safety net for marines and marines usually stay near the edge of the siege tank range, which means infestors are still able to safely FG the marines. | ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
5unrise
New Zealand646 Posts
| ||
Sprungjeezy
United States1313 Posts
| ||
PraetorianX
Sweden780 Posts
| ||
SC2Phoenix
Canada2814 Posts
| ||
Hypatio
549 Posts
| ||
Highwinds
Canada955 Posts
| ||
iEchoic
United States1776 Posts
On January 23 2011 15:37 ELA wrote: Imo, cheering for MKP is wrong on so many levels - His play is super gimmicky and abusive - And you are rooting for him over our very own Jinro? :o MKP isn't gimmicky at all. He has some allins which he uses strategically. He FEs literally 80%+ of his games. | ||
kr_priest
Korea (South)223 Posts
Expecting some awesome games out of these two | ||
Finrod1
Germany3997 Posts
![]() | ||
Thrombozyt
Germany1269 Posts
| ||
SixSongs
Poland1455 Posts
| ||
TUski
United States1258 Posts
On the other hand, Jinro defends a 6pool and bunker rushes to a gg. I definitely think they could have made better videos lol. | ||
jeddus
United States832 Posts
F*CK HIM UP, JINRO! (Even though I like MKP too) | ||
| ||