|
On August 22 2010 21:23 Jimmy Raynor wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:15 Seze wrote:
How can anyone honestly claim that Zerg is gimped, compared to Terran, after following this tournament? Yeah have you actually watched the tournament? Dimaga hast to work his ass off, flank perfectly, and even after he destroys the whole Terran army, its np because the other player got mules, and immediately not only does herebuild his army but also pulls ahead in food while having less bases than the zerg.
The whole point with zerg has always been flanking.
And Terran needs less expos than zerg, because it´s harder to defend many bases as T.
I´m surprised Dimaga did no harass in the game, the latter expos were almost compeletely without defence.
To me it seems the worse player has always lost.
Of course it´s easier to point at something and call imba, I guess it´s okay too.
It just doesn´t help..at all.
|
It's like Tarson is in a room with a door.
Instead of walking through the door he's choosing to ram his head into the wall reapeatedly until it breaks.
|
Some hellions and marauders 2 take some hits would've been nice?
|
On August 22 2010 21:28 Potatisodlaren wrote:
That said its really bad by Blizzard not to have a good save system or reconnect like HoN.
How would you probably implement this though? Just curious. I mean, imagine your opponent dropping in a ladder game and you have to wait 5 min for him to reconnect otherwise you won't get the win. I can imagine tons of griefing with that.
|
tarson preparing his trademark ctrl alt del transition right now
|
On August 22 2010 21:29 HeIios wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:28 Sadistx wrote:On August 22 2010 21:27 Topsecret wrote:
I thought IdrA proved how ineffective this Marine/Tank push is? I thought Morrow proved that it actually is effective  What I'd like to see Terran players do is add blue hellions to support this kind of push. Sounds almost impossible, you need the minerals for marines anyhow. You'd have to have some kind of awesome economy to pull that off.
6 Blue hellions > 12 marines killed by 2 banelings, easily.
|
tarson's army just got levelled lol
|
why does he kept making marines against the dimaga composition ?
|
On August 22 2010 21:31 Piski wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:27 mF.jEIN wrote:
i am so happy with that disconnect, it shows once more where blizz has some work to do. It was a pc crash :o Not sure even blizzard can do anything
well i know^^ i was more thinking of LAN or multiplayer save...
|
On August 22 2010 21:31 Jimmeh wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:30 vyyye wrote:On August 22 2010 21:29 Jimmeh wrote:On August 22 2010 21:28 vyyye wrote:On August 22 2010 21:27 DminusTerran wrote:On August 22 2010 21:26 Trok67 wrote:
why isnt he making marauders against ling/banelings combo ? lol wut? He could utilize them like tanks, they would absorb quite gre bit of banelings. Marauders can't shoot up. Banelings can't fly. It's muta/baneling/ling/infestor. If tarson starts getting marauders, Dimaga gets more mutas. Simples.
They could still absorb a few banelings. The game isn't 100% rock, paper, scissors.
|
On August 22 2010 21:31 HwangjaeTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:23 Jimmy Raynor wrote:On August 22 2010 21:15 Seze wrote:
How can anyone honestly claim that Zerg is gimped, compared to Terran, after following this tournament? Yeah have you actually watched the tournament? Dimaga hast to work his ass off, flank perfectly, and even after he destroys the whole Terran army, its np because the other player got mules, and immediately not only does herebuild his army but also pulls ahead in food while having less bases than the zerg. The whole point with zerg has always been flanking. And Terran needs less expos than zerg, because it´s harder to defend many bases as T. I´m surprised Dimaga did no harass in the game, the latter expos were almost compeletely without defence. To me it seems the worse player has always lost. Of course it´s easier to point at something and call imba, I guess it´s okay too. It just doesn´t help..at all.
it's harder to defend many bases as t? are you kidding?
|
On August 22 2010 21:31 Jimmeh wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:30 vyyye wrote:On August 22 2010 21:29 Jimmeh wrote:On August 22 2010 21:28 vyyye wrote:On August 22 2010 21:27 DminusTerran wrote:On August 22 2010 21:26 Trok67 wrote:
why isnt he making marauders against ling/banelings combo ? lol wut? He could utilize them like tanks, they would absorb quite gre bit of banelings. Marauders can't shoot up. Banelings can't fly. It's muta/baneling/ling/infestor. If tarson starts getting marauders, Dimaga gets more mutas. Simples.
Compare the Meerkat.com. Simples.
|
On August 22 2010 21:32 Mastermyth wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:28 Potatisodlaren wrote:
That said its really bad by Blizzard not to have a good save system or reconnect like HoN. How would you probably implement this though? Just curious. I mean, imagine your opponent dropping in a ladder game and you have to wait 5 min for him to reconnect otherwise you won't get the win. I can imagine tons of griefing with that.
Make it so that you can kick him after say 1 minute? They wouldn't kick the player in tournaments.
|
|
|
repair damnit !!! and get some upgrades.
|
He doesnt need SCVs, he has mules.
|
On August 22 2010 21:32 Mastermyth wrote:Show nested quote +On August 22 2010 21:28 Potatisodlaren wrote:
That said its really bad by Blizzard not to have a good save system or reconnect like HoN. How would you probably implement this though? Just curious. I mean, imagine your opponent dropping in a ladder game and you have to wait 5 min for him to reconnect otherwise you won't get the win. I can imagine tons of griefing with that.
Make it a 2 minute limit, it's honestly not that hard. Sometimes the internet only cuts off by 2 seconds, but atm it's autoloss.
HoN reconnect is totally fine.
|
DIMAGA needs more Infestors asap.
|
|
|
Tarson is still doing well. With so many banelings from DiMaGa, he doesn't have any units to mount a successful attack..
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
