• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:23
CEST 03:23
KST 10:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 612 users

[D] PvZ Beating Stephano Style Roaches - Page 30

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 28 29 30 31 32 78 Next
Please have some semblance of an idea of what you're talking about.
buldermar
Profile Joined March 2008
Denmark102 Posts
March 20 2012 17:38 GMT
#581
On March 21 2012 02:29 KiF1rE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


tbh... The only PvZ games i could find of MC recently. are similar to 8 gate 1-1 upgrades, with alot of sentries, crushing violet. IEM WC.... And if he doesnt kill the zerg or denies a 3rd he loses... He seems to always go for a quick aggressive timing regardless.


Looking at games from this year only, he is 12-0, defeating Stephano 2-0 and Nerchio 3-0 at Home Story Cup, Nerchio 2-0 and Violet 3-0 at IEM and Idra 2-0 at Iron Squid. The point is he doesn't lose, so the question that remains to be answered is why? What you pointed to is only that he succeeds with strats that other people apperently fail with. Why is this? What is he doing differently? Stephano crushing protoss players was mentioned in this thread. MC is 4-0 against Stephano, with 2 games being from this year.
Belha
Profile Joined December 2010
Italy2850 Posts
March 20 2012 17:40 GMT
#582
On March 21 2012 02:35 Friend23 wrote:
i already said that above

Show nested quote +
and for these who instantly think of muta switch:
why dont you load 4 your immortals into warp prisms and just bruteforce kill spire to buy time, building another one will give you enough time to prepare for mutas,

and even, if he had just spent all this gas for 200/200 roaches, first hatch (after the roach push ended) wont be 20 mutas at once, or even, you might be able to brute force his third/fourth and expind behind the counter attack


what he cant do? he cant have double the amount of gas that you have

Post replays in a decent level or just stop it.
Chicken gank op
Skyro
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1823 Posts
March 20 2012 17:45 GMT
#583
On March 21 2012 02:38 buldermar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:29 KiF1rE wrote:
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


tbh... The only PvZ games i could find of MC recently. are similar to 8 gate 1-1 upgrades, with alot of sentries, crushing violet. IEM WC.... And if he doesnt kill the zerg or denies a 3rd he loses... He seems to always go for a quick aggressive timing regardless.


Looking at games from this year only, he is 12-0, defeating Stephano 2-0 and Nerchio 3-0 at Home Story Cup, Nerchio 2-0 and Violet 3-0 at IEM and Idra 2-0 at Iron Squid. The point is he doesn't lose, so the question that remains to be answered is why? What you pointed to is only that he succeeds with strats that other people apperently fail with. Why is this? What is he doing differently? Stephano crushing protoss players was mentioned in this thread. MC is 4-0 against Stephano, with 2 games being from this year.


MC is probably has one of, if not the best timing execution out there. 2-base timings are still very potent, evidenced by their popularity and relatively even win rates.
happyness
Profile Joined June 2010
United States2400 Posts
March 20 2012 17:50 GMT
#584
On March 21 2012 02:29 KiF1rE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


tbh... The only PvZ games i could find of MC recently. are similar to 8 gate 1-1 upgrades, with alot of sentries, crushing violet. IEM WC.... And if he doesnt kill the zerg or denies a 3rd he loses... He seems to always go for a quick aggressive timing regardless.


So maybe that's the way more of us should be playing against zerg then. A win is a win is a win.
buldermar
Profile Joined March 2008
Denmark102 Posts
March 20 2012 17:54 GMT
#585
On March 21 2012 02:32 Belha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


Always check for korean stats.
International are useless cose all top koreans rape most foreigners and add fake numbers aganist inferior players.

MC last 9 international PvZ's: 9-0

3-0 vs Violet
2-0 vs Idra
4-0 vs Nerchio

MC last 10 korean PvZ's: 4-6

2-3 vs DRG
2-1 vs Leenock
0-2 vs Losira


Your logic is backwards. The reasoning in this thread is that Stephano is crushing protoss players by virtue of apperently exploiting roaches. I show that MC beat a lot of zergs recently (this year), including Stephano 2-0. Then you're simply remove the games versus Stephano and others, claiming that they're inferior players to boost the argument that Stephanos strat is apperently unbeatable?

Looking at only games from this year, MC is 14-1 against zergs:

Leenock: 2-1
Stephano 2-0
Nerchio 5-0
viOlet 3-0
IdrA 2-0

I'd like to know which of these players you consider inferior to MC and why. If your reasoning is fair, you can remove them from the list. If this leaves us with too few matches, we can simply include the last month of last year and repeat.
superstartran
Profile Joined March 2010
United States4013 Posts
March 20 2012 17:58 GMT
#586
On March 21 2012 02:54 buldermar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:32 Belha wrote:
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


Always check for korean stats.
International are useless cose all top koreans rape most foreigners and add fake numbers aganist inferior players.

MC last 9 international PvZ's: 9-0

3-0 vs Violet
2-0 vs Idra
4-0 vs Nerchio

MC last 10 korean PvZ's: 4-6

2-3 vs DRG
2-1 vs Leenock
0-2 vs Losira


Your logic is backwards. The reasoning in this thread is that Stephano is crushing protoss players by virtue of apperently exploiting roaches. I show that MC beat a lot of zergs recently (this year), including Stephano 2-0. Then you're simply remove the games versus Stephano and others, claiming that they're inferior players to boost the argument that Stephanos strat is apperently unbeatable?

Looking at only games from this year, MC is 14-1 against zergs:

Leenock: 2-1
Stephano 2-0
Nerchio 5-0
viOlet 3-0
IdrA 2-0

I'd like to know which of these players you consider inferior to MC and why. If your reasoning is fair, you can remove them from the list. If this leaves us with too few matches, we can simply include the last month of last year and repeat.



MC FF's better than any other Protoss player in the world, so it's alot easier for him to fight at a 50-60 supply disadvantage. One missed FF means you instantly die to Roaches. Not to mention that he also tends to try and attack before Z can mass a critical amount of Roaches.
buldermar
Profile Joined March 2008
Denmark102 Posts
March 20 2012 18:05 GMT
#587
On March 21 2012 02:50 happyness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:29 KiF1rE wrote:
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


tbh... The only PvZ games i could find of MC recently. are similar to 8 gate 1-1 upgrades, with alot of sentries, crushing violet. IEM WC.... And if he doesnt kill the zerg or denies a 3rd he loses... He seems to always go for a quick aggressive timing regardless.


So maybe that's the way more of us should be playing against zerg then. A win is a win is a win.


Maybe it is at least a way that you could be playing against zerg some of the time since it appears to be quite effective? The reasoning that "well, i know he wins all the time and all, but IF HE DIDN'T he would lose" seem to be flawed. If he's doing 2 base timings all of the time, it must be expected by his opponents. If it's expected and still works, it must be consistent. If it's consistent, it wins you games consistently. In that sense i guess a win is a win, yes. The way to prove otherwise is to point to big mistakes by zerg players in the games won by MC or point to lack of mistakes by MC in games he lost against zerg players, or simply call it coincidence by means of levels of statistical significance.
[MLG]GCA
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States90 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-20 21:28:41
March 20 2012 18:06 GMT
#588
On March 20 2012 18:05 RaNgeD wrote:


Thanks for sharing. This may sound obvious to some, but i'm of the opinion that to play against zerg you have to choices:
1) Aggressively expand in order to keep up with their economy; or 2) Do timings or harass to kill them or at the very least, slow them down before hive tech. If you choose to play passively against zerg I think you need to be playing aggressive economically.

That being said, I really like what SaSe was doing in Game 1 against ret. I don't know how viable it is, and I don't know how zergs will react to a fast 3rd like that once they've played against it a few times and have had the chance to sit down and study it out a bit. But the general idea is amazing to me.


I agree. As much as I like to complain about Speedroach spam and feel completely helpless most of the time, I feel like PvZ is in the need of a meta shift. Zergs have gotten too good at defending all of the currently popular two-base timings as long as they aren't overly greedy (and really, there is no need for them to be), and at the same time have the production capability to shut down a fast third off of the current popular openings (4Gate Robo after FFE most commonly).

So fundamentally, how do we go about changing our approach to PvZ? Theorycraft time oh boy! These are the ideas that feel best to me:

Faster third: I feel like Sase's opening, or some variation of it, is the only way to go about it. I think a third Nexus any later than 7 minutes won't provide an economic boost fast enough to deal with an 11-12 minute Roach attack, and any committed investment in tech before the Nexus (Sentries included) won't allow for this to happen while constantly making Probes, a sim city and static defense. This feels like the best answer right to me, and is what I want to try and make work.

Crippling production: This begins and ends with killing Queens, and I think Phoenix are the best approach. There's nothing really new about this idea, but a dedicated Phoenix-only air army (6-10) with the sole intention of killing Queens may open up windows to take a third safely. Another option might be some kind of fast Stalker attack, chronoed out of two Gates after an FFE designed to hit before Ling Speed is done.

New compositions: Focusing exclusively on Zealots from the Gateway while getting better tech units out. Phoenix/Immortal feels like it would be best here, and provide scouting and a safety net against Muta. Gravition Beam could act in a similar way to Forcefield to cut down overwhelming Roach numbers in an engagement. I don't think this is the answer at all, but could be worth a shot.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
March 20 2012 18:06 GMT
#589
I'm not a big GSL spectator, but from what I've seen, MC wins a lot because he's really really good at 2-base timings and he has immaculate control that wins him games even when he's way behind after a failed timing attack.

I want to make it clear that I think Protoss can win games against Zerg. 2-base timing pushes are really strong and it's hard for Zerg to know which one is coming. And if Protoss is able to secure a third and enter lategame on even footing, I think Protoss has a big advantage because mothership+carrier+archon+templar is unbeatable. It takes 25 minutes to get the perfect composition, but if Zerg doesn't stop Protoss from getting there, Protoss wins almost every time.

So there are exploits on both sides of the match-up, and a lot of how well the exploits play out depends on the map. On Entombed Valley, for instance, Protoss should just take a fast third, defend with forcefields and get mothership+carrier+archon for the win. It's boring as hell, but there's no reason Protoss should lose on that map. On Korhal Compound, Zerg can prevent Protoss's third seemingly indefinitely, and Zerg should just focus on defending 2-base timings and win every time.
superstartran
Profile Joined March 2010
United States4013 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-20 18:16:23
March 20 2012 18:09 GMT
#590
On March 21 2012 03:06 kcdc wrote:
I'm not a big GSL spectator, but from what I've seen, MC wins a lot because he's really really good at 2-base timings and he has immaculate control that wins him games even when he's way behind after a failed timing attack.

I want to make it clear that I think Protoss can win games against Zerg. 2-base timing pushes are really strong and it's hard for Zerg to know which one is coming. And if Protoss is able to secure a third and enter lategame on even footing, I think Protoss has a big advantage because mothership+carrier+archon+templar is unbeatable. It takes 25 minutes to get the perfect composition, but if Zerg doesn't stop Protoss from getting there, Protoss wins almost every time.

So there are exploits on both sides of the match-up, and a lot of how well the exploits play out depends on the map. On Entombed Valley, for instance, Protoss should just take a fast third, defend with forcefields and get mothership+carrier+archon for the win. It's boring as hell, but there's no reason Protoss should lose on that map. On Korhal Compound, Zerg can prevent Protoss's third seemingly indefinitely, and Zerg should just focus on defending 2-base timings and win every time.


I found that MC's most consistent play vs Z is +1 Blink Stalkers that allows him to pressure very quickly right before massive amounts of Roaches hit the field. It allows him to defend against Roach busts and Muta tech switches, all while pressuring to secure a 3rd.


His ghetto +1 Blink Attack that hits around 10:30 is pretty funny to watch.


buldermar
Profile Joined March 2008
Denmark102 Posts
March 20 2012 18:18 GMT
#591
On March 21 2012 02:58 superstartran wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 02:54 buldermar wrote:
On March 21 2012 02:32 Belha wrote:
On March 21 2012 02:22 buldermar wrote:
@kcdc

I noticed that MC has pretty good international stats against zerg. He has won his last 12 games, and has a 76%+ winrate overall. He lost only twice recently, which was to DRG who just won code S. Since you seem to have accounted for much, I want to ask you if you know why MC is winning against zerg so consistently?


Always check for korean stats.
International are useless cose all top koreans rape most foreigners and add fake numbers aganist inferior players.

MC last 9 international PvZ's: 9-0

3-0 vs Violet
2-0 vs Idra
4-0 vs Nerchio

MC last 10 korean PvZ's: 4-6

2-3 vs DRG
2-1 vs Leenock
0-2 vs Losira


Your logic is backwards. The reasoning in this thread is that Stephano is crushing protoss players by virtue of apperently exploiting roaches. I show that MC beat a lot of zergs recently (this year), including Stephano 2-0. Then you're simply remove the games versus Stephano and others, claiming that they're inferior players to boost the argument that Stephanos strat is apperently unbeatable?

Looking at only games from this year, MC is 14-1 against zergs:

Leenock: 2-1
Stephano 2-0
Nerchio 5-0
viOlet 3-0
IdrA 2-0

I'd like to know which of these players you consider inferior to MC and why. If your reasoning is fair, you can remove them from the list. If this leaves us with too few matches, we can simply include the last month of last year and repeat.



MC FF's better than any other Protoss player in the world, so it's alot easier for him to fight at a 50-60 supply disadvantage. One missed FF means you instantly die to Roaches. Not to mention that he also tends to try and attack before Z can mass a critical amount of Roaches.


This gives us at least two things to look into:
a) improvement of FF's (can the strat be beaten with really, really good FF's? The way to test this could be to play x amount of games and look into the ones where the FF's are best. Does these games have other mistakes that could be fixed?)

b) how to try and attack before Z can mass a critical amount of roaches and be more succesful doing so (this is more tricky because it requires that one look into the specific strat of MC and try it out several times to see if it was a designed strat for one or both of a specific opponent and a specific map, or if it is actually viable)

Ofc. one could also go by the reasoning that since MC is so good with forcefields, he doesn't represent balance. However, balance in sc2 is based on the skilllevel of the top players in the world. If, for instance, the best zerg player in the world has about a 50% winrate against the best protoss player in the world over a large sample of games, it doesn't make the game imbalanced that the 10th to 100th best zerg players has a 65% winrate against the 10th to 100th best protoss players. One need only to compare the various distributions of races in the different leagues with various top X distributions of races in these leagues respectively to see that balance is based on optimal play (contrary to suboptimal play such as missing a forcefield).

To make my point perfectly clear: balance is a term for the state of the game when two players makes as few mistakes as possible and got as few flaws in their game as possible. Even if MC is the only player in the entire world who doesn't mess up forcefields and thus beats zergs consistently, balance should be based on the possibility of doing this consistently, proving that a way of dealing with zergs exists, and not on the mistakes of the 99,999% who loses entire games as a result.
buldermar
Profile Joined March 2008
Denmark102 Posts
March 20 2012 18:25 GMT
#592
On March 21 2012 03:06 kcdc wrote:
I'm not a big GSL spectator, but from what I've seen, MC wins a lot because he's really really good at 2-base timings and he has immaculate control that wins him games even when he's way behind after a failed timing attack.

I want to make it clear that I think Protoss can win games against Zerg. 2-base timing pushes are really strong and it's hard for Zerg to know which one is coming. And if Protoss is able to secure a third and enter lategame on even footing, I think Protoss has a big advantage because mothership+carrier+archon+templar is unbeatable. It takes 25 minutes to get the perfect composition, but if Zerg doesn't stop Protoss from getting there, Protoss wins almost every time.

So there are exploits on both sides of the match-up, and a lot of how well the exploits play out depends on the map. On Entombed Valley, for instance, Protoss should just take a fast third, defend with forcefields and get mothership+carrier+archon for the win. It's boring as hell, but there's no reason Protoss should lose on that map. On Korhal Compound, Zerg can prevent Protoss's third seemingly indefinitely, and Zerg should just focus on defending 2-base timings and win every time.


These are all fair points in my opinion. However, some of them changes the focus of the strat quite a bit. In particular, you seem to emphasize the importance of the map. Have you accounted for this previously? If the level of importance of the map is this great, perhaps the focus on the strat is uncalled for altogether since it might mostly be a consequence of various suboptimal (imbalanced) maps being played in various tournaments.

Also, you point to MC winning a lot of games that he is behind because he's really good at something. I see this as a strong point for a possible counter to the mass roach strat discussed here - not a point against it. If he's really good at something, and if it works against good zerg players, there is a good reason to believe that it's doable for other protoss players with similar or close to similar APM/level of skill the way I see it.
buldermar
Profile Joined March 2008
Denmark102 Posts
March 20 2012 18:32 GMT
#593
On March 21 2012 03:09 superstartran wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 03:06 kcdc wrote:
I'm not a big GSL spectator, but from what I've seen, MC wins a lot because he's really really good at 2-base timings and he has immaculate control that wins him games even when he's way behind after a failed timing attack.

I want to make it clear that I think Protoss can win games against Zerg. 2-base timing pushes are really strong and it's hard for Zerg to know which one is coming. And if Protoss is able to secure a third and enter lategame on even footing, I think Protoss has a big advantage because mothership+carrier+archon+templar is unbeatable. It takes 25 minutes to get the perfect composition, but if Zerg doesn't stop Protoss from getting there, Protoss wins almost every time.

So there are exploits on both sides of the match-up, and a lot of how well the exploits play out depends on the map. On Entombed Valley, for instance, Protoss should just take a fast third, defend with forcefields and get mothership+carrier+archon for the win. It's boring as hell, but there's no reason Protoss should lose on that map. On Korhal Compound, Zerg can prevent Protoss's third seemingly indefinitely, and Zerg should just focus on defending 2-base timings and win every time.


I found that MC's most consistent play vs Z is +1 Blink Stalkers that allows him to pressure very quickly right before massive amounts of Roaches hit the field. It allows him to defend against Roach busts and Muta tech switches, all while pressuring to secure a 3rd.


His ghetto +1 Blink Attack that hits around 10:30 is pretty funny to watch.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_663472&feature=iv&src_vid=FluFCF5dtmQ&v=oz0EwYH2U5Q


Thank you for posting this link. I didn't notice any significant mistakes in the mass roach strat by Stephano. He stopped droning at 61, which seems ideal against 2base +1 protoss pushes. He also had creep spread out nicely. What should Stephano have done differently, assuming that he should still be doing the 3base roach strategy?
NeonFox
Profile Joined January 2011
2373 Posts
March 20 2012 18:34 GMT
#594
On March 21 2012 03:06 kcdc wrote:
I'm not a big GSL spectator, but from what I've seen, MC wins a lot because he's really really good at 2-base timings and he has immaculate control that wins him games even when he's way behind after a failed timing attack.

I want to make it clear that I think Protoss can win games against Zerg. 2-base timing pushes are really strong and it's hard for Zerg to know which one is coming. And if Protoss is able to secure a third and enter lategame on even footing, I think Protoss has a big advantage because mothership+carrier+archon+templar is unbeatable. It takes 25 minutes to get the perfect composition, but if Zerg doesn't stop Protoss from getting there, Protoss wins almost every time.

So there are exploits on both sides of the match-up, and a lot of how well the exploits play out depends on the map. On Entombed Valley, for instance, Protoss should just take a fast third, defend with forcefields and get mothership+carrier+archon for the win. It's boring as hell, but there's no reason Protoss should lose on that map. On Korhal Compound, Zerg can prevent Protoss's third seemingly indefinitely, and Zerg should just focus on defending 2-base timings and win every time.


It sums up exactly my thoughts on ZvP, it's a horrible matchup. Builds hardcounter each other way too strongly, on either side a slight misread can have you get completly rolled over.

Entering the lategame on even footing, once broodlord infestor is out the protoss can't win until mothership is out and once it is the zerg can't win.
[MLG]GCA
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States90 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-20 21:36:48
March 20 2012 18:38 GMT
#595
On March 21 2012 01:52 kcdc wrote:

I think that Sase's opening is really interesting as well, but I think even that fast of a third will wind up well behind in army size. First, a stalker roughly equals a roach in combat strength, but costs twice as much. Second, Z has to spend substantially less on infrastructure for the 3-base roach max compared to a 3-base Protoss defense.

SuperRoach (counting drone in building cost):
pool, warren: 450 minerals
3 hatches (2 expansion, 1 macro): 1050 minerals
3 queens: 450 minerals
evolution chamber: 125 minerals
lair: 150/100
ling speed, roach speed and +1 missile: 300/300
4 gas: 300 minerals
Total: 3125/400


SuperRoach Defense:
2 nexii: 800 minerals
forge, core: 300 minerals
4 cannons minimum: 600 minerals
WG and +1 weapons: 150/150
8 gates (minimum, you'll want more on 3-base econ): 1200
robo: 200/100
5 gas: 375 minerals
twilight (necessary before 12 minutes): 150/100
observer (or hallucination, but we'll count the cheaper one): 25/75
Total: 3800/425

So ~1000 minerals is the minimum infrastructure difference as I see it. If you want some extra cannons or blink or a robo support bay or some extra gates, it's going to add up pretty fast.

Factor in that you'll never fully catch Z's economy even with a third nexus before core and that roaches cost about half as much per supply as your composition does, and it becomes pretty clear that if P wants to take a fast third, Z can have a 70 supply lead at 12 minutes if they want it.

So I think that while it's tempting to ask, "How do I match Z's economy and army size?" the more important question may be, "How do I defend 2+ attack paths when I'm down 70 supply?" I think the answer to the latter question is going to rest heavily on forcefields, so I wonder if Sase's delayed core build is such a good choice.




I'm thinking that a delayed core opening would have to rely on a well-positioned Zealot/Sentry/Immortal army with cannon support until you get your third saturated on minerals and take a 5th and 6th gas afterward. I think spending any gas on Stalkers would put your cut too deeply into your Sentry and Immortal count as you try and catch your tech up. I also think you'd have to cut the TC until you completely stabilize from any early Roach aggression.

I would add it up this way:

SuperRoach (counting drone in building cost):
pool, warren: 450 minerals
3 hatches (2 expansion, 1 macro): 1050 minerals
3 queens: 450 minerals
evolution chamber: 125 minerals
lair: 150/100
ling speed, roach speed and +1 missile: 300/300
4 gas: 300 minerals
Total: 3125/400


SuperRoach Defense (Edited):
2 nexii: 800 minerals
forge, core: 300 minerals
4 cannons minimum: 600 minerals
WG and +1 weapons: 150/150
6 gates (minimum, you'll want more on 3-base econ): 900
robo: 200/100
4 gas: 300 minerals
observer (or hallucination, but we'll count the cheaper one): 25/75
Total: 3275/325

By cutting a gas, the TC and two Gates, the numbers start to look a little bit better, and you will have a better mineral income to add in extra static defense, Gates and/or simcity if needed. I'm not sure if this will actually flush out well, but it seems like a more stable core lined up with what Zerg is capable of and invested in at that point. Essentially the goal here is to trade defending on multiple fronts with a high Sentry/Stalker count with a better simcity and more static defense, both of which you can theoretically afford with the faster third Nexus and delayed early gas, along with the delayed 5th/6th gas at the third. Again, I'm not sure this is even possible, but the consensus in this thread so far is that Sentry defenses are very volatile, so it's worth a shot I think.

I also believe this opening will be extremely map dependent. You'll need to be able to simcity a 2 FF choke maximum at your third with no more than 3 Gateways, and ideally leave 3-4 sentries to defend a ramp leading into your natural. Shakuras, Daybreak, Antiga and Cloud Kingdom feel like they would be viable maps for something like this.
[MLG]GCA
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States90 Posts
March 20 2012 19:33 GMT
#596
JYP is streaming some practice games with Stephano. Maybe we can get some ideas? http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/EGJYP
Roynalf
Profile Joined August 2011
Finland886 Posts
March 20 2012 19:41 GMT
#597
On March 21 2012 04:33 [MLG]GCA wrote:
JYP is streaming some practice games with Stephano. Maybe we can get some ideas? http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/EGJYP

well JYP survived the mass roach part but in result of that he didnt have fast enough tech to counter Stephanos smaller army of broodlord, corruptor, infestors and it ended up growing too large
(V) (;,,;) (V) Woopwoopwoopwoop
Benjamin80
Profile Joined February 2012
581 Posts
March 20 2012 19:49 GMT
#598
JYP is practising against Stephano when he does this build and thee is nothing JYP can do.
[QUOTE][B]On March 19 2012 02:32 iNcontroL wrote:[/B] IF LIFE GIVES YOU LEMONS YOU CANNON RUSH[/QUOTE]
How2getMaster
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany124 Posts
March 20 2012 19:55 GMT
#599
What about double Robo and chrono out Immos?
DiamondToss looking for a team :)
tooleman
Profile Joined April 2011
United States20 Posts
March 20 2012 19:59 GMT
#600
On March 21 2012 04:41 Roynalf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2012 04:33 [MLG]GCA wrote:
JYP is streaming some practice games with Stephano. Maybe we can get some ideas? http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/EGJYP

well JYP survived the mass roach part but in result of that he didnt have fast enough tech to counter Stephanos smaller army of broodlord, corruptor, infestors and it ended up growing too large



This just isn't true. He had the perfect army to deal with Stephano but he decided to mass recall his army into the main and as a result he lost nearly the whole thing to take out the hive and spire among other infrastructure, saving only small portion of his army with a second recall. This left him with no energy on the mothership and a severely decreased army with which he could not deal with the counter attack.

More relevant to this discussion JYP went SG after his FFE for a quick VR (and later 1 phoenix for scouting) used for map control and fake VR +1 zealot pressure. He then got a robo and four gates for sentry/stalker/immortal in order to defend a fast third with immaculate army splitting and control in conjunction with more gates and cannons for a sim city at the third.

He follows this up with a TC for blink and +2 attack (up to +1/+1 at this point) and colossus tech (tries to stay at about 3-4 i believe), eventually also getting templar and mothership tech after a fourth.

This was game 1 of the practice sessions which I am sure you were talking about as game 2 had not been played when you wrote that.
Prev 1 28 29 30 31 32 78 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 183
SpeCial 136
ProTech72
RuFF_SC2 51
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 73
Icarus 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1162
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Cuddl3bear4
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 346
Stewie2K154
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox549
AZ_Axe152
Other Games
tarik_tv8909
Day[9].tv1106
shahzam795
C9.Mang0268
ViBE226
Maynarde175
Livibee62
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1493
BasetradeTV34
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• rockletztv 43
• RyuSc2 34
• HeavenSC 15
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki19
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5701
Other Games
• Scarra1521
• Day9tv1106
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
8h 38m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 8h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.