• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:22
CEST 08:22
KST 15:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL54Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps
Tourneys
Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Unit and Spell Similarities Help: rep cant save
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 649 users

infestor is a buff, nice changes - Page 7

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 26 Next All
Grapefruit
Profile Joined November 2010
Germany439 Posts
February 26 2011 18:05 GMT
#121
On February 26 2011 22:39 biskit wrote:
Not sure if the change is a buff really. Has anyone seen this footage?



In a real battle situation Lings would nibble the stalkers to death while they move around like this.
Starcraft 2 is funny, everybody picks the race, which he considers to be the weakest. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
ckukner
Profile Joined November 2010
Turkey54 Posts
February 26 2011 18:22 GMT
#122
My brain hurts why the f. Blizzard wanted to NERF fungal growth.I believe we will suffer for another 2 months to regain instant cast.
And ZvZ will become Muta fest. I mean anyone gets fungalled with this speed is outright moron and should stop playing Starcraft.
loving it
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada271 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-26 18:43:40
February 26 2011 18:35 GMT
#123
On February 27 2011 03:05 Grapefruit wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2011 22:39 biskit wrote:
Not sure if the change is a buff really. Has anyone seen this footage?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lSeH0U8H4M&feature=player_embedded


In a real battle situation Lings would nibble the stalkers to death while they move around like this.


Sure, but blink can be used to retreat right? If the stalkers just blink back at the right moment, they can just dodge the fungal and retreat whereas in the current patch, the stalkers wouldn't be able to run at all.

And the missile is also pretty slow. If a group of marines were just on the edge of the fungal cast range, all they have to do is stim and run back. So instead of 10 marines getting fungaled, only 1 or 2 do cause the marines will already have retreated by the time the fungal growth reaches there.

Or basically any unit that is running away from the infestor will now be able to dodge it. Phoenixes running away from an infestor can easily out pace the fungal growth.
Stay gold.
telfire
Profile Joined May 2010
United States415 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-26 18:40:29
February 26 2011 18:37 GMT
#124
It's not a straight buff. You can say that all you want but in a literal sense, you are wrong. It's a buff and a nerf, and the nerf happens to hit at one of the most useful parts of the Infestor. Essentially, this change has completely redefined the purpose of the Infestor. It's a useful new late game unit, but we have lost our ability to delay pushes for long amounts of time to gather our forces. We have lost our ability to be precise in any fashion at all. It is no longer reliable because whether it lands or not is based on the enemy's skill, not ours. To me it seems like an overall nerf.

It doesn't help the early game where Zerg has major issues coming out ahead against many different kinds of harass.
Sajuuk7
Profile Joined November 2010
134 Posts
February 26 2011 18:41 GMT
#125
This is a huge disguised nerf, don't kid yourselves.

Disguise #1
Infestors have slightly more HP!

Disguise #2
Fungal does slightly more damage to armored units!

Nerf #1
The spell roots enemies HALF as long as before.
This means less positioning time and that Banelings will have a tiny window to do their damage.
This means using the spell as cloak detection (ex. Banshees) will be twice as energy consuming.
This means bringing in your units to kill Mutalisk/Viking/Reaper/Stalker/Phoenix harass will be infinitesimally harder.

Nerf #2
The spell has a slow projectile, instead of being instant cast anywhere.
This means anyone who is skilled can simply dodge your Fungals, especially if you are casting it at it's max range (which was basically the only way of doing it, otherwise your Infestors are dead).
This means fungaling Mutalisk/Viking/Reaper/Stalker/Phoenix harass will be infinitesimally harder.

"But... but... It has increased DPS and it's quicker!"

It will be doing exactly the same amount of damage per energy, except for that tiny buff towards armored units. If you are using your Infestors to do damage as the fight is already underway, it's too late. You should have been delaying them and damaging them the entire time they were coming across the map towards your base or coming through a choke point.

"But... but... It does more damage than PSYSTORM now!"

What are you smoking? It doesn't do more damage OR dps than psystorm and it never will.
decaf
Profile Joined October 2010
Austria1797 Posts
February 26 2011 18:44 GMT
#126
On February 27 2011 03:41 Sajuuk7 wrote:
This is a huge disguised nerf, don't kid yourselves.

Disguise #1
Infestors have slightly more HP!

Disguise #2
Fungal does slightly more damage to armored units!

Nerf #1
The spell roots enemies HALF as long as before.
This means less positioning time and that Banelings will have a tiny window to do their damage.
This means using the spell as cloak detection (ex. Banshees) will be twice as energy consuming.
This means bringing in your units to kill Mutalisk/Viking/Reaper/Stalker/Phoenix harass will be infinitesimally harder.

Nerf #2
The spell has a slow projectile, instead of being instant cast anywhere.
This means anyone who is skilled can simply dodge your Fungals, especially if you are casting it at it's max range (which was basically the only way of doing it, otherwise your Infestors are dead).
This means fungaling Mutalisk/Viking/Reaper/Stalker/Phoenix harass will be infinitesimally harder.

"But... but... It has increased DPS and it's quicker!"

It will be doing exactly the same amount of damage per energy, except for that tiny buff towards armored units. If you are using your Infestors to do damage as the fight is already underway, it's too late. You should have been delaying them and damaging them the entire time they were coming across the map towards your base or coming through a choke point.

"But... but... It does more damage than PSYSTORM now!"

What are you smoking? It doesn't do more damage OR dps than psystorm and it never will.

The questions is: what are you smoking?

User was temp banned for this post.
Venomsflame
Profile Joined February 2011
United States613 Posts
February 26 2011 18:44 GMT
#127
I don't really buy all this talk about the "muta ball" coming back. i mean, honestly, how many of us respond to 6 mutas in ZvZ with..an infestor? nonsense. You throw down your spore crawler, get a hydra den and make sure your queens can protect each other. No one throws down an infestor pit after seeing a spire. This patch doesn't change that at all. Hydras still eat mutas like they don't exist and roach/hydra will still be the same against muta/ling
ckukner
Profile Joined November 2010
Turkey54 Posts
February 26 2011 18:55 GMT
#128
How will you stop banelings?
It will be impossible to hit rolling banes with this lame fungal.

Mutalingbane will own roachhydra
danielsan
Profile Joined December 2010
Romania399 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-26 19:00:25
February 26 2011 19:00 GMT
#129
On February 26 2011 22:39 biskit wrote:
Not sure if the change is a buff really. Has anyone seen this footage?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lSeH0U8H4M&feature=player_embedded


As i said in some other topic, i'm confident i could dodge that with a Thor. Even i, as T, feel sorry for zerg for such a projectile speed.
Sajuuk7
Profile Joined November 2010
134 Posts
February 26 2011 19:07 GMT
#130
The questions is: what are you smoking?

... is this turning into the battlenet forums? Do you have anything constructive to say?

Are you for or against the changes and why?

If you're going to post on TL at least state an opinion and not just nonsense.
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
February 26 2011 19:08 GMT
#131
On February 27 2011 03:41 Sajuuk7 wrote:

Disguise #2
Fungal does slightly more damage to armored units!


slightly? Even though you shrug off DPS below, it does make a difference. In the timespan of a battle, let's take 16 seconds for example, infestors will now deal 192 damage (4 casts) to armored units, whereas in the current version they deal 72 (2 casts). It takes more infestors, but the increase is not slight by any means. It's nearly 3 times the damage.

Nerf #1
The spell roots enemies HALF as long as before.
This means less positioning time and that Banelings will have a tiny window to do their damage.
This means using the spell as cloak detection (ex. Banshees) will be twice as energy consuming.
This means bringing in your units to kill Mutalisk/Viking/Reaper/Stalker/Phoenix harass will be infinitesimally harder.


In general, what the change does is make fungal more of an AoE spell, and less of a stun spell (obviously). Pretty much they just made it synergize with banelings less, but do more damage.

All they did was change the spell, chill out. Use an overseer to detect the banshee, or wait to fungal until you actually have something there to kill it.

Nerf #2
The spell has a slow projectile, instead of being instant cast anywhere.
This means anyone who is skilled can simply dodge your Fungals, especially if you are casting it at it's max range (which was basically the only way of doing it, otherwise your Infestors are dead).
This means fungaling Mutalisk/Viking/Reaper/Stalker/Phoenix harass will be infinitesimally harder.


We'll see about that. If you're not looking at your marines/stalkers at the time of the cast, it's not gonna happen. And if you are, you're not going to have much warning. In a non-engagement, you'll see the infestor in the corner of your vision as the fungal ball comes at you. In an engagement, he's got so many places he could logically cast, you'd have to predict when and where he casts in order to dodge. It's not like psi storm where you see it and then move out of the way to mitigate damage. Once fungal hits you, you can't move and you take all the damage.

Worst case scenario, they have to increase the speed of the fungal ball a bit. But IMO, this change is great if for no other reason than for spectator and skill ceiling value.

"But... but... It has increased DPS and it's quicker!"

It will be doing exactly the same amount of damage per energy, except for that tiny buff towards armored units. If you are using your Infestors to do damage as the fight is already underway, it's too late. You should have been delaying them and damaging them the entire time they were coming across the map towards your base or coming through a choke point.


See my points above. No way to say it other than you're flat out wrong.

Currently, the best way is to delay and slowly deal damage with fungal before the engagement. With the new fungal, you will have the opportunity to deal significantly more damage during the engagement.

"But... but... It does more damage than PSYSTORM now!"

What are you smoking? It doesn't do more damage OR dps than psystorm and it never will.


Fungal vs psi storm damage is debatable, and depends on the speed of the unit targetted and whether or not they are cornered. But the inability to micro is worth something, so it's tough to say whether that makes up for the damage.

Also, please refrain from antagonizing comments such as


"But... but... It has increased DPS and it's quicker!"


"But... but... It does more damage than PSYSTORM now!"


It's an insult to the intelligence of those who disagree with you, doesn't contribute to the discussion, and makes you look like a troll.

Ordained
Profile Joined June 2010
United States779 Posts
February 26 2011 19:16 GMT
#132
On February 26 2011 12:24 awwnuts07 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2011 12:21 shaby23 wrote:
Does that means that Vs Terran infestor will be a must???


It will probably be a must for all match-ups now. Be prepared to go toe to toe with ghosts trying to EMP your Infestors.

Thank goodness for burrow movement.
"You are not trying to win, you are trying to be awesome" -Day[9]
burnswuff
Profile Joined December 2010
United States61 Posts
February 26 2011 19:17 GMT
#133
I have to point out as a T player I am somewhat excited and somewhat worried. Not saying anything is OP or IMBA, terran need to essentially split the marines with micro against banelings. Now, it seems like we have to do it with infestors as well since if we split, less damage is done. However, I do feel sorry for zerg as they have to get pretty accurate with those slow projectiles.
Gigaudas
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Sweden1213 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-26 19:27:35
February 26 2011 19:21 GMT
#134
On February 26 2011 12:24 awwnuts07 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2011 12:21 shaby23 wrote:
Does that means that Vs Terran infestor will be a must???


It will probably be a must for all match-ups now. Be prepared to go toe to toe with ghosts trying to EMP your Infestors.


Both EMP and Feedback are already extremely effective against casters and these spells are mainly used against casters with instant abilities.

An Infestor has no way of defending itself against a Templar or a Ghost. Infestors will, if standard, be a play that you need to transition out of when your opponent responds with Templar/Ghost.

Infestors in ZvZ will be bad ass. Which is a good thing, Infestor+Roach should beat pure Roach if we want a micro intensive matchup.
I
funk100
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom172 Posts
February 26 2011 19:38 GMT
#135
yeah, btw since it has a bigger radius than psi storm it does more overall damage on most units, assuming they are tightly packed

stalkers & maraders & roaches, as they are roughly the same size and armored
+ Show Spoiler +

psy storm raidius = 1.5
area = 1.5squared * pie = 7.064
7.064*80 = 565.12 assuming stalkers are 1 matrix in area (arverage size)

fungal radius = 2
area = 2 squared * pie = 12.56
damage = 12.56 * 36 * 1.3 (30% extra armored) = 587.808


rines and zeals and general small units
+ Show Spoiler +


storm = 7.064*2*80 = 1,130.23
fungal = 12.56 * 36 * 2 = 904.43
oh crap,
oh well maybe just for armored units but hey you cant dodge fungal and armored units make up like half of the game
after every post "oh god I hope i've made sence"
telfire
Profile Joined May 2010
United States415 Posts
February 26 2011 19:40 GMT
#136
On February 27 2011 04:38 funk100 wrote:
yeah, btw since it has a bigger radius than psi storm it does more overall damage on most units, assuming they are tightly packed

stalkers & maraders & roaches, as they are roughly the same size and armored
+ Show Spoiler +

psy storm raidius = 1.5
area = 1.5squared * pie = 7.064
7.064*80 = 565.12 assuming stalkers are 1 matrix in area (arverage size)

fungal radius = 2
area = 2 squared * pie = 12.56
damage = 12.56 * 36 * 1.3 (30% extra armored) = 587.808


rines and zeals and general small units
+ Show Spoiler +


storm = 7.064*2*80 = 1,130.23
fungal = 12.56 * 36 * 2 = 904.43
oh crap,
oh well maybe just for armored units but hey you cant dodge fungal and armored units make up like half of the game


So you realize halfway through that you are wrong, hide that fact in a spoiler, and are also wrong about not being able to dodge fungal, it's EXTREMELY slow and VERY dodgable.
Sajuuk7
Profile Joined November 2010
134 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-27 23:35:47
February 26 2011 19:42 GMT
#137

Also, please refrain from antagonizing comments such as

Show nested quote +

"But... but... It has increased DPS and it's quicker!"


"But... but... It does more damage than PSYSTORM now!"


It's an insult to the intelligence of those who disagree with you, doesn't contribute to the discussion, and makes you look like a troll.



No, I am not a troll. The people saying psystorm does less damage are, and people who put "The question is: What are you smoking?" as their entire post are. I'm simply stating their shortmindedness, much like yours.

Ex. They have cloaked banshees.
Solution - get Overseer.
Duh... or you could have pre-patch Infestors.

Case in point.
Serendipityx
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
United States595 Posts
February 26 2011 19:46 GMT
#138
this change makes fungal an offensive spell rather than a defensive spell, not sure how much i like it.
Harbinger631
Profile Joined September 2010
United States376 Posts
February 26 2011 19:51 GMT
#139
It's still a great defensive spell, if you kill the marines instead of stall them, there's nothing to defend against!

The fact that fungal can be used more effectively against units w/ medivac support is huge. The fact that fungal in combo with speedlings can now more quickly take down marine balls is huge.
noddyz
Profile Joined October 2008
United Kingdom462 Posts
February 26 2011 19:53 GMT
#140
I really think this is a nerf for mid game TvZ. The whole point of going of infestor that it was strong v T ground and weak but playable v T air. This change will make it insanely hard to stop drop play.

The increased DPS i really don't care about to much either. The main problem for me was running out of energy, not that fungal didn't do damage fast enough. Still the same damage per energy

Saying that, it's a buff for the late game, when not so limited by energy and requiring the dps against mass medivacs.

Don't like it overall.
?
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 26 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Korean StarCraft League
03:00
Week 77
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 298
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm144
League of Legends
JimRising 619
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K423
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor94
Other Games
summit1g6022
WinterStarcraft702
kaitlyn41
RuFF_SC218
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 54
Other Games
BasetradeTV53
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH333
• practicex 12
• Adnapsc2 9
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1773
• Stunt506
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
3h 38m
RSL Revival
3h 38m
ByuN vs Cham
herO vs Reynor
FEL
9h 38m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
1d 5h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 11h
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.