• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 07:32
CET 13:32
KST 21:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice6Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza1Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0258
StarCraft 2
General
How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Vitality disbanding their sc2-team Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
Flash's ASL S21 & Future Plans Announcement Gypsy to Korea BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] Open Qualifier #1 - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile PC Games Sales Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Gaming-Related Deaths
TrAiDoS
ONE GREAT AMERICAN MARINE…
XenOsky
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1729 users

[G] iEchoic's 2fact2port TvT - Page 15

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 56 Next
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-07 20:32:46
February 07 2011 20:29 GMT
#281
nice... didnt know this

oh so this how the pros make a super split for workers to mine on the start of the game..
valheru
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia966 Posts
February 07 2011 20:56 GMT
#282
On February 08 2011 05:29 dohgg wrote:
nice... didnt know this

oh so this how the pros make a super split for workers to mine on the start of the game..

I don't think so I think they use the 3,3 split or the 2,2,2 split

I reject your reality and substitute my own
OrangeNinja21
Profile Joined November 2010
United States84 Posts
February 07 2011 21:12 GMT
#283
iEchoic, I applaud you, you have successfully changed the TvT metagame on ladder lol.
(at least in the low-mid diamond level)

Over the past couple days, every TvT I have played has been a loss due to hellion drops and banshees. Upon inspecting the replays, all of my opponents were doing this build and it is truly amazing to see the versatility of it, especially from the receiving end ( I had tried a variety of openings that were subsequently squashed). I know you touched upon it in your post, but I am still curious as to how such a TvT will play out when both players perform this build.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
EximoSua2
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States216 Posts
February 07 2011 21:16 GMT
#284
Nothing makes me happier than a well put together build post like this. Thank you. I also hate the tank game in TvT, it's so time consuming and slow. I will be practiciing this build, and maybe it can end up bumping my win % that last bit it needs to get into Masters.
Toxi78
Profile Joined May 2010
966 Posts
February 07 2011 21:29 GMT
#285
so i have been playing this build at 3k masters and havent lost with it yet (ok i lost the first one coz i was watching the build order on TL while doing it xd). being a wc3 player with very good micro i find this build much more rewarding for my set of skills.
basicly here is how i see it : all game long i sneak in hellions, doing drops and run-bys even against a few tanks because you gain a lot of little advantages (mid game) or a huge one (early game) while you keep yourself updated about their positioning and army composition. a lot of early agression is a freewin if you pull scvs while murdering marines with hellions because you can do OO much damage with blue flame right after it.
GeForceFX
Profile Joined June 2010
Lithuania101 Posts
February 07 2011 21:48 GMT
#286
Played quite a lot of TvT against a person (CurtainCarrot) using this build in all his games. I have to say - I lost pretty much every single game. Blue flame in mass eats up all bio (even the marauders) and they just ignore the tanks, flank, drop (by medivac) and it's pretty hard to stop, for me at least.
"My biggest rival is myself" - Nada
JamesSwift
Profile Joined May 2010
United States71 Posts
February 07 2011 21:56 GMT
#287
On February 08 2011 06:12 OrangeNinja21 wrote:
...

I know you touched upon it in your post, but I am still curious as to how such a TvT will play out when both players perform this build.

Being a random player, and using this build in all my TvT's recently, I have only run into the mirror one time. It ended up feeling a LOT like ZvZ ling/bane wars where you are trying to get an advantage in workers while trying not to lose all your hellions all at one (to another group of hellions...) It all comes down to how much econ damage you both do on the initial drop (especially since there is nothing either side can do to prevent the drop in the first place) and who gets started on vikings first.

If you give up hellion superiority, you likely lose.
你好
Tesla12
Profile Joined December 2010
Serbia71 Posts
February 07 2011 22:02 GMT
#288
U rly like helions aperently... :D Great read...
"Divide et impera"
Pokebunny
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States10654 Posts
February 07 2011 22:37 GMT
#289
vs vVvNGry, FireFlash Open Semifinals
Semipro Terran player | Pokebunny#1710 | twitter.com/Pokebunny | twitch.tv/Pokebunny | facebook.com/PokebunnySC
REM.ca
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada354 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-07 23:52:12
February 07 2011 23:48 GMT
#290
Huge fan. Your TvP build has had great success for me and so I was/am very excited at this new build you offer for TvT. I too absolutely hate playing tank/viking so was glad to see you try something else.

Been practicing this build and having a lot of trouble vs close position early rushes (I know you don't recommend this build in those situations but I'm stubborn) so here's how I've modified your build a bit to deal with these situations. Would appreciate feedback from anyone.

When scouting close positions, I delay 2nd gas (till I've dropped 2nd factory) and keep pumping marines (EDIT: except when I build tech lab ofc). Everything else I pretty much do the same as described in OP. This delays blue flame by about 45 secs but give me enough army size early on to feel comfortable.
I have a palm permanently stuck to my face yo.
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-08 00:17:36
February 08 2011 00:14 GMT
#291
ok i m done with my first tiral of this bo after epic 45 min game.. and i must say - it ROX!

but 1 problem occured

dealing with 3rd fortress surrounded by turrets

i tried sent some hellions, but i m not sure if it was such cost effective, as the PF really grined my hellions quickly, and later on he just built SDs to surround his min line..

teching for BCs is an isuue of really late game when u can be sure u'll be with the upper hand of vikings to break this PF with turrets, by then, the expo will be already saturated

Anywayz, tnx alot for this build, i had a great game, and i was so happy that my BCs just came in time when i saw him transfer to thors, its nice to go back to use BCs as they seemed the most "easy to counter" unit in the game

Oh, and whats ur PVT BO btw?
VanGarde
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden755 Posts
February 08 2011 00:41 GMT
#292
This build really does seem amazingly strong, but I wonder if it isn't the wrong approach to see this as a whole game strategy. I mean, most of the issues or at least potential weaknesses in this build lies in the lategame, in fact just like the banshee + hellion play mimics baneling mutalisk in the earlier stages of the game, giving huge map control and amazing abilities to win small skirmishes and deny your opponents aggression, so does it mimic baneling muta in the late game in the sense that once turret lines, thors, lots of tanks and planetary fortresses arrive, and the open spaces of the map start to shrink, it is no longer very feasible.

The transition to battlecruisers leaves one huge problem as far as I can see. In TvT, if I see the other terran going for bc's I instantly start making vikings because I know that even if I were down in viking count before, the switch to bc's means the bc player has to cut all viking production.

I think this build is better seen as an opener and early mid game strategy where you control the map and harass. But ideally you would want to transition into something else while taking your third.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
February 08 2011 00:50 GMT
#293
Another thing i wanted to mention..

Some guys here asked about "what do i do if i find out we're both doing the same BO", which mean ur scouting hellion just found out there r a bunch of hellions on top of his ramp, or u threw a scan and saw 2 fact producing hellions and 2 port

For stoping his hellion haras, theres not much u can do besides be ready to spread ur SCV well and have hellion ready to engage

But right after u done ur haras, and he done with his, i think there 2 good options besides trying to "outnumber" him with hellions/vikings
1. rushing for thor
Thor is abit easier to get then BC, and its much more cheaper, on the early-mid game he will be hopeless to thors, and will have hard time to transit to maras

2. maras with Cs + vikings + raven.
This will make his hellion useless as soon as u wall ur min line well and put some turrets vs drops...
u'll probably outnumber him with vikings cuz his ports would be busy with getting banshees, while u can feel free to put reacotrs on urs after u get ur raven that will do great on vikings fights with pdd

as soon as u feel ready, u would just run over him and theres nothing he will be able to do vs these maras
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-08 01:03:53
February 08 2011 01:02 GMT
#294
On February 08 2011 09:41 VanGarde wrote:
This build really does seem amazingly strong, but I wonder if it isn't the wrong approach to see this as a whole game strategy. I mean, most of the issues or at least potential weaknesses in this build lies in the lategame, in fact just like the banshee + hellion play mimics baneling mutalisk in the earlier stages of the game, giving huge map control and amazing abilities to win small skirmishes and deny your opponents aggression, so does it mimic baneling muta in the late game in the sense that once turret lines, thors, lots of tanks and planetary fortresses arrive, and the open spaces of the map start to shrink, it is no longer very feasible.

The transition to battlecruisers leaves one huge problem as far as I can see. In TvT, if I see the other terran going for bc's I instantly start making vikings because I know that even if I were down in viking count before, the switch to bc's means the bc player has to cut all viking production.

I think this build is better seen as an opener and early mid game strategy where you control the map and harass. But ideally you would want to transition into something else while taking your third.


Unlike TvZ, when Zerg is just busy on holding T and macro up - in this BO, not only u're macroing up better him with map control = more expos, u're also constant pressure him with hellions drops and sneakes, and banshees haras on naked tanks and buildings.

So by the time u will be ready to transfer to BCs to "end the game" he wont have the eco or the porduction to produce enough vkings

Another thing - u'll be upgrading ur Air upgrdes all the time, and he probablly wont, and Bc starts with 3 armor, so with fully upgraded it can handle alot of dmg... and a good useage on yamato cannons can eliminate alot of vkings...
Quasimoto3000
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States471 Posts
February 08 2011 01:05 GMT
#295
Seems interesting, cant wait to try it
Every sunday a nun lays from my gunplay
vaderseven
Profile Joined September 2008
United States2556 Posts
February 08 2011 02:38 GMT
#296
This is a solid build. This is WAY more solid as a possible long term style than the TvP build you posted (which is a good build but in a totally different way). I am interested to see how this develops.

Works at the mid masters level very well so far (I want to see how it is in a few weeks when people are more used to it) on ladder and in customs in game after game.

Kudos to you sir.
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
February 08 2011 02:51 GMT
#297
On February 08 2011 07:37 Pokebunny wrote:
vs vVvNGry, FireFlash Open Semifinals


That Harass was so beautiful... ToT
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
Ertu
Profile Joined November 2010
Greece686 Posts
February 08 2011 02:52 GMT
#298
On February 08 2011 09:14 dohgg wrote:


Oh, and whats ur PVT BO btw?




This one??

loving it
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada271 Posts
February 08 2011 04:30 GMT
#299
iEchoic... you are a pioneer for builds man. I'm glad to see guys like you who really define and potentially change the way games are played with these extensively well made guides. Your guides are one of the best around and it makes me wish there was more people like you.

After reading this entire thing... this just blows my mind on well done this is. Thanks!
Stay gold.
VanGarde
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden755 Posts
February 08 2011 05:18 GMT
#300
On February 08 2011 10:02 dohgg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2011 09:41 VanGarde wrote:
This build really does seem amazingly strong, but I wonder if it isn't the wrong approach to see this as a whole game strategy. I mean, most of the issues or at least potential weaknesses in this build lies in the lategame, in fact just like the banshee + hellion play mimics baneling mutalisk in the earlier stages of the game, giving huge map control and amazing abilities to win small skirmishes and deny your opponents aggression, so does it mimic baneling muta in the late game in the sense that once turret lines, thors, lots of tanks and planetary fortresses arrive, and the open spaces of the map start to shrink, it is no longer very feasible.

The transition to battlecruisers leaves one huge problem as far as I can see. In TvT, if I see the other terran going for bc's I instantly start making vikings because I know that even if I were down in viking count before, the switch to bc's means the bc player has to cut all viking production.

I think this build is better seen as an opener and early mid game strategy where you control the map and harass. But ideally you would want to transition into something else while taking your third.


Unlike TvZ, when Zerg is just busy on holding T and macro up - in this BO, not only u're macroing up better him with map control = more expos, u're also constant pressure him with hellions drops and sneakes, and banshees haras on naked tanks and buildings.

So by the time u will be ready to transfer to BCs to "end the game" he wont have the eco or the porduction to produce enough vkings

Another thing - u'll be upgrading ur Air upgrdes all the time, and he probablly wont, and Bc starts with 3 armor, so with fully upgraded it can handle alot of dmg... and a good useage on yamato cannons can eliminate alot of vkings...


Actually that is not unlike TvZ that is exactly like a muta centered TvZ midgame where zerg both takes complete map control and pressures constantly with muta threat and thus is free to expand around the map with the mutas threatening a devastating counter attack if terran tries to move out too much.

In a way you are correct that if everything goes your way then you will have a sufficient economical advantage to go bc's, but they still feel "forced". It is not the strongest lategame and this has actually been demonstrated in most of the games where this build is eventually beaten.

Battlecruiser, viking, hellion will lose to thor, viking, marine and a build that is too centered on requiring a substantial economic lead in the late game is a flawed build. The hellion and air dominance early is the strength of the build but how much damage you end up doing is not ultimately up to you, you will in all likelyhood be ahead in economy but not necessarily by enough to force a very immobile battlecruiser transition.

It seems much more natural to go for a more bio centered transition than to force bc's. What is the purpose of bc's in the build? Well, when enough thors are out to make the splash damage challenge your viking/banshee air dominance the bc's are there to take over the role. But the point of the air in the first place was in mobility, and in shutting down tank play. Both of which bc's are really bad at.

It seems that a bio transition with that extra economy feels much more natural, marauders rape thors in more ways than battlecruisers could dream of. They are only vulnerable to marines and air, the two things that your hellions and your vikings are shutting down. And most importantly marauders are fast, and they can be used in drops since you already have the aerial infrastructure to get some medivacs out. The banshee's are strong in this build because they force marines, which the hellions rape, and the hellions are good because they force marauders and tanks, which the banshee's rape. Likewise marauders force tanks and marines which is already covered.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Winter Champion…
12:00
Playoffs
Classic vs Rogue
Solar vs Gerald
Bunny vs Nicoract
ByuN vs Zoun
herO vs Clem
MaxPax vs Cure
WardiTV461
IndyStarCraft 201
TKL 192
EnkiAlexander 53
LiquipediaDiscussion
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 4: Group A
Reynor vs Zoun
herO vs sOs
Tasteless818
Rex136
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #143
CranKy Ducklings69
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 818
Lowko275
IndyStarCraft 201
TKL 192
Rex 136
BRAT_OK 71
MindelVK 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 41156
Britney 28911
Jaedong 1853
PianO 374
Mong 335
Last 242
firebathero 182
Pusan 71
[sc1f]eonzerg 26
yabsab 23
[ Show more ]
Terrorterran 13
Nal_rA 10
Purpose 10
Dota 2
Gorgc4932
XcaliburYe195
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K860
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor174
Other Games
singsing1409
B2W.Neo1002
Fuzer 146
Mew2King68
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream8977
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2533
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4548
• Jankos1638
• Stunt753
Upcoming Events
AI Arena Tournament
7h 28m
Patches Events
10h 28m
Replay Cast
11h 28m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 28m
RSL Revival
21h 28m
Classic vs TriGGeR
Cure vs Cham
WardiTV Winter Champion…
23h 28m
OSC
23h 58m
BSL
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-05
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
NationLESS Cup
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.