• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:24
CEST 22:24
KST 05:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL73
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Server Blocker RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Script to open stream directly using middle click ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 657 users

[G] iEchoic's 2fact2port TvT - Page 15

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 56 Next
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-07 20:32:46
February 07 2011 20:29 GMT
#281
nice... didnt know this

oh so this how the pros make a super split for workers to mine on the start of the game..
valheru
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia966 Posts
February 07 2011 20:56 GMT
#282
On February 08 2011 05:29 dohgg wrote:
nice... didnt know this

oh so this how the pros make a super split for workers to mine on the start of the game..

I don't think so I think they use the 3,3 split or the 2,2,2 split

I reject your reality and substitute my own
OrangeNinja21
Profile Joined November 2010
United States84 Posts
February 07 2011 21:12 GMT
#283
iEchoic, I applaud you, you have successfully changed the TvT metagame on ladder lol.
(at least in the low-mid diamond level)

Over the past couple days, every TvT I have played has been a loss due to hellion drops and banshees. Upon inspecting the replays, all of my opponents were doing this build and it is truly amazing to see the versatility of it, especially from the receiving end ( I had tried a variety of openings that were subsequently squashed). I know you touched upon it in your post, but I am still curious as to how such a TvT will play out when both players perform this build.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
EximoSua2
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States216 Posts
February 07 2011 21:16 GMT
#284
Nothing makes me happier than a well put together build post like this. Thank you. I also hate the tank game in TvT, it's so time consuming and slow. I will be practiciing this build, and maybe it can end up bumping my win % that last bit it needs to get into Masters.
Toxi78
Profile Joined May 2010
966 Posts
February 07 2011 21:29 GMT
#285
so i have been playing this build at 3k masters and havent lost with it yet (ok i lost the first one coz i was watching the build order on TL while doing it xd). being a wc3 player with very good micro i find this build much more rewarding for my set of skills.
basicly here is how i see it : all game long i sneak in hellions, doing drops and run-bys even against a few tanks because you gain a lot of little advantages (mid game) or a huge one (early game) while you keep yourself updated about their positioning and army composition. a lot of early agression is a freewin if you pull scvs while murdering marines with hellions because you can do OO much damage with blue flame right after it.
GeForceFX
Profile Joined June 2010
Lithuania101 Posts
February 07 2011 21:48 GMT
#286
Played quite a lot of TvT against a person (CurtainCarrot) using this build in all his games. I have to say - I lost pretty much every single game. Blue flame in mass eats up all bio (even the marauders) and they just ignore the tanks, flank, drop (by medivac) and it's pretty hard to stop, for me at least.
"My biggest rival is myself" - Nada
JamesSwift
Profile Joined May 2010
United States71 Posts
February 07 2011 21:56 GMT
#287
On February 08 2011 06:12 OrangeNinja21 wrote:
...

I know you touched upon it in your post, but I am still curious as to how such a TvT will play out when both players perform this build.

Being a random player, and using this build in all my TvT's recently, I have only run into the mirror one time. It ended up feeling a LOT like ZvZ ling/bane wars where you are trying to get an advantage in workers while trying not to lose all your hellions all at one (to another group of hellions...) It all comes down to how much econ damage you both do on the initial drop (especially since there is nothing either side can do to prevent the drop in the first place) and who gets started on vikings first.

If you give up hellion superiority, you likely lose.
你好
Tesla12
Profile Joined December 2010
Serbia71 Posts
February 07 2011 22:02 GMT
#288
U rly like helions aperently... :D Great read...
"Divide et impera"
Pokebunny
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States10654 Posts
February 07 2011 22:37 GMT
#289
vs vVvNGry, FireFlash Open Semifinals
Semipro Terran player | Pokebunny#1710 | twitter.com/Pokebunny | twitch.tv/Pokebunny | facebook.com/PokebunnySC
REM.ca
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada354 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-07 23:52:12
February 07 2011 23:48 GMT
#290
Huge fan. Your TvP build has had great success for me and so I was/am very excited at this new build you offer for TvT. I too absolutely hate playing tank/viking so was glad to see you try something else.

Been practicing this build and having a lot of trouble vs close position early rushes (I know you don't recommend this build in those situations but I'm stubborn) so here's how I've modified your build a bit to deal with these situations. Would appreciate feedback from anyone.

When scouting close positions, I delay 2nd gas (till I've dropped 2nd factory) and keep pumping marines (EDIT: except when I build tech lab ofc). Everything else I pretty much do the same as described in OP. This delays blue flame by about 45 secs but give me enough army size early on to feel comfortable.
I have a palm permanently stuck to my face yo.
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-08 00:17:36
February 08 2011 00:14 GMT
#291
ok i m done with my first tiral of this bo after epic 45 min game.. and i must say - it ROX!

but 1 problem occured

dealing with 3rd fortress surrounded by turrets

i tried sent some hellions, but i m not sure if it was such cost effective, as the PF really grined my hellions quickly, and later on he just built SDs to surround his min line..

teching for BCs is an isuue of really late game when u can be sure u'll be with the upper hand of vikings to break this PF with turrets, by then, the expo will be already saturated

Anywayz, tnx alot for this build, i had a great game, and i was so happy that my BCs just came in time when i saw him transfer to thors, its nice to go back to use BCs as they seemed the most "easy to counter" unit in the game

Oh, and whats ur PVT BO btw?
VanGarde
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden755 Posts
February 08 2011 00:41 GMT
#292
This build really does seem amazingly strong, but I wonder if it isn't the wrong approach to see this as a whole game strategy. I mean, most of the issues or at least potential weaknesses in this build lies in the lategame, in fact just like the banshee + hellion play mimics baneling mutalisk in the earlier stages of the game, giving huge map control and amazing abilities to win small skirmishes and deny your opponents aggression, so does it mimic baneling muta in the late game in the sense that once turret lines, thors, lots of tanks and planetary fortresses arrive, and the open spaces of the map start to shrink, it is no longer very feasible.

The transition to battlecruisers leaves one huge problem as far as I can see. In TvT, if I see the other terran going for bc's I instantly start making vikings because I know that even if I were down in viking count before, the switch to bc's means the bc player has to cut all viking production.

I think this build is better seen as an opener and early mid game strategy where you control the map and harass. But ideally you would want to transition into something else while taking your third.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
February 08 2011 00:50 GMT
#293
Another thing i wanted to mention..

Some guys here asked about "what do i do if i find out we're both doing the same BO", which mean ur scouting hellion just found out there r a bunch of hellions on top of his ramp, or u threw a scan and saw 2 fact producing hellions and 2 port

For stoping his hellion haras, theres not much u can do besides be ready to spread ur SCV well and have hellion ready to engage

But right after u done ur haras, and he done with his, i think there 2 good options besides trying to "outnumber" him with hellions/vikings
1. rushing for thor
Thor is abit easier to get then BC, and its much more cheaper, on the early-mid game he will be hopeless to thors, and will have hard time to transit to maras

2. maras with Cs + vikings + raven.
This will make his hellion useless as soon as u wall ur min line well and put some turrets vs drops...
u'll probably outnumber him with vikings cuz his ports would be busy with getting banshees, while u can feel free to put reacotrs on urs after u get ur raven that will do great on vikings fights with pdd

as soon as u feel ready, u would just run over him and theres nothing he will be able to do vs these maras
dohgg
Profile Joined February 2011
310 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-08 01:03:53
February 08 2011 01:02 GMT
#294
On February 08 2011 09:41 VanGarde wrote:
This build really does seem amazingly strong, but I wonder if it isn't the wrong approach to see this as a whole game strategy. I mean, most of the issues or at least potential weaknesses in this build lies in the lategame, in fact just like the banshee + hellion play mimics baneling mutalisk in the earlier stages of the game, giving huge map control and amazing abilities to win small skirmishes and deny your opponents aggression, so does it mimic baneling muta in the late game in the sense that once turret lines, thors, lots of tanks and planetary fortresses arrive, and the open spaces of the map start to shrink, it is no longer very feasible.

The transition to battlecruisers leaves one huge problem as far as I can see. In TvT, if I see the other terran going for bc's I instantly start making vikings because I know that even if I were down in viking count before, the switch to bc's means the bc player has to cut all viking production.

I think this build is better seen as an opener and early mid game strategy where you control the map and harass. But ideally you would want to transition into something else while taking your third.


Unlike TvZ, when Zerg is just busy on holding T and macro up - in this BO, not only u're macroing up better him with map control = more expos, u're also constant pressure him with hellions drops and sneakes, and banshees haras on naked tanks and buildings.

So by the time u will be ready to transfer to BCs to "end the game" he wont have the eco or the porduction to produce enough vkings

Another thing - u'll be upgrading ur Air upgrdes all the time, and he probablly wont, and Bc starts with 3 armor, so with fully upgraded it can handle alot of dmg... and a good useage on yamato cannons can eliminate alot of vkings...
Quasimoto3000
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States471 Posts
February 08 2011 01:05 GMT
#295
Seems interesting, cant wait to try it
Every sunday a nun lays from my gunplay
vaderseven
Profile Joined September 2008
United States2556 Posts
February 08 2011 02:38 GMT
#296
This is a solid build. This is WAY more solid as a possible long term style than the TvP build you posted (which is a good build but in a totally different way). I am interested to see how this develops.

Works at the mid masters level very well so far (I want to see how it is in a few weeks when people are more used to it) on ladder and in customs in game after game.

Kudos to you sir.
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
February 08 2011 02:51 GMT
#297
On February 08 2011 07:37 Pokebunny wrote:
vs vVvNGry, FireFlash Open Semifinals


That Harass was so beautiful... ToT
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
Ertu
Profile Joined November 2010
Greece686 Posts
February 08 2011 02:52 GMT
#298
On February 08 2011 09:14 dohgg wrote:


Oh, and whats ur PVT BO btw?




This one??

loving it
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada271 Posts
February 08 2011 04:30 GMT
#299
iEchoic... you are a pioneer for builds man. I'm glad to see guys like you who really define and potentially change the way games are played with these extensively well made guides. Your guides are one of the best around and it makes me wish there was more people like you.

After reading this entire thing... this just blows my mind on well done this is. Thanks!
Stay gold.
VanGarde
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden755 Posts
February 08 2011 05:18 GMT
#300
On February 08 2011 10:02 dohgg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2011 09:41 VanGarde wrote:
This build really does seem amazingly strong, but I wonder if it isn't the wrong approach to see this as a whole game strategy. I mean, most of the issues or at least potential weaknesses in this build lies in the lategame, in fact just like the banshee + hellion play mimics baneling mutalisk in the earlier stages of the game, giving huge map control and amazing abilities to win small skirmishes and deny your opponents aggression, so does it mimic baneling muta in the late game in the sense that once turret lines, thors, lots of tanks and planetary fortresses arrive, and the open spaces of the map start to shrink, it is no longer very feasible.

The transition to battlecruisers leaves one huge problem as far as I can see. In TvT, if I see the other terran going for bc's I instantly start making vikings because I know that even if I were down in viking count before, the switch to bc's means the bc player has to cut all viking production.

I think this build is better seen as an opener and early mid game strategy where you control the map and harass. But ideally you would want to transition into something else while taking your third.


Unlike TvZ, when Zerg is just busy on holding T and macro up - in this BO, not only u're macroing up better him with map control = more expos, u're also constant pressure him with hellions drops and sneakes, and banshees haras on naked tanks and buildings.

So by the time u will be ready to transfer to BCs to "end the game" he wont have the eco or the porduction to produce enough vkings

Another thing - u'll be upgrading ur Air upgrdes all the time, and he probablly wont, and Bc starts with 3 armor, so with fully upgraded it can handle alot of dmg... and a good useage on yamato cannons can eliminate alot of vkings...


Actually that is not unlike TvZ that is exactly like a muta centered TvZ midgame where zerg both takes complete map control and pressures constantly with muta threat and thus is free to expand around the map with the mutas threatening a devastating counter attack if terran tries to move out too much.

In a way you are correct that if everything goes your way then you will have a sufficient economical advantage to go bc's, but they still feel "forced". It is not the strongest lategame and this has actually been demonstrated in most of the games where this build is eventually beaten.

Battlecruiser, viking, hellion will lose to thor, viking, marine and a build that is too centered on requiring a substantial economic lead in the late game is a flawed build. The hellion and air dominance early is the strength of the build but how much damage you end up doing is not ultimately up to you, you will in all likelyhood be ahead in economy but not necessarily by enough to force a very immobile battlecruiser transition.

It seems much more natural to go for a more bio centered transition than to force bc's. What is the purpose of bc's in the build? Well, when enough thors are out to make the splash damage challenge your viking/banshee air dominance the bc's are there to take over the role. But the point of the air in the first place was in mobility, and in shutting down tank play. Both of which bc's are really bad at.

It seems that a bio transition with that extra economy feels much more natural, marauders rape thors in more ways than battlecruisers could dream of. They are only vulnerable to marines and air, the two things that your hellions and your vikings are shutting down. And most importantly marauders are fast, and they can be used in drops since you already have the aerial infrastructure to get some medivacs out. The banshee's are strong in this build because they force marines, which the hellions rape, and the hellions are good because they force marauders and tanks, which the banshee's rape. Likewise marauders force tanks and marines which is already covered.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 56 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
DaveTesta Events
18:00
Kirktown Ready Room #3
davetesta115
Liquipedia
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18:00
RO8 Round Robin Group - Day 1
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
ZZZero.O283
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
BRAT_OK 103
SpeCial 57
StarCraft: Brood War
ZZZero.O 283
HiyA 104
LaStScan 103
Dota 2
syndereN276
monkeys_forever237
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Grubby5112
Dendi1256
Counter-Strike
fl0m1854
Stewie2K913
flusha440
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor464
Other Games
B2W.Neo1681
mouzStarbuck127
ToD117
Pyrionflax89
Trikslyr62
Sick61
Hui .47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick52434
StarCraft 2
angryscii 52
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 236
• printf 72
• StrangeGG 51
• tFFMrPink 22
• Legendk 9
• OhrlRock 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21334
League of Legends
• Doublelift2630
• Jankos2314
Other Games
• imaqtpie2273
• Shiphtur349
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 36m
RSL Revival
13h 36m
Classic vs Clem
FEL
18h 36m
Elazer vs Spirit
Gerald vs MaNa
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
21h 36m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.