• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 23:48
CET 05:48
KST 13:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win
Tourneys
$100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Anyone remember me from 2000s Bnet EAST server?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 958 users

[D] Neural Parasite versus Thor analysis - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
DuneBug
Profile Joined April 2010
United States668 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-17 19:08:18
August 17 2010 19:07 GMT
#21
It's usually better to do calculations on the worst, the median, and the best possible outcomes..
rather than just the best.

Worst case scenario your infestor gets killed immediately and you do 0 damage.

i understand median is difficult to calculate.

I am not arguing against the usefulness of neural parasite. But at the moment it is only useful if your opponent is getting thors or colossus and you have a numerical advantage, and he has very few tanks. And you have enough energy to cast it, and you can keep it alive for some duration of time, and not have its ability broken by something like graviton beam.

That sounds really whiney but that's a list of things you need to consider before investing in infestors. After all you probably could've bought 3 hydras with that gas.
Whereas the requirement for fungal growth is essentially, have enough energy (not very hard) and they need to have bio or some other low ranged and/or squishy unit type.
TIME TO SAY GOODNIGHT BRO!
Herculix
Profile Joined May 2010
United States946 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-18 00:18:23
August 18 2010 00:17 GMT
#22
it went from slightly useful to almost never useful after the nerf, and that was before people even used infested terrans. with how good infested terrans are at sniping vital units, which is what you use NP for indirectly except NP is pretty dumb to use against some units that IT helps against a lot, and a myriad of other things that NP can't do at all. i pretty much never use NP ever, nor will i ever use it except to just burn gas on randomly until it gets a long time duration, preferably infinite. i would rather have 1 more infestor with extra ITs ready to spawn on top of the FG and ITs i'm already going to have, or an actually useful tech for infestors that will increase their viability in more situations like burrow.

what makes NP suck no matter how much you might be able to get out of it, is i'm sacrificing my 150 gas unit for 1 momentum shift, gambling heavily in my opponent's favor. if i keep my infestor alive, it's an opponent's mistake to not immediately target fire the infestor and relying on your opponent to make mistakes for you is just not a good way to play.

this thread does make me wonder what the actual mathematical differences are between infested terrans over NP in terms of damage against thors and other units worth NPing. not enough to make me actually check, since i won't use NP even if it proves mathematically superior due to how likely the unit is to be sacrificed, but hey.
OhJesusWOW
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom127 Posts
August 18 2010 00:31 GMT
#23
I don't wanna be a Debbie Downer, but Neural Parasite is one of those spells that looks better on paper than it does in practice.
Red Bull is the new Mountain Dew.
Vaporized
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1471 Posts
August 18 2010 00:43 GMT
#24
i target fire the NP thor with my own roaches BEFORE the timer wears out. the battle is generally over at this point and i can kill it before it turns on me. ive found its even useful to target fire a NP unit while you are still engaged in a battle, this might sound counterintuitive but it seems to work.

using the burrow casting trick is of course, mandatory.

this is the change i made to my play when they nerfed NP length, it sucks but whatre u gonna do.
MforWW
Profile Joined July 2010
United States157 Posts
August 18 2010 01:50 GMT
#25
here's the problem:

If the battle was actually so close that your victory was entirely dependent on your use of neural parasite...

then your margin of victory will be slim and you will have few leftover units at the end which means...

your meager units will be unable to kill all of those thors you NP'd before the 12 seconds is up. this is exactly why the 12 second duration makes NP suck.


On the other hand, if your army is massive, you'll be able to kill off the thors before NP wears off. but you probably would have won the battle easily anyway. And this is why NP is hard to balance... if you have a large army it makes you win way harder than before. if you have a small army, the benefit is negligible.
T.O.P. *
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Hong Kong4685 Posts
August 18 2010 01:58 GMT
#26
Breaking NP is as easy as selecting 2 tanks and telling it to fire in the infestor. That's why NP is useless.
Oracle comes in, Scvs go down, never a miscommunication.
Lucius2
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany548 Posts
August 18 2010 02:13 GMT
#27
On August 18 2010 10:50 MforWW wrote:
here's the problem:

If the battle was actually so close that your victory was entirely dependent on your use of neural parasite...

then your margin of victory will be slim and you will have few leftover units at the end which means...

your meager units will be unable to kill all of those thors you NP'd before the 12 seconds is up. this is exactly why the 12 second duration makes NP suck.


On the other hand, if your army is massive, you'll be able to kill off the thors before NP wears off. but you probably would have won the battle easily anyway. And this is why NP is hard to balance... if you have a large army it makes you win way harder than before. if you have a small army, the benefit is negligible.


also the archon has this kinda problem: if u win the battle anyway, theres no need to morph archons, better keep the templar for future storms. if u lose the battle, your stupid ball of blasting energy wont get 1 shot off...
Mjolnir
Profile Joined January 2009
912 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-18 04:19:53
August 18 2010 04:11 GMT
#28
Interesting post but my experience doesn't agree.

I've lost games, and seen pros lose games, simply because NP is so dismal in it's current state. I still don't understand why this ability was nerfed so hard considering it's so easy to counter. On top of which, it's not particularly powerful if it last for 12 seconds anyhow.

Example:

Was in a 2v2 not long ago. ZT vs ZT. I went tank/marine to counter thor/marine while the zergs both went air. At one point the enemy had about 8 thors attacking 3 of my tanks and a handful of marines. My partner NP'd 3 thors. He tried to focus fire as best he could and easily took one down. The enemy backed off and as he was trying to kill the second (of the 3) NP'd thors the spell broke and the 2 remaining thors marched off.

Ultimately he lost 3 infestors shortly after since they were exposed... 3 infestors for 1 thor dead and one thor damaged.

I could give a whack of other examples; but probably don't need to. In practice the spell is crap. If it was an unlimited duration it would actually be a threat. The enemy would have lost 3 thors until he committed to killing the Infestors - then he would get them back. As it stands, NP is a non-issue when dealing with large units with huge HP pools that can take 12 seconds of damage.

On top of which, I believe the 12 second timer causes another problem. If you have a smaller-scale battle and you NP a thor at some point you have to decide between two options: do you a) kill the NP'd unit before the timer wears out or b) let the timer run out and risk the NP'd unit escaping or doing damage to you? If you pick "a" you have to stop your units from attacking their current target and then focus down a unit that you "own" - which means you're giving up damage from one place to dish it out somewhere else. If you choose "b" you might just end up letting a unit escape, or kill you, when it should have been yours from the start.

With regard to that... I played a game on Desert Oasis where I had about 4-5 hydras an infestor and some lings vs. marine/marauder and one thor. I NP'd the thor, I chose "b" and when all was said and done, I was left with 2 hydras and an infestor with a NP'd thor. Pre-nerf, I just won that battle... except that NP wore out and the thor proceeded to pick off my low HP hydras while the Infestor managed to run away. So I lost, what I normally would have won pre-nerf.

I'm sure I only see NP on b.net when I or my partner use it - desperately hoping to find a place where it's actually worth striving for. I never see an enemy use it - which is unfortunate because it has the potential to be a really dynamic spell that actually forces players to adapt their strategies as soon as Infestors hit the field.

It was always easy to stop. Now it's easy to stop and weak. Awesome.

Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
August 18 2010 04:35 GMT
#29
Any experience you have with someone casting NP while unburrowed should be immediately thrown out. That's like saying nukes never land because your ghosts without cloak always die when trying to nuke.

To the op...

Great post, really backs up what I've intuitively still felt. I've still been having great success with NP vs Terran*.

Burrow casting + coordinated attack will let the NP get off without a problem. Even if they scan they still have to target the infestors which can be doubly hard if there are unit standing on top of them.

*it's unusable vs protoss because of observers.

NP isn't so much about winning battles you can't otherwise win. It's about winning battles with more stuff. Using NP can save you a ton of resources and units.

Really that's why the infestor is amazing and why the infestor fails as a unit. Unlike templar, ghost, or any defensive unit the infestor can't really win you battles that you otherwise can't win. What the infestor does is cause battles to go in your favor with minimized (or even no) losses.
Logo
Mjolnir
Profile Joined January 2009
912 Posts
August 18 2010 06:11 GMT
#30
On August 18 2010 13:35 Logo wrote:
Any experience you have with someone casting NP while unburrowed should be immediately thrown out. That's like saying nukes never land because your ghosts without cloak always die when trying to nuke.


Umm...

I might be wrong but isn't that a glitch or a bug? I was under the impression that NP was meant to be cast while above ground, and the underground cast was a glitch that is yet to be fixed. It sure plays that way.

If that's the case, then I wouldn't put too much weight on the argument that NP is good "if you cast it while burrowed" and any evidence of it's "proper use" should be chucked.

It almost always plays out like this:

Massive battle: You NP and your Infestors are annihilated almost instantly if the enemy has a clue.

Small-scale battle: a) You NP and the damage you do with NP is less than what you could do with ITs or FGs, b) you NP and have to focus fire the target before it turns and escapes or kills you, c) you NP the target and it serves you well for the entire duration only to pop free and escape or kill you after 12 seconds, or d) you NP, win the battle and manage to kill the NP'd unit.

When is the last time you saw "d" happen when you weren't already going to win? Or how about: when is the last time "d" wouldn't have happened anyway if you built more hydras/roaches with the tech/cost that went toward an Infestor with NP?


Voyager I
Profile Joined July 2010
United States260 Posts
August 18 2010 07:15 GMT
#31
On August 18 2010 10:58 T.O.P. wrote:
Breaking NP is as easy as selecting 2 tanks and telling it to fire in the infestor. That's why NP is useless.


I can do it with all my Tanks, actually, since they're not gonna overkill.
Johnny_Vegas
Profile Joined December 2007
United States239 Posts
August 18 2010 07:38 GMT
#32
I am not disagreeing that when using NP the infestor usually gets killed. And I consider burrow-casting a glitch so I did not include that in my analysis.

Neural Parasite should not be cast if you don't first consider whether your Infestor is safe. If he's not safe, don't cast it, cast FG or Infested Terrans instead, or wait for a better opportunity.

I disagree with those that say it will only win you battles you already would have won though... If you are able to get the NP off for the full 15 secs on a Thor, you at least see a 1000+ health swing in your favor, probably lopsidedly winning you the battle. I had an example in my post where I used the unit tester to test its effect, where simply adding 2 NP's (on Thors) caused 14 roaches and an infestor to survive, but without the 2 NPs all 30 roaches die with 4 Thor (wounded) and a tank remaining.

Obviously Blizz nerfed it to 15 secs as a perma NP completely nullified BCs and Thors (and carriers, Motherships, etc..). I'd like to see it go to 20 -30 secs maybe.
battlereports.com (co-founder/developer), Nohunters Discussion Forum operator
blackodd
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden451 Posts
August 18 2010 08:36 GMT
#33
Great post!!!
For I am the Queen of Blades. And none shall ever dispute my rule, again...
Looky
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1608 Posts
August 18 2010 08:41 GMT
#34
what stupid about it. is the enemy units attack the infestors and not its own unit first. i think they should switch this
Neuuubeh
Profile Joined July 2010
138 Posts
August 18 2010 09:50 GMT
#35
Thanks for the analysis, personally I will continue to avoid using it :D

On August 18 2010 16:38 Johnny_Vegas wrote: I had an example in my post where I used the unit tester to test its effect, where simply adding 2 NP's (on Thors) caused 14 roaches and an infestor to survive, but without the 2 NPs all 30 roaches die with 4 Thor (wounded) and a tank remaining.

Obviously Blizz nerfed it to 15 secs as a perma NP completely nullified BCs and Thors (and carriers, Motherships, etc..). I'd like to see it go to 20 -30 secs maybe.



The unit tester is a terrible way to check for this.You mightve as well spawned 2-3 broodlords and tell us how you can wipe out unlimited ground armies of any composition with them...

In real world your infestors will die instantly, unless you are facing a bad opponent.


I do think/hope an increase to 30 secs is realistic and probably in our future
Gdarkness
Profile Joined November 2009
United States40 Posts
August 18 2010 10:50 GMT
#36
NP can probably win fights depending on the situation, just seems that Fungal Growth is more reliable and versatile.

Hopefully Blizz does something with NP to make it worth the energy.
be internet.
LoLiver
Profile Joined July 2010
United Kingdom22 Posts
August 18 2010 11:10 GMT
#37
When dealing with mass "Massive units" (Ultralisk, Thor, BattleCruiser, Broodlord), It's common sense to throw in a few Neural Parasite Infestors in to your unit mix, it may not look like much but believe me, I always use Infestors when given the chance now as Zerg, they are excellent units and the ability to CONTROL an enemy unit is often overlooked, if you use them well and don't send your Infestors into the fire, proper micro can destroy an other wise invulnerable enemy army. I recommend always using it because it does more damage than it looks, though keep Infestors behind a wall of roaches when dealing with Thors in particular, they can kill Infestors in 2 hits if i'm right.
Flying Zerglings. Good idea? or Greatest idea?
Meff
Profile Joined June 2010
Italy287 Posts
August 18 2010 11:56 GMT
#38
On August 18 2010 20:10 LoLiver wrote:
When dealing with mass "Massive units" (Ultralisk, Thor, BattleCruiser, Broodlord), It's common sense to throw in a few Neural Parasite Infestors in to your unit mix, it may not look like much but believe me, I always use Infestors when given the chance now as Zerg, they are excellent units and the ability to CONTROL an enemy unit is often overlooked, if you use them well and don't send your Infestors into the fire, proper micro can destroy an other wise invulnerable enemy army. I recommend always using it because it does more damage than it looks, though keep Infestors behind a wall of roaches when dealing with Thors in particular, they can kill Infestors in 2 hits if i'm right.

You seem not to know that you cannot mind control ultralisks (they are specifically immune, they turned that way towards the end of the beta), which means that you haven't actually tried it in a long while. How much of this post stems from actual experience and at which level of play?
Baha
Profile Joined June 2010
Spain64 Posts
August 18 2010 12:08 GMT
#39
Looks like we gotta do some build like fast infestor or something is we look mech strat
jcarlsoniv
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States27922 Posts
August 18 2010 12:10 GMT
#40
On August 18 2010 00:55 Nik0 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 18 2010 00:48 iNdo-Man wrote:
does EVERYONE know that if you activate NP and immediately hit "R" for burrow you can NP a unit and have your infester burrowed and protected. (might be a trick not everyone is familiar with)

if im not wrong this is considered an exploit


So what if it is a bug/exploit? So was grouping an ovie with mutas in BW causing them to stack. These little things add depth and can really distinguish players.

OT: I have been trying to use Infestors with NP in ZvT, but it is very difficult to keep them alive long enough. However, seeing these potential numbers, I'm more motivated to keep trying.
Soniv ||| Soniv#1962 ||| @jcarlsoniv ||| The Big Golem ||| Join the Glorious Evolution. What's your favorite aminal, a bear? ||| Joe "Don't call me Daniel" "Soniv" "Daniel" Carlsberg LXIX ||| Paging Dr. John Shadow
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft714
RuFF_SC2 220
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 180
Leta 160
PianO 126
ZergMaN 59
Yoon 57
ggaemo 50
Mind 25
Bale 8
Icarus 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever351
LuMiX0
League of Legends
JimRising 529
Counter-Strike
summit1g2072
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2541
C9.Mang0401
Other Games
ViBE99
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1050
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22240
League of Legends
• Rush632
• Lourlo607
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
7h 12m
Gerald vs YoungYakov
Spirit vs MaNa
SHIN vs Percival
Creator vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 4h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 7h
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-12-22
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.